Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 7/2009

Open Access 01-07-2009

Effect of Temperature on the Properties and Microstructures of Carbon Refractories for Blast Furnace

Authors: Xilai Chen, Yawei Li, Yuanbing Li, Shengli Jin, Lei Zhao, Shan Ge

Published in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A | Issue 7/2009

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The effects of temperature on phase composition, microstructure, and properties of silicon-containing blast furnace (BF) carbon refractories after firing in coke breeze packing at 1000 °C to 1600 °C were studied with the aid of X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray, mercury porosimetry, and a laser thermal conductivity meter. The results showed that silicon played a dominant role in the evolution of phase, microstructure, and properties. The amount of SiC whiskers increased with temperature. The phase in the outer part of the specimen was cristobalite balls, and its content decreased and β-SiC whisker increased in the inner part of the specimen. The phase and microstructure development with firing temperature influenced the properties. The bulk density, strength, and <1-μm micropore volume of open pores were highest, whereas the apparent and total porosity, mean pore size, and thermal conductivity were lowest for specimens fired at 1400 °C. Moreover, the thermal conductivity was affected by pore structure and phases formed after firing.
Notes
Manuscript submitted August 21, 2008.

1 Introduction

The blast furnace (BF) is used at the beginning of the iron production process to reduce the iron oxide ores. Owing to the need to increase productivity in recent years, it has become necessary to enlarge the volume of the BF and increase the hot metal temperature. In the lower portion of the BF, where the molten iron accumulates, especially in the portion below the iron notch, the surface of the lining refractory layer is in contact with the molten metal at a temperature of 1400 °C to 1600 °C. Thereafter, the lining refractory layer is often eroded and damaged by various factors, such as the molten metal penetration, thermal stresses, carbon dissolution, carbon oxidation, alkalia attack, etc.[16] Thus, it has been of established consensus that the lifetime of a BF is mainly determined by the rate of erosion and corrosion of the hearth refractory lining.
In order to prevent damage to the BF carbon refractories, it is required that the pore be made small enough to reduce the penetration of molten metal and reactive gases and the thermal conductivity high enough to reduce thermal stresses. Thus, super-micropore and high thermal conductivity are pursued by manufacturers and producers. However, the relationship between micropore size and thermal conductivity has not been adequately established. Silicon is commonly added in the production of carbon bricks, and its reaction mechanism and role in enlarging performance are reported.[711] It has been suggested that the temperature plays an important role in the evolution of silicon-containing compounds during heat treatment under reducing atmosphere.[1215] However, few reports can be found in the literature regarding the effect of temperature of the heat-treatment process on performance and microstructures developed for BF carbon refractories.
In the present work, the evolution of phases, microstructures, and performance of BF carbon refractories during heat treatment were investigated in a CO-N2 atmosphere, which aims to establish a theoretical basis for the development and production of super-high-quality carbon refractories for the BF.

2 Experimental

2.1 Raw Materials and Refractories Fabrication

Electric-calcined anthracite granules and fine powder, graphite, corundum, metallic silicon, and silicon carbide were used as the raw materials, and a mixture of coal-tar pitch (softening point: 80 °C to 90 °C) and toluene insoluble (≤25 wt pct) was used as a binder. The chemical compositions of all the raw materials, which were all from China, are shown in Table I. The batch containing 50 wt pct electric-calcined anthracite, 16.5 wt pct graphite, 6 wt pct corundum, 8 wt pct silicon, 0.5 wt pct silicon carbide, and binder (19 wt pct) were kneaded and pressed following the standard commercial practice. Cubes (~50 × 50 × 50 mm) were cut from the prepared carbon bricks, embedded in carbon powder in an alumina crucible with a lid, and heated in the temperature range of 1000 °C to 1600 °C in an electric furnace with air atmosphere outside the crucible. The furnace was heated from room temperature to 1000 °C at 5 °C/min and then from 1000 °C to 1200 °C at 4 °C/min and finally from 1200 °C to 1600 °C at 3 °C/min. The soaking time at the final temperature was 3 hours.
Table I
Chemical Compositions of the Raw Materials (Weight Percent)
 
