Top

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Published in:

04-07-2020 | Research Article-Civil Engineering

Evaluation of Supplementary Constraints on Dispersion of EDPs Using Real Ground Motion Record Sets

Authors: Ahmet Demir, Mehmet Palanci, Ali Haydar Kayhan

Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering | Issue 10/2020

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Nonlinear dynamic analysis is the most advanced structural analysis method, and it has become very widespread method to determine structural responses for seismic design or assessment. On the other hand, structural responses strongly rely on the selection of earthquake records for nonlinear dynamic analysis. In this study, several earthquake record selection strategies which impose different compatibility levels between the spectral shape of earthquake records and target spectrum are introduced. Eurocode-8 procedure is considered as reference record selection strategy. Four main engineering demand parameters (EDPs): maximum floor acceleration, global drift ratio, inter-story drift ratio and residual global drift ratio, are used to investigate the superiority of presented strategies. Nonlinear dynamic analyses of three representative low- and mid-rise RC frames are carried out to obtain the EDPs. The central tendency and dispersion of the EDPs are utilized to investigate efficiency of the strategies. Results indicated that the EDPs are correlated with dispersion of spectral accelerations. Numerical evaluations have also highlighted that the presented strategies are capable of providing consistent mean structural responses. It is thought that the presented strategies can be used to select real earthquake records for nonlinear dynamic analysis of structures.

previous article Investigating Transport Properties of Low-Binder Ultrahigh-Performance Concretes: Binary and Ternary Blends of Nanosilica, Microsilica and Cement

next article The Effects of Shear Stud Distribution on the Fatigue Behavior of Steel–Concrete Composite Beams

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

ASCE 41-17: Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston (2017)

Priestley, M.J.N.; Calvi, G.M.; Kowalsky, M.J.: Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures. IUSS Press, Pavia (2007)

EUROCODE-8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. EN1998-1-2004, European Committee for Standardization. Brussels (2004)

TBEC: Turkish Building Earthquake Code. Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency. Ankara (2018)

ASCE 07-16: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston (2016)

GB: Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing (2010)

Araújo, M.; Macedo, L.; Marques, M.; Castro, J.M.: Code-based record selection methods for seismic performance assessment of buildings. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 45, 129–148 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2620CrossRef

Macedo, L.; Castro, J.M.: SelEQ: an advanced ground motion record selection and scaling framework. Adv. Eng. Softw. 114, 1–16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2017.05.005CrossRef

Kayhan, A.H.; Demir, A.; Palanci, M.: Statistical evaluation of maximum displacement demands of SDOF systems by code-compatible nonlinear time history analysis. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 115, 513–530 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.09.008CrossRef

10.

Katsanos, E.I.; Sextos, A.G.: ISSARS: an integrated software environment for structure-specific earthquake ground motion selection. Adv. Eng. Softw. 58, 70–85 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.01.003CrossRef

11.

Han, S.W.; Seok, S.W.: Efficient procedure for selecting and scaling ground motions for response history analysis. J. Struct. Eng. 140(1), 1–6 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000881CrossRef

12.

Palanci, M.; Kayhan, A.H.; Demir, A.: A statistical assessment on global drift ratio demands of mid-rise RC buildings using code-compatible real ground motion records. Bull. Earthq. Eng. 16(11), 5453–5488 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0384-yCrossRef

13.

Shome, N.; Cornell, A.C.; Bazzurro, P.; Carballo, J.E.: Earthquakes, records and nonlinear responses. Earthq. Spectra 14(3), 469–500 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586011CrossRef

14.

Katsanos, I.E.; Sextos, G.A.; Manolis, D.G.: Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art-review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 30(4), 157–169 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.10.005CrossRef

15.

Bommer, J.J.; Acevedo, A.B.: The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. J. Earthq. Eng. 8(1), 43–91 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350521CrossRef

16.

Beyer, K.; Bommer, J.J.: Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bidirectional loading: a review of current practice and code provisions. J. Earthq. Eng. 11(1), 13–45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701280013CrossRef

17.

Baker, J.W.: Conditional mean spectrum: tool for ground-motion selection. J. Struct. Eng. 137(3), 322–331 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000215CrossRef

18.

FEMA-368: NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington (2001)

19.

Kayhan, A.H.; Korkmaz, K.A.; Irfanoglu, A.: Selecting and scaling real ground motion records using harmony search algorithm. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 31(7), 941–953 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.009CrossRef

20.

Kayhan, A.H.: Scaled and unscaled ground motion sets for uni-directional and bi-directional dynamic analysis. Earthq. Struct. 10(3), 563–588 (2016). https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.3.563CrossRef

21.

