Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 2/2021

01-06-2021 | Technical paper

Effect of the interfacial shearing stress of soil–geogrid interaction on the bearing capacity of geogrid-reinforced sand

Authors: Hussein Ahmad, Ahmad Mahboubi

Published in: Innovative Infrastructure Solutions | Issue 2/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A transformed approach has been made to predict the impression of inclusion geogrid on the reinforced soil’s bearing capacity underneath the strip foundation. The influence of the friction factor of the tensile strength of the reinforcement element performs a significant purpose in estimating the tolerance of the strengthened soil. Analytical study and experimental tests have been performed to validate the proposed empirical approach. This study analyzed certain parameters that influence the efficiency of the strip footing placed on reinforced soil, such as effects of two geogrid layers, the efficacy of geogrid embedment depths, the distance between geogrid layers, the tensile strength of geogrid, the contact surface friction angle, and shear stress distribution along the interactions at the soil–geogrid interface. Consequently, a simple new equation was proposed to modify the reinforced soil’s increased bearing capacity, then a comparative study was executed by the analytical method of literature. Finally, the calculations confirmed a good agreement between laboratory and analytical results such that the error rate was less than 2%. It was found that the value of strain-induced at the midpoint of geogrid decreases with depth, and their magnitude is constant at a 0.5B embedment depth. The impact of geogrid with length ratio (L/B = 5–7) on the strain values has similar behavior, but it is a significant effect of shorter geogrid length layers.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Huang C, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):51–82CrossRef Huang C, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):51–82CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div 101:1257–1276CrossRef Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div 101:1257–1276CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Huang C, Menq F (1997) Deep-footing and wide-slab effects in reinforced sandy ground. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(1):30–36CrossRef Huang C, Menq F (1997) Deep-footing and wide-slab effects in reinforced sandy ground. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(1):30–36CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shukla SK, Chandra S (1994) A generalized mechanical model for geosynthetic-reinforced foundation soil. Geotext Geomembr 13(12):813–825CrossRef Shukla SK, Chandra S (1994) A generalized mechanical model for geosynthetic-reinforced foundation soil. Geotext Geomembr 13(12):813–825CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wayne MH, Han J, Akins K (1998) The design of geosynthetic reinforced foundations. Geosynthetics in foundation reinforcement and erosion control systems. ASCE, Reston, pp 1–18 Wayne MH, Han J, Akins K (1998) The design of geosynthetic reinforced foundations. Geosynthetics in foundation reinforcement and erosion control systems. ASCE, Reston, pp 1–18
6.
go back to reference Chen Q (2007) An experimental study on characteristics and behavior of reinforced soil foundation. Ph.D. Dissertation. Louisiana State University Chen Q (2007) An experimental study on characteristics and behavior of reinforced soil foundation. Ph.D. Dissertation. Louisiana State University
7.
go back to reference Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M (2015) Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of strip footings on reinforced soil foundation. Soils Found 55(1):74–85CrossRef Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M (2015) Ultimate bearing capacity analysis of strip footings on reinforced soil foundation. Soils Found 55(1):74–85CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sharma R, Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M, Yoon S (2009) Analytical modeling of geogrid reinforced soil foundation. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):63–72CrossRef Sharma R, Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M, Yoon S (2009) Analytical modeling of geogrid reinforced soil foundation. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):63–72CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Li GX, Chen Y, Tang X (2009)‏ Geosynthetics in civil and environmental engineering. In: Geosynthetics Asia 2008 proceedings of the 4th asian regional conference on geosynthetics in Shanghai, China. Springer Science and Business Media Li GX, Chen Y, Tang X (2009)‏ Geosynthetics in civil and environmental engineering. In: Geosynthetics Asia 2008 proceedings of the 4th asian regional conference on geosynthetics in Shanghai, China. Springer Science and Business Media
11.
go back to reference Badakhshan E, Noorzad A, Zameni S (2020) Eccentrical behavior of square and circular footings resting on geogrid-reinforced sand. Int J Geotech Eng 14(2):151–161CrossRef Badakhshan E, Noorzad A, Zameni S (2020) Eccentrical behavior of square and circular footings resting on geogrid-reinforced sand. Int J Geotech Eng 14(2):151–161CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chen RH, Huang YW, Huang FC (2013) Confinement effect of geocells on sand samples under triaxial compression. Geotext Geomembr 37:35–44CrossRef Chen RH, Huang YW, Huang FC (2013) Confinement effect of geocells on sand samples under triaxial compression. Geotext Geomembr 37:35–44CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M, Sharma R (2009) Experimental and analytical studies of reinforced crushed limestone. Geotext Geomembr 27(5):357–367CrossRef Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M, Sharma R (2009) Experimental and analytical studies of reinforced crushed limestone. Geotext Geomembr 27(5):357–367CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Li JZ, Hou J (2018) Bearing behavior of strip footing reinforced with horizontal-vertical geogrids. Master dissertation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China Li JZ, Hou J (2018) Bearing behavior of strip footing reinforced with horizontal-vertical geogrids. Master dissertation, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China
15.
go back to reference Lopes ML (2012) Soil-geosynthetic interaction. In: Shukla SK (ed) Handbook of geosynthetic engineering geosynthetics and their applications. ICE Publishing, Thomas Telford, London, UK, pp 45–66 Lopes ML (2012) Soil-geosynthetic interaction. In: Shukla SK (ed) Handbook of geosynthetic engineering geosynthetics and their applications. ICE Publishing, Thomas Telford, London, UK, pp 45–66
16.
