Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Human Studies 3/2015

01-09-2015 | Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Durkheim as the Founding Father of Phenomenological Sociology

Author: Carlos Belvedere

Published in: Human Studies | Issue 3/2015

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In the first place, I discuss the main papers and books on Durkheim published in recent years, where no attention is given to the phenomenological interpretations of his work. Then I expose different phenomenological readings of Durkheim, some of them positive (for instance, Tyriakian’s), some negative (Monnerot and others), some ambivalent (like Schutz’s). Later I find that there is in Durkheim an implicit practice of phenomenology, inspired by Descartes’ Meditations on first philosophy. Consequently, I support Tyriakian’s thesis that there is in Durkheim an implicit phenomenological approach, despite his positivism. Then I wonder whether this tacit approach produces a phenomenological ontology of the social world. I find that it actually does, especially in what regards to social facts considered as things. I argue that Durkheim’s conception of social things is consistent with Husserl’s notion of ideal objectivities. I conclude that Durkheim’s rule of considering social facts as things is part of his phenomenological legacy and that it does not contradict the idea that they also are “states lived”.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
According to Michel Henry, “reality is not ‘economic,’ which means that both the objective structures of Economy and their allegedly autonomous laws have their ultimate founding outside the economy, in the living individual; thus, such laws are subject to his fate and to the immanent law that transforms, in the individual, his needs into action and satisfaction” (Lipsitz 2012: 140).
 
2
In other words: “society has no reality of itself, a specific or different one from that of the individuals, since the only reality is life in its irreducible nature” (Paredes-Martín 2011: 105).
 
3
On the Schutz–Ortega relation, see Nasu (2009: 271–289).
 
4
See also Caygill (2002: 9f.).
 
5
See also Tiryakian (2009).
 
6
As Larrabee recalls, the method of static phenomenology can be summarized in two principles: “(1) Guide the analysis by the use of a ‘transcendental clue’ in the form of an object which is pregiven and therefore is a finished unity embodying a certain sense (Sinn); and (2) Carry out a series of correlation analyses which trace on the side of the object its various levels and on the side of consciousness the corresponding levels of conscious acts” (Larrabee 1976: 164).
 
7
Husserl’s “radical approach”—which expresses his most elaborated position on this matter- would restructure the elements of static and genetic methods into a single method; the latter would integrate into genetic method those elements from static method which have both methodological and phenomenological validity and do not involve essential distortion. […] We shall call this new analysis ‘static/genetic’ analysis to signify the integration of the viable elements of static phenomenology into genetic phenomenology. This new static/genetic method is the only feasible solution to the difficulties inherent in the complete distinction of the static and genetic phenomenology of perception and related phenomena” (Larrabee 1976: 171).
 
8
Although a distinction must be made here. Durkheim practices genetic phenomenology in a limited way since he does not traces the genetic history of the monad itself nor does he carries his “investigations into the ultimate levels of consciousness, those of inner time-consciousness, the ‘obscure depths’ which were omitted in the static analysis” in order to account for “all characteristics of conscious experience” (Larrabee 1976: 164).
 
9
I’m indebted to Nisashi Nasu, who made me notice that, in genetic perspective, the historical must be distinguished from the eidetic. Both layers coexist in Durkheim. On the one side, he sketches out a brief history of religions, by describing how different kinds of cults followed one after the other. On the other side, this history is structured in strict order from the complex to the simple, elemental. Therefore, history has its logic. So, in Durkheim, the eidetic and the historic are articulated, just like in Husserl’s Crisis… (2009) when he accounts for history not as it has occurred but as it would have occurred.
 
