Top

Empirical Economics

Published in:

11-06-2020

Does high debt ratio influence Chinese firms’ performance? A semiparametric stochastic frontier approach with zero inefficiency

Authors: Taining Wang, Jinjing Tian, Feng Yao

Published in: Empirical Economics | Issue 2/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The excessive debt ratio of Chinese firms has raised concerns over its impact on productive efficiency. We employ a firm-level dataset over 1998–2007 to investigate the role of debt in the firm’s production frontier and technical efficiency. The impact of debt on frontier is decomposed into a stand-alone neutral effect and indirect non-neutral effects, which alter the output elasticity of production inputs. We estimate the effects through a semiparametric smooth coefficient stochastic frontier model. We allow a nonzero probability for the firms to be fully efficient and model it as a function of debt and technical progress represented by time. We observe that an increase in debt significantly shifts firms’ frontier downward across different ownerships, regions, and industries. Foreign and private firms are more efficient, with their full efficiency probability increased by debt and technical progress. By contrast, state-owned enterprises and collective firms are much less efficient and their probability of being fully efficient does not increase with more debt. Furthermore, lower efficiency levels are concentrated in the central and western regions and in the mining and public utility industries.

previous article Can licensing induce productivity? Exploring the IPR effect

next article Electricity derivatives: an application to the futures Italian market

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

We note that the measure of firm’s performance varies in the literature. The measures commonly include ROA, ROE, profitability, TFP growth, and technical efficiency. In this paper, we extend the effect of debt to both firm’s frontier (measured by net output values) and technical efficiency (measured by the mean of technical efficiency conditioning on a composite error).

See Park et al. (2015b) for a review of recent development in smooth coefficient regression.

See Zhang et al. (2018) for more discussion on the limitation of modeling the determinants of inefficiency through only its conditional mean function.

See Parmeter and Kumbhakar (2014) and Kumbhakar et al. (2015) for an comprehensive review of recent development in SF models with empirical applications.

We did not explore the identification of p and \(\sigma _u^2\) detailed in simulation studies in Rho and Schmidt (2015), because we observe in our empirical investigation that \(\lambda = \frac{\sigma _u}{\sigma _v}\) estimates are generally larger than one and \({\hat{p}}(\cdot )\) is not close to zero.

We thank a referee to bring our attention to this point.

See Fu et al. (2008). In addition, using firms’ output to measure of \( Y_{it} \) typically requires production inputs to have capital, labor, and raw materials. In this setup, the multicollinearity issue appears and affects the convergence of MLE estimation in our second step and the parametric SF models, making the empirical results unreliable. A similar issue is also pointed out by Movshuk (2004).

Legal persons are defined as various domestic institutions such as banks and research institutions. Because the goal of this ownership is to profit, it is treated as private ownership.

One can alternatively employ Moran’s I test to check for spatial dependence. Implementation of such test requires data on firms’ location and their distance, both of which are unfortunately unavailable in our dataset. Since we reject the null of the weak CSD, we proceed to model the strong CSD through a multifactor approach.

Other issues have been well discussed in explaining SOEs’ low production efficiency. For example, the deviation of bureaucrats’ political interests (i.e., focusing on annual production target by the central government) from shareholder’s interests (i.e., profit maximization) reduces the efficiency of SOEs (He et al. 2015). Additionally, the political pressure on SOEs induces SOEs managers to pursue not probability but capital accumulation with a cheap price and secured employment. As a result, the input can be seriously misallocated, causing the efficiency of SOEs to decrease significantly (Berkowitz et al. 2017; Hsieh and Klenow 2009).

Zhang et al. (2012) find that the eastern region in China has a highly intensive R&D inventory compared to central and western region.

We note that a direct comparison between our results and Zhou et al. (2011) is inappropriate. They measure the technical inefficiency as the difference between firms’ estimated output level and the highest outputs estimated in the sample, whereas we measure the inefficiency through its density conditioning on composite error. Their frontier model is deterministic and thus does not separate inefficiency term from the random noisy. We model the probability of inefficiency explicitly in a semiparametric frontier model with the composite error structure.

