Skip to main content
Top

2017 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

14. Disability and the Para-TV Communities of Reality Television

Author : Anita Biressi

Published in: Documentary and Disability

Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan UK

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This chapter begins by reviewing the early marginalisation of disabled people in formats such as Big Brother and their subsequent visibility in shows such as Born This Way and The Dream House. In doing so, it offers new insights into the relationship between reality TV communities and what Biressi terms ‘para-TV communities’. In addition, focusing on the docusoap The Specials, it explores the political problems and possibilities inherent in reality TV communities that feature young people with intellectual disabilities. Here the author asks: ‘In what ways might reality TV be viewed as establishing ideal communities and how might these intersect with the community experiences of disabled people?’ Overall, this chapter develops the argument that critical readings of these formats should be worked through in the context of the political, economic and social realities, which constrain or enable disabled people in their everyday lives.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
In fact, in the most recent BB (2015), only two contestants were over the age of 30. See http://​www.​digitalspy.​co.​uk/​tv/​s149/​big-brother/​news/​a646537/​meet-the-big-brother-contestants–from-a-calvin-klein-model-to-glamorous-socialite-twins.​html#~ppjNBeqX4ZJiDX(accessed 27 March 2017).
 
2
In 2009 the TV drama Castoffs (C4) nicely satirised both reality TV and the politics of casting via a six-part ‘mockumentary’ drama featuring disabled actors (see Klein 2011).
 
4
Opening ceremony: https://​www.​youtube.​com/​watch?​v=​iOrFW3Myz_​A (accessed 27 March 2017). See also ‘Big Brother Enters Virtual World’, http://​news.​bbc.​co.​uk/​1/​hi/​entertainment/​6122140.​stm (accessed 27 March 2017).
 
5
In correspondence with the author, 12 February 2016.
 
6
See, for example, the Mandeville sisters, who address the growth of their ‘YouTube community’ https://​www.​youtube.​com/​watch?​v=​xYqsrfoTCro (accessed 27 March 2017). For a concise discussion of the concept of community in relation to digital social worlds, see Pink et al. (2016, pp. 105–107).
 
8
Intellectual disability connotes both a diagnostic (medical) and social category (i.e. that disability is constructed and socially produced; Rapley 2004). The Specials participant Lewis is diagnosed with Williams Syndrome.
 
11
In fact, there have been similar shows in Sweden: I En Annan del av Köping (TV4, 2007–2010) and Norway Tangerudbakken Borettslag (TVNorge, 2009–2014).
 
12
Channel 4’s problematically titled show The Undateables (2012–), for example, arranged dates for physically or developmentally disabled or disfigured individuals and those with long-term medical conditions looking for love. Its promotion and packaging naturally raised concerns around freak-show voyeurism, a concern commonly expressed about this type of show but arguably doubly-loaded once sex, sexuality and disability are foregrounded (see Gill 2012; Morrison 2012). As a constructed reality series with a voice-over narration, the series’ warmth and engaging humour was arguably tempered by its framing and promotional devices, which established disabled people as socially inadequate and therefore at the margins of community life.
 
