Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Indicators Research 2/2009

01-01-2009

Education, Human Development and Quality of Life: Measurement Issues and Implications for India

Author: M. R. Narayana

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 2/2009

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper analyses and compares the measurement of indicators and variables in the construction of education index in Human Development Index (HDI) at the global, national and 18 sub-national human development reports in India since 1990. The results show non-comparability of measurement of the education indicators and variables. This implies that vertical and horizontal comparability of HDI may not be plausible for India. Implications of these analyses are highlighted for measurement of quality of life indices with special reference to physical quality of life index. Policy lessons are derived for future measurement of education index for India in particular, and other developing countries in general.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Sub-national goals and targets of education have also been complementary to attainment of higher levels of human development in India. This is evident, for instance, in the following select goals and objectives for primary and secondary education in Karnataka State in 2002 (Government of Karnataka 2002): (a) to ensure that all 6–13 year old children are in classes 1–8 by 2007; and (b) about 65% children in the relevant age group should participate and about 80% of those who join should successfully complete secondary education.
 
2
Education indicators and variables in the UNDP-HDRs are constructed beyond the requirements for HDI. The nature and number of these additional indicators and variables vary between years. For instance, additional indicators in UNDP-HDR 2007/2008 (UNDP 2007) include commitment to education public spending, literacy and enrolment, technology diffusion and creation, priorities in public spending, gender-related development index and gender inequality in education. Literacy and enrolment variables are dominant under the literacy and enrolment, gender-related development index and gender inequality in education. Further, as compared to UNDP-HDR 1991, public finance variables are modified and extended by including (a) public expenditure on pre-primary and primary education as a percentage of all levels of education; (b) public expenditure on secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education as a percentage of all levels of education; and (c) public expenditure on tertiary education as a percentage of all levels of education. To restrict the scope of this paper, these additional education indicators from the global HDRs are not elaborated. In the same way, additional indicators in India’s HDRs are not analysed below.
 
3
For instance, the UNESCO Institute of Statistics (UIS) provides with, among others, India’s adult literacy rate for 2000–2004 (UNESCO 2005a).
 
4
Methodology for estimation and projection of adult literacy are described in UNESCO (1995).
 
5
These figures are taken from the Government of India (2002b) and UNDP (2004). In fact, there is self-recognition of incomparability between national estimates and international estimates by both UNESCO (2005b) and UNDP (1999, p. 143).
 
6
Complete reports of all Sub-national HDRs are available from the UNDP India website: http://​www.​undp.​org.​in/​index.​php?​option=​com_​content&​task=​view&​id=​239&​Itemid=​322.
 
7
Following Sirgy et al. (2006, pp. 334–335), subjective indicators refer to personal feelings, attitudes, preferences, opinions, judgments or beliefs (e.g. satisfaction with one’s health, attitudes toward science or scientists, beliefs about the dangers of some new technology) and objective indicators are relatively easily observable and measurable (e.g. the height and weight of people, numbers of automobiles manufactured or sold each year, numbers of people employed in research and development). Further, Sirgy et al. provides with a good review of sociological, economic, psychological, health, marketing, industrial/organizational psychological and management perspectives of QOL.
 
8
The latest QOL that does not include education indicators/variables is The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Quality of Life Index. This is constructed based on 9 indicators for 111 countries including India in 2005. Details are available on: http://​www.​economist.​com/​media/​pdf/​QUALITY_​OF_​LIFE.​pdf.
 
9
These 15 states are: Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Orissa, Punjab, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, and West Bengal. Ranking of these states by PQLI is based on data in Government of India (2001) and by HDI is based on Government of India (2002b).
 