Literature
go back to reference Affergan, F. (2008). Institution de la sociologie et naissance de l’ethnologie: une filiation en question. In B. Valade (Ed.), Durkheim. L’institution de la sociologie (pp. 125–150). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Affergan, F. (2008). Institution de la sociologie et naissance de l’ethnologie: une filiation en question. In B. Valade (Ed.), Durkheim. L’institution de la sociologie (pp. 125–150). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
go back to reference Alexander, J. C., & Smith, Ph (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Alexander, J. C., & Smith, Ph (Eds.). (2005). The Cambridge companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Boudon, R. (2006). Nouveau Durkheim? Vrai Durkheim? Dukrheimian Sturides, 12, 137–148. Boudon, R. (2006). Nouveau Durkheim? Vrai Durkheim? Dukrheimian Sturides, 12, 137–148.
go back to reference Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Minuit.
go back to reference Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le sens pratique. Paris: Minuit.
go back to reference Caygill, H. (2002). Levinas and the political, 1965. London: Routledge. Caygill, H. (2002). Levinas and the political, 1965. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Chazel, F. (2011). Comment lire Les Règles de la méthode sociologique aujourd’hui? In R. Boudon (Ed.), Durkheim fut-il dukheimien? (pp. 27–40). Paris: Armand Colin. Chazel, F. (2011). Comment lire Les Règles de la méthode sociologique aujourd’hui? In R. Boudon (Ed.), Durkheim fut-il dukheimien? (pp. 27–40). Paris: Armand Colin.
go back to reference Durkheim, E. (1999). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France. Durkheim, E. (1999). Les règles de la méthode sociologique. Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France.
go back to reference Durkheim, E. (2005). Les Formes Élémentaires de la Vie Religieuse. Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France. Durkheim, E. (2005). Les Formes Élémentaires de la Vie Religieuse. Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France.
go back to reference Fields, K. E. (2005). What difference does translation make ? Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse in French and English. In J. C. Alexander & P. H. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fields, K. E. (2005). What difference does translation make ? Les Formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse in French and English. In J. C. Alexander & P. H. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Durkheim. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Hamilton, K. (2002). Emile Durkheim (Revised Edition). London and New York: Routledge. Hamilton, K. (2002). Emile Durkheim (Revised Edition). London and New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Hayat, P. (1995). Emmanuel Levinas, Éthique et société. Paris: Kimé. Hayat, P. (1995). Emmanuel Levinas, Éthique et société. Paris: Kimé.
go back to reference Heap, J. L., & Roth, P. A. (1973). On phenomenological sociology. American Sociological Review, 38, 354–367.CrossRef Heap, J. L., & Roth, P. A. (1973). On phenomenological sociology. American Sociological Review, 38, 354–367.CrossRef
go back to reference Henry, M. (2007). Est/Ouest : Quel destin pour l’individu ? Entretien avec Roland Vaschalde. Entretiens. [East/West: What fate for the individual? An interview with Roland Vaschalde. Interviews]. Paris: Sulliver. Henry, M. (2007). Est/Ouest : Quel destin pour l’individu ? Entretien avec Roland Vaschalde. Entretiens. [East/West: What fate for the individual? An interview with Roland Vaschalde. Interviews]. Paris: Sulliver.
go back to reference Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European sciences and transcendental philosophy. An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Husserl, E. (1970). The Crisis of European sciences and transcendental philosophy. An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
go back to reference Husserl, E. (1982). Cartesian meditations (D. Cairns, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Husserl, E. (1982). Cartesian meditations (D. Cairns, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
go back to reference Husserl, E. (1992). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica (J. Gaos, Trans.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Husserl, E. (1992). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica (J. Gaos, Trans.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
go back to reference Husserl, E. (1995). Investigaciones lógicas (M. G. Morente & J. Gaos, Trans.). Barcelona: Altaya. Husserl, E. (1995). Investigaciones lógicas (M. G. Morente & J. Gaos, Trans.). Barcelona: Altaya.
go back to reference Husserl, E. (1998a). Essay 1. Static and genetic phenomenological method (A. Steinbock, Trans.). Continental Philosophy Review, 31, 135–142. Husserl, E. (1998a). Essay 1. Static and genetic phenomenological method (A. Steinbock, Trans.). Continental Philosophy Review, 31, 135–142.
go back to reference Husserl, E. (1998b). Essay 2. The phenomenology of monadic individuality and the phenomenology of the general possibilities and compossibilities of lived-experiences: static and genetic phenomenology (A. Steinbock, Trans.). Continental Philosophy Review, 31, 143–152. Husserl, E. (1998b). Essay 2. The phenomenology of monadic individuality and the phenomenology of the general possibilities and compossibilities of lived-experiences: static and genetic phenomenology (A. Steinbock, Trans.). Continental Philosophy Review, 31, 143–152.