Agostino M, Ruberto S, Trivieri F (2018) Lasting lending relationships and technical efficiency: evidence on European SMEs. J Product Anal 50:25–40CrossRef

Aigner D, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontiers production function models. J Econom 6(1):21–37CrossRef

Allen F, Qian J, Qian M (2005) Law, finance, and economic growth in China. J Financ Econ 77(1):57–116CrossRef

Amoroso S (2015) Profits, R&D and labour: breaking the law of diminishing returns to labour. Institute of Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS), Joint Research Centre working paper. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2704080

Amsler C, Prokhorov A, Schmidt P (2016) Endogeneity in stochastic frontier models. J Econom 190(2):280–288CrossRef

Bao Q, Wang Y, Xie H (2019) From honeymoon to divorce: Institution quality and foreign investors’ ownership consolidation in China. Econ Inq 57(1):372–390CrossRef

Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empir Econ 20(2):325–332CrossRef

Berkowitz D, Ma H, Nishioka S (2017) Recasting the iron rice bowl: the reform of China’s state-owned enterprises. Rev Econ Stat 99(4):735–747CrossRef

Binswanger HP (1974) A cost function approach to the measurement of elasticities of factor demand and elasticities of substitution. Am J Agric Econ 56(2):377–386CrossRef

Brandt L, Van Biesebroeck J, Zhang Y (2014) Challenges of working with the Chinese NBS firm-level data. China Econ Rev 30:339–352CrossRef

Brandt L, Van Biesebroeck J, Wang L, Zhang Y (2017) WTO accession and performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. Am Econ Rev 107(9):2784–2820CrossRef

Breitung J, Das S (2005) Panel unit root tests under cross-sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica 59(4):414–433CrossRef

Cai H, Liu Q (2009) Competition and corporate tax avoidance: evidence from Chinese industrial firms. Econ J 119(537):764–795CrossRef

Chen M, Guariglia A (2013) Internal financial constraints and firm productivity in China: Do liquidity and export behavior make a difference? J Comp Econ 41(4):1123–1140CrossRef

Chen MX (2013) The matching of heterogeneous firms and politicians. Econ Inq 51(2):1502–1522CrossRef

Chen Y, Liang KY (2010) On the asymptotic behaviour of the pseudolikelihood ratio test statistic with boundary problems. Biometrika 97(3):603–620CrossRef

Chen Z, Huffman WE, Rozelle S (2009) Farm technology and technical efficiency: evidence from four regions in China. China Econ Rev 20(2):153–161CrossRef

Coricelli F, Driffield N, Pal S, Roland I (2012) When does leverage hurt productivity growth? A firm-level analysis. J Int Money Finance 31(6):1674–1694CrossRef

Diewert WE (1971) An application of the Shephard duality theorem: a generalized Leontief production function. J Political Econ 79(3):481–507CrossRef

Ding S, Knight J, Zhang X (2016) Does China overinvest? Evidence from a panel of Chinese firms. Eur J Finance 25:489–507CrossRef

Drehmann M, Juselius M (2014) Evaluating early warning indicators of banking crises: satisfying policy requirements. Int J Forecast 30(3):759–780CrossRef

Eubank R, Huang C, Maldonado YM, Wang N, Wang S, Buchanan R (2004) Smoothing spline estimation in varying-coefficient models. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol 66(3):653–667CrossRef

Fan Y, Li Q, Weersink A (1996) Semiparametric estimation of stochastic production frontier models. J Bus Econ Stat 14:460–468

Fu FC, Vijverberg CPC, Chen YS (2008) Productivity and efficiency of state-owned enterprises in China. J Product Anal 29(3):249–259CrossRef

Fuss M, McFadden D (1978) Production economics: a dual approach to theory and applications, vol 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam

