Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Urban Ecosystems
Published in: Urban Ecosystems 2/2022

23-10-2021

Estimating carbon storage in urban forests of New York City

Authors: Clara C. Pregitzer, Chloe Hanna, Sarah Charlop-Powers, Mark A. Bradford

Published in: Urban Ecosystems | Issue 2/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Forests play an important role in mitigating many of the negative effects of climate change. One of the ways trees mitigate impacts of climate change is by absorbing carbon dioxide and storing carbon in their wood, leaves, roots, and soil. Field assessments are used to quantify the carbon storage across different forested landscapes. The number of trees, their size, and total area inform estimates of how much carbon they store. Urban forested natural areas often have greater tree density compared to trees planted in designed cityscapes suggesting that natural area forests could be an important carbon stock for cities. We report a carbon budget for urban forested natural area using field-collected data across an entire city and model carbon stock and annual stock change in multiple forest pools. We find that natural area forests in New York City store a mean of 263.04 (95% CI 256.61, 270.40) Mg C ha-1 and we estimate that 1.86 Tg C (95% CI 1.60, 2.13 Tg C) is stored in the city’s forested natural areas. We provide an upper estimate that these forests sequester carbon at a mean rate of 7.42 (95% CI 7.13, 7.71) Mg C ha-1 y-1 totaling 0.044 Tg (95% CI 0.028, 0.055) of carbon annually, with the majority being stored in trees and soil. Urban forested natural areas store carbon at similar and in some cases higher rates compared to rural forests. Native oak-dominated forests with large mature trees store the most carbon. When compared to previous estimates of urban-canopy carbon storage, we find that trees in natural area forests in New York City account for the majority of carbon stored despite being a minority of the tree canopy. Our results show that urban forested natural areas play an important role in localized, natural climate solutions and should be at the center of urban greening policies looking to mitigate the climate footprint of cities.
previous article Avian species richness in cities: A review of the Spanish-language literature from the Southern Cone of South America
next article High species turnover shapes anuran community composition in ponds along an urban-rural gradient

