Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Education and Information Technologies
Published in: Education and Information Technologies 2/2021

01-09-2020

Examining PRESERVICE teachers’ use of SMARTBOARD and pc tablets in lessons

Authors: Murat Yalman, Bulent Basaran

Published in: Education and Information Technologies | Issue 2/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Transfer of knowledge to future generations has always been performed by people since existence of early humans. Today, with the developments in technology, education is presented in several ways and through a wide variety of tools such as two- or three-dimensional learning contents, animations, video conference lessons and interactive applications. Parallel to these developments, smartboards, tablets, virtual laboratories and cooperative learning environments have resulted in more innovative solutions in teacher training and changed the way of teaching. Education given with this type of technological tools helps make learning more permanent. The quality of education given with technological tools is determined by students’ approach to and knowledge about these tools. In the present study, the purpose was to reveal preservice teachers’ views about the use of smartboards in classes. The study was carried out with 124 preservice teachers attending different departments at Education Faculty of a state university in the Southeast of Turkey in the Fall Term of the academic year of 2016–2017. The results obtained in the study demonstrated that there were significant differences between the preservice teachers’ views about the audio-visual use of tablet computers and smartboards in classes with respect to their departments. Analysis of the research data also revealed that use of tablet computers in classes did not decrease motivation based on gender.
previous article The impact of a technological intervention program on learning mathematical skills
next article Behind the scenes of educational data mining

