Top

International Journal of Technology and Design Education

Published in:

12-12-2022

Design thinking customized to support STEM teachers: Co-developing and implementing STEM activities for fifth graders in Turkey

Authors: Ahsen Öztürk, Fatma Korkut

Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education | Issue 4/2023

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Some of the key challenges for STEM education in Turkey include the problems encountered by teachers when integrating diverse disciplines and technologies into STEM activities, the need for teachers to acquire the skills necessary to prepare and implement appropriate STEM activities for the educational level of their students and their school context, the difficulties faced by teachers when following the Engineering Design (ED) problem-solving process in the implementation of STEM activities, and teachers’ heavy workloads, which impede the collaboration required to develop and implement STEM activities. A field study was carried out in Samsun, Turkey between 2017 and 2018 to develop a Design Thinking (DT) approach customized to support STEM teachers. The field study adopted an action research methodology and involved two main studies with fifth-grade teachers and students, facilitated by a researcher-designer. Qualitative methods including co-design workshops, focus groups, interviews, and observation were employed to gather data. The paper presents a seven-step DT approach, customized to support pre-service and in-service secondary school teachers in collaboratively designing and implementing classroom STEM activities. The results indicate that structuring the STEM activity design as a specialized DT process provides a complementary framework. Collaboration among teachers in a structured STEM activity design process supports the integration of disciplines and the development of STEM activities that correspond to the students’ level of knowledge and ability. Empathy building, which facilitates familiarization with other teachers and students, enhances collaboration among teachers and aids the development of STEM activities relevant to the students’ level.

previous article Applying the design thinking model to hands-on mechatronics STEM activities for senior high school students to improve the learning performance and learning behavior

next article Programming in school technology education: the shaping of a new subject content

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

In Turkey, the “Pedagogical Formation Certificate Program” was initiated in 2010 by the Council of Higher Education. This certificate is required from those who seek to work as teachers in K-12 schools but are not education faculty graduates (Yılmaz & Güneş, 2017).

An earlier version of Main Study I was presented at a national design conference in Turkey (Öztürk & Korkut, 2020).

An earlier version of Main Study II was presented as an extended abstract at an international education congress in Turkey (Öztürk, 2020a).

Akarsu, M., OkurAkçay, N., & Elmas, R. (2020). STEM eğitimi yaklaşımının özellikleri ve değerlendirilmesi. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 37(Özel Sayı), 155–175.

Akaygun, S., & Aslan-Tutak, F. (2020). Collaboratively learning to teach STEM: A model for learning to integrate STEM education in preservice teacher education. In V. L. Akerson & G. A. Buck (Eds.), Critical questions in STEM education (Contemporary trends and issues in science education, Vol:51) (pp. 147–163). Springer.CrossRef

Akgun, O. (2013). Technology in STEM project-based learning. In R. M. Capraro, M. M. Capraro, & J. R. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning: An integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) Approach (2nd ed., pp. 65–75). Sense Publishers.CrossRef

Alashwal, M. (2020). Design thinking in STEM education: A review. International Research in Higher Education, 5(1), 18–24.CrossRef

An Introduction to Design Thinking. (2012). Retrieved June 26, 2017 from https://dschool-old.stanford.edu/sandbox/groups/designresources/wiki/4dbb2/attachments/d5c91/Wallet%20Facilitators%20Guide2012.pdf?sessionID=284984d22365aed841322860a725264d47aa06ec

Arifin, N. R., & Mahmud, S. N. D. (2021). A systematic literature review of design thinking application in STEM integration. Creative Education, 12(7), 1558–1571.CrossRef

Bal, H. (2018). Küresel bağlamda STEM yaklaşımları [STEM approaches in a global context]. Ankara: MEB Yayınları. Retrieved June 06, 2021 from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_11/05145033_hYlya_bal.pdf

Barclay, T. G., & Bentley, B. (2021). STEM Education: How much integration is enough? International Journal of Research Publications, 89(1), 183–199.CrossRef