Literature
go back to reference Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press. Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Biressi, A. and Nunn, H. (2005). Reality TV: Realism and Revelation. London: Wallflower Press. Biressi, A. and Nunn, H. (2005). Reality TV: Realism and Revelation. London: Wallflower Press.
go back to reference Biressi, A. and Nunn, H. (2013). ‘Reality TV: A Sign of the Times?’ in B. Winston (ed.), The Documentary Cinema Book. London: BFI, pp. 299–305.CrossRef Biressi, A. and Nunn, H. (2013). ‘Reality TV: A Sign of the Times?’ in B. Winston (ed.), The Documentary Cinema Book. London: BFI, pp. 299–305.CrossRef
go back to reference Blackman, L. (2011). ‘“This is a Matter of Pride”: The Choir: Unsung Town and Community Transformation’ in H. Wood and B. Skeggs (eds), Reality Television and Class. London: Palgrave Macmillan/BFI, pp. 237–249. Blackman, L. (2011). ‘“This is a Matter of Pride”: The Choir: Unsung Town and Community Transformation’ in H. Wood and B. Skeggs (eds), Reality Television and Class. London: Palgrave Macmillan/BFI, pp. 237–249.
go back to reference Cavender, G. (2004). ‘In Search of Community on Reality TV: America’s Most Wanted and Survivor’ in S. Holmes and D. Jermyn (eds), Understanding Reality TV. London: Routledge, pp. 154–172. Cavender, G. (2004). ‘In Search of Community on Reality TV: America’s Most Wanted and Survivor’ in S. Holmes and D. Jermyn (eds), Understanding Reality TV. London: Routledge, pp. 154–172.
go back to reference Deery, J. (2003). ‘TV. com: Participatory Viewing on the Web’, Journal of Popular Culture, 37(2), 161–183.CrossRef Deery, J. (2003). ‘TV. com: Participatory Viewing on the Web’, Journal of Popular Culture, 37(2), 161–183.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellis, K. (2014). ‘The Voice Australia (2012): Disability, Social Media and Collective Intelligence’, Continuum, 28(4), 482–494.CrossRef Ellis, K. (2014). ‘The Voice Australia (2012): Disability, Social Media and Collective Intelligence’, Continuum, 28(4), 482–494.CrossRef
go back to reference Ellis, K. (2015). Disability and Popular Culture: Focusing Passion, Creating Community and Expressing Defiance. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Ellis, K. (2015). Disability and Popular Culture: Focusing Passion, Creating Community and Expressing Defiance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Geraghty, C. (1990). Women and Soap Opera: A Study of Prime Time Soaps. Cambridge: Polity Press. Geraghty, C. (1990). Women and Soap Opera: A Study of Prime Time Soaps. Cambridge: Polity Press.
go back to reference Gill, M. (2012). ‘The Specials Meet the Lady Boys of Bangkok: Sexual and Gender Transgression and Smashing Intellectual Disability’, Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34(3–4), 156–169.CrossRef Gill, M. (2012). ‘The Specials Meet the Lady Boys of Bangkok: Sexual and Gender Transgression and Smashing Intellectual Disability’, Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 34(3–4), 156–169.CrossRef
go back to reference Haller, B. (2010). Representing Disability in and Ableist World. Louisville: Advocado Press. Haller, B. (2010). Representing Disability in and Ableist World. Louisville: Advocado Press.
go back to reference Holmes, S. (2010). ‘Reality TV and ‘Ordinary’ People: Re-visiting Celebrity, Performance, and Authenticity’ in N. Carpentier and S. Van Bauwel (eds), Trans-reality Television: The Transgression of Reality, Genre, Politics and Audience in Reality TV. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 251–274. Holmes, S. (2010). ‘Reality TV and ‘Ordinary’ People: Re-visiting Celebrity, Performance, and Authenticity’ in N. Carpentier and S. Van Bauwel (eds), Trans-reality Television: The Transgression of Reality, Genre, Politics and Audience in Reality TV. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 251–274.
go back to reference Jacobs, S. (2007). ‘Big Brother, Africa is Watching’, Media, Culture & Society, 29(6), 851–868.CrossRef Jacobs, S. (2007). ‘Big Brother, Africa is Watching’, Media, Culture & Society, 29(6), 851–868.CrossRef
go back to reference Kavka, M. (2012). Reality TV. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Kavka, M. (2012). Reality TV. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
go back to reference Kilborn, R. (2003). Staging the Real: Factual TV Programming in the Age of Big Brother. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Kilborn, R. (2003). Staging the Real: Factual TV Programming in the Age of Big Brother. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