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Literature
Akar, H. (2020). The effect of smart board use on academic achievement: A meta-analytical and thematic study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(3), 261–273.
Aldhafiri, M, D. (2020). The effectiveness of using interactive white boards in improving the Arabic listening skills of undergraduates majoring in Arabic language at Kuwaiti universities. Education and Information Technologies, 1–15.
Amelink, C. T., Scales, G., & Tront, J. G. (2012). Student use of the tablet PC: Impact on student learning behaviors. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(1), n1.
Anderson, R., Anderson, R., Simon, B., Wolfman, S, A., VanDeGrift, T., & Yasuhara, K. (2004, March). Experiences with a tablet PC based lecture presentation system in computer science courses. In Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 56-60).
Anderson, J. E., Schwager, P. H., & Kerns, R. L. (2006). The drivers for acceptance of tablet PCs by faculty in a college of business. Journal of Information Systems Education, 17(4), 429.
Armstrong, D. A. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online learning and instructional tools: A qualitative study of undergraduate students use of online tools. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology - TOJET, 10(3), 222–226.
Batdi, V. (2017). Smart board and academic achievement in terms of the process of integrating technology into instruction: A study on the McA. Croatian Journal of Education: Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje, 19(3), 763–801.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The qualitative report, 13(4), 544–559.
Beeland Jr, W, D. (2002). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can interactive whiteboards help?.
Benoit, A. (2018). Investigating the impact of interactive whiteboards in higher education: A case study. Journal of Learning Spaces, 7(1), 76–90.
Blau, I. (2011). Being a smart teacher in a “smart classroom”: Assessing teacher professional development for incorporating interactive White boards at schools. Learning in the Technological Era, 63–74.
Bonastre, O, M., Benavent, A, P., & Belmonte, F, N. (2006, October). Pedagogical use of tablet pc for active and collaborative learning. In International Professional Communication Conference, 2006 IEEE (pp. 214-218). IEEE.
Brophy, S, P., & Walker, G. (2005, June). Case study of the pedagogical impact of tablet PCs as a presentation medium in large-scale engineering classrooms. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.
Brown, C., & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the ‘digital native’: Beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357–369.
Bürg, O., & Mandl, H. (2004). Akzeptanz von E-Learning in Unternehmen (Forschungsbericht Nr. 167). München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Department Psychologie, Institut für Pädagogische Psychologie.
Cabus, S. J., Haelermans, C., & Franken, S. (2017). SMART in mathematics? Exploring the effects of in-class-level differentiation using SMARTboard on math proficiency. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 145–161.
Carbonara, N. (2005). Information and communication technology and geographical clusters: opportunities and spread. Technovation, 25(3), 213–222.
Casas, I., Ochoa, S, F., & Puente, J. (2009, July). Using tablet PCs and pen-based technologies to support engineering education. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 31-38). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Chau, K. T., Zainuddin, D. A. B., Ling, S. K., Ng, L. M., & Yang, J. (2020). The perception of teachers towards smart Board Technology in a Malaysian Primary School. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(6), 405–409.
Clarke, B., Svanaes, S., & Zimmermann, S. (2013). One-to-one tablets in secondary schools: An evaluation study. Tablets for schools.
Cogill, J. (2002). How is the interactive whiteboard being used in the primary school and how does this affect teachers and teaching. Retrieved November, 6, 2009.
Corlett, D., Sharples, M., Bull, S., & Chan, T. (2005). Evaluation of a mobile learning organiser for university students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(3), 162–170.
Cunningham, P., Sexton, S., and Williams, J. (2009). Why come to class? Posting notes from Tablet PC lectures. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
Davidovitch, N., & Yavich, R. (2017). The effect of smart boards on the cognition and motivation of students. Higher Education Studies, 7(1), 60.
De Vita, M., Verschaffel, L., & Elen, J. (2018a). The power of ınteractive whiteboards for secondary mathematics teaching: Two case studies. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(1), 50–78.
De Vita, M., Verschaffel, L., & Elen, J. (2018b). Towards a better understanding of the potentialofinteractivewhiteboardsinstimulatingmathematicslearning. Learning Environments Research, 21(1), 81–107.
Dempsey, J, V. (1996). Instructional applications of computer games.
Dori, S., & Kurtz, G. (2015). Student’s perceptions meaningful learning via ICT. In Chais Annual Meeting, Open University, Raanana.
Dündar, H., & Akçayır, M. (2014). Implementing tablet pcs in schools: Students’ attitudes and opinions. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 40–46.
El-Gayar, O., Moran, M., & Hawkes, M. (2011). Students' acceptance of tablet PCs and implications for educational institutions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 58–70.
Enriquez, A. G. (2010). Enhancing student performance using tablet computers. College Teaching, 58(3), 77–84.
Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). Active learning: An introduction. ASQ Higher Education Brief, 2(4), 1–5.