Literature
go back to reference Government of Arunachal Pradesh. (2006). Arunachal Human Development Report 2005. Itanagar: Department of Planning. Government of Arunachal Pradesh. (2006). Arunachal Human Development Report 2005. Itanagar: Department of Planning.
go back to reference Government of Assam. (2003). Assam Human Development Report 2003. Guwahati: Planning & Development Department. Government of Assam. (2003). Assam Human Development Report 2003. Guwahati: Planning & Development Department.
go back to reference Government of Chhattisgarh. (2005). Chhattisgarh Human Development Report 2005. Raipur: Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society. Government of Chhattisgarh. (2005). Chhattisgarh Human Development Report 2005. Raipur: Chhattisgarh Infotech and Biotech Promotion Society.
go back to reference Government of Himachal Pradesh. (2002). Himachal Pradesh Human Development Report 2002. Shimla: Planning Department. Government of Himachal Pradesh. (2002). Himachal Pradesh Human Development Report 2002. Shimla: Planning Department.
go back to reference Government of India. (2001). Status of women in India 2001. New Delhi: National Commission for Women. Government of India. (2001). Status of women in India 2001. New Delhi: National Commission for Women.
go back to reference Government of India. (2002a). Report of the Committee on India Vision 2020. New Delhi: Government of India. Government of India. (2002a). Report of the Committee on India Vision 2020. New Delhi: Government of India.
go back to reference Government of India. (2002b). National Human Development Report 2001. New Delhi: Government of India. Government of India. (2002b). National Human Development Report 2001. New Delhi: Government of India.
go back to reference Government of India. (2006). Towards faster and more inclusive growth: An approach to the 11th Five Year Plan: 2007–2012. New Delhi: Government of India. Government of India. (2006). Towards faster and more inclusive growth: An approach to the 11th Five Year Plan: 2007–2012. New Delhi: Government of India.
go back to reference Government of Karnataka. (2002). Shaping education in Karnataka: Goals and strategies. Bangalore: Government of Karnataka. Government of Karnataka. (2002). Shaping education in Karnataka: Goals and strategies. Bangalore: Government of Karnataka.
go back to reference Government of Karnataka. (2006). Karnataka Human Development in Karnataka 2005. Bangalore: Planning and Statistics Department. Government of Karnataka. (2006). Karnataka Human Development in Karnataka 2005. Bangalore: Planning and Statistics Department.
go back to reference Government of Kerala. (2006). Human Development Report 2005, KERALA. Thiruvananthapuram: State Planning Board. Government of Kerala. (2006). Human Development Report 2005, KERALA. Thiruvananthapuram: State Planning Board.
go back to reference Government of Madhya Pradesh. (2007). Madhya Pradesh Human Development Report 2007. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Government of Madhya Pradesh. (2007). Madhya Pradesh Human Development Report 2007. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Government of Maharashtra. (2002). Human Development Report Maharashtra 2002. Mumbai: Government Central Press. Government of Maharashtra. (2002). Human Development Report Maharashtra 2002. Mumbai: Government Central Press.
go back to reference Government of Nagaland. (2004). Nagaland State Human Development Report 2004. Kohima: Development of Planning and Coordination. Government of Nagaland. (2004). Nagaland State Human Development Report 2004. Kohima: Development of Planning and Coordination.
go back to reference Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. (2006). Delhi Human Development Report 2006. New Delhi: Oxford University Press. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi. (2006). Delhi Human Development Report 2006. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Government of Orissa. (2004). Human Development Report 2004 Orissa. Bhubaneswar: Planning and Coordination Department. Government of Orissa. (2004). Human Development Report 2004 Orissa. Bhubaneswar: Planning and Coordination Department.
go back to reference Government of Punjab. (2004). Human Development Report 2004 Punjab. Chandigarh: Economic & Statistical Organization, Punjab, Department of Planning. Government of Punjab. (2004). Human Development Report 2004 Punjab. Chandigarh: Economic & Statistical Organization, Punjab, Department of Planning.
go back to reference Government of Rajasthan. (2002). Rajasthan Human Development Report 2002. Jaipur: Government of Rajasthan. Government of Rajasthan. (2002). Rajasthan Human Development Report 2002. Jaipur: Government of Rajasthan.
go back to reference Government of Sikkim. (2001). Sikkim Human Development Report 2001. New Delhi: Social Science Press. Government of Sikkim. (2001). Sikkim Human Development Report 2001. New Delhi: Social Science Press.
go back to reference Government of Tamil Nadu. (2003). Tamil Nadu Human Development Report. Delhi: Social Science Press. Government of Tamil Nadu. (2003). Tamil Nadu Human Development Report. Delhi: Social Science Press.
go back to reference Government of Tripura. (2007). Tripura Human Development Report 2007. Agartala: Government of Tripura. Government of Tripura. (2007). Tripura Human Development Report 2007. Agartala: Government of Tripura.
