Top

Quality & Quantity

Published in:

29-04-2015

Ex-post evaluation of scenarios: the case of nanotechnology societal impacts

Authors: Sepehr Ghazinoory, Fatemeh Saghafi, Sahar Kousari

Published in: Quality & Quantity | Issue 3/2016

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Scenario development is one of the popular methods of futures studies. There has been a lot of attention paid to different methods of scenario writing in theoretical literature; but what is important is to evaluate the scenarios which has not been a matter of comprehensive study heretofore. In this paper, we have carried out a comprehensive study in this regard. Accordingly, evaluation has been divided into three categories: ex-ante evaluation, mid-term evaluation and ex-post evaluation. Ex-ante evaluation is carried out when the scenario is generating; mid-term evaluation is carried out when the scenarios are transferring; and ex-post evaluation is being done after the transfer of scenarios. It should be noted that main purpose for ex-ante evaluation is considered “effectiveness”, for mid-term evaluation “relevance”, and for ex-post evaluation “the impact”. The outstanding part of this paper is the ex-post evaluation of scenarios for societal impact of nanotechnology, (which is carried out in accordance with a former paper) whose corresponding National Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative (NINI) time began approximately 10 years ago.

previous article Scientists’ spirituality in scientists’ words. Assessing and enriching the results of a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews by means of quantitative approaches

next article When are concepts comparable across minds?

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Scenario based assessment method.

National Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative.

Banuls, V.A., Salmeron, J.L.: A scenario: based assessmeny model: SBAM. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74, 750–762 (2007)CrossRef

Bishop, P., Hines, A., Collins, T.: The current states of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight 9(1), 5–25 (2007)CrossRef

Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., Van Der Heijden, K.: The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures 37, 795–812 (2006)CrossRef

CAFOD: Monitoring government policies, a toolkit for civil society organizations in Africa, Christian Aid and Trocaire. www.cafod.org.uk (2007)

Chen, K., Jarboe, K., Wolfe, J.: Long: range scenario construction for technology evaluation. Technol. Forcast. Soc. Change 20, 27–40 (1981)CrossRef

Clark, W.C., Ronald, B.M., David, W.C.: Evaluating the influence of global environmental assessments. In: Mitchell, R.B., Clark, W.C., Cash, D.W., Dickson, N.M. (eds.) Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

Chermack, T.J.: Assessing the quality of scenarios in scenario planning. Futures Res. Quart. 22(4), 23–35 (2006)

Chermack, T.J., van der Merwe, L., Lynham, S.A.: Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of strategic conversation quality. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74, 379–390 (2006)CrossRef

De schutter, B., Hoogendoorn, S.P., Schuurman, H., Stramigoili, S.: A multi: agent case based traffic control scenario evaluation system, Technical Report, CSEO2-18, Delft University of Technology, 2003

Garb, Y.S., Pulver, S., Vandeveer, S.D.: Scenarios in society in scenarios, toward a social scientific analysis of story line: driven environmental modeling. Environ. Res Lett. 3(4), 045015 (2008)CrossRef

Ghazinoory, S., Heydari, E.: Potential impact of nanotechnology development in Iran. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 27(4), 37–44 (2008)CrossRef

Ghazinoory, S., Tavasolizadeh, S.: Assessing NINI (National Iranian Nanotechnology Initiative) by BSC; & explaining the role of “Social Capital” as a missing link in NIS theory. J. Sci. Technol. Policy 1(4), 49–58 (2008)

Ghazinoory, S., Divsalar, A., Soofi, A.S.: A new definition and framework for the development of a national technology strategy: the case of nanotechnology for Iran. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 76(6), 835–848 (2009)CrossRef

Ghazinoory, S., Ghazinoori, S.: Introduction in science and technology and innovation policy, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, 2012 [in Farsi]

Goodwin, P., Wright, G.: Enhancing sterategy evaluation in scenario planning a role for decision analysis. J. Manag. Stud. 38(1), 1–16 (2001)CrossRef

Green, J., South, J.: Evaluations, Key Concepts for Public Health Practice, Open University press. First Published, 2006

Groves, D., Knopman, D., Lempert, R., Berry, S., Wainfan, L.: Presenting uncertainty about climate change to water Resource Manager, RAND corporation, TR-505-nsf, 2008

Huss, W.R., Honton, E.J.: Scenario planning: what style should you use? Long Range Plan. 20(4), 21–29 (1987)CrossRef

Hertin, J., Jacob, K., Volkery, A.: Policy appraisal. In: Jordan, A., Lenschow, A. (eds.) Innovation in Environmental Policy? Integrating the Environment for Sustainability, pp. 114–133. Edgar Elgar Publishing, Lokdon (2008)CrossRef

Klessmann, C.: The evaluation of flexibility mechanisms for achieving European renewable energy targets 2020: ex-ante evaluation of the principle mechanisms. Energy Policy 37(11), 4966–4979 (2009)CrossRef