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
Al-Shammary AAG, Kouzani AZ, Kaynak A, Khoo SY, Norton M, Gates W (2018) Soil bulk density estimation methods: A review. Pedosphere 28(4):581–596CrossRef
Ashworth J, Keyes D, Kirk R, Lessard R (2001) Standard procedure in the hydrometer method for particle size analysis. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 32(5–6):633–642CrossRef
Berland A, Shiflett SA, Shuster WD, Garmestani AS, Goddard HC, Herrmann DL, Hopton ME (2017) The role of trees in urban stormwater management. Landsc Urban Plan 162:167–177CrossRef
Bragg DC (2001) Potential relative increment (PRI): A new method to empirically derive optimal tree diameter growth. Ecol Model 137(1):77–92CrossRef
Bragg DC (2005) Optimal tree increment models for the northeastern United States. In Proceedings of the fifth annual forest inventory and analysis symposium; 2003 November 18-20; New Orleans, LA. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-69. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service. 222p. (Vol. 69)
Cambou A, Shaw RK, Huot H, Vidal-Beaudet L, Hunault G, Cannavo P, Nold F, Schwartz C (2018) Estimation of soil organic carbon stocks of two cities, New York City and Paris. Sci Total Environ 644:452–464CrossRef
Campbell JL, Green MB, Yanai RD, Woodall CW, Fraver S, Harmon ME, Domke GM (2019) Estimating uncertainty in the volume and carbon storage of downed coarse woody debris. Ecol Appl 29(2):e01844
Carreiro MM, Pouyat RV, Tripler CE, Zhu WX (2009) Carbon and nitrogen cycling in soils of remnant forests along urban–rural gradients: case studies in the New York metropolitan area and Louisville, Kentucky. Ecology of cities and towns: A comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, New York 308–328
Chojnacky DC, Milton M (2008) Measuring carbon in shrubs. In Field measurements for forest carbon monitoring (pp. 45–72). Springer, Dordrecht
Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Jenkins JC (2013) Updated generalized biomass equations for North American tree species. Forestry 87(1):129–151CrossRef
Crowther TW, Glick HB, Covey KR, Bettigole C, Maynard DS, Thomas SM, Smith JR, Hintler G, Duguid MC, Amatulli G, Tuanmu MN (2015) Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525(7568):201–205CrossRef
Davis AA, Compton JE, Stolt MH (2010) Soil respiration and ecosystem carbon stocks in New England forests with varying soil drainage. Northeast Nat 17(3):437–455CrossRef
De Vos B, Vandecasteele B, Deckers J, Muys B (2005) Capability of loss-on-ignition as a predictor of total organic carbon in non-calcareous forest soils. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36(19–20):2899–2921CrossRef
Domke GM, Woodall CW, Smith JE (2011) Accounting for density reduction and structural loss in standing dead trees: Implications for forest biomass and carbon stock estimates in the United States. Carbon Balance Manag 6(1):1–11CrossRef
Domke GM, Perry CH, Walters BF, Woodall CW, Russell MB, Smith JE (2016) Estimating litter carbon stocks on forest land in the United States. Science of the Total Environment 557:469–478CrossRef
Environmental Protection Agency (2017) Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990–2015
Fahey TJ, Tierney GL, Fitzhugh RD, Wilson GF, Siccama TG (2005) Soil respiration and soil carbon balance in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Can J For Res 35(2):244–253CrossRef
Finér L, Ohashi M, Noguchi K, Hirano Y (2011) Fine root production and turnover in forest ecosystems in relation to stand and environmental characteristics. For Ecol Manag 262(11):2008–2023CrossRef
Fargione JE, Bassett S, Boucher T, Bridgham SD, Conant RT, Cook-Patton SC, Ellis PW, Falcucci A, Fourqurean JW, Gopalakrishna T, Gu H (2018) Natural climate solutions for the United States. Sci Adv 4(11):p.eaat1869
Fraver S, Ringvall A, Jonsson BG (2007) Refining volume estimates of down woody debris. Can J For Res 37(3):627–633CrossRef
Fraver S, Milo AM, Bradford JB, D’Amato AW, Kenefic L, Palik BJ, Woodall C, Brissette J (2013) Woody debris volume depletion through decay: implications for biomass and carbon accounting. Ecosystems 16(7):1262–1272CrossRef
Gaudinski JB, Trumbore SE, Davidson EA, Zheng S (2000) Soil carbon cycling in a temperate forest: radiocarbon-based estimates of residence times, sequestration rates and partitioning of fluxes. Biogeochemistry 51(1):33–69CrossRef
Giasson MA, Ellison AM, Bowden RD, Crill PM, Davidson EA, Drake JE, Munger JW (2013) Soil respiration in a northeastern US temperate forest: A 22-year synthesis. Ecosphere 4(11):1–28CrossRef