Fuss M, McFadden D, Yair M (1978) Chapter 4: A survey of functional forms in the economic analysis of production. In: Fuss M, McFadden D (eds) Production economics: a dual approach to theory and applications. North Holland, Amsterdam

Garriga JM (2006) The effect of relationship lending on firm performance. University Autònoma de Barcelona. Department d’Economia de l’Empresa

Gennaioli N, Shleifer A, Vishny R (2012) Neglected risks, financial innovation, and financial fragility. J Financ Econ 104(3):452–468CrossRef

Giannetti C (2012) Relationship lending and firm innovativeness. J Empir Finance 19(5):762–781CrossRef

Guariglia A, Liu X, Song L (2011) Internal finance and growth: microeconometric evidence on Chinese firms. J Dev Econ 96(1):79–94CrossRef

Guo D, Guo Y, Jiang K (2017) Funding forms, market conditions, and dynamic effects of government R&D subsidies: evidence from China. Econ Inq 55(2):825–842CrossRef

He Y, Chiu YH, Zhang B (2015) The impact of corporate governance on state-owned and non-state-owned firms efficiency in China. N Am J Econ Finance 33:252–277CrossRef

Henderson DJ, Simar L (2005) A fully nonparametric stochastic frontier model for panel data. Unpublished manuscript. https://sites.uclouvain.be/ISBA-Archives/ISBApublications/archive/dp2005/dp0525.pdf

Hsieh CT, Klenow PJ (2009) Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Q J Econ 124(4):1403–1448CrossRef

Huang X (2013) Nonparametric estimation in large panels with cross-sectional dependence. Econom Rev 32(5–6):754–777CrossRef

Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom 115(1):53–74CrossRef

Jensen M, Meckling W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360CrossRef

Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76(2):323–329

Jin M, Zhao S, Kumbhakar SC (2019) Financial constraints and firm productivity: evidence from Chinese manufacturing. Eur J Oper Res 275(3):1139–1156CrossRef

Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov IS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. J Econom 19:233–238CrossRef

Kumbhakar SC, Denny M, Fuss M (2000) Estimation and decomposition of productivity change when production is not efficient: a panel data approach. Econom Rev 19(4):312–320CrossRef

Kumbhakar SC, Park BU, Simar L, Tsionas E (2007) Nonparametric stochastic frontiers: a local maximum likelihood approach. J Econom 137:1–27CrossRef

Kumbhakar SC, Parmeter CF, Tsionas EG (2013) A zero inefficiency stochastic frontier model. J Econom 172(1):66–76CrossRef

Kumbhakar SC, Wang HJ, Horncastle AP (2015) A practitioner’s guide to stochastic frontier analysis using stata. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRef

Lang L, Ofek E, Stulz RM (1995) Leverage, investment, and firm growth. J Financ Econ 40(1):3–29CrossRef

Lau L (1978) Application of profit functions. In: Fuss M, McFadden D (eds) Production economics: a dual approach to theory and applications, vol 1. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 133–216

Levine R (1999) Financial development and economic growth: views and agenda. The World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRef

Li Q (1996) Nonparametric testing of closeness between two unknown distribution functions. Econom Rev 15:261–274CrossRef

Li Q, Huang CJ, Li D, Fu T (2002) Semiparametric smooth coefficient models. J Bus Econ Stat 20(3):412–422CrossRef

Li Q, Racine JS (2010) Smooth varying-coefficient estimation and inference for qualitative and quantitative data. Econom Theory 26:1607–1637CrossRef

Lin B, Wang X (2014) Exploring energy efficiency in China’s iron and steel industry: a stochastic frontier approach. Energy Policy 72:87–96CrossRef

Lin JY, Cai F, Li Z (2003) The China miracle: development strategy and economic reform. Chinese University Press, Sha Tin

Lin ZJ, Liu S, Sun F (2017) The impact of financing constraints and agency costs on corporate R&D investment: evidence from China. Int Rev Finance 17(1):3–42CrossRef

