Top

Energy Efficiency

Published in:

01-05-2013 | Original Article

Emerging evaluation issues: persistence, behavior, rebound, and policy

Authors: Edward Vine, Nick Hall, Kenneth M. Keating, Martin Kushler, Ralph Prahl

Published in: Energy Efficiency | Issue 2/2013

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on a select group of technical and policy issues, which are currently important and/or are expected to become more critical in the coming years. The first set of technical issues deals with the evaluation of (1) persistence, (2) behavior and behavior change, and (3) rebound. We provide an overview of the importance of these issues, discuss key data collection and analytical challenges involved in evaluating them, and identify some recent methodological advances that have been made in these areas. These technical issues are becoming more important as energy efficiency and demand side management are increasingly being relied upon as a means of achieving long-term energy resource and environmental objectives. The second set of policy issues deals with (1) the evaluation of energy efficiency at the “policy” rather than the “program” level, (2) the use of “top-down” rather than “bottom-up” evaluation of energy efficiency programs and policies, and (3) closing the loop between evaluators and implementers. We provide an overview of the importance of these issues, particularly as seen by policymakers at the state, federal, and international levels.

previous article How to get residents/owners in housing cooperatives to agree on sustainable renovation

next article Linking historic developments and future scenarios of industrial energy use in the Netherlands between 1993 and 2040

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

They also noted a lack of in-depth studies in process equipment, some shell measures, and specific end uses like cooking, refrigeration, and air compressors.

In at least one study of an incentive-based early replacement program, high rates of free riders were found, so that early retirement was not really achieved (personal communication with Robert Wirtshafter, May 24, 2011).

These papers are found at: http://uc-ciee.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=18&Itemid=47)

BECC: www.BECCconference.org

It is important to point out that behavior and technology are often seen as an integrated whole: for example, one cannot promote a technology or evaluate a technology’s effectiveness without considering the behavioral aspects of that particular technology. This integration makes the assessment of attribution even more challenging.

In Europe, policies and programs are often used interchangeably, while in the USA, they are seen as distinct.

CALMAC: www.calmac.org; CEE: www.cee1.org.

The EMEEES project: http://www.evaluate-energy-savings.eu/emeees/en/the_project/project_description.php

Donnelly, K. (2010). The technological and human dimensions of residential feedback: an introduction to the broad range of today’s feedback. In K. Ehrhardt-Martinez & J. Skip Laitner (Eds.), People-centered initiatives for increasing energy savings. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). (2010). Guidelines for designing effective energy information feedback pilots: research protocols. Report 1020855. Palo Alto: EPRI.

Gillingham, K., Newell, R., & Plamer, K. (2004). Retrospective examination of demand-side energy efficiency policies. Report RFF DP 04–19 REV. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Goldstein, D., Martinez, S., & Roy, R. (2011). Are there rebound effects from energy efficiency?—an analysis of empirical data, internal consistency, and solutions. Available at: ElectricityPolicy.com. Accessed 1 May 2011

Gynther, L., Mikkonen, I., & Smits, A. (2010). Evaluation of European energy behavioural change programmers, Proceedings of the 2010 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Paris, France: IEPEC. Available at: http://www.iepec.org/2010PapersTOC/2010TOC.htm.

Horowitz, M. (2007). Changes in electricity demand in the U.S. from the 1970s to 2003. The Energy Journal, 28(3), 93–119.CrossRef

Horowitz, M. (2010). Measuring the savings from energy efficiency policies: a step beyond program evaluation. Energy Efficiency, 4(1), 43–56.CrossRef

Integral Analytics, SageView Associates, & TecMarket Works. (2011). Evaluation of the home energy comparison report. Oregon: TecMarket Works.

Keating, K. (1991). Persistence of energy savings. In E. Hirst & J. Reed (Eds.), Evaluation handbook (pp. 89–99). Oak Ridge: Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Report ORNL/CON-33, Chapter 6.

Khan, J., Harmelink, M., Harmsen, R., Irrek, W., & Labanca, N. (2007). From theory based policy evaluation to SMART policy design: summary report of the AID-EE project. Utrecht, the Netherlands: ECOFYS Netherlands bv. Available at: http://www.aid-ee.org/documents.htm.

Kiss, B., McCormick, K., Neij, L., & Mundaca, L. (2010). Policy Instruments for Energy Efficiency in Buildings: Experiences and Lessons from the Nordic Countries, Proceedings of the 2010 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Paris, France: IEPEC. Available at: http://www.iepec.org/2010PapersTOC/2010TOC.htm.