Benligil, Ö., & Ergün, S. N. (2021). Yabancı diller eğitiminde STEM çalışmaları [STEM activities in foreign languages education]. In: İ. Saralar-Aras (Ed.), Okul Öncesinden Ortaöğretime Farklı Disiplinlerde STEM Eğitimi Uygulamaları (pp. 272–286). Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/30114633_Okul_oncesinden_ortaogretime_farkli_disiplinlerde_stem_eYitimi_uygulamalari_final_3.pdf

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaCrossRef

Carroll, M. (2015). Stretch, dream, and do - A 21st century design thinking & STEM journey. Journal of Research in STEM Education, 1(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.51355/jstem.2015.9CrossRef

Chon, H., & Sim, J. (2019). From design thinking to design knowing: An educational perspective. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 18(2), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00006_1CrossRef

Cook, K. L., & Bush, S. B. (2018). Design thinking in integrated STEAM learning. Surveying the landscape and exploring exemplars in elementary grades. School Science and Mathematics, 118, 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12268CrossRef

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Cullen, T. A., & Guo, M. (2020). The nature of technology. In V. L. Akerson & G. A. Buck (Eds.), Critical questions in STEM education (Contemporary trends and issues in science education, Vol:51) (pp. 21–32). Springer.CrossRef

Design Thinking Bootcamp Bootleg. (n.d.). Retrieved August 18, 2017 from d.school at Stanford University website: https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/the-bootcamp-bootleg

Dare, E. A., Keratithamkul, K., Hiwatig, B. M., & Li, F. (2021). Beyond content: The role of STEM disciplines, real-world problems, 21st century skills, and STEM Careers within Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Integrated STEM Education. Education Sciences, 11, 737.CrossRef

Doğan, H., SavranGencer, A., & Bilen, K. (2022). STEM öğrenme modülü geliştirilmesi: Tasarım tabanlı araştırma uygulaması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Dergisi, 61, 390–424.

Drake, S., & Burns, R. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Ellis, J., Wieselmann, J., Sivaraj, R., Roehrig, G., Dare, E., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2020). Toward a productive definition of technology in science and STEM education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(3), 472–496.

Esen, B., Avcı, F., Arıkan, G., Karagöz, M., Demircan, Ö., Arısoy, P., Açıkgöz, S., & Kalıncı, Z. (2021). Müfredata STEM entegrasyonu ve STEM kariyerleri [STEM integration into the curriculum and STEM careers]. In: İ. Saralar-Aras (Ed.), Okul Öncesinden Ortaöğretime Farklı Disiplinlerde STEM Eğitimi Uygulamaları (pp. 142–159). Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/30114633_Okul_oncesinden_ortaogretime_farkli_disiplinlerde_stem_eYitimi_uygulamalari_final_3.pdf

Gallagher, A., & Thordarson, K. (2018). Design thinking for school leaders: Five roles and mindsets that ignite positive change. ASCD.

Girgin, D. (2021). Design thinking and its reflections on education. In: A. Kabadayı (Ed.), Bridging theory and practices for educational sciences (pp. 215–236). France: Livre de Lyon

Gleason, B., & Cherrez, N. J. (2021). Design thinking approach to global collaboration and empowered learning: Virtual exchange as innovation in a teacher education course. TechTrends, 65(3), 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00573-6CrossRef

González, E. J., & Mella, J. M. (2021). Technological tools in teaching the EU: A design thinking proposal. In A. Visvizi, M. Field, & M. Pachocka (Eds.), Teaching the EU: Fostering knowledge and understanding in the Brexit age (Emerald Studies in Higher Education, Innovation and Technology) (pp. 85–101). Emerald Publishing Limited.

