Top

Published in:

02-01-2019

Efficacy of Rainfall-Runoff Models in Loose Coupling Spacial Decision Support Systems Modelbase

Authors: Sílvio Luís Rafaeli Neto, Eder Alexandre Schatz Sá, Aline Bernarda Debastiani, Víctor Luís Padilha, Thiago Alves Antunes

Published in: Water Resources Management | Issue 3/2019

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The need for a prognosis for water resources management in Brazil means that studies with hydrological models are required, as part of a Spatial Decision Support System (SDSS). Choosing the model in a modelbase requires knowledge of the performance of the existing models in the specific situations in which they are to be applied. This paper evaluated the performance of two physically-based models and two numerical-based models in their ability to represent the rainfall-runoff process. The study occurred in a watershed in southern Brazil. Historical data series from the same periods were taken to calibrate and train the models, using two different periods to validate their efficacy. The results show that the SWAT and TOPMODEL models presented an inferior performance compared to the numerical-based models (RT and ANN). However, all the models presented satisfactory levels of efficacy and the potential for use in different management situations.

next article Pareto Optimal Multigene Genetic Programming for Prediction of Longitudinal Dispersion Coefficient

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Alsabhan W (2016) Designing a human-centred, mobile interface to support real-time flood forecasting and warning system. Thesis. Brunel University

Antunes TA (2015) Modelagem hidrológica da bacia hidrográfica do Alto Canoas através do modelo swat. Dissertation. State University of Santa Catarina

Armstrong M, Densham P, Rushton G (1986) Architecture for a microcomputer based spatial decision support system. International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling 2:120–131 Seatle: International Geographical Union

Arnold JG, Moriasi DN, Gassman PW et al (2012) SWAT: Model Use, Calibration and Validation. Trans ASABE 55:1491–1508. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42256 CrossRef

Beven KJ, Kirby MJ (1979) A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol Process 24(1):43–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667909491834

Chorley RJ, Kennedy BA (1971) Physical geography: a systems approach. Prentice-Hall International, London

Clark M, Kavetski D, Fenicia F (2011) Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling. Water Resour Res 47(9):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009827 CrossRef

Dawson CW, Wilby RL (2001) Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Prog Phys Geogr 25(1):80–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913330102500104 CrossRef

Debastiani AB, Silva RD, Neto SLR (2016) Eficácia da arquitetura MLP em modo closed-loop para simulação de um Sistema Hidrológico. Rev Bras Recur Hidr 21(4):821–831. https://doi.org/10.1590/2318-0331.011615124

Densham PJ (1991) Spatial decision support systems. In: Maguire DJ, Goodchild MF, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical information systems: principles and applications. Longman, New York, pp 403–412

Densham PJ, Goodchild MF (1989) Spatial decision support systems: a research agenda. GIS/LIS'89, 2, Orlando, pp. 707–716

Devantier BA, Feldman AD (1993) Review of GIS applications in hydrologic modeling. J Water Resour Plan Manag 119:246–260. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1993)119:2(246) CrossRef

EPAGRI (2014) Mapas digitais de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis. Available in: http://ciram.epagri.sc.gov.br/mapoteca/ Access in mar 10

Fakhari A, Moghadam AM (2013) Combination of classification and regression in decision tree for multi-labeling image annotation and retrieval. Appl Soft Comput 13(2):1292–1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2012.10.019 CrossRef

Fitz PR (2008) Geoprocessamento sem complicação. Oficina de Textos. São Paulo, São Paulo

Govindaraju RS, Rao AR (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. Springer, Dordrecht, p 332. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9341-0 CrossRef

Gupta HV, Kling H, Yilmaz KK, Martinez GF (2009) Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. J Hydrol 377:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003 CrossRef

Hagan MT, Menhaj M (1994) Training feed-forward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5(6):989–993. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.329697 CrossRef

Haykin S (2001) Neural networks: principles and practice. Bookman, Porto Alegre

Heath GE (2010) Training, testing and validating data set in Neural Network. Retrieved 74, 2013. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/295781#917734. Accessed 11 July 2016

Keenan PB (2003) Spatial decision support systems. In Mora M, Forgione G, Gupta JN, Decision making support systems: achievements and challenges for the new decade. Idea Group, pp. 28–39