C
Al2O3
SiO2
Si
SiC
Ash
Volatile
Na2O
Fe
Electric-calcined Anthracite
93.12
3.87
3.96
  
7.34
1.35
  
Graphite
≥97
    
1.4
   
Corundum
 
≥98
     
≤0.8
 
Metallic silicon
   
≥98
    
0.5
Silicon carbide
    
≥95
   
0.5
Coal-tar pitch
     
≤0.5
55 to 75
  

2.2 Tests and Characterization Methods

The properties of the fired specimens were characterized by measurements of weight changes, bulk density, apparent porosity, true density, and cold crushing strength (CCS); the closed porosity and total porosity were then obtained. The amount of unreacted silicon in the specimens was measured semiquantitatively by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Micropore size distribution was examined from samples of ~6 × 6 × 6 mm by mercury porosimetry (Autopore IV9500, Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA). Thermal conductivity was measured by a laser thermal conductivity meter (Flashline 5000, Anter Corp., Pittsburgh, PA) from the samples of ~i.d.12.5 × 2.5 mm; five specimens were used, and the average value of thermal conductivity was obtained. The thermal conductivity was measured in a direction parallel to the forming direction of the initial carbon refractories. The phase composition and microstructure of the specimens were analyzed and observed by XRD (PHILIPS,1 X’Pert Pro, using Ni-filtered, Cu K α radiation at a scanning speed of 2 deg/min of 16 °C), scanning electron microscopy (SEM, PHILIPS, XL30TMP), and energy-dispersive–X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, EDAX, Phoenix, The Netherlands).

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 Phase Evolution

The XRD patterns of the specimens fired at different temperatures are shown in Figure 1. β-SiC and SiO2 phases are detected together with corundum, graphite, and silicon phases in the specimens fired at 1200 °C. With an increase in the firing temperature, the X-ray peak intensity associated with SiO2 decreased and then disappeared completely after firing at 1400 °C, while the peak intensity associated with SiC increased gradually. The Si peak intensity decreased a little with the formation of SiC phase, as shown in the X-ray patterns. At 1300 °C, no residual Si could be detected in the specimens. Surprisingly, no other phases could be detected, such as the Si3N4, Si-O-N, or Si-Al-O-N compounds, which usually form in the fired Si-containing carbon materials.[16]

3.2 Microstructures

3.2.1 Unburned microstructure

The typical matrix SEM micrograph of the unburned specimen is illustrated in Figure 2. The matrix was mainly composed of graphite (dark contrast), corundum (~50 μm, light gray contrast), electric-calcined anthracite (light dark contrast), fine Si (white contrast), fine SiC (gray contrast), and a trace of Fe-containing silicate impurities (bright contrast). The impurities were from the electric-calcined anthracite and graphite raw materials.

