Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 11/2018

05-10-2017 | Original Article

Decision-theoretic rough set model of multi-source decision systems

Authors: Binbin Sang, Yanting Guo, Derong Shi, Weihua Xu

Published in: International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics | Issue 11/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Through the complementary integration of information from different sources, information fusion can improve the decision-making process in the increasing uncertain environments. How to make full use of the information from various sources to make decisions is a key problem in multi-source decision-theoretic. The more accurate and comprehensive information is, the easier the decision will be. Thus the uncertainty of decision-making is an objective criterion for evaluating the fusion effect. Therefore, three kinds of multi-source decision methods are proposed based on considering the uncertainty of decision-making process, which are the conditional entropy multi-source decision (CE-MSD) method, the decision support degree multi-source decision (DS-MSD) method and the mean multi-source decision (M-MSD) method. The CE-MSD method based on taking into account the uncertainty of each condition attribute for decisions aims to select the most reliable source for each attribute according to the conditional entropy, and then make final decisions under a new restructuring decision table. The DS-MSD method proposed by considering the uncertainty of condition attribute set for decisions aims to make the final decision through the decision support degree of all the sources to each object. The M-MSD method and the approximate precision index are introduced as reference standards to measure the effectiveness of CE-MSD and DS-MSD in the multi-source decision system. Meanwhile, three corresponding algorithms are designed to verify the effectiveness and feasibility of the proposed decision methods. Finally, in order to verify the validity of methods, approximation accuracies of CE-MSD, DS-MSD and M-MSD are compared in multi-source decision systems which are generated by adding Gauss noise and random noise to Data set downloaded from UCI. In sum, the decision theory of multi-source decision systems is a generalization of the decision-theoretic rough set, which is worthy of further research.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Show more products
Literature
1.
go back to reference Azam N, Yao JT (2014) Analyzing uncertainties of probabilistic rough set regions with game-theoretic rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):142–155MathSciNetCrossRef Azam N, Yao JT (2014) Analyzing uncertainties of probabilistic rough set regions with game-theoretic rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):142–155MathSciNetCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dai JH, Wang WT, Xu Q (2013) An uncertainty measure for incomplete decision tables and its applications. Trans Cybern 43(4):1277–1289CrossRef Dai JH, Wang WT, Xu Q (2013) An uncertainty measure for incomplete decision tables and its applications. Trans Cybern 43(4):1277–1289CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Deng XF, Yao YY (2014) A multifaceted analysis of probabilistic three-way decisions. Fundam Inf 132(3):291–313MathSciNetMATH Deng XF, Yao YY (2014) A multifaceted analysis of probabilistic three-way decisions. Fundam Inf 132(3):291–313MathSciNetMATH
4.
go back to reference Jia XY, Li WW, Shang L, Chen JJ (2011) An optimization viewpoint of decision-theoretic rough set model. Lect Notes Comput Sci 6954:457–465CrossRef Jia XY, Li WW, Shang L, Chen JJ (2011) An optimization viewpoint of decision-theoretic rough set model. Lect Notes Comput Sci 6954:457–465CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Jia XY, Li WH, Tang ZM, Shang L (2013) Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Inf Sci 219:151–167MathSciNetCrossRef Jia XY, Li WH, Tang ZM, Shang L (2013) Minimum cost attribute reduction in decision-theoretic rough set models. Inf Sci 219:151–167MathSciNetCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jia XY, Shang L, Zhou XZ (2012) Three-way decisions theory and its applications. Nanjing University Press, Nanjing Jia XY, Shang L, Zhou XZ (2012) Three-way decisions theory and its applications. Nanjing University Press, Nanjing
7.
go back to reference Jia XY, Tang ZM, Liao WH, Shang L (2014) On an optimization representation of decision-theoretic rough set model. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):156–166MathSciNetCrossRef Jia XY, Tang ZM, Liao WH, Shang L (2014) On an optimization representation of decision-theoretic rough set model. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):156–166MathSciNetCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Khaleghi B, Khamis A, Karry FO, Razavi SN (2013) Multisensor data fusion: a review of the state-of-the-art. Inf Fusion 14(1):28–44CrossRef Khaleghi B, Khamis A, Karry FO, Razavi SN (2013) Multisensor data fusion: a review of the state-of-the-art. Inf Fusion 14(1):28–44CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Khan MA, Banerjee M (2010) A study of multiple-source approximation systems. Lect Notes Comput Sci 12:46–75CrossRef Khan MA, Banerjee M (2010) A study of multiple-source approximation systems. Lect Notes Comput Sci 12:46–75CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Khan MA, Banerjee M (2010) A perference-based multiple-source rough set model. Lect Notes Comput Sci 6068:247–256CrossRef Khan MA, Banerjee M (2010) A perference-based multiple-source rough set model. Lect Notes Comput Sci 6068:247–256CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Liu D, Li TR, Li HX (2012) A multiple-category classification approach with decision-theoretic rough sets. Fundam Inf 115(2–3):173–188MathSciNetMATH Liu D, Li TR, Li HX (2012) A multiple-category classification approach with decision-theoretic rough sets. Fundam Inf 115(2–3):173–188MathSciNetMATH