Lapillonne, B., Bosseboeuf, D., & Thomas, S. (2009). Top-down evaluation methods of energy savings: a summary report, Grenoble, Switzerland: Enerdata; Paris, France: ADEME; and Wuppertal, Germany: Wuppertal Institute.

Lin, J., Cao, B., Cui, S., Wang, W., & Bai, X. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of urban energy conservation and GHG mitigation measures: the case of Xiamen City, China. Energy Policy, 38(9), 5123–5132.CrossRef

Mundaca, L., & Neij, L. (2010). A meta-analysis of bottom-up ex-ante energy efficiency policy evaluation studies. Proceedings of the 2010 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Paris, France: IEPEC. Available at: http://www.iepec.org/2010PapersTOC/2010TOC.htm.

Nadel, S. (1993). The takeback effect: fact or fiction? Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.

Nadel, S. (2011). Our perspective on the ‘rebound effect’—is it true that the more efficient a product becomes, the more its owner will use it? January 12. Available at: http://www.aceee.org/blog/2011/01/our-perspective-rebound-effect-it-true-more-efficient-pro.

Owen, D. (2010). The efficiency dilemma. The New Yorker, Dec. 20.

Proctor Engineering Group. (1999). Summary report of persistence studies: assessment of technical degradation factors, final report. San Rafael: Proctor Engineering Group.

Ridge, R., Jacobs, P., Tress, H., Hall, N., & Evans, B. (2011). One solution to capturing the benefits of early replacement: approximately correct is good enough. Proceedings of the 2011 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Boston, MA: IEPEC.

Skumatz, L., Khawaya, M., & Colby, J. (2009). Lessons learned and next steps in energy efficiency measurement and attribution: energy savings, net to gross, non-energy benefits, and persistence of energy efficiency behavior. Available at: http://uc-ciee.org/energyeff/energyeff.html.

Sorrell, S. (2007). The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy saving from improved energy efficiency. London: UK Energy Research Centre.

Thomas, S., Boonekamp, P., Vreuls, H., Broc, J., Bosseboeuf, D., Lapillonne, B., & Labanca, N. (2010). How to measure the overall energy savings linked to policies and energy services at the national level. Proceedings of the 2010 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Paris, France: IEPEC. Available at: http://www.iepec.org/2010PapersTOC/2010TOC.htm

Togeby, M., Dyhr-Mikkelsen, K., Larsen, A., & Bach, P. (2010). Portfolio evaluation and its impact on energy efficiency policy. Proceedings of the 2010 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Paris, France: IEPEC. Available at: http://www.iepec.org/2010PapersTOC/2010TOC.htm

Vine, E. (2008). Strategies and policies for improving energy efficiency programs: closing the loop between evaluation and implementation. Energy Policy, 36(10), 3872–3881.CrossRef

Vine, E., du Pont, P., & Waide, P. (2001). Evaluating the impact of appliance efficiency labeling programs and standards: process, impact, and market transformation evaluations. Energy-The International Journal, 26(11), 1041–1059.CrossRef

Vine, E., Hall, N., Keating, K., Kushler, M., & Prahl, R. (2010). Emerging issues in the evaluation of energy efficiency programs. Proceedings of the 2010 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference, Paris, France: IEPEC. Available at: http://www.iepec.org/2010PapersTOC/2010TOC.htm.

Vine, E., Sullivan, M., Lutzenhiser, L., Blumstein, C., & Miller, B. (2011). Experimentation and the evaluation of energy efficiency programs: will the Twain meet? Proceedings of the 2011 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference. Boston, MA: IEPEC.

Vreuls, H., Boonekamp, P., & Pauwels, H. (2007). Energy savings lifetimes of measures: will the new European harmonized lifetimes account for less energy savings compared to the policy induced energy savings measures? Proceedings of the 2007 International Energy Program Evaluation Conference. Chicago, IL: IEPEC.

Title: Emerging evaluation issues: persistence, behavior, rebound, and policy
Authors: Edward Vine
Nick Hall
Kenneth M. Keating
Martin Kushler
Ralph Prahl
Publication date: 01-05-2013
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Energy Efficiency / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1570-646X
Electronic ISSN: 1570-6478
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-012-9174-6

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Energy retrofit of commercial buildings: case study and applied methodology

Assessing the energy-efficiency information gap: results from a survey of home energy auditors

How to get residents/owners in housing cooperatives to agree on sustainable renovation

Matching policy and people? Household responses to the promotion of renewable electricity

Laptop energy-saving opportunities based on user behaviors

Training the next generation of energy efficiency evaluators