3.2.2 Microstructures of burned specimens

A polished section of a specimen fired at 1200 °C is presented in Figure 3(a). Unreacted Si still remained in the matrix, although product phases such as SiC and SiO2 began to form on the surface of Si, and a large hole was present in the Si particle. At 1400 °C (Figure 3(b)), only a little unreacted Si remained, which could not be detected by XRD, but more SiC whiskers formed around the Si particle or in the holes, which were the original sites occupied by Si particles. No Si was detected in specimens fired at 1600 °C (Figure 3(c)), but the SiC whiskers and more SiC particles with different sizes formed in the holes and matrix.
The fracture surface of samples fired at different temperatures was studied by SEM. A large number of ball-like substances could be easily identified in the matrix of the samples fired at 1100 °C. Only Si and O elements were detected by EDS in these substances; and, based on the XRD results, it may be concluded that these ball substances were cristobalite (Figure 4(a)). At 1200 °C, the amount of cristobalite tended to decrease and whiskers of nanosize in diameter and micrometer size in length appeared (Figure 4(b)). According to XRD and EDS analyses, such whiskers were β-SiC, which was the same as that reported in previous studies.[12] A few of the dumbbell-shaped whiskers were also found in the interior part of the matrix at 1200 °C along with some cristobalite balls and straight β-SiC whiskers. The ball-like cristobalite was most difficult to identify in samples above 1200 °C. Temperature played an important role in the growth and increase of β-SiC whiskers. At 1400 °C, the β-SiC whiskers were dendritic, interlocked with each other to form intertextures, and were uniformly distributed in the matrix (Figure 4(c)). Up to 1600 °C (Figure 4(d)), the β-SiC whiskers were straighter and their ratio of length to diameter increased significantly, whereas some of them curled and less uniformly distributed in the matrix. Similar microstructure evolution with temperature was also observed in Al2O3-ZrO2-C composite refractories;[12] however, the onset temperature of phase evolution observed in this work was ~100 °C lower than that observed in previous investigations.
The evolution of phases in the fired samples not only depended on the temperature, but also took place in different locations of the same sample. The color of fracture surface of the burned samples started to change from 1200 °C. The gray-white color of the fringe layer, which was about 5 mm in thickness, changed to gray-green color at the interior at 1200 °C, and the same phenomenon was found at higher temperatures. The thickness of the fringe layer decreased to ~2 mm at 1300 °C and then remained constant with further increase in temperature. Figure 5 indicates the phase change from the outer to interior part of the sample fired at 1400 °C. Many balls with several micrometers in diameter were observed in the fringe layer, which were identified as cristobalite by a combination of energy-dispersive X-ray and XRD analysis (Figure 5(a)). The volume of balls reduced and the amount of β-SiC whiskers increased in the middle layer (Figure 5(b)). In the interior of the sample, the balls disappeared and only β-SiC whiskers were present (Figure 5(c)).