Görgöz, Y., & Bozanoğlu, B. (2021). STEM öğretmen yeterlikleri [STEM teacher competencies]. In: İ. Saralar-Aras (Ed.), Okul Öncesinden Ortaöğretime Farklı Disiplinlerde STEM Eğitimi Uygulamaları (pp. 333–342). Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/30114633_Okul_oncesinden_ortaogretime_farkli_disiplinlerde_stem_eYitimi_uygulamalari_final_3.pdf

Holmlund, T. D., Lesseig, K., & Slavit, D. (2018). Making sense of “STEM education” in K-12 contexts. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0127-2CrossRef

What is design thinking? (n.d.). Retrieved May 18, 2020 from HPI Academy website: https://hpi-academy.de/en/design-thinking/what-is-design-thinking.html

Ibrahim, M., & Şeker, H. (2022). Examination of the attitudes of grade 7 and 8 students towards STEM education in Turkey and Ghana. LUMAT: International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education, 10(1), 107–126.CrossRef

Design thinking for educators. (2012). Retrieved September 06, 2016 from IDEO website: http://www.designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/

Ivanova, A. A. (2017). Design thinking as a new approach in education. BICHИК, 3, 11–14.

Johansson-Sköldberg, U., Woodilla, J., & Cetinkaya, M. (2013). Design thinking: Past, present and possible futures. Creativity and Innovation Management, 22(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023CrossRef

Kanadli, S. (2019). A meta-summary of qualitative findings about STEM education. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 959–976.CrossRef

Karataş, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., & Üstündağ, M. T. (2021). Different Approaches in STEM Trainers’ Training. Retrieved October 14, 2021, from http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/STEAMENG/mobile/index.html

Keane, L. & Keane, M. (2014). Design is our nature disseminating design practices in K12 education. In International Teacher Education Conference Proceedings Book (pp. 253–262). Dubai, UAE

Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11.CrossRef

King, N. (2004). Using templates in the thematic analysis of text. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research (pp. 256–270). Sage Publications.CrossRef

Laursen, L. N., & Haase, L. M. (2019). The Shortcomings of design thinking when compared to designerly thinking. The Design Journal, 22(6), 813–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1652531CrossRef

Léger, M. T., Laroche, A. M., & Pruneau, D. (2020). Using design thinking to solve a local environmental problem in the context of a university civil engineering course-an intrinsic case study. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 22, 6–12.

Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., Duschl, R. A. (2019). Design and design thinking in STEM education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(2), 93–104.CrossRef

Lo, C. K. (2021). Design principles for effective teacher professional development in integrated STEM education: A systematic review. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 136–152.

Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2CrossRef

Mattelmäki, T., & Visser, F. S. (2011). Lost in Co-X: Interpretations of co-design and cocreation. In Proceedings of IASDR2011, 4th World Conference on Design Research (Vol. 31). Netherlands: Delft University of Technology

McCurdy, R. P., Nickels, M., & Bush, S. B. (2020). Problem-based design thinking tasks: engaging student empathy in STEM. Electronic Journal for Research in Science & Mathematics Education, 24(2), 22–55.

Mercin, L., & Diksoy, İ. (2020). Teknoloji ve tasarım öğretmenlerinin güncellenen ders öğretim programı hakkındaki görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Kalemişi, 8(17), 165–191.

Miller, F., & Wallis, J. (2011). Social interaction and the role of empathy in information and knowledge management: A literature review. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science, 52(2), 122–132.

Ministry of National Education. (2016). STEM Education Report. Retrieved April 08, 2017 from http://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/STEM_Education_ Report.pdf

Ministry of National Education. (2019). Kazanım merkezli STEM uygulamaları. Ankara: MEB Yayınları. Retrieved June 06, 2021 from https://ookgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_01/29164143_STEM_KitapYk.pdf

Ministry of National Education. (n.d.). STEM eğitimi öğretmen el kitabı. Ankara: MEB Yayınları. Retrieved June 06, 2021 from http://fclturkiye.eba.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/STEM-Eg%CC%86itimi-O%CC%88g%CC%86retmen-El-Kitab%C4%B1.pdf

Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In J. Strobel, S. Purzer, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in precollege settings: Synthesizing Research, Policy, and Practices (pp. 35–60). Purdue University Press.CrossRef

Mumcu, F., Atman Uslu, N., & Yıldız, B. (2022). Investigating teachers’ expectations from a professional development program for integrated STEM education. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 44–60.