Lipton D (2016) Rebalancing China: international lessons in corporate debt. In: Speech given at the conference on sustainable development in China and the world, China Economic Society, Shenzhen, vol 10

Liu H (2018) Three critical battles China is preparing to fight. In: Speech in world economic forum annual meeting, Davos, 2018

Ma G, Laurenceson J (2019) China’s debt challenge: stylized facts, drivers and policy implications. Singap Econ Rev 64(04):815–837

Maliszewski W, Arslanalp MS, Caparusso J, Garrido J, Guo MS, Kang JS, Lam WR, Law D, Liao W (2016) Resolving China’s corporate debt problem. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

Martins-Filho C, Yao F (2015) Nonparametric stochastic frontier estimation via profile likelihood. Econom Rev 34(4):413–451CrossRef

Mastromarco C, Serlenga L, Shin Y (2016) Modelling technical efficiency in cross sectionally dependent stochastic frontier panels. J Appl Econ 31(1):281–297CrossRef

McConnell JJ, Servaes H (1995) Equity ownership and the two faces of debt. J Financ Econ 39(1):131–157CrossRef

Meeusen W, van Den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. Int Econ Rev 18:435–444CrossRef

Modigliani F, Miller MH (1958) The cost of capital, corporation finance, and the theory of investment. Am Econ Rev 48(3):261–291

Movshuk O (2004) Restructuring, productivity and technical efficiency in Chinas iron and steel industry, 1988–2000. J Asian Econ 15(1):135–151CrossRef

Park BU, Simar L, Zelenyuk V (2015a) Categorical data in local maximum likelihood: theory and applications to productivity analysis. J Product Anal 43:199–214CrossRef

Park BU, Mammen E, Lee YK, Lee ER (2015b) Varying coefficient regression models: a review and new developments. Int Stat Rev 83:36–64CrossRef

Parmeter CF, Kumbhakar SC (2014) Efficiency analysis: a primer on recent advances. Found Trends® Econom 7(3–4):191–385CrossRef

Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econom 22(2):265–312CrossRef

Pesaran MH, Ullah A, Yamagata T (2008) A bias-adjusted lm test of error cross-section independence. Econom J 11(1):105–127CrossRef

Pesaran MH, Tosetti E (2011) Large panels with common factors and spatial correlation. J Econom 161(2):182–202CrossRef

Pesaran MH (2015a) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econom Rev 34(6–10):1089–1117CrossRef

Pesaran MH (2015b) Time series and panel data econometrics. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRef

Pessarossi P, Weill L (2013) Choice of corporate debt in China: the role of state ownership. China Econ Rev 26:1–16CrossRef

Pettis M (2013) Avoiding the fall: China’s economic restructuring. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

Reinhart CM, Rogoff KS (2010) Growth in a time of debt. Am Econ Rev 100(2):573–78CrossRef

Rodriguez-Poo JM, Soberon A (2014) Direct semi-parametric estimation of fixed effects panel data varying coefficient models. Econom J 17(1):107–138CrossRef

Rho S, Schmidt P (2015) Are all firms inefficient? J Product Anal 43(3):327–349CrossRef

Riedel J, Jin J, Gao J (2007) How China grows: investment, finance, and reform. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRef

Rosen S (1983) Specialization and human capital. J Labor Econ 1(1):43–49CrossRef

Shiu A (2002) Efficiency of Chinese enterprises. J Product Anal 18(3):255–267CrossRef

Song Z, Storesletten K, Zilibotti F (2011) Growing like China. Am Econ Rev 101(1):196–233CrossRef

Su L, Jin S (2012) Sieve estimation of panel data models with cross section dependence. J Econom 169(1):34–47CrossRef

Sun Y, Malikov E (2018) Estimation and inference in functional-coefficient spatial autoregressive panel data models with fixed effects. J Econom 203(2):359–378CrossRef