Flanagan, S., Bouck, E. C., & Richardson, J. (2013). Middle school special education teachers’ perceptions and use of assistive technology in literacy instruction. Assistive Technology, 25(1), 24–30.
Fokides, E., Atsikpasi, P., & Karageorgou, D. (2020). Tablets, plants, and primary school students: A study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–29.
Franklin, T. (2011). Mobile learning: At the tipping point. Turkish Online Journal Of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 261–275.
Galligan, L., Loch, B., McDonald, C., & Taylor, J. A. (2010). The use of tablet and related technologies in mathematics teaching. Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 24(1), 38–51.
Geer, R., & Barnes, A. (2007). Cognitive concomitants of interactive board use and their relevance to developing effective research methodologies. International Education Journal., 8(2), 92–102.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media, and Technology, 32(1), 5–20.
Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in US public schools: 2009.
Hadlington, L., White, H., & Curtis, S. (2019). “I cannot live without my [tablet]”: Children's experiences of using tablet technology within the home. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 19–24.
Hall, I., & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students' perceptions of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 102–117.
Hamhuis, E., Glas, C., & Meelissen, M. (2020). Tablet assessment in primary education: Are there performance differences between TIMSS’paper-and-pencil test and tablet test among Dutch grade-four students?. British journal of educational technology.
Herguner, S. (2017). Prospective EFL Teachers' emotional intelligence and tablet computer use and literacy. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(4), 56–64.
Hulls, C. C. (2005, October). Using a tablet PC for classroom instruction. In Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference (pp. T2G-T2G). IEEE.
Ifenthaler, D., & Schweinbenz, V. (2013). The acceptance of tablet-PCs in classroom instruction: The teachers’ perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 525–534.
Ilgar, M, Z., & Ilgar, S, C. (2013). Nitel bir araştırma deseni olarak gömülü teori (Temellendirilmiş Kuram).
Judge, S., & Simms, K. A. (2009). Assistive technology training at the pre-service level: A national snapshot of teacher preparation programs. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(1), 33–44.
Koile, K., & Singer, D. (2006, April). Development of a tablet-pc-based system to increase instructor-student classroom interactions and student learning. In Proc. of Workshop on the Impact of Pen-Based Technology on Education (WIPTE’06).
Kong, S, C. (2012, March). Using mobile devices for learning in school education. In 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (pp. 172-176). IEEE.
Köse, S., Gencer, A. S., & Gezer, K. (2007). Meslek Yüksekokulu Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayar ve. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(21), 44–54.
Kurt, A. A., Abdullah, K. U. Z. U., Dursun, Ö. Ö., GÜLLEPINAR, F., & Gültekin, M. (2013). FATİH projesinin pilot uygulama sürecinin değerlendirilmesi: Öğretmen görüşleri. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 2(1).
Li, S., Pow, J. C., Wong, E. L., & Fung, A. W. (2010). Empowering student learning through tablet PCs: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 15(3), 171–180.
Liao, Y, K. (2013, October). The effect of IWB on student academic achievement in Taiwan: A meta-analysis. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1999-2007). Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE).
Litzler, M. F., & Laborda, J. G. (2016). Students’ opinions about ubiquitous delivery of standardized English exams. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, 1, 99–110.
López, O. S. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54(4), 901–915.
Malkawi, N. A. M. (2017). The effect of using smart board on the achievement of tenth grade students in English language and on verbal interaction during teaching in public schools. International Research in Education, 5(1), 197–208.
Mambaeva, V. (2018). Comparative study of English language teaching settings of MONE and IB schools (Turkey). Doktora Tezi, Bilkent University, Ankara.
Mang, C. F., & Wardley, L. J. (2012). Effective adoption of tablets in post-secondary education: Recommendations based on a trial of iPads in university classes. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11(1), 301–317.
Montrieux, H., Vanderlinde, R., Schellens, T., & De Marez, L. (2015). Teaching and learning with mobile technology: A qualitative explorative study about the introduction of tablet devices in secondary education. PLoS One, 10(12), e0144008.
Nikolopoulou, K. (2007). Early childhood educational software: Specific features and issues of localization. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(2), 173–179.
Oigara, J., & Keengwe, J. (2013). Students’ perceptions of clickers as an instructional tool to promote active learning. Education and Information Technologies, 18(1), 15–28.
Otterborn, A., Schönborn, K., & Hultén, M. (2019). Surveying preschool teachers’ use of digital tablets: General and technology education related findings. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 717–737.
Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students' behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150–162.
Polat, S., & Özcan, A. (2014). Akıllı Tahta Kullanımıyla İlgili Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Görüşleri. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 22(2), 439–455.
Prensky, M. (2003). Overcoming educators' digital immigrant accents: A rebuttal. The Technology Source, 7(3).