go back to reference Husserl, E. (2005). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. Libro segundo: Investigaciones fenomenológicas sobre la constitución (A. Z. Quijano, Trans.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Husserl, E. (2005). Ideas relativas a una fenomenología pura y una filosofía fenomenológica. Libro segundo: Investigaciones fenomenológicas sobre la constitución (A. Z. Quijano, Trans.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
go back to reference Husserl, E. [Hua XIII] (2001). «[98] Appendice XVIII. La donation d’objectitites et de configurations sociales concretes, et la clarifitation des concepts qui s’y rapportent. Otntologie sociale et sociologie descriptive. < autour de 1910 >». Sur l’intersubjectivité. II. (N. Depraz, Trans.) (pp. 203–211). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. Husserl, E. [Hua XIII] (2001). «[98] Appendice XVIII. La donation d’objectitites et de configurations sociales concretes, et la clarifitation des concepts qui s’y rapportent. Otntologie sociale et sociologie descriptive. < autour de 1910 >». Sur l’intersubjectivité. II. (N. Depraz, Trans.) (pp. 203–211). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
go back to reference Kern, I. (2005). The three ways to the transcendental phenomenological reduction in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl. In F. A. Elliston & P. McCormick (Eds.), Husserl. Expositions and appraisals (pp. 126–149). Notre DamE/London: University of Notre Dame Press. Kern, I. (2005). The three ways to the transcendental phenomenological reduction in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl. In F. A. Elliston & P. McCormick (Eds.), Husserl. Expositions and appraisals (pp. 126–149). Notre DamE/London: University of Notre Dame Press.
go back to reference Larrabee, M. J. (1976). Husserl’s static and genetic phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review, 9(2), 163–174. Larrabee, M. J. (1976). Husserl’s static and genetic phenomenology. Continental Philosophy Review, 9(2), 163–174.
go back to reference Levinas, E. (1961). Autrement qu’être ou su-delà de l’essence. La Haye: Nijhoff. Levinas, E. (1961). Autrement qu’être ou su-delà de l’essence. La Haye: Nijhoff.
go back to reference Levinas, E. (1982). Éthique et infini. Paris: Vrin. Levinas, E. (1982). Éthique et infini. Paris: Vrin.
go back to reference Levinas, E. (1991). Entre nous. Essais sur le penser-à-l’autre. Paris: Grasset. Levinas, E. (1991). Entre nous. Essais sur le penser-à-l’autre. Paris: Grasset.
go back to reference Lipsitz, M. (2012). Fenomenología de la irrealidad económica: el Marx de M.Henry. In C. Belvedere (Ed.), La constitución de lo social. Aportes para el diálogo entre sociología y fenomenología (pp. 123–140). Los Polovorines: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Lipsitz, M. (2012). Fenomenología de la irrealidad económica: el Marx de M.Henry. In C. Belvedere (Ed.), La constitución de lo social. Aportes para el diálogo entre sociología y fenomenología (pp. 123–140). Los Polovorines: Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.
go back to reference Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). Éloge de la philosophie et autres essais. Paris: Gallimard. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). Éloge de la philosophie et autres essais. Paris: Gallimard.
go back to reference Monnero, J. (1946). Les faits sociaux ne sont pas des choses. Paris: Gallimard. Monnero, J. (1946). Les faits sociaux ne sont pas des choses. Paris: Gallimard.
go back to reference Moran, D. (2014). Husserl’s crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press. Moran, D. (2014). Husserl’s crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Morin, D. (2003). Émile Durkheim et Marcel Mauss. Étude d’épistémologie historique sur l’émergence de la tradition de recherche sciences contemporaines. Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures de l’Université Laval pour l’obtention du grade de maître ès arts (M.A.). Québec: Université Laval, Faculté des Sciences Sociales, Département de Sociologie. Morin, D. (2003). Émile Durkheim et Marcel Mauss. Étude d’épistémologie historique sur l’émergence de la tradition de recherche sciences contemporaines. Mémoire présenté à la Faculté des études supérieures de l’Université Laval pour l’obtention du grade de maître ès arts (M.A.). Québec: Université Laval, Faculté des Sciences Sociales, Département de Sociologie.
go back to reference Nasu, H. (2009). Alfred Schutz’s dialogue with Ortega y Gasset: In Special reference to Schutz’s annotations on man and people. In H. Nasu, L. Embree, G. Psathas, & I. Srubar (Eds.), Alfred Schutz and his intellectual partners (pp. 271–289). Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. Nasu, H. (2009). Alfred Schutz’s dialogue with Ortega y Gasset: In Special reference to Schutz’s annotations on man and people. In H. Nasu, L. Embree, G. Psathas, & I. Srubar (Eds.), Alfred Schutz and his intellectual partners (pp. 271–289). Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
go back to reference Némedi, D. (2000). A change in ideas. Collective consciousness, morphology, and collective representations. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations. London and New York: Routledge. Némedi, D. (2000). A change in ideas. Collective consciousness, morphology, and collective representations. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations. London and New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Ortega y Gasset, J. (1981). El hombre y la gente. Madrid: Revista de Occidente. Ortega y Gasset, J. (1981). El hombre y la gente. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