Tran KC, Tsionas MG (2015) Zero-inefficiency stochastic frontier models with varying mixing proportion: a semiparametric approach. Eur J Oper Res 249(3):1113–1123CrossRef

Tsai KH, Wang JC (2004) R&D productivity and the spillover effects of high-tech industry on the traditional manufacturing sector: the case of Taiwan. World Econ 27(10):1555–1570CrossRef

Tsionas MG, Polemis ML (2019) On the estimation of total factor productivity: a novel Bayesian non-parametric approach. Eur J Oper Res 277(3):886–902CrossRef

Wakelin K (2001) Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms. Res Policy 30(7):1079–1090CrossRef

Walter C, Howie F (2012) Red capitalism: the fragile financial foundation of China’s extraordinary rise. Wiley, SingaporeCrossRef

Wang XF, Hu B, Wang B, Fang K (2014) Bayesian generalized varying coefficient models for longitudinal proportional data with errors-in-covariates. J Appl Stat 41(6):1342–1357CrossRef

Wang HJ, Schmidt P (2002) One-step and two-step estimation of the effects of exogenous variables on technical efficiency levels. J Product Anal 18(2):129–144CrossRef

Weill L (2008) Leverage and corporate performance: does institutional environment matter? Small Bus Econ 30(3):251–265CrossRef

Westerlund J (2007) Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bull Econ Stat 69(6):709–748CrossRef

Wu Y (1995) The productive efficiency of Chinese iron and steel firms a stochastic frontier analysis. Resour Policy 21(3):215–222CrossRef

Wu Y, Zhou X (2013) Technical efficiency in the Chinese textile industry. Front Econ China 8(1):146–163

Wu Y (2002) Technical efficiency and its determinants in Chinese manufacturing sector. Working paper

Yao F, Wang T, Tian J, Kumbhakar SC (2018) Estimation of a smooth coefficient zero-inefficiency panel stochastic frontier model: a semiparametric approach. Econ Lett 166:25–30CrossRef

Yao F, Zhang F, Kumbhakar SC (2019) Semiparametric smooth coefficient stochastic frontier model with panel data. J Bus Econ Stat 37:556–572CrossRef

Zhang F, Hall J, Yao F (2018) Does economic freedom affect the production frontier? A semiparametric approach with panel data. Econ Inq 56(2):1380–1395CrossRef

Zhang R, Sun K, Delgado MS, Kumbhakar SC (2012) Productivity in China’s high technology industry: regional heterogeneity and R&D. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(1):127–141CrossRef

Zhang YF, Sun K (2019) How does infrastructure affect economic growth? Insights from a semiparametric smooth coefficient approach and the case of telecommunications in China. Econ Inq 57(3):1239–1255CrossRef

Zheng J, Liu X, Bigsten A (1998) Ownership structure and determinants of technical efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to Chinese enterprises (1986–1990). J Comp Econ 26(3):465–484CrossRef

Zhou X, Li K-W, Li Q (2011) An analysis on technical efficiency in post-reform China. China Econ Rev 22(3):357–372CrossRef

Zou J, Shen G, Gong Y (2018) The effect of value-added tax on leverage: evidence from China’s value-added tax reform. China Econ Rev, (in press)

Title: Does high debt ratio influence Chinese firms’ performance? A semiparametric stochastic frontier approach with zero inefficiency
Authors: Taining Wang
Jinjing Tian
Feng Yao
Publication date: 11-06-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Empirical Economics / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Electronic ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01889-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Electricity derivatives: an application to the futures Italian market

Embedding effect and the consequences of advanced disclosure: evidence from the valuation of cultural goods

Return and volatility spillovers to African equity markets and their determinants

On Zipf’s law and the bias of Zipf regressions

A model selection approach to jointly testing for structural breaks and cointegration with application to the Eurocurrency interest rates market

Dynamic linkage between oil prices and exchange rates: new global evidence

Premium Partner