Top

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Published in:

09-12-2023 | Original Article

Efficient intraoral photogrammetry using self-identifying projective invariant marker

Authors: Yanghai Chen, Mingzhu Zhu, Bingwei He, Zhen Deng

Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery | Issue 4/2024

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

The re-measurement of full-arch implant digital impressions is an important step in denture restoration. This paper provides an efficient oral photogrammetry technology using projective invariant marker, applied in the re-measurement of full-arch implant digital impressions.

Methods

We have developed a self-recognizing marker with projection invariance, along with its detection code. The marker is installed on the scanning body and used for photogrammetric measurements. Triangulation is utilized to determine the 3D coordinates of the marker, followed by a series of post-processing steps to obtain more accurate 3D coordinates.

Results

The experimental data indicate that the optimal working distance is between 200 and 250 mm, with a minimum measurement error of less than 0.05 mm and an average measurement error of 0.10 mm. The measurement time is less than 2 min.

Conclusions

The experimental results show that the photogrammetric system can obtain reliable positions of full-arch implants with efficient photogrammetry, without the need to enter the patient’s oral cavity, and has potential clinical application value.

previous article Path tracking control of a steerable catheter in transcatheter cardiology interventions

next article Rapid detection of non-normal teeth on dental X-ray images using improved Mask R-CNN with attention mechanism

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Ciocca L, Meneghello R, Monaco C, Savio G, Scheda L, Gatto MR, Baldissara P (2018) In vitro assessment of the accuracy of digital impressions prepared using a single system for full-arch restorations on implants. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 13:1097–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1719-5CrossRefPubMed

Li Y, Hu J, Tao B, Yu D, Shen Y, Fan S, Wu Y, Chen X (2020) Automatic robot-world calibration in an optical-navigated surgical robot system and its application for oral implant placement. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 15:1685–1692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02232-wCrossRefPubMed

Vigh B, Müller S, Ristow O, Deppe H, Holdstock S, den Hollander J, Navab N, Steiner T, Hohlweg-Majert B (2014) The use of a head-mounted display in oral implantology: a feasibility study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 9:71–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0912-9CrossRefPubMed

Abduo J (2020) Fit of implant immediate provisional prostheses fabricated by digital workflow prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implant Res 31(S20):13–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.9_13643CrossRef

Han YT, Lin WC, Fan FY, Chen CL, Lin CC, Cheng HC (2021) Comparison of dental surface image registration and fiducial marker registration: an in vivo accuracy study of static computer-assisted implant surgery. J Clin Med 10(18):4183. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dounis GS, Ziebert GJ, Dounis KS (1991) A comparison of impression materials for complete-arch fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 65(2):165–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90311-5CrossRefPubMed

Michalakis KX, Asar NV, Kapsampeli V, Magkavali-Trikka P, Pissiotis AL, Hirayama H (2012) Delayed linear dimensional changes of five high strength gypsum products used for the fabrication of definitive casts. J Prosthet Dent 108(3):189–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60146-2CrossRefPubMed

Ma B, Yue X, Sun Y, Peng L, Geng W (2021) Accuracy of photogrammetry, intraoral scanning, and conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: an in vitro comparative study. BMC Oral Health 21(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-02005-0CrossRef

Ahlholm P, Sipilä K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U (2018) Digital versus conventional impressions in fixed prosthodontics: a review. J Prosthodont 27(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12527CrossRefPubMed

10.

Sang JL, Jamjoom FZ, Le T, Radics A, Gallucci GO (2022) A clinical study comparing digital scanning and conventional impression making for implant-supported prostheses: A crossover clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 128(1):42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.043CrossRef

11.

Waldecker M, Rues S, Behnisch R, Rammelsberg P, Bömicke W (2022) Effect of scan-path length on the scanning accuracy of completely dentate and partially edentulous maxillae. J Prosthet Dent. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.02.016CrossRefPubMed

12.

Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Thulin M, Nyström I, Thor A (2023) In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols. J Dent 128(104):308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104308CrossRef

13.