go back to reference Paredes-Martín, M.C. (2011). Conflictividad y libertad. Una aproximación a la fenomenología social de M. Henry. In Investigaciones fenomenológicas (p. 7). Madrid: Sociedad Española de Fenomenología. Paredes-Martín, M.C. (2011). Conflictividad y libertad. Una aproximación a la fenomenología social de M. Henry. In Investigaciones fenomenológicas (p. 7). Madrid: Sociedad Española de Fenomenología.
go back to reference Pickering, W. S. F. (Ed.). (2000a). Durkheim and representations. London and New York: Routledge. Pickering, W. S. F. (Ed.). (2000a). Durkheim and representations. London and New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Pickering, W. S. F. (2000b). What do representations represent? The issue of reality. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations (pp. 98–117). London and New York: Routledge. Pickering, W. S. F. (2000b). What do representations represent? The issue of reality. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations (pp. 98–117). London and New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Reeder, H. P. (2010). The Theory and Practice of Husserl’s Phenomenology (2nd ed.). Bucharest: Zeta Books. Reeder, H. P. (2010). The Theory and Practice of Husserl’s Phenomenology (2nd ed.). Bucharest: Zeta Books.
go back to reference Richman, M. H. (2002). Sacred revolutions. Durkheim and the Collège de Sociologie. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press. Richman, M. H. (2002). Sacred revolutions. Durkheim and the Collège de Sociologie. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.
go back to reference Schmaus, W. (1998). Durkheim on the causes and functions of the categories. In N. J. Allen, W. S. F. Pickering, & W. Watts Miller (Eds.), On Durkheim’s elementary forms of religious life (pp. 176–188). London and New York: Routledge. Schmaus, W. (1998). Durkheim on the causes and functions of the categories. In N. J. Allen, W. S. F. Pickering, & W. Watts Miller (Eds.), On Durkheim’s elementary forms of religious life (pp. 176–188). London and New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Schmaus, W. (2004). Rethinking Durkheim and his tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Schmaus, W. (2004). Rethinking Durkheim and his tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers II. Studies in social theory. The Hage: Martinus Nihoff. Schutz, A. (1964). Collected papers II. Studies in social theory. The Hage: Martinus Nihoff.
go back to reference Schutz, A. (1967). Collected papers I. The problem of social reality. The Hage: Martinus Nihoff. Schutz, A. (1967). Collected papers I. The problem of social reality. The Hage: Martinus Nihoff.
go back to reference Schutz, A., & Luckmann, Th. (1989). The structures of the life-world (Vol. II). Illinois: Northwestern University Press. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, Th. (1989). The structures of the life-world (Vol. II). Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
go back to reference Stedman Jones, S. (2000a). Representations in Durkheim’s masters: Kant and Renouvier. I: Representation, reality and the question of science. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations (pp. 37–58). London and New York: Routledge. Stedman Jones, S. (2000a). Representations in Durkheim’s masters: Kant and Renouvier. I: Representation, reality and the question of science. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations (pp. 37–58). London and New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Stedman Jones, S. (2000b). Representations in Durkheim’s masters: Kant and Renouvier. II: Representation and logic. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations (pp. 59–79). London and New York: Routledge. Stedman Jones, S. (2000b). Representations in Durkheim’s masters: Kant and Renouvier. II: Representation and logic. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.), Durkheim and representations (pp. 59–79). London and New York: Routledge.
go back to reference Stedman Jones, S. (2003). Représentations. Durkheimian Studies, 9, 14–19.CrossRef Stedman Jones, S. (2003). Représentations. Durkheimian Studies, 9, 14–19.CrossRef
go back to reference Steinbock, A. J. (1998). Husserl’s static and genetic phenomenology: Translator’s introduction to two essays. Continental Philosophy Review, 31, 127–134.CrossRef Steinbock, A. J. (1998). Husserl’s static and genetic phenomenology: Translator’s introduction to two essays. Continental Philosophy Review, 31, 127–134.CrossRef
go back to reference Tiryakian, E. (1965). Existential phenomenology and sociology. American Sociological Review, 30(October), 374–388. Tiryakian, E. (1965). Existential phenomenology and sociology. American Sociological Review, 30(October), 374–388.
go back to reference Tiryakian, E. (2009). For Durkheim: Essays in historical and cultural sociology. Surrey: Ashgate. Tiryakian, E. (2009). For Durkheim: Essays in historical and cultural sociology. Surrey: Ashgate.
go back to reference Toews, D. (2001). The social occupations of modernity: Philosophy and social theory in Durkheim, tarde, Bergson and Deleuze. Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick, Warwick. Toews, D. (2001). The social occupations of modernity: Philosophy and social theory in Durkheim, tarde, Bergson and Deleuze. Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick, Warwick.
Metadata
Title
Durkheim as the Founding Father of Phenomenological Sociology
Author
Carlos Belvedere
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Human Studies / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0163-8548
Electronic ISSN: 1572-851X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-015-9357-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Human Studies 3/2015 Go to the issue

Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

The Vocabulary of Reality

Theoretical / Philosophical Paper

Merleau-Ponty on Causality