Nadelson, L. S., & Seifert, A. L. (2017). Integrated STEM defined: Contexts, challenges, and the future. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 221–223.CrossRef

NSF (National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics). (2015). Science and Engineering Degrees: 1966–2012. (NSF 15–326). Arlington, VA. Retrieved December 05, 2020 from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2015/nsf15326/

OECD Pisa. (2019). Retrieved 01 May, 2021 from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/PISA2018_CN_TUR.pdf

O’leary, Z. (2004). The essential guide to doing research. SAGE Publications

Panke, S. (2019). Design thinking in education: Perspectives, opportunities, and challenges. Open Education Studies, 1(1), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022CrossRef

Razi, A., & Zhou, G. (2022). STEM, iSTEM, and STEAM: What is next? International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 5(1), 1–29.CrossRef

Reinking, A. K., & Martin, B. (2018). Strategies, research, and examples for elementary teachers to integrate STEM. K-12 STEM Education., 4(4), 413–419.

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research., 3(1), 1–18.CrossRef

Saraç, E., & Doğru, M. (2021). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının STEM eğitimi tasarlama ve uygulama deneyimlerinin incelenmesi. Fen Bilimleri Öğretimi Dergisi, 9(1), 1–37.

Sarıkoç, Z., Baydar, S., Sarıça, S., Ekici, T., Kurnaz, K. T., & Torun, I. G. (2021). STEM projeleri ve tasarım odaklı düşünme [STEM projects and design thinking]. In: İ. Saralar-Aras (Ed.), Okul Öncesinden Ortaöğretime Farklı Disiplinlerde STEM Eğitimi Uygulamaları (pp. 355–370). Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/30114633_Okul_oncesinden_ortaogretime_farkli_disiplinlerde_stem_eYitimi_uygulamalari_final_3.pdf

Senan, Ö., & Özel, N. (2021). Edebiyat eğitiminde STEM çalışmaları [STEM studies in literature education]. In: İ. Saralar-Aras (Ed.), Okul Öncesinden Ortaöğretime Farklı Disiplinlerde STEM Eğitimi Uygulamaları (pp. 183–189). Retrieved October 14, 2021, from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/30114633_Okul_oncesinden_ortaogretime_farkli_disiplinlerde_stem_eYitimi_uygulamalari_final_3.pdf

Stapleton, S. R. (2022). Where am I in STEM? Critiquing STEM through lived experience as a science education researcher. Critical Education, 13(1), 98–107.

Stakeholder Analysis Toolkit. (n.d.). Retrieved October 21, 2019 from https://www2.mmu.ac.uk/media/mmuacuk/content/documents/bit/Stakeholder-analysis-toolkit-v3.pdf

Taking Design Thinking to Schools. (n.d.). Retrieved September 06, 2016 from https://stanford.edu/dept/SUSE/taking-design/presentations/Taking-design-to-school.pdf

Taner, Z., & Ayrancıoğlu, İ. (2021). Sosyal bilimler eğitiminde STEM çalışmaları [STEM studies in social science education]. In: İ. Saralar-Aras (Ed.), Okul Öncesinden Ortaöğretime Farklı Disiplinlerde STEM Eğitimi Uygulamaları (pp. 254–271). Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/30114633_Okul_oncesinden_ortaogretime_farkli_disiplinlerde_stem_eYitimi_uygulamalari_final_3.pdf

Turkish Technology and Design Education Curriculum. (2018). Retrieved May 06, 2018 from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=380