3.2.3 Thermodynamics analysis

The thermodynamic analysis was undertaken to relate those phases formed in the fired specimens to the ones predicted at equilibrium. The amount of SiC added in the batch was small and thus was not considered in the calculation process. The calculation was made under the atmosphere of 3.5 × 104 Pa CO and 6.5 × 104 Pa N2,[17] and the parameter α was defined as the weight ratio of atmosphere gas to carbon brick sample. At 1100 °C, Si is an unstable phase, and when α is close to zero, the amount of SiC and Al2O3 is high and decreases slightly with increasing α. With an increase in α to ~0.030, the amount of Al6Si2O13, CO, and SiO suddenly increases and thereafter Al6Si2O13 content continuously increases, whereas the CO (10−2.2 g) and SiO (10−5 g) contents remain constant. When α is ~0.125, the amount of N2 and Si3N4 suddenly increases and the Si3N4 content continues increasing, whereas the N2 remains constant with further increase in α (Figure 6(a)). At 1200 °C, AlN disappears suddenly with increasing α; the amount of Al6Si2O13 and Si3N4 increases abruptly when α is ~0.20 and 0.63, respectively; and the CO (10−1.5 g) and SiO (10−4 g) contents are higher compared to those at 1100 °C (Figure 6(b)). At 1400 °C, Al6Si2O13 and Si3N4 no longer exist and the amount of CO (10−2 to 10−0.8 g), SiO (10−4 to 10−3 g), and AlN suddenly increases initially and thereafter CO and SiO continuously increase, whereas AlN reduces with α (Figure 6(c)). At 1600 °C, Al4C3 occurs and disappears and Al2O3 decreases slightly as α increases, and the amount of CO (10−1.3 to 1 g), SiO (10−3.3 to 10−2 g), and AlN is higher than it is at lower temperatures (Figure 6(d)).
Thermodynamic calculations indicate that at 1100 °C, when CO, N2, and SiO levels are close to zero, SiC, corundum, and C are the main stable solid phases. In this case, Si initially reacts with C to form SiC:
$$ {\text{Si}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + {\text{C}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) = {\text{SiC}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) $$
(1)
Si3N4 is formed by the reaction of SiC with N2 from the atmosphere, and the reaction between SiC and CO occurs to form SiO2, which further reacts with Al2O3 to form Al6Si2O13:
$$ 3 {\text{SiC}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + 2 {\text{N}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{g}} \right) = {\text{Si}}_{ 3} {\text{N}}_{ 4} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 3 {\text{C}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) $$
(2)
$$ {\text{SiC}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + 2 {\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) = {\text{SiO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 3 {\text{C}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) $$
(3)
$$ 2 {\text{SiO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 3 {\text{Al}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 3} \left( {\text{s}} \right) = {\text{Al}}_{ 6} {\text{Si}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 1 3} \left( {\text{s}} \right) $$
(4)
With increasing temperature, the N2 content first increases (maximum at 1200 °C) and then decreases. At 1200 °C, AlN is formed according to
$$ 2 {\text{Al}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 3} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 2 {\text{N}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{g}} \right) = 4 {\text{AlN}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + 3 {\text{O}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{g}} \right) $$
(5)
Up to 1400 °C, Al6Si2O13 and Si3N4 disappear according to
$$ {\text{Al}}_{ 6} {\text{Si}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 1 3} \left( {\text{s}} \right) = 2 {\text{SiO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 3 {\text{Al}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 3} \left( {\text{s}} \right) $$
(6)
$$ {\text{Si}}_{ 3} {\text{N}}_{ 4} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 2 {\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) = 2 {\text{SiC}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + {\text{SiO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 2 {\text{N}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) $$
(7)
Thereafter, SiO2 formed is reduced by CO:
$$ {\text{SiO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 4 {\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) = {\text{SiC}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + 3 {\text{CO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) $$
(8)
At 1600 °C, Al4C3 is formed by the reaction between Al2O3 and CO due to the presence of an increasing amount of CO:
$$ 2 {\text{Al}}_{ 2} {\text{O}}_{ 3} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 1 2 {\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) = {\text{Al}}_{ 4} {\text{C}}_{ 3} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 9 {\text{CO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{g}} \right) $$
(9)
The CO2 formed in the system, in turn, is reacted with C to form CO:
$$ {\text{CO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{g}} \right) + {\text{C}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) = 2 {\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) $$
(10)
However, in the fired samples, SiO2 was the only Si-containing compound detected at 1100 °C (Figure 4(a)), indicating that kinetic factors hindered the formation SiC, Si3N4, and Al6Si2O13. At 1200 °C, SiO2 and SiC shells were observed on the surface of unreacted Si (Figure 3(a)), indicating Si was oxidized by CO. SiC whiskers were also identified on the unreacted Si and in the matrix (Figures 3(a) and 4(b)). The presence of large holes in the Si particle was believed to be the result of the direct oxidation of Si and simultaneous formation and evaporation of SiO (g):
$$ {\text{Si}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + 2 {\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) = {\text{SiO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) + 2 {\text{C}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) $$
(11)
$$ {\text{Si}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + {\text{SiO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{s}} \right) = 2 {\text{SiO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) $$
(12)
SiC whiskers may be condensed from the vapor phase reaction between CO and SiO:
$$ {\text{SiO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) + 3 {\text{CO}}\left( {\text{g}} \right) = {\text{SiC}}\left( {\text{s}} \right) + 2 {\text{CO}}_{ 2} \left( {\text{g}} \right) $$
(13)
AlN was not found due to the kinetic factor. With increasing temperature to 1400 °C, according to Reaction [8], SiO2 was reduced by CO and the amount of SiC formed increased correspondingly. The difference in atmosphere partial pressure from the outer part to inner part of the samples could account for the difference in the phases formed. At 1600 °C, Al4C3 did not form due to the kinetic factor.