go back to reference Klein, B. (2011). ‘Entertaining Ideas: Social Issues in Entertainment Television’, Media, Culture & Society, 33(6), 905–992.CrossRef Klein, B. (2011). ‘Entertaining Ideas: Social Issues in Entertainment Television’, Media, Culture & Society, 33(6), 905–992.CrossRef
go back to reference Klein, B. and Wardle, C. (2008). ‘“These Two are Speaking Welsh on Channel 4!” Welsh Representation and Cultural Tensions on Big Brother 7’, Television & New Media, 9(6), 514–530.CrossRef Klein, B. and Wardle, C. (2008). ‘“These Two are Speaking Welsh on Channel 4!” Welsh Representation and Cultural Tensions on Big Brother 7’, Television & New Media, 9(6), 514–530.CrossRef
go back to reference Mogk, M.E. (ed.) (2013). Different Bodies: Essays on Disability in Film and Television. London: McFarlane. Mogk, M.E. (ed.) (2013). Different Bodies: Essays on Disability in Film and Television. London: McFarlane.
go back to reference Müller, F., Klijn, M. and Van Zoonen, L. (2012). ‘Disability, Prejudice and Reality TV: Challenging Disablism through Media Representations’, Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 62(2), 28.1–28.13. Müller, F., Klijn, M. and Van Zoonen, L. (2012). ‘Disability, Prejudice and Reality TV: Challenging Disablism through Media Representations’, Telecommunications Journal of Australia, 62(2), 28.1–28.13.
go back to reference Ofcom (Office of Communications) (2005). ‘The Representation and Portrayal of People with Disabilities on Analogue Terrestrial Television: Content Analysis Research Report’. Published 13 December. Ofcom (Office of Communications) (2005). ‘The Representation and Portrayal of People with Disabilities on Analogue Terrestrial Television: Content Analysis Research Report’. Published 13 December.
go back to reference Oliver, M. and Barnes, C. (2012). The New Politics of Disablement, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Oliver, M. and Barnes, C. (2012). The New Politics of Disablement, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Ouellette, L. and Hay, R. (2008). Better Living through Reality TV. Oxford: Blackwell. Ouellette, L. and Hay, R. (2008). Better Living through Reality TV. Oxford: Blackwell.
go back to reference Palasinski, M., Riggs, D. and Zebialowicz, A. (2011). ‘“You Don’t Do it in Public”: Racism, Respectability and Responsibility in Celebrity Big Brother’, Celebrity Studies, 2(2), 164–177.CrossRef Palasinski, M., Riggs, D. and Zebialowicz, A. (2011). ‘“You Don’t Do it in Public”: Racism, Respectability and Responsibility in Celebrity Big Brother’, Celebrity Studies, 2(2), 164–177.CrossRef
go back to reference Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T. and Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London: Sage. Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T. and Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London: Sage.
go back to reference Rapley, M. (2004). The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Rapley, M. (2004). The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Riley, C.A. (2005). Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England. Riley, C.A. (2005). Disability and the Media: Prescriptions for Change. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
go back to reference Silverstone, R. (1999). Why Study the Media? London: Sage. Silverstone, R. (1999). Why Study the Media? London: Sage.
go back to reference Thumin, N. (2012). Self-Representation and Digital Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Thumin, N. (2012). Self-Representation and Digital Culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Turner, G. (2005). ‘Cultural Identity, Soap Narrative, and Reality TV’, Television & New Media, 6(4), 415–422.CrossRef Turner, G. (2005). ‘Cultural Identity, Soap Narrative, and Reality TV’, Television & New Media, 6(4), 415–422.CrossRef
go back to reference Wilde, A. and Williams, D. (2011) ‘Big Brother’s Disabled Brother’, Celebrity Studies, 2(2), 224–226.CrossRef Wilde, A. and Williams, D. (2011) ‘Big Brother’s Disabled Brother’, Celebrity Studies, 2(2), 224–226.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Disability and the Para-TV Communities of Reality Television
Author
Anita Biressi
Copyright Year
2017
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59894-3_14