Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Quality & Quantity 3/2014

01-05-2014

Evaluation of sustainability reporting practices in Poland

Author: Patrycja Hąbek

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 3/2014

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper examines voluntary sustainability reporting practices in Poland. The number of these types of reports published by companies from year to year increases however the form, content and quality of these reports varies. Disclosure of economic, social and environmental performance demonstrates social responsibility of a company and therefore, the author first has analysed in this paper the level of implementation of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) concept in Polish companies. Then the attention was focused on sustainability reports published in 2011. The questionnaire to evaluate the quality and type of the disclosed information in sustainability reports consisted of twenty three criteria grouped in five categories. The author discusses the overall results as well as results obtained in the particular categories. The analyses indicate that sustainability reporting is not widespread among companies in Poland. On the other hand, increasing demands/expectations from stakeholders in this direction are not observed. In 2011, 32 reports were published, 6 of them have been audited by independent organizations and 19 have been developed in accordance with the GRI guidelines (Global reporting initiative sustainability reporting guidelines). Corporate social responsibility in Poland is a relatively new concept and although all events suggestive of the development of this concept, it is still little known and rarely implemented among entrepreneurs. The results of the study indicate that sustainability reporting practices in Poland, despite a few good examples and valuable disclosures, are at its early stage of development.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Buhr, N.: Histories of and rationales for sustainability reporting. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., O’Dwyer, B. (eds.) Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, pp. 57–69. Routledge, Abingdon (2007) Buhr, N.: Histories of and rationales for sustainability reporting. In: Unerman, J., Bebbington, J., O’Dwyer, B. (eds.) Sustainability Accounting and Accountability, pp. 57–69. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)
go back to reference Chen, S., Bouvain, P.: Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. J. Bus. Ethics 87, 299–317 (2009)CrossRef Chen, S., Bouvain, P.: Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. J. Bus. Ethics 87, 299–317 (2009)CrossRef
go back to reference Davis-Walling, P., Batterman, S.A.: Environmental reporting by the Fortune 50 firms. Environ. Manag. 21(6), 865–875 (1997)CrossRef Davis-Walling, P., Batterman, S.A.: Environmental reporting by the Fortune 50 firms. Environ. Manag. 21(6), 865–875 (1997)CrossRef
go back to reference Eccles, R.G., Krzus, M.P.: One Report. Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy. Wiley, New Jersey (2010) Eccles, R.G., Krzus, M.P.: One Report. Integrated Reporting for a Sustainable Strategy. Wiley, New Jersey (2010)
go back to reference Epstein, M.J.: Making Sustainability Work. Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield (2008) Epstein, M.J.: Making Sustainability Work. Best Practices in Managing and Measuring Corporate Social, Environmental, and Economic Impacts. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield (2008)
go back to reference Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, OJL 222, 14.8.1978 Fourth Council Directive 78/660/EEC of 25 July 1978 on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, OJL 222, 14.8.1978
go back to reference Gazdar, K.: Reporting Nonfinancials. Wiley, Chichester (2007) Gazdar, K.: Reporting Nonfinancials. Wiley, Chichester (2007)
go back to reference Hąbek, P., Szewczyk, P.: Społeczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstw a zarządzanie jakością. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice (2010) Hąbek, P., Szewczyk, P.: Społeczna odpowiedzialność przedsiębiorstw a zarządzanie jakością. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice (2010)
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P.: The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(January/February), 71–79 (1992) Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P.: The balanced scorecard—measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70(January/February), 71–79 (1992)
go back to reference Maignan, I., Ralston, D.A.: Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: insights from businesses’ self-representations. J. Int. Bus. Studi. 33(3), 497–514 (2002)CrossRef Maignan, I., Ralston, D.A.: Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: insights from businesses’ self-representations. J. Int. Bus. Studi. 33(3), 497–514 (2002)CrossRef
go back to reference Morhardt, J.E.: Scoring corporate environmental reports for comprehensiveness: a comparison of three systems. Environ. Manag. 26(6), 881–892 (2001)CrossRef Morhardt, J.E.: Scoring corporate environmental reports for comprehensiveness: a comparison of three systems. Environ. Manag. 26(6), 881–892 (2001)CrossRef
go back to reference Morhardt, J.E., Baird, S., Freeman, K.: Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 9, 215–233 (2002)CrossRef Morhardt, J.E., Baird, S., Freeman, K.: Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 9, 215–233 (2002)CrossRef
go back to reference Reynolds, M., Yuthas, K.: Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 78, 47–64 (2008)CrossRef Reynolds, M., Yuthas, K.: Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 78, 47–64 (2008)CrossRef
go back to reference Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R.: Corporate sustainability accounting a catchphrase for compliant corporations or a business decision support for sustainability leaders? In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R. (eds.) Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, pp. 37–59. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)CrossRef Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R.: Corporate sustainability accounting a catchphrase for compliant corporations or a business decision support for sustainability leaders? In: Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M., Burritt, R. (eds.) Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, pp. 37–59. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)CrossRef
go back to reference Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., Chua, W.F.: Assurance on sustainability reports: an international comparison. Account. Rev. 84(3), 937–967 (2009)CrossRef Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., Chua, W.F.: Assurance on sustainability reports: an international comparison. Account. Rev. 84(3), 937–967 (2009)CrossRef
go back to reference UNEP: Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w Polsce. Wstępna analiza. UNEP, Warszawa (2007) UNEP: Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu w Polsce. Wstępna analiza. UNEP, Warszawa (2007)
go back to reference Wolniak, R., Drzewowska, E.: Humanistyczne aspekty TQM na przykładzie angielskiej organizacji. Problemy Jakości 1/2009, 39–45 (2009) Wolniak, R., Drzewowska, E.: Humanistyczne aspekty TQM na przykładzie angielskiej organizacji. Problemy Jakości 1/2009, 39–45 (2009)
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of sustainability reporting practices in Poland
Author
Patrycja Hąbek
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Quality & Quantity / Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-013-9871-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Quality & Quantity 3/2014 Go to the issue

Premium Partner