12.
go back to reference Liu D, Li TR, Liang DC (2014) Incorporating logistic regression to decision-theoretic rough sets for classifications. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):197–210MathSciNetCrossRef Liu D, Li TR, Liang DC (2014) Incorporating logistic regression to decision-theoretic rough sets for classifications. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):197–210MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Liu D, Li TR, Liang DC (2012) Three-way government decision analysis with decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 20(1):119–132 Liu D, Li TR, Liang DC (2012) Three-way government decision analysis with decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 20(1):119–132
14.
go back to reference Liu D, Li TR, Miao DQ (2013) Three-way decisions and granular computing. Science Press, Beijing Liu D, Li TR, Miao DQ (2013) Three-way decisions and granular computing. Science Press, Beijing
15.
go back to reference Liang DC, Liu D, Pedrycz W, Hu P (2013) Triangular fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 54(8):1087–1106CrossRef Liang DC, Liu D, Pedrycz W, Hu P (2013) Triangular fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 54(8):1087–1106CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Li W, Miao DQ, Wang WL, Zhang N (2010) Hierarchical rough decision-theoretic framework for text classification. IEEE Int Conf Cogn Inf 9:484–489 Li W, Miao DQ, Wang WL, Zhang N (2010) Hierarchical rough decision-theoretic framework for text classification. IEEE Int Conf Cogn Inf 9:484–489
17.
go back to reference Liu D, Yao YY, Li TR (2011) Three-way investment decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 4(1):66–74CrossRef Liu D, Yao YY, Li TR (2011) Three-way investment decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Comput Intell Syst 4(1):66–74CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Li HX, Zhou XZ (2011) Risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough set: a three-way view decision model. Int J Comput Intell Syst 4(1):1–11MathSciNetCrossRef Li HX, Zhou XZ (2011) Risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough set: a three-way view decision model. Int J Comput Intell Syst 4(1):1–11MathSciNetCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Md AK, Ma MH (2011) A modal logic for multiple-source tolerance approximation spaces. Indian Conf Logic and ITS Applica 6521:124–136 Md AK, Ma MH (2011) A modal logic for multiple-source tolerance approximation spaces. Indian Conf Logic and ITS Applica 6521:124–136
20.
go back to reference Ma XA, Wang GY, Yu H, Li TR (2014) Decision region distribution preservation reduction in decision-theoretic rough set model. Inf Sci 278:614–640MathSciNetCrossRef Ma XA, Wang GY, Yu H, Li TR (2014) Decision region distribution preservation reduction in decision-theoretic rough set model. Inf Sci 278:614–640MathSciNetCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ma WM, Sun BZ (2012) On relationship between probabilistic rough set and Bayesian risk decision over two universes. Int J Gen Syst 41(3):225–245MathSciNetCrossRef Ma WM, Sun BZ (2012) On relationship between probabilistic rough set and Bayesian risk decision over two universes. Int J Gen Syst 41(3):225–245MathSciNetCrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Qian YH, Zhang H, Sang YL, Liang JY (2014) Multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):225–237MathSciNetCrossRef Qian YH, Zhang H, Sang YL, Liang JY (2014) Multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):225–237MathSciNetCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Qi XW, Liang CY, Zhang JL (2016) Multiple attribute group decision making based on generalized power aggregation operators under interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(6):1147–1193CrossRef Qi XW, Liang CY, Zhang JL (2016) Multiple attribute group decision making based on generalized power aggregation operators under interval-valued dual hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(6):1147–1193CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Tang YQ, Fan M, Li JH (2016) An information fusion technology for triadic decision contexts. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(1):13–24CrossRef Tang YQ, Fan M, Li JH (2016) An information fusion technology for triadic decision contexts. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(1):13–24CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Wei GW (2016) Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(6):1093–1114CrossRef Wei GW (2016) Interval valued hesitant fuzzy uncertain linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(6):1093–1114CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Yao YY (2012) An outline of a theory of three-way decisions. In: The 8th international conference on rough sets and current trends in computing, vol 181, no. 6, pp 1–17CrossRef Yao YY (2012) An outline of a theory of three-way decisions. In: The 8th international conference on rough sets and current trends in computing, vol 181, no. 6, pp 1–17CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Yao YY (2007) Decision-theoretic rough set models. In: Proceeding of rough sets and knowledge technology, lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 4481, pp 1–12 Yao YY (2007) Decision-theoretic rough set models. In: Proceeding of rough sets and knowledge technology, lecture notes in artificial intelligence, vol 4481, pp 1–12
30.
31.
go back to reference Yao YY, Zhou B (2010) Naive Bayesian rough sets. In: The 5th international conference on rough sets and knowledge technology, pp 719–726 Yao YY, Zhou B (2010) Naive Bayesian rough sets. In: The 5th international conference on rough sets and knowledge technology, pp 719–726
32.
go back to reference Yu H, Liu ZG, Wang GY (2014) An automatic method to determine the number of clusters using decision-theoretic rough set. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):101–115MathSciNetCrossRef Yu H, Liu ZG, Wang GY (2014) An automatic method to determine the number of clusters using decision-theoretic rough set. Int J Approx Reason 55(1):101–115MathSciNetCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Yao YY, Wong SKM, Lingras P (1990) A decision-theoretic rough set model. In: The 5th international symposium on methodologies for intelligent systems, vol 5, pp 17–25 Yao YY, Wong SKM, Lingras P (1990) A decision-theoretic rough set model. In: The 5th international symposium on methodologies for intelligent systems, vol 5, pp 17–25
34.
go back to reference Yao JT, Raghavan VV, Wu Z (2008) Web information fusion: a review of the state of the art. Inf Fusion 9(4):446–449CrossRef Yao JT, Raghavan VV, Wu Z (2008) Web information fusion: a review of the state of the art. Inf Fusion 9(4):446–449CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Yang XP, Yao JT (2012) Modelling multi-agent three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. Fundam Inf 115(2–3):157–171MathSciNetMATH Yang XP, Yao JT (2012) Modelling multi-agent three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets. Fundam Inf 115(2–3):157–171MathSciNetMATH
37.
go back to reference Yang HL, Guo ZL (2015) Multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets in incomplete information systems. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 6(6):1005–1018CrossRef Yang HL, Guo ZL (2015) Multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets in incomplete information systems. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 6(6):1005–1018CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Zhou XZ, Li HX (2009) A multi-view decision model based on decision-theoretic rough set. In: The 4th international conference on rough sets and knowledge technology, lecture notes in computer science, vol 5589, pp 650–657CrossRef Zhou XZ, Li HX (2009) A multi-view decision model based on decision-theoretic rough set. In: The 4th international conference on rough sets and knowledge technology, lecture notes in computer science, vol 5589, pp 650–657CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Yao JT (2014) Determining three-way decision regions with gini coefficients. In: The 9th international conference on rough sets and current trends in computing, lecture notes in computer science, vol 8536, pp 160–171 Zhang Y, Yao JT (2014) Determining three-way decision regions with gini coefficients. In: The 9th international conference on rough sets and current trends in computing, lecture notes in computer science, vol 8536, pp 160–171
40.
go back to reference Zhou B, Yao YY, Luo JG (2014) Cost-sensitive three-way email spam filtering. J Intell Inf Syst 42(1):19–45CrossRef Zhou B, Yao YY, Luo JG (2014) Cost-sensitive three-way email spam filtering. J Intell Inf Syst 42(1):19–45CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Zhang SP, Feng T (2016) Optimal decision of multi-inconsistent information systems based on information fusion. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(4):563–572CrossRef Zhang SP, Feng T (2016) Optimal decision of multi-inconsistent information systems based on information fusion. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 7(4):563–572CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Decision-theoretic rough set model of multi-source decision systems
Authors
Binbin Sang
Yanting Guo
Derong Shi
Weihua Xu
Publication date
05-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics / Issue 11/2018
Print ISSN: 1868-8071
Electronic ISSN: 1868-808X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0729-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2018

International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 11/2018 Go to the issue