3.2.4 Property changes

The weight change of specimens and the percentage of silicon consumed during heat treatment (initial silicon minus the unreacted silicon) are presented in Figure 7. Silicon either reacted to form silicon-containing compounds or vaporized. At firing temperatures below 1400 °C, the weight of the specimens increased, but interestingly it increased only slightly between 1200 °C and 1400 °C. At temperatures above 1400 °C, it decreased with temperature; the decrease was especially large above 1500 °C. Silicon started to react at temperatures as low as 1100 °C. Approximately 95 wt pct silicon was consumed when the temperature was 1400 °C; thereafter, the silicon consumption changed only slightly. The mass loss observed below 1000 °C was due to the release of the volatile species of the binder. The increase in mass was a direct consequence of the formation of new silicon-containing phases (SiO2 and SiC) during heat treatment, whereas the decrease in mass at temperatures above 1400 °C was a result of the volatilization of SiO (g).
The evolutions of bulk and true densities of the specimens during heat treatment are illustrated in Figure 8. It is clear that the bulk density of specimens increased with the firing temperature and reached its maximum at 1400 °C, which was 1.65 g/cm3; it then declined down to 1.58 g/cm3 at 1600 °C. However, the true density increased slightly with temperature. The trend of bulk density change was similar to that of weight change. The bulk density decrease corresponded well to the apparent porosity increase (Figure 9), which was due to the release of the volatile species and the comparatively large bulk volume change above 1400 °C. The bulk volume change was believed to be due partly to the high anisotropic thermal expansion of the graphite. From 1000 °C to 1100 °C, the apparent porosity increased and the closed porosity reduced, whereas total porosity changed accordingly, which may be accounted for by the release of the volatile species of the binder. Above 1100 °C, as a general trend, total porosity change was similar to that of apparent porosity, i.e., first declined and then increased, reaching a minimum at 1400 °C, while the closed porosity changed only slightly (2.8 to 3.0 pct). The ceramic phases formed in the specimens contributed to the apparent and total porosity decreases, while the volatilization of SiO (g) resulted in the apparent and total porosity increase.
The micropore size distribution of specimens after firing at different temperatures is shown in Figure 11. The peak corresponding to the pore size diameter (D) ≈ 2 μm was observed for the specimen fired at 1000 °C. For the specimens fired at 1200 °C, two peaks appeared: the lower one was at D ≈ 1.8 μm and the higher one at D ≈ 0.2 μm. For the specimens fired at 1400 °C, two peaks at D ≈ 0.17 μm and D ≈ 0.25 μm were observed, and at 1600 °C, two peaks at D ≈ 0.5 μm and D ≈ 0.9 μm were detected. In order to better explain the changes in micropore size distribution, the mean diameter and <1 μm micropore volume of open pores at various temperatures were calculated and are presented in Figure 12. It could be seen that the mean diameter of the pores first reduced and then increased as the firing temperature increased from 1000 °C to 1600 °C; however, the change was not as large as at temperatures below 1200 °C. The <1 μm micropore volume and mean diameter of open pores changed on the opposite directions and reached the respective extremes at 1400 °C.
The CCS of the specimens was measured and the results are given in Figure 10. The maximum strength of 39 MPa was achieved at 1200 °C to 1400 °C. It should be noted that the trend of the strength mirrored that of the weight change and the bulk density in the range of 1000 °C to 1600 °C. The results seemed to indicate a strong relationship between the strength and the mass gain on firing.
The thermal conductivity of specimens fired was measured at temperatures of 25 °C, 300 °C, 600 °C, and 800 °C, and the results are plotted against firing temperature in Figure 13. When the firing temperature was below 1400 °C, the thermal conductivity of specimens first increased and then reduced with a maximum of 15.7 W/(m·K) at 600 °C for the specimens fired at 1200 °C. Thereafter, there was a dramatic increase in thermal conductivity of up to 19 W/(m·K) at 600 °C for specimens fired at 1500 °C. The micropore structure was closely related to the thermal conductivity of specimens. Figure 14 indicates the relationship between thermal conductivity at 600 °C and <1 μm micropore volume for specimens fired at 1100 °C to 1600 °C. This shows that the <1 μm micropore volume increased while the thermal conductivity first increased and then declined in the temperature range 1000 °C to 1400 °C, and the thermal conductivity maximum was reached when the <1 μm micropore volume of open pores was 55 pct, i.e., at 1200 °C. Above 1400 °C, the <1 μm micropore volume of open pores reduced while the thermal conductivity augmented. In the temperature range of 1200 °C to 1500 °C, the change of thermal conductivity was in the direction opposite that of the <1 μm micropore volume of open pores. The results seemed to indicate that the thermal conductivity was strongly related to the micropore volume and the phase change on firing. Increasing the micropore volumes could cause a decrease in the thermal conductivity, whereas the high thermal conductivity ceramics such as SiC could lead to an increase in the thermal conductivity. At 1000 °C to 1200 °C, the >1 μm micropore volume of open pores was 45 to 70 pct and the heat was conducted by means of convection; thus, the thermal conductivity was enhanced as the temperature increased. At 1200 °C to 1400 °C, the effect of micropore on thermal conductivity became dominant, and the thermal conductivity declined as the micropore volume increased. Over 1400 °C, both the micropore and phases formed in the specimens worked together; thermal conductivity effectively improved as the micropore decreased (Figure 12), and the high thermal conductivity SiC phase content increased (Figures 1 and 4).