Gregg JW, Jones CG, Dawson TE (2003) Urbanization effects on tree growth in the vicinity of New York City. Nature 424(6945):183CrossRef
Hanson PJ, O’Neill EG, Chambers MLS, Riggs JS, Joslin JD, Wolfe MH (2003) Soil respiration and litter decomposition. In: North American temperate deciduous forest responses to changing precipitation regimes. Springer, New York, NY, pp 163–189
Hardy CC (1996) Guidelines for estimating volume, biomass, and smoke production for piled slash (Vol. 364). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
Harmon ME, Woodall CW, Fasth B, Sexton J (2008) Woody detritus density and density reduction factors for tree species in the United States: A synthesis. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-29. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 84:29
Harmon ME, Woodall CW, Fasth B, Sexton J, Yatkov M (2011) Differences between standing and downed dead tree wood density reduction factors: A comparison across decay classes and tree species. Res. Pap. NRS-15. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station 40:15:1-40
Hutyra LR, Yoon B, Alberti M (2011) Terrestrial carbon stocks across a gradient of urbanization: A study of the Seattle, WA region. Glob Change Biol 17(2):783–797CrossRef
Jenkins JC, Chojnacky DC, Heath LS, Birdsey RA (2003) National-scale biomass estimators for United States tree species. For Sci 49(1):12–35
Jo HK (2002) Impacts of urban greenspace on offsetting carbon emissions for middle Korea. J Environ Manag 64(2):115–126CrossRef
Johnson KD, Domke GM, Russell MB, Walters B, Hom J, Peduzzi A, Birdsey R, Dolan K, Huang W (2017) Estimating aboveground live understory vegetation carbon in the United States. Environ Res Lett 12(12):125010
Jomura M, Kominami Y, Tamai K, Miyama T, Goto Y, Dannoura M, Kanazawa Y (2007) The carbon budget of coarse woody debris in a temperate broad-leaved secondary forest in Japan. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol 59(2):211–222CrossRef
Joslin JD, Gaudinski JB, Torn MS, Riley WJ, Hanson PJ (2006) Fine-root turnover patterns and their relationship to root diameter and soil depth in a 14C-labeled hardwood forest. New Phytol 172(3):523–535CrossRef
Kabisch N, Frantzeskaki N, Pauleit S, Naumann S, Davis M, Artmann M, Haase D, Knapp S, Korn H, Stadler J, Zaunberger K (2016) Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action. Ecol Soc 21(2)
Liu WH, Bryant DM, Hutyra LR, Saleska SR, Hammond-Pyle E, Curran D, Wofsy SC (2006) Woody debris contribution to the carbon budget of selectively logged and maturing mid-latitude forests. Oecologia 148(1):108CrossRef
Martin AR, Doraisami M, Thomas SC (2018) Global patterns in wood carbon concentration across the world’s trees and forests. Nat Geosci 11(12):915–920CrossRef
Matthews ER, Schmit JP, Campbell JP (2016) Climbing vines and forest edges affect tree growth and mortality in temperate forests of the U.S. Mid-Atlantic States. Forest Ecology and Management 374:166–173CrossRef
Melaas EK, Wang JA, Miller DL, Friedl MA (2016) Interactions between urban vegetation and surface urban heat islands: A case study in the Boston metropolitan region. Environ Res Lett 11(5):054020
Nelson DW, Sommers LE (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Methods Soil Anal Part 3 Chem Methods 5:961–1010
Nowak DJ, Bodine AR, Hoehn RE, Ellis A, Hirabayashi S, Coville R, Endreny T (2018) The urban forest of New York City. Resource Bulletin NRS-117. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 82 p, 117, 1–82
Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut 116(3):381–389CrossRef
Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC, Hoehn RE, Walton JT, Bond J (2008) A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Aboric Urban For 34(6):347–358
Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ, Hoehn RE, Lapoint E (2013) Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States. Environ Pollut 178:229–236CrossRef
O'Neil-Dunne JPM, MacFaden SW, Forgione HM, Lu JWT (2014) Urban ecological land-cover mapping for New York City. Final report to the Natural Areas Conservancy. Spatial Informatics Group, University of Vermont, Natural Areas Conservancy, and New York City Department of Parks & Recreation 22
Pregitzer CC, Charlop‐Powers S, Bibbo S, Forgione HM, Gunther B, Hallett RA, Bradford MA (2019a) A city‐scale assessment reveals that native forest types and overstory species dominate New York City forests. Ecol Appl 29(1):p.e01819
