Advertisement
Published in:
01-03-2015 | Erratum
Erratum to: Cushioning the Fall: Scandals, Economic Conditions, and Executive Approval
Published in: Political Behavior | Issue 1/2015
Log inActivate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Excerpt
In the original publication of this article, Table 2 was incorrectly printed. The correct version of Table 2 is shown below.
Table 2
Political scandals, economic performance, and presidential approval: autoregressive dynamic lag models
|
I
|
II
|
III
Fixed-effect
|
IV
Brazil exc.
|
V
Brazil exc.
|
VI
FE: Brazil exc.
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Approvalt−1
|
0.893***
|
0.891***
|
0.676***
|
0.896***
|
0.893***
|
0.666***
|
|
0.019
|
0.020
|
0.022
|
0.019
|
0.020
|
0.023
|
|
|
Scandal
|
−0.743
|
1.681
|
−0.565
|
−0.961
|
3.313
|
0.306
|
|
0.850
|
2.589
|
2.401
|
1.080
|
3.028
|
2.720
|
|
|
Scandalt−1
|
−0.051
|
6.840***
|
5.125**
|
−0.112
|
8.774***
|
6.834**
|
|
1.128
|
2.187
|
2.367
|
1.452
|
2.336
|
2.663
|
|
|
Unemployment
|
−1.020*
|
−0.963*
|
0.223
|
−1.263**
|
−1.214**
|
0.110
|
|
0.550
|
0.544
|
0.580
|
0.602
|
0.597
|
0.621
|
|
|
Unemploymentt−1
|
1.044*
|
1.034*
|
−0.501
|
1.286**
|
1.281**
|
−0.451
|
|
0.558
|
0.558
|
0.579
|
0.607
|
0.606
|
0.616
|
|
|
Inflation
|
−0.034***
|
−0.032***
|
−0.046***
|
−0.0488***
|
−0.045***
|
−0.055***
|
|
0.010
|
0.011
|
0.009
|
0.012
|
0.012
|
0.012
|
|
|
Inflationt−1
|
0.021***
|
0.022***
|
0.021***
|
0.021***
|
0.021***
|
0.020***
|
|
0.003
|
0.003
|
0.006
|
0.003
|
0.003
|
0.006
|
|
|
Growth
|
0.369
|
0.475
|
0.808**
|
0.252
|
0.422
|
0.769**
|
|
0.307
|
0.295
|
0.325
|
0.306
|
0.292
|
0.333
|
|
|
Growtht−1
|
−0.024
|
−0.054
|
−0.085
|
−0.072
|
−0.165
|
−0.186
|
|
0.323
|
0.319
|
0.307
|
0.329
|
0.318
|
0.317
|
|
|
Trade
|
−39.74**
|
−38.85**
|
−24.410
|
−40.89**
|
−38.99**
|
−23.410
|
|
15.780
|
15.580
|
17.310
|
15.890
|
15.620
|
17.630
|
|
|
Tradet−1
|
40.19***
|
39.86***
|
36.33**
|
41.79***
|
39.71**
|
34.48**
|
|
15.130
|
15.000
|
17.050
|
15.460
|
15.270
|
17.410
|
|
|
Polity
|
1.578*
|
1.319*
|
0.224
|
1.723**
|
1.367*
|
0.399
|
|
0.840
|
0.762
|
1.210
|
0.842
|
0.756
|
1.241
|
|
|
Polityt−1
|
−1.774**
|
−1.540*
|
1.162
|
−1.931**
|
−1.603**
|
1.077
|
|
0.857
|
0.786
|
1.134
|
0.859
|
0.779
|
1.163
|
|
|
Scandal × Unemployment
|
−0.096
|
0.083
|
−0.198
|
0.040
|
||
|
0.286
|
0.233
|
0.298
|
0.247
|
|||
|
Scandalt−1 × Unemploymentt−1
|
−0.719***
|
−0.701***
|
−0.826***
|
−0.789***
|
||
|
0.179
|
0.224
|
0.171
|
0.235
|
|||
|
Scandal × Inflation
|
−0.0469*
|
−0.038
|
−0.347***
|
−0.231
|
||
|
0.027
|
0.038
|
0.087
|
0.148
|
|||
|
Scandalt−1 × Inflationt−1
|
−0.029
|
−0.034
|
−0.213
|
−0.197
|
||
|
0.024
|
0.036
|
0.131
|
0.144
|
|||
|
Scandal × Growth
|
−1.531
|
−1.168
|
−0.925
|
−0.794
|
||
|
1.169
|
1.121
|
0.967
|
1.208
|
|||
|
Scandalt−1 × Growtht−1
|
0.363
|
1.216
|
0.479
|
1.277
|
||
|
0.666
|
1.013
|
0.748
|
1.072
|
|||
|
Honeymoon
|
0.680
|
0.764
|
2.948***
|
0.784
|
0.882
|
3.154***
|
|
1.417
|
1.414
|
0.746
|
1.522
|
1.524
|
0.778
|
|
|
Constant
|
5.427***
|
5.153**
|
3.745
|
5.461**
|
5.318**
|
4.121
|
|
2.025
|
2.039
|
7.759
|
2.125
|
2.162
|
8.120
|
|
|
Observations
|
1,019
|
1,019
|
1,019
|
933
|
933
|
933
|
|
R2
|
0.85
|
0.86
|
0.64
|
0.85
|
0.86
|
0.63
|