Fiala M (2005) Artag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In: 2005 IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR’05), IEEE, pp 590–596, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2005.74

14.

Bergamasco F, Albarelli A, Rodola E, Torsello A (2011) Rune-tag: a high accuracy fiducial marker with strong occlusion resilience. In: CVPR 2011, IEEE, pp 113–120, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995544

15.

Bergamasco F, Albarelli A, Torsello A (2013) Pi-tag: a fast image-space marker design based on projective invariants. Mach Vis Appl 24:1295–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00138-012-0469-6CrossRef

16.

Kaltenbrunner M, Bencina R (2007) Reactivision: a computer-vision framework for table-based tangible interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on tangible and embedded interaction, pp 69–74, https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1226983

17.

Bennett S, Lasenby J (2014) ChESS–quick and robust detection of chess-board features. Comput Vis Image Underst 118:197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cviu.2013.10.008CrossRef

18.

Meer P, Lenz R, Ramakrishna S (1998) Efficient invariant representations. Int J Comput Vision 26:137–152. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01086CrossRef

19.

Triggs B, McLauchlan PF, Hartley RI, Fitzgibbon AW (2000) Bundle adjustment-a modern synthesis. In: Vision algorithms: theory and practice: international workshop on vision algorithms corfu, Greece, September 21–22, 1999 Proceedings, Springer, pp 298–372, https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44480-7_21

20.

Arun KS, Huang TS, Blostein SD (1987) Least-squares fitting of two 3-d point sets. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI 9(5):698–700. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.1987.4767965CrossRef

21.

Zhang Z (2000) A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(11):1330–1334. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.888718CrossRef

22.

Schepke U, Meijer HJ, Kerdijk W, Cune MS (2015) Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns: operating time and patient preference. J Prosthet Dent 114(3):403–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.003CrossRefPubMed

23.

Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA Jr, Seidt J, Johnston WM (2020) Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 123(1):96–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A (2016) In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 115(3):313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.011

25.

Zhang L, Ye M, Chan PL, Yang GZ (2017) Real-time surgical tool tracking and pose estimation using a hybrid cylindrical marker. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12:921–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1558-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Wang J, Kobayashi E, Sakuma I (2015) Coarse-to-fine dot array marker detection with accurate edge localization for stereo visual tracking. Biomed Signal Process Control 15:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2014.09.008CrossRef

27.

Qin C, Cao Z, Fan S, Wu Y, Sun Y, Politis C, Wang C, Chen X (2019) An oral and maxillofacial navigation system for implant placement with automatic identification of fiducial points. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 14:281–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1870-z

28.

Haliburton L, Esfandiari H, Guy P, Anglin C, Hodgson A (2020) A visual odometry base-tracking system for intraoperative c-arm guidance. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 15(10):1597–1609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02229-5CrossRefPubMed

29.

Ma C, Cui X, Chen F, Ma L, Xin S, Liao H (2020) Knee arthroscopic navigation using virtual-vision rendering and self-positioning technology. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 15:467–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-019-02099-6CrossRefPubMed

30.

Wang J, Song S, Ren H, Lim CM, Meng MQH (2018) Surgical instrument tracking by multiple monocular modules and a sensor fusion approach. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 16(2):629–639. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2018.2848239CrossRef

Title: Efficient intraoral photogrammetry using self-identifying projective invariant marker
Authors: Yanghai Chen
Mingzhu Zhu
Bingwei He
Zhen Deng
Publication date: 09-12-2023
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Published in: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery / Issue 4/2024
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Electronic ISSN: 1861-6429
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-023-03039-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2024

Path tracking control of a steerable catheter in transcatheter cardiology interventions

Algorithmically designed flaps in tongue reconstruction: a feasibility analysis

Model guided medicine and the search for truth

Generative pretrained transformer-4, an artificial intelligence text predictive model, has a high capability for passing novel written radiology exam questions

Automatic image registration on intraoperative CBCT compared to Surface Matching registration on preoperative CT for spinal navigation: accuracy and workflow

Image-based hemodynamic simulations for intracranial aneurysms: the impact of complex vasculature

Premium Partner