Turan, A., Soysal, M. T., Dümbüllü, T., & Çelikkol, Ö. (2021). Teknoloji, tasarım odaklı düşünme, mühendislik tasarım süreci ve STEM projeleri [Technology, design thinking, engineering design process and STEM projects]. In: İ. Saralar-Aras (Ed.), Okul Öncesinden Ortaöğretime Farklı Disiplinlerde STEM Eğitimi Uygulamaları (pp. 99–130). Retrieved October 14, 2021 from https://yegitek.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2021_09/30114633_Okul_oncesinden_ortaogretime_farkli_disiplinlerde_stem_eYitimi_uygulamalari_final_3.pdf

Turkish Science Education Curriculum. (2018). Retrieved May 06, 2018 from http://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=325

Van Mechelen, M., Leanen, A., Zaman, B., Willems, B., & Abeele, V. V. (2019). Collaborative design thinking (CoDeT): A co-design approach for high child-to-adult ratios. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 130, 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.06.013CrossRef

Vasquez, J. A., Snelder, C., & Corner, M. (2013). STEM lesson essential, grade 3–8: Integrating science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Heinemann.

Wang, H.-H., Charoenmuang, M., Knobloch, N. A., & Tormoehlen, R. L. (2020). Defining interdisciplinary collaboration based on high school teachers’ beliefs and practices of STEM integration using a complex designed system. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1–17.CrossRef

Wolfmeyer, M., & Lupinacci, J. (2022). “Don’t Vax Up”: The real-time failure of public STEM education in the COVID-19 era. Critical Education, 13(1), 107–121.

Öztürk, A. (2020). Co-developing STEM activities through design thinking approach for 5th graders (PhD thesis), Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.

Öztürk. (2020a). Empowering DT approach in teachers’ education, STEM education and K-12 education. In VII. International Eurasian Educational Research Congress Abstracts Book (pp. 911-912). Online, Turkey: Anadolu University.

Öztürk, A. (2021). Meeting the challenges of STEM education in K-12 education through design thinking. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 26(1), 70–88.

Öztürk, A., & Korkut, F. (2020). Tasarım odaklı düşünme yaklaşımı ile STEM eğitimi etkinliği geliştirme. In UTAK 2020: 4th National Design Research Conference Proceedings Book (pp. 391-404). Online, Turkey: Middle East Technical University.

Yilmaz, R., & Güneş, M. H. (2017). Reasons of pedagogical formation education certificate program students taking this education: Comparison of different departments. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(12), 2320–2330.CrossRef

Yin, X. (2020). A self-study on teaching integrated STEM education to K-12 science and mathematics teachers. In V. L. Akerson & G. A. Buck (Eds.), Critical questions in STEM education (Contemporary trends and issues in science education, Vol:51) (pp. 105–127). Springer.CrossRef

Zhou, D., Gomez, R., Wright, N., Rittenbruch, M., & Davis, J. (2020). A design-led conceptual framework for developing school integrated STEM programs: The Australian context. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32, 383–411.CrossRef

Zhou, D., Gomez, R., Davis, J., & Rittenbruch, M. (2022). Engaging solution-based design process for integrated STEM program development: An exploratory study through autoethnographic design practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09745-2CrossRef

Title: Design thinking customized to support STEM teachers: Co-developing and implementing STEM activities for fifth graders in Turkey
Authors: Ahsen Öztürk
Fatma Korkut
Publication date: 12-12-2022
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: International Journal of Technology and Design Education / Issue 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0957-7572
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1804
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09790-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2023

“Well, a tough question. Congratulations:” How and in what aspects do design students evaluate a design studio course?

Evaluation of the effect of music on idea generation using electrocardiography and electroencephalography signals

Applying the design thinking model to hands-on mechatronics STEM activities for senior high school students to improve the learning performance and learning behavior

Estimating the replicability of technology education research

Entrepreneurship, STEM attitude, and career interest development through 6E learning byDeSIGN™ model based STEM education

Elementary students’ perceptions of STEM professionals

Premium Partner