Sextos, A.G.; Katsanos, E.I.; Manolis, G.D.: EC8-based earthquake record selection procedure evaluation: validation study based on observed damage of an irregular R/C building. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 31(4), 583–597 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.10.009CrossRef

22.

Reyes, J.C.; Kalkan, E.: How many records should be used in an ASCE/SEI-7 ground motion scaling procedure. Earthq. Spectra 28(3), 1223–1242 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000066CrossRef

23.

Kayhan, A.H.; Demir, A.: Statistical evaluation of drift demands of RC frames using code-compatible real ground motion record sets. Struct. Eng. Mech. 60(6), 953–977 (2016). https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.60.6.953CrossRef

24.

Hancock, J.; Bommer, J.J.; Stafford, P.J.: Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 37(14), 1585–1607 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.827CrossRef

25.

Mergos, P.E.; Sextos, A.G.: Selection of earthquake ground motions for multiple objectives using genetic algorithms. Eng. Struct. 187, 414–427 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.067CrossRef

26.

Akkar, S.; Sucuoglu, H.; Yakut, A.: Displacement-Based fragility functions for low-and mid-rise ordinary concrete buildings. Earthq. Spectra 24(4), 901–927 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2084232CrossRef

27.

Bessason, B.; Bjarnason, J.Ö.: Seismic vulnerability of low-rise residential buildings based on damage data from three earthquakes (M_w 6.5, 6.5 and 6.3). Eng. Struct. 111, 64–79 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.12.008CrossRef

28.

SAP2000: Integrated Solution for Structural Analysis and Design. Computers and Structures. Berkeley (2009)

29.

Ersoy, U.; Ozcebe, G.: Reinforced Concrete. Evrim Yayınevi, Istanbul (2004)

30.

Park, R.; Priestley, M.J.N.; Gill, W.D.: Ductility of square-confined concrete columns. J. Struct. Div. 108(4), 929–950 (1982)

31.

Mander, J.B.: Seismic design of bridge piers, research report 84-2. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch (1984)

32.

Palanci, M.; Kalkan, A.; Senel, S.M.: Investigation of shear effects on the capacity and demand estimation of RC buildings. Struct. Eng. Mech. 60(6), 1021–1038 (2016). https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.60.6.1021CrossRef

33.

ACI 318: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318R-08) MI. ACI, Farmington Hills (2008)

34.

Iervolino, I.; Maddaloni, G.; Cosenza, E.: Eurocode-8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures. J. Earthq. Eng. 12(1), 54–90 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460701457173CrossRef

35.

Ambraseys, N.N.; Douglas, J.; Rinaldis, D.; Berge, C.T.; Suhadolc, P.; Costa, G.; Sigbjornsson, R.; Smit, P.: Dissemination of European strong-motion data, vol. 2. CD-ROM Collection. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Swindon (2004)

36.

Ancheta, T.D.; Darragh, R.B.; Stewart, J.P.; Seyhan, E.; Silva, W.J.; Chiou, B.S.-J.; Wooddell, K.E.; Graves, R.W.; Kottke, A.R.; Boore, D.M.; Kishida, T.; Donahue, J.L.: NGA-West2 database. Earthq. Spectra 30, 989–1005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1193/070913EQS197MCrossRef

37.

Geem, Z.W.; Kim, J.H.; Loganathan, G.V.: A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 76(2), 60–68 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/003754970107600201CrossRef

38.

Du, W.; Ning, C.L.; Wang, G.: The effect of amplitude scaling limits on conditional spectrum-based ground motion selection. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3173CrossRef

39.

García, R.J.; Guerrero, H.: Prediction of residual displacement ratios for simple structures built on soft-soil sites of Mexico City. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 126, 105809 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105809CrossRef

Title: Evaluation of Supplementary Constraints on Dispersion of EDPs Using Real Ground Motion Record Sets
Authors: Ahmet Demir
Mehmet Palanci
Ali Haydar Kayhan
Publication date: 04-07-2020
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in: Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 2193-567X
Electronic ISSN: 2191-4281
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-020-04719-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

Comparative Evaluation of Waste Cooking Oil and Waste Engine Oil Rejuvenated Asphalt Concrete Mixtures

Investigating the Efficiency and Safety of Signalized Intersections Under Mixed Flow Conditions of Autonomous and Human-Driven Vehicles

The Effects of Shear Stud Distribution on the Fatigue Behavior of Steel–Concrete Composite Beams

Extraction of Vehicle Turning Trajectories at Signalized Intersections Using Convolutional Neural Networks

Analysis of Virgin Asphalt Brands via the Integrated Application of FTIR and Gel Permeation Chromatography

An Improved Methodology for the Prediction of the Stress at Ultimate in Unbonded Internal and External Steel Tendons

Premium Partners