go back to reference Moraci N, Cardile G, Gioffrè D, Mandaglio MC, Calvarano LS, Carbone L (2014) Soil geosynthetic interaction: design parameters from experimental and theoretical analysis. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 1(2):165–227CrossRef Moraci N, Cardile G, Gioffrè D, Mandaglio MC, Calvarano LS, Carbone L (2014) Soil geosynthetic interaction: design parameters from experimental and theoretical analysis. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 1(2):165–227CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M (2016) Mitigating the bridge end bump problem: a case study of a new approach slab system with geosynthetic reinforced soil foundation. Geotext Geomembr 44(1):39–50CrossRef Chen Q, Abu-Farsakh M (2016) Mitigating the bridge end bump problem: a case study of a new approach slab system with geosynthetic reinforced soil foundation. Geotext Geomembr 44(1):39–50CrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Sharan UN (1977) Pressure–settlement characteristics of surface footing from constitutive laws. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India Sharan UN (1977) Pressure–settlement characteristics of surface footing from constitutive laws. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, India
21.
23.
go back to reference ASTM D422–63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils (withdrawn 2016), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org ASTM D422–63 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils (withdrawn 2016), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.​astm.​org
24.
go back to reference ASTM-D2049 (1969) Test method for relative density of cohesionless soils (withdrawn 1983) ASTM-D2049 (1969) Test method for relative density of cohesionless soils (withdrawn 1983)
25.
go back to reference ASTM D5321/D5321M-19 (2019) Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org ASTM D5321/D5321M-19 (2019) Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic-geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.​astm.​org
26.
go back to reference ASTM D5321/D5321M-19 (2019) Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic–geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.astm.org ASTM D5321/D5321M-19 (2019) Standard test method for determining the shear strength of soil-geosynthetic and geosynthetic–geosynthetic interfaces by direct shear, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, www.​astm.​org
27.
go back to reference ASTM D 1196 (2016) Standard test method for nonrepetitive static plate load tests of soils and flexible pavement components, for use in evaluation and design of airport and highway pavements. American Society for Testing and Material, ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA, USA ASTM D 1196 (2016) Standard test method for nonrepetitive static plate load tests of soils and flexible pavement components, for use in evaluation and design of airport and highway pavements. American Society for Testing and Material, ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA, USA
28.
go back to reference Kolbsuzewski J (1948) General investigation of the fundamental factors controlling loose packing of sands. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering Rotterdam (4): 47–49 Kolbsuzewski J (1948) General investigation of the fundamental factors controlling loose packing of sands. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering Rotterdam (4): 47–49
29.
go back to reference Xu Y, Yan G, Williams DJ, Serati M, Scheuermann A, Vangsness T (2020) Experimental and numerical studies of a strip footing on geosynthetic-reinforced sand. Int J Phys Model Geotech 20(5):267–280 Xu Y, Yan G, Williams DJ, Serati M, Scheuermann A, Vangsness T (2020) Experimental and numerical studies of a strip footing on geosynthetic-reinforced sand. Int J Phys Model Geotech 20(5):267–280
30.
go back to reference Mosallanezhad M, Alfaro MC, Hataf N, Taghavi SH (2016) Performance of the new reinforcement system in the increase of shear strength of typical geogrid interface with soil. Geotext Geomembr 44(3):457–462CrossRef Mosallanezhad M, Alfaro MC, Hataf N, Taghavi SH (2016) Performance of the new reinforcement system in the increase of shear strength of typical geogrid interface with soil. Geotext Geomembr 44(3):457–462CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Cicek E, Guler E, Yetimoglu T (2015) Effect of reinforcement length for different geosynthetic reinforcements on strip footing on sand soil. Soils Found 55(4):661–677CrossRef Cicek E, Guler E, Yetimoglu T (2015) Effect of reinforcement length for different geosynthetic reinforcements on strip footing on sand soil. Soils Found 55(4):661–677CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Patra S, Shahu JT (2012) Pasternak model for an oblique pullout of inextensible reinforcements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(12):1503–1513CrossRef Patra S, Shahu JT (2012) Pasternak model for an oblique pullout of inextensible reinforcements. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 138(12):1503–1513CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ouria A, Mahmoudi A (2018) Laboratory and numerical modeling of strip footing on geotextile-reinforced sand with a cement-treated interface. Geotext Geomembr 46(1):29–39CrossRef Ouria A, Mahmoudi A (2018) Laboratory and numerical modeling of strip footing on geotextile-reinforced sand with a cement-treated interface. Geotext Geomembr 46(1):29–39CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Huang CC (2017) Model tests on the bearing capacity of reinforced saturated sand ground. Geosynth Int 24(2):114–124CrossRef Huang CC (2017) Model tests on the bearing capacity of reinforced saturated sand ground. Geosynth Int 24(2):114–124CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q, Sharma R (2013) An experimental evaluation of the behavior of footings on geosynthetic-reinforced sand. Soils Found 53(2):335–348CrossRef Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q, Sharma R (2013) An experimental evaluation of the behavior of footings on geosynthetic-reinforced sand. Soils Found 53(2):335–348CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q, Sharma R, Zhang X (2008) Large-scale model footing tests on a geogrid-reinforced foundation and marginal embankment soils. Geotech Test J 31(5):413–423 Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q, Sharma R, Zhang X (2008) Large-scale model footing tests on a geogrid-reinforced foundation and marginal embankment soils. Geotech Test J 31(5):413–423
39.
go back to reference Shukla SK, Chandra S (1996) A study on a new mechanical model for foundations and its elastic settlement response. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 20(8):595–604CrossRef Shukla SK, Chandra S (1996) A study on a new mechanical model for foundations and its elastic settlement response. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 20(8):595–604CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of the interfacial shearing stress of soil–geogrid interaction on the bearing capacity of geogrid-reinforced sand
Authors
Hussein Ahmad
Ahmad Mahboubi
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 2364-4176
Electronic ISSN: 2364-4184
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00430-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Innovative Infrastructure Solutions 2/2021 Go to the issue