Reboli, D. (2007, March). Introducing a tablet PC into any classroom: Bringing ideas from a high school into a college classroom. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 3319–3324). Jacksonville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Saillard, E, K. (2009). NVIVO 8 ile nitel araştırma projeleri. Anı Yayıncılık.
Schaal, S., Grübmeyer, S., & Matt, M. (2012). Outdoors and online-inquiry with mobile devices in pre-service science teacher education. World Journal on Educational Technology, 4(2), 113–125.
Schuck, S., & Kearney, M. (2007). Exploring pedagogy with interactive whiteboards: A case study of six schools. Verified OK.
Shen, D., Laffey, J., Lin, Y., & Huang, X. (2006). Social influence for perceived usefulness and ease-of-use of course delivery systems. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 5(3), 270–282.
Shi, Y., Zhang, J., Yang, H., & Yang, H, H. (2020). Effects of interactive whiteboard-based instruction on students’ cognitive learning outcomes: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-18.
Sommerich, C., Ward, R., Sikdar, K., Payne, J., & Herman, L. (2007). A survey of high school students’ with ubiquitous access to tablet PCs. Ergonomics, 50(5), 706–727.
Starkings, S., & Krause, L. (2008). Chalkboard to smartboard – Maths going green? MSOR Connections, 7(4), 13–15.
Starkman, N. (2006). The wonders of interactive whiteboards: No cutting-edge classroom is complete without one. T H E Journal, 33(10), 36–39.MathSciNet
Tront, J., Filer, K., Scales, G., & Prey, J. (2009). Implementing a tablet PCs requirement program. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education.
Twining, P., Evans, D., Cook, D., Ralston, J., Selwood, I., Jones, A., ... & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Tablet PCs in schools: Case study report: A report for Becta by the Open University. http://​oro.​open.​ac.​uk/​6407/​
Twining, P., Evans, D., Cook, D., Selwood, I., Jones, A., Underwood, J., et al. (2006). Should there be a future for tablet PCs in schools? Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 20, 1–18.
Uslu, O., & Bümen, N. T. (2012). Effects of the professional development program on Turkish teachers: Technology integration along with attitude towards ICT in education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(3), 115–127.
Uzoğlu, M., & Bozdoğan, A. E. (2015). Investigation of primary school students’ attitudes toward tablet computers according to different variables Ortaokul öğrencilerinin tablet bilgisayarlara yönelik tutumlarının çeşitli değişkenlere göre incelenmesi. Journal of Human Sciences, 12(1), 539–553.
Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271.
Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated things. Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851–867.
Wang, S. K., Hsu, H. Y., Campbell, T., Coster, D. C., & Longhurst, M. (2014). An investigation of middle school science teachers and students use of technology inside and outside of classrooms: Considering whether digital natives are more technology savvy than their teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(6), 637–662.
Wise, J. C., Toto, R., & Lim, K. Y. (2006, October). Introducing tablet PCs: Initial results from the classroom. In Proceedings. Frontiers in education. 36th Annual conference (pp. 17–20). IEEE.
Xu, H, L. (2011). It makes the whole learning experience better”: Student feedback on the use of the ınteractive whiteboard in learning chinese at tertiary level. Asian Social Science, 7,11,20–34.
Yalman, M. (2013). EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN BİLGİSAYAR DESTEKLİ UZAKTAN EĞİTİM SİSTEMİ (MOODLE) MEMNUNİYET DÜZEYLERİ. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8(8).
Yalman, M. (2015). Preservice teachers’ views about e-book and their levels of use of e-books. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 255–262.
Yau, H, K., & Leung, Y, F. (2016, March). Gender difference of self-efficacy and attitudes towards the use of technology in learning in Hong Kong higher education. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (Vol. 2).
Yin, R, K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5).
Zheng, J., & Li, S. (2020). What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101612.
Zittle, F. (2004). Enhancing native American mathematics learning: The use of Smartboard-generated virtual manipulatives for conceptual understanding. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 5512-5515). Association for the Advancement of computing in education (AACE).
Metadata
Title
Examining PRESERVICE teachers’ use of SMARTBOARD and pc tablets in lessons
Authors
Murat Yalman
Bulent Basaran
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Education and Information Technologies / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10292-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Education and Information Technologies 2/2021 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Impact of technostress on academic productivity of university students

OriginalPaper

Influencing factors in M-learning adoption in higher education

OriginalPaper

Parental mediation of adolescent Internet use: Combining strategies to promote awareness, autonomy and self-regulation in preparing youth for life on the web

OriginalPaper

Cloud computing and semantic web technologies for ubiquitous management of smart cities-related competences

OriginalPaper

Evaluation of course outcome attainment of engineering course with traditional, blended and flipped classroom approaches

OriginalPaper

Perceptions of E-learning among undergraduates and academic staff of higher educational institutions in north-eastern Nigeria

Premium Partner

    Image Credits