4 Conclusions

The following conclusions can be made on the basis of the study of the phases, microstructures, and properties of carbon refractories heat treated at 1000 °C to 1600 °C in coke breeze packing.
1.
Temperature played a dominant role in the reaction process of Si. At 1100 °C, Si led to the formation of cristobalite balls, and its content declined while β-SiC content enhanced with increase in temperature. Dumbbell-shaped β-SiC whiskers appeared at 1200 °C, and dendritic SiC whiskers formed at 1400 °C; with further increase in temperature to 1600 °C, part of the β-SiC whiskers straightened and part of them curled. From the outer to inner part of the specimens at or over 1200 °C, the phases correspondingly changed from cristobalite balls to SiC whiskers.
 
2.
The density and strength were higher and apparent and total porosity were lower at 1400 °C, owing to the phase evolution in the heat-treatment process.
 
3.
The <1 μm micropore volume of open pores was at a maximum while the mean pore size and thermal conductivity were at a minimum at 1400 °C. The formation of ceramic phases could fill in the pores and reduce the pore diameter, which caused the decrease of thermal conductivity; however, the phases formed such as SiC could effectively improve thermal conductivity.
 

Acknowledgments

We thank the Department of Education of China for the financial support for this research under the program of the New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant No. NCET-06-0676).