Pregitzer CC, Ashton MS, Charlop-Powers S, D'Amato A, Frey BR, Gunther B, Hallett RA, Pregitzer KS, Woodall CW, Bradford MA (2019b) Defining and assessing urban forests to inform management and policy. Environ Res Lett 14(8):085002
Pregitzer CC, Charlop-Powers S, Bradford MA (2021) Natural Area Forests in US Cities: Opportunities and Challenges. J For 119(2):141-151
Pribyl DW (2010) A critical review of the conventional SOC to SOM conversion factor. Geoderma 156(3–4):75–83CrossRef
Pouyat R, Groffman P, Yesilonis I, Hernandez L (2002) Soil carbon pools and fluxes in urban ecosystems. Environ Pollut 116:S107–S118CrossRef
Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, Hammer SA, Mehrotra S (2010) Cities lead the way in climate–change action. Nature 467(7318):909–911CrossRef
Russell MB, D'Amato AW, Schulz BK, Woodall CW, Domke GM, Bradford JB (2014) Quantifying understorey vegetation in the US Lake States: A proposed framework to inform regional forest carbon stocks. For Int J For Res 87(5):629–638
Schmid AV, Vogel CS, Liebman E, Curtis PS, Gough CM (2016) Coarse woody debris and the carbon balance of a moderately disturbed forest. For Ecol Manag 361:38–45CrossRef
Steenberg JW, Duinker PN, Nitoslawski SA (2019) Ecosystem-based management revisited: Updating the concepts for urban forests. Landsc Urban Plan 186:24–35CrossRef
Smith JE, Heath LS, Hoover CM (2013) Carbon factors and models for forest carbon estimates for the 2005–2011 National Greenhouse Gas Inventories of the United States. For Ecol Manag 307:7–19CrossRef
Smith JE, Domke GM, Nichols MC, Walters BF (2019) Carbon stocks and stock change on federal forest lands of the United States. Ecosphere 10(3):e02637
United Nations (UN) Population Division (2018) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision
Ward EB, Pregitzer CC, Kuebbing SE, Bradford MA (2020) Invasive lianas are drivers of and passengers to altered soil nutrient availability in urban forests. Biological Invasions 22(3):935–955CrossRef
Woodall CW, Monleon VJ (2008) Sampling protocol, estimation, and analysis procedures for the down woody materials indicator of the FIA program. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-22. Newtown Square, PA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station 68:22
Woodall CW, Heath LS, Domke GM, Nichols MC (2011) Methods and equations for estimating aboveground volume, biomass, and carbon for trees in the US forest inventory 2010
Woodall CW, Walters BF, Oswalt SN, Domke GM, Toney C, Gray AN (2013) Biomass and carbon attributes of downed woody materials in forests of the United States. For Ecol Manag 305:48–59CrossRef
Woodbury PB, Smith JE, Heath LS (2007) Carbon sequestration in the US forest sector from 1990 to 2010. For Ecol Manag 241(1–3):14–27CrossRef
Yanai RD, Park BB, Hamburg SP (2006) The vertical and horizontal distribution of roots in northern hardwood stands of varying age. Can J For Res 36(2):450–459CrossRef
Zipperer WC, Sisinni SM, Pouyat RV, Foresman TW (1997) Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective. Urban Ecosyst 1(4):229–246CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Estimating carbon storage in urban forests of New York City
Authors
Clara C. Pregitzer
Chloe Hanna
Sarah Charlop-Powers
Mark A. Bradford
Publication date
23-10-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Urban Ecosystems / Issue 2/2022
Print ISSN: 1083-8155
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1642
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-021-01173-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2022

Urban Ecosystems 2/2022 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Study on the ecosystem services of urban forests: implications for climate change mitigation in the case of Adama City of Oromiya Regional Sate, Ethiopia

OriginalPaper

The impact of different tree planting strategies on ecosystem services and disservices in the piazzas of a northern Italian city

OriginalPaper

Response to commentary on “cues to care: future directions for ecological landscapes”

OriginalPaper

Ecological performance evaluation of urban agriculture in Beijing based on temperature and fractional vegetation cover

OriginalPaper

Assessment of dispersal and population structure of Norway rats (Rattus norvegicus) in a seaport setting

OriginalPaper

A multi-scale, multi-species approach highlights the importance of urban greenspace and pond design for amphibian communities