go back to reference Government of West Bengal. (2004). West Bengal Human Development Report 2004. Kolkata: Development and Planning Department. Government of West Bengal. (2004). West Bengal Human Development Report 2004. Kolkata: Development and Planning Department.
go back to reference Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and Agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRef Hagerty, M. R., Cummins, R. A., Ferriss, A. L., Land, K., Michalos, A. C., Peterson, M., et al. (2001). Quality of life indexes for national policy: Review and Agenda for research. Social Indicators Research, 55, 1–96.CrossRef
go back to reference Indrayan, A., Wysocki, M. J., Chawla, A., Kumar, R., & Singh, N. (1999). 3-Decade trend in human development index in India and its major states. Social Indicators Research, 46, 91–120.CrossRef Indrayan, A., Wysocki, M. J., Chawla, A., Kumar, R., & Singh, N. (1999). 3-Decade trend in human development index in India and its major states. Social Indicators Research, 46, 91–120.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaur, B., & Misra, S. (2003). Social sector expenditure and achievements: An analysis of Indian states. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 24, 105–143. Kaur, B., & Misra, S. (2003). Social sector expenditure and achievements: An analysis of Indian states. Reserve Bank of India Occasional Papers, 24, 105–143.
go back to reference Mahatma Gandhi Labour Institute. (2004). Gujarat Human Development Report 2004. Ahmadabad: Mahatma Gandhi Labour Institute. Mahatma Gandhi Labour Institute. (2004). Gujarat Human Development Report 2004. Ahmadabad: Mahatma Gandhi Labour Institute.
go back to reference Morris, D. M. (1979). Measuring the conditions of the world’s poor: The physical quality of life index. New York: Pergamon Press. Morris, D. M. (1979). Measuring the conditions of the world’s poor: The physical quality of life index. New York: Pergamon Press.
go back to reference Mukherjee, M., Ray, A. K., & Rajalakshmi, C. (1979). Physical quality of life index: Some international and Indian applications. Social Indicators Research, 6, 283–292.CrossRef Mukherjee, M., Ray, A. K., & Rajalakshmi, C. (1979). Physical quality of life index: Some international and Indian applications. Social Indicators Research, 6, 283–292.CrossRef
go back to reference Sirgy, J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76, 343–466.CrossRef Sirgy, J., Michalos, A. C., Ferriss, A. L., Easterlin, R. A., Patrick, D., & Pavot, W. (2006). The quality-of-life (QOL) research movement: Past, present, and future. Social Indicators Research, 76, 343–466.CrossRef
go back to reference UNDP. (1990). Human Development Report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press. UNDP. (1990). Human Development Report 1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference UNDP. (1992). Human Development Report 1992. New York: Oxford University Press. UNDP. (1992). Human Development Report 1992. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference UNDP. (1994). Human Development Report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press. UNDP. (1994). Human Development Report 1994. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference UNDP. (1999). Human Development Report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press. UNDP. (1999). Human Development Report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference UNDP. (2004). Human Development Report 2004. New York: United Nations Development Programme. UNDP. (2004). Human Development Report 2004. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
go back to reference UNDP. (2007). Human Development Report 2007/08. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. UNDP. (2007). Human Development Report 2007/08. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference UNESCO. (2005a). Youth (15–24) and adult (15+) literacy rates by country and by gender for 2000–04: April 2005. Paris: Literacy and Non-formal Education Section, UNESCO Institute of Statistics. UNESCO. (2005a). Youth (15–24) and adult (15+) literacy rates by country and by gender for 2000–04: April 2005. Paris: Literacy and Non-formal Education Section, UNESCO Institute of Statistics.
go back to reference UNESCO. (2005b). Metadata on national literacy data: April 2005. Paris: Literacy and Non-formal Education Section UNESCO Institute of Statistics. UNESCO. (2005b). Metadata on national literacy data: April 2005. Paris: Literacy and Non-formal Education Section UNESCO Institute of Statistics.
go back to reference UNESCO. (1995). Statistical issues. Paris: Division of Statistics. UNESCO. (1995). Statistical issues. Paris: Division of Statistics.
go back to reference Vidhwans, S. M. (1985). A critique of Mukerjee’s index of physical quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 17, 127–146.CrossRef Vidhwans, S. M. (1985). A critique of Mukerjee’s index of physical quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 17, 127–146.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Education, Human Development and Quality of Life: Measurement Issues and Implications for India
Author
M. R. Narayana
Publication date
01-01-2009
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9258-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2009

Social Indicators Research 2/2009 Go to the issue

Premium Partner