Janssen, N., Ruijter, P., Grambeger, M.: Scenarios and dynamic policy, Ministry of Justice the Dutch Inspectorate for Health protection, 2002

Kemp-Benedict, E.: Narrative: led and indicator: driven scenario development a methodology for constructing scenarios, In: Maak, J.N. (eds.) Scenario Analysis. A Tool for Task Managers, version 1, 2006

Lempert, R.: Can scenarios help policymakers be both bold and careful? In: Fukuyama, F. (ed.) Blindside: How to Anticipate Forcing Events and Wild Cards in Global Politics. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC (2007)

Maack, J.N.: 5. Scenario analysis: A tool for task managers. Soc. Anal. Sel. Tools Tech, 2001

Meeting Carbon Budgets: The Need for a Step Change. Emissions Reduction Scenarios and Indicators, Committee on Climate Change, ch. 3, 2009

NERC: Scenario reliability evaluation. North American Electric Reliability Corporation, 2009

Oglivy, J., Smith, Erik: Mapping Public and Private Scenario Planning: Lessons from regional projects. Development 47(4), 62–72 (2004)

Parson, E.A., Burkett, V.R., Fisher-Vanden, K., Keith, D.W., Meams, L.O., Pitcher, H.M., Rosenzweig, C.E., Webster, M.D.: Global Change Scenarios: Their Development and Use. Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1B of the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Department of Energy, office of Biological & Environmental Research, Washigton (2007a)

Parson, E.A., Burkett, V.R., Fisher-Vanden, K., Keith, D.W., Mearns, L.O., Pitcher, H.M., Rosenzzweig, C.E., Webster, M.D.: “Global-change Scenarios: Their Development and Use.” Sub-report 2.1B of Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1 by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Department of Energy, Office of Biological & Environmental Research, Washington (2007b)

Report on Academic Rank in Nanotechnology, Nanotechnology Magazine, 7(180), 2012 [in farsi]

Report on the European Commission’s Public Online Consultation towards a Strategic Nanotechnology Action Plan (SNAP), 2010

Report on Cientifica Institute, Nanotechnology Funding Landscape has Changed Dramatically, 2009

Report on BCC Institute, Nanotechnology: a Realistic Market Assessment, 2010

Ronteltap, A., Fischer, A.R.H., Tobi, H.: Societal response to nanotechnology: converging technologies converging societal response research? J. Nanopart. Res. 13(10), 4399–4410 (2011)CrossRef

Schaper-Rinkel, P.: The role of future: oriented technology analysis in governance of emerging technologies the example of nanotechnology, technological for casting and social change, TFS-17654, 2012

Schoemaker, P.J.H.: Multiple scenario development: its conceptual and behavioral foundation. Strateg. Manag. J. 14, 193–213 (1993)CrossRef

Scottish Government, National Planning Frame work 2 SEA Annex to the environmental report. Evaluation of Strategic Alternatives, Edinburgh, 2008

Starton, A., Jackson, S., Marinoni, O., Proctor W., Woodward, E., CSIRO: evaluating scenarios for Harward catchment summery repot for workshop participants and stakeholders, 2008

Sullivan, K.: Global Biodiversity Indicators. Scenario modeling for ficheries Policy, A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of science and the Diploma of Imprical college London, 2010

United States Commission on National Security in the 21st Century, New World Coming: American Security in the 21st Century, Study Addendum, 1999

Yemen scenarios and indicators, middle East and North Africa Programme. Yemen Forum workshop, CHATAM House, 2012

van Asselt, M.B.A.: Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk: The Prima Approach to Decision Support. Springer, New York (2000)CrossRef

Van ‘t Klooster, S.A., van Asselt, M.B.A.: Practicing the scenario-axis technique. Futures 38, 15–30 (2006)CrossRef

Van Notten, P.W.F., Rotmans, J., van Asselt, M.B.A., Rothman, D.S.: “An updated scenario typology”. Futures 35, 423–443 (2003)CrossRef

Volkey, A., Ribeiro, T.: Scenario planning in public policy understanding us, impact and the role of institutional context factors. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 76, 1198–1207 (2009)CrossRef

Title: Ex-post evaluation of scenarios: the case of nanotechnology societal impacts
Authors: Sepehr Ghazinoory
Fatemeh Saghafi
Sahar Kousari
Publication date: 29-04-2015
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Quality & Quantity / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0033-5177
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7845
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-015-0209-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

How to measure institutional diversity in higher education using revenue data

Corruption and inequality of wealth amongst the very rich

Cognitive interviewing as tool for enhancing the accuracy of the interpretation of quantitative findings

Integrating quality into quantity: survey research in the era of mixed methods

When are concepts comparable across minds?

Research participant selection in non-English language questionnaire pretesting: findings from Chinese and Korean cognitive interviews

Premium Partner