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Open AccessThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by-nc/​2.​0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Footnotes
1
PHILIPS is a trademark of Philips Electronic Instruments Corp., Mahwah, NJ.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference S.N. Silva, F. Vernilli, S.M. Justus, O.R. Marques, A. Mazine, J.B. Baldo, E. Longo, and J.A. Varela: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2005, vol. 32, pp. 459–65.CrossRef S.N. Silva, F. Vernilli, S.M. Justus, O.R. Marques, A. Mazine, J.B. Baldo, E. Longo, and J.A. Varela: Ironmaking and Steelmaking, 2005, vol. 32, pp. 459–65.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference S. Tamura, S. Fujihara, and M. Ikeda: Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 1986, vol. 65, pp. 1065–72. S. Tamura, S. Fujihara, and M. Ikeda: Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull., 1986, vol. 65, pp. 1065–72.
3.
go back to reference F. Vernilli, Jr., S.M. Justus, and S.N. Silva: Mater. Corros., 2005, vol. 56, pp. 475–80.CrossRef F. Vernilli, Jr., S.M. Justus, and S.N. Silva: Mater. Corros., 2005, vol. 56, pp. 475–80.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference F. Vernilli, Jr., S.M. Justus, and S.N. Silva: ISIJ Int., 2005, vol. 45, pp. 1871–77.CrossRef F. Vernilli, Jr., S.M. Justus, and S.N. Silva: ISIJ Int., 2005, vol. 45, pp. 1871–77.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference S.M. Justus, S.S. Cava, and L.E. Bastos Soledade: Interceram. Refractories Manual, 2003, pp. 60–65. S.M. Justus, S.S. Cava, and L.E. Bastos Soledade: Interceram. Refractories Manual, 2003, pp. 60–65.
6.
go back to reference D. Bandyopadhyay, S.D. Singh, and D. Sanyal: Chem. Eng. J., 2003, vol. 94, pp. 79–92.CrossRef D. Bandyopadhyay, S.D. Singh, and D. Sanyal: Chem. Eng. J., 2003, vol. 94, pp. 79–92.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference H.W. Gudenau, M. Scheiwe, and R. Sieger: Steel Res., 1993, vol. 64, pp. 535–41. H.W. Gudenau, M. Scheiwe, and R. Sieger: Steel Res., 1993, vol. 64, pp. 535–41.
8.
go back to reference F. Zhao, D. Peng, L. Gao, and Z. Wang: Naihuo Cailiao, 1997, vol. 31, pp. 211–13 (in Chinese). F. Zhao, D. Peng, L. Gao, and Z. Wang: Naihuo Cailiao, 1997, vol. 31, pp. 211–13 (in Chinese).
9.
go back to reference X. Zhan and M. Song: Naihuo Cailiao, 1998, vol. 32, pp. 15–17 (in Chinese). X. Zhan and M. Song: Naihuo Cailiao, 1998, vol. 32, pp. 15–17 (in Chinese).
10.
go back to reference W. Chen, Q. Chen, Z. Li, and Z. Pang: Ironmaking, 2001, vol. 20, pp. 27–29 (in Chinese). W. Chen, Q. Chen, Z. Li, and Z. Pang: Ironmaking, 2001, vol. 20, pp. 27–29 (in Chinese).
11.
go back to reference G. Zhang, L. Ma, Z. Xiang, and J. Zhang: Carbon Technol., 2003, pp. 43–47 (in Chinese). G. Zhang, L. Ma, Z. Xiang, and J. Zhang: Carbon Technol., 2003, pp. 43–47 (in Chinese).
12.
go back to reference Y.W. Li, C.G. Aneziris, X.X. Yi, S.L. Jin, and N. Li: Interceram. Refractories Manual, 2005, pp. 20–23. Y.W. Li, C.G. Aneziris, X.X. Yi, S.L. Jin, and N. Li: Interceram. Refractories Manual, 2005, pp. 20–23.
13.
go back to reference K. Inoue, K. Akamine, I. Sasaka, J. Yoshitomi, and K. Asano: J. Tech. Assoc. Refractories, 2003, vol. 23, pp. 62–65. K. Inoue, K. Akamine, I. Sasaka, J. Yoshitomi, and K. Asano: J. Tech. Assoc. Refractories, 2003, vol. 23, pp. 62–65.
14.
go back to reference M.N. Khezrabadi, J. Javadpour, H.R. Rezaie, and R. Naghizadeh: J. Mater. Sci., 2006, vol. 41, pp. 3027–32.CrossRefADS M.N. Khezrabadi, J. Javadpour, H.R. Rezaie, and R. Naghizadeh: J. Mater. Sci., 2006, vol. 41, pp. 3027–32.CrossRefADS
15.
go back to reference S. Zhang, N.J. Marriott, and W.E. Lee: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2001, vol. 21, pp. 1037–47.CrossRef S. Zhang, N.J. Marriott, and W.E. Lee: J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2001, vol. 21, pp. 1037–47.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference W. Vieira and B. Rand: Nature of the Bond in Silicon-containing Alumina-carbon Refractory Composites. Part.1. UNITECR ’97, Proc. Unified Int. Tech. Conf. on Refractories, 5th Biennial Worldwide Congress, “Refractories—A Worldwide Technology”, 4–7 Nov. 1997, New Orleans, 1997, vol. 2, pp. 831–40. W. Vieira and B. Rand: Nature of the Bond in Silicon-containing Alumina-carbon Refractory Composites. Part.1. UNITECR ’97, Proc. Unified Int. Tech. Conf. on Refractories, 5th Biennial Worldwide Congress, “Refractories—A Worldwide Technology”, 4–7 Nov. 1997, New Orleans, 1997, vol. 2, pp. 831–40.
17.
go back to reference X.L. Chen, Y.B. Li, and Y.W. Li: Ceram. Int., 2008, vol. 34, pp. 1253–59.CrossRef X.L. Chen, Y.B. Li, and Y.W. Li: Ceram. Int., 2008, vol. 34, pp. 1253–59.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of Temperature on the Properties and Microstructures of Carbon Refractories for Blast Furnace
Authors
Xilai Chen
Yawei Li
Yuanbing Li
Shengli Jin
Lei Zhao
Shan Ge
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A / Issue 7/2009
Print ISSN: 1073-5623
Electronic ISSN: 1543-1940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-009-9850-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2009

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 7/2009 Go to the issue

Premium Partners