Koch J, Cornelissen T, Fang Z et al (2016) Inter-comparison of three distributed hydrological models with respect to seasonal variability of soil moisture patterns at a small forested catchment. J Hydrol 533:234–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.12.002 CrossRef

Krause P, Boyle DP, Base FB (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv Geosci 5:89–97. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005 CrossRef

Legates DR, McCabe GJ Jr (1999) Evaluating the use of “goodness-of-fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model validation. Water Resour Res 35(1):233–241. https://doi.org/10.1029/1998WR900018 CrossRef

Li N, Raskin R, Goodchild MF, Janowicz K (2012) An ontology-driven framework and web portal for spatial decision support. Trasctions in GIS 16(3):313–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2012.01325.x CrossRef

Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (2013) Geographic information systems and science. 3 Edition, Porto Alegre: Bookman, pp. 560

Metcalfe P, Beven K, Freer J (2015) Dynamic TOPMODEL: A new implementation in R and its sensitivity time and space steps. Environ Model Softw 72:155–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.010 CrossRef

Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900.

Morid S, Gosain AK, Keshari AK (2002) Comparison of the SWAT Model and ANN for daily simulation of runoff in snowbound ungauged catchments (1 ed.). At Cardiff, UK: Conference: 5th International Conference on Hydro informatics, Cardiff, 1–5 July 2002

Neto SLR (2000) Um modelo conceitual de Sistema de Apoio à Decisão Espacial para gerenciamento de desastres por inundações. Thesis. São Paulo University

Neto SLR, Rodrigues M (1999) A taxonomy of strategies for developing spatial decision support systems. In: Wojtkowski W, Wojtkowski WG, Wrycza S, Zupancic J (eds) Systems development methods for databases, enterprise, modelling, and workflow management. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4261-2

Noori N, Kalin L (2016) Coupling SWAT and ANN models for enhanced daily streamflow prediction. J Hydrol 533:141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.11.050 CrossRef

Quinlan JR (1992) Learning with continuous classes. In: Adams N, Sterling L (eds) Proceedings of the Fifth Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 343–348

Riad S, Mania J, Bouchaou L, Najjar Y (2004) Rainfall-runoff model using an artificial neural network approach. Math Comput Model 40:839–846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2004.10.012 CrossRef

Runck BC (2017) Spatial decision-support system. The International Encyclopedia of Geography, pp. 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg1018

Sá EAS (2014) Estudo do modelo TOPMODEL na bacia hidrográfica do Alto Canoas SC. Dissertation. State University of Santa Catarina

Sage A (1991) Decision support systems engineering. Willey & Sons, New York, p 360

Solomantine DP, Dulal KN (2003) Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):399–411. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.3.399.45291 CrossRef

Sprague RH Jr, Watson HJ (1991) Sistema de apoio à decisão: colocando a teoria em prática. Campus, Rio de Janeiro, p 498

Sugumaran R, Degroote J (2011) Spatial decision support systems. CRC Press, New York

Suliman AH, Jajarmizadeh M, Harun S, Darus IZ (2015) Comparison of semi-distributed, GIS-based hydrological models for the prediction of streamflow in a large catchment. Water Resour Manag 29(9):3095–3110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0984-0 CrossRef

Turban E (1995) Decision support systems and expert systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 930

Yang W (2017) Geomatics and water policy. In: Renzetti S, Dupont DP (eds) Water policy and governance in Canada. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 435–451CrossRef

Title: Efficacy of Rainfall-Runoff Models in Loose Coupling Spacial Decision Support Systems Modelbase
Authors: Sílvio Luís Rafaeli Neto
Eder Alexandre Schatz Sá
Aline Bernarda Debastiani
Víctor Luís Padilha
Thiago Alves Antunes
Publication date: 02-01-2019
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Water Resources Management / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0920-4741
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1650
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2086-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Distribution of grain size and resulting hydraulic conductivity in land reclamations constructed by bottom dumping, rainbowing and pipeline discharge

Sustaining Reforms in Water Service Delivery: the Role of Service Quality, Salience, Trust and Financial Viability

Leakage Estimation in Water Distribution Network: Effect of the Shape and Size Cracks

A Recursive Approach to Long-Term Prediction of Monthly Precipitation Using Genetic Programming

Groundwater Vulnerability Modeling to Assess Seawater Intrusion: a Methodological Comparison with Geospatial Interpolation

Leakage Identification in Water Distribution Networks with Error Tolerance Capability