Top

Journal of Business and Psychology

Published in:

01-12-2011

Examining the Relationships Between Personality, Coping Strategies, and Work–Family Conflict

Authors: Boris B. Baltes, Ludmila S. Zhdanova, Malissa A. Clark

Published in: Journal of Business and Psychology | Issue 4/2011

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to examine the processes through which personality characteristics may influence work–family conflict (WFC). Specifically, the mediating effects of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC) behavioral stress-coping strategies on the relationship between personality characteristics and WFC were tested.

Design/Methodology/Approach

A snowball sampling technique was used to recruit 289 working adults, who completed online questionnaires. The proposed model was tested using path analysis.

Findings

Conscientiousness and agreeableness were related to greater usage of work and family behavioral coping strategies, and these behavioral strategies influenced levels of experienced WFC. Negative affect was found to have direct effects on work interference with family (WIF) and family interference with work (FIW), and emotional stability was found to have a direct effect on WIF conflict.

Implications

Findings suggest that different processes underlie the influence of specific personality characteristics on WFC. These findings can have implications for the effectiveness of training programs and interventions aimed at reducing work–family conflict levels of employees, in that trainers and managers should take into account the strong influence of individual factors on a person’s choice of coping strategies.

Originality/Value

The examination of the processes through which personality characteristics may influence work–family conflict (WFC) has not received adequate attention. This article advances work–family conflict research by examining the mediating role of behavioral strategies aimed to cope with competing demands of work and family roles in the relationship between individual difference variables and WFC.

previous article A Construct Validation of the Neutral Objects Satisfaction Questionnaire (NOSQ)

next article The Effectiveness of Self-Managed Work Teams in Government Organizations

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

Andreassi, J. K., & Thompson, C. A. (2007). Dispositional and situational sources of control: Relative impact on work–family conflict and positive spillover. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 722–740. doi:10.1108/02683940710837697.CrossRef

Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (Eds.). (1990). Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioral sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Baltes, P. B., Baltes, M. M., Freund, A. M., & Lang, F. R. (1999). The measurement of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC) by self-report: Technical report 1999. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development.

Baltes, B. B., & Dickson, M. W. (2001). Using life-span models in industrial-organizational psychology: The theory of selective optimization with compensation. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 51–63. doi:10.1207/S1532480XADS0501_5.CrossRef

Baltes, B. B., & Heydens-Gahir, H. (2003). Reduction of work–family conflict through the use of selection, optimization, and compensation behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 1005–1018. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.1005.PubMedCrossRef

Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 41, 1–26. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x.CrossRef

Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating top-down and bottom-up theories of subjective well-being: The case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 646–653. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.646.PubMedCrossRef

Bruck, C. S., & Allen, T. D. (2003). The relationship between big five personality traits, negative affectivity, type A behavior, and work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 457–472. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00040-4.CrossRef

Butt, Z. A., Strauss, M. E., Smyth, K. A., & Rose-Rego, S. A. (2002). Negative affectivity and emotion-focused coping in spouse caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 21, 471–483. doi:10.1177/073346402237633.CrossRef

Caligiuri, P. M. (2000). The big five personality characteristics as predictors of expatriate’s desire to terminate the assignment and supervisor-rated performance. Personnel Psychology, 53, 67–88. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00194.x.CrossRef

Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56, 249–276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713.CrossRef

Clark, M. A., Bal, A., Zhdanova, L., & Baltes, B. B. (2009, April). A qualitative analysis of strategies for coping with work–family stressors. Interactive poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.

Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. S. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A metaanalysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1080–1107. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1080.CrossRef

Dierdorff, E. C., & Ellington, J. K. (2008). It’s the nature of the work: Examining behavior-based sources of work–family conflict across occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 883–892. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.883.PubMedCrossRef

Eby, L. T., Casper, W. J., Lockwood, A., Bordeaux, C., & Brinley, A. (2005). Work and family research in IO/OB: Content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 124–197. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2003.11.003.

Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25, 178–199. doi:10.2307/259269.

Fletcher, T. D., Selgrade, K. A., & Germano, L. M. (2006, May). On the use of partial covariances in structural equation modeling. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Dallas, TX.

Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219–239.PubMedCrossRef

Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). Selection, optimization and compensation as strategies of life management: Correlations with subjective indications of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13, 531–543. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.531.PubMedCrossRef

Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization, and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 642–662. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.642.PubMedCrossRef

Friede, A., & Ryan, A. M. (2005). The importance of the individual: How self-evaluations influence the work–family interface. In E. E. Kossek & S. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work–family conflict: Testing a model of the work–family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 65–78. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.1.65.PubMedCrossRef

Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1997). Relation of work–family conflict to health outcomes: A four-year longitudinal study of employed parents. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70, 325–335.CrossRef

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Greenhaus, J. H., Allen, T. D., & Spector, P. E. (2006). Health consequences of work–family conflict: The dark side of the work–family interface. In P. L. Perrewe & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Research in occupational stress and well-being (Vol. 5, pp. 61–98). Amsterdam: JAI Press/Elsevier.

Grzywacz, J. G., & Marks, N. F. (2000). Reconceptualizing the work–family interface: An ecological perspective on the correlates of positive and negative spillover between work and family. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 111–126. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.1.111.PubMedCrossRef

Heckathorn, D. D. (1997). Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 44, 174–199. doi:10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m.CrossRef

Hooker, K., Frazier, L. D., & Monahan, D. J. (1994). Personality and coping among caregivers of spouses with dementia. The Gerontologist, 34, 386–392.PubMedCrossRef

Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

James, L. R., & Mazerolle, M. D. (2002). Personality in work organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (2004). LISREL 8.8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

Kahana, E., Kahana, B., & Zhang, J. (2005). Motivational antecedents of preventive proactivity in late life: Linking future orientation and exercise. Motivation & Emotion, 29, 438–459. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9012-2.CrossRef

Kinnunen, U., Vermulst, A., Gerris, J., & Makikangas, A. (2003). Work–family conflict and its relation to well-being: The role of personality as a moderating factor. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1669–1683. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00389-6.CrossRef

Kossek, E. E., Lautsch, B. A., & Eaton, S. C. (2005). Flexibility enactment theory: Implications of flexibility types, control and boundary management for work–family effectiveness. In E. E. Kossek & S. J. Lambert (Eds.), Work and life integration: Organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Lee-Baggley, D., Preece, M., & DeLongis, A. (2005). Individual differences in coping across time: Role of the Big 5 Personality Dimensions. Journal of Personality, 73, 1141–1180. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00345.x.PubMedCrossRef

Lefcourt, H. M. (1991). Locus of control. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (Vol. 1, pp. 413–499). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.

Loehlin, J. C. (1998). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1986). Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54, 385–405. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1986.tb00401.x.CrossRef

McCrae, R. R., & John, O. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x.PubMedCrossRef

Michel, J. S., & Clark, M. A. (2009). Has it been affect all along? A test of work-to-family and family-to-work models of conflict, enrichment, and satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 163–168. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.015.CrossRef

Noor, N. M. (2002). Work–family conflict, locus of control, and women’s well-being: Tests of alternative pathways. Journal of Social Psychology, 142, 645–662. doi:10.1080/00224540209603924.PubMedCrossRef

Parkes, K. R. (1986). Coping in stressful episodes: The role of individual differences, environmental factors and situational characteristics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1277–1292. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1277.PubMedCrossRef

Pratt, A. K. (2006). Role of cognitive ability and personality factors in coping with work-family conflict. Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University, 2006. Dissertation Abstracts International, AAT 3211006.

Penley, J. A., & Tomaka, J. (2002). Associations among the Big Five, emotional responses, and coping with acute stress. Personality and Individual Differences, 32, 1215–1228. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00087-3.CrossRef

Pfeffer, J. (1998). Understanding organizations: Concepts and controversies. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 733–777). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Rees, D. W., & Cooper, C. L. (1992). The occupational stress indicator locus of control scale: Should this be regarded as a state rather than trait measure? Work and Stress, 6, 45–48. doi:10.1080/02678379208257038.CrossRef

Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, 1–28.PubMed

Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2007). Strategies for coping with work–family conflict: The distinctive relationships of gender role ideology. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 1–19. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.1.PubMedCrossRef

Stewart, G. L., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Four lessons learned from the person-situation debate: A review and research agenda. In D. B. Smith & B. Schneider (Eds.), Personality and organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Strentz, T., & Auerbach, S. M. (1988). Adjustment to the stress of simulated captivity: Effects of emotion-focused vs. problem-focused preparation on hostages differing in locus of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 652–660. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.652.PubMedCrossRef

Valecha, G. K., & Ostrom, T. M. (1974). An abbreviated measure of internal–external locus of control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38, 369–376.CrossRef

Watson, D. (1988). Intraindividual and interindividual analyses of positive and negative affect: Their relation to health complaints, perceived stress, and daily activities. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1020–1030. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1020.PubMedCrossRef

Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the positive and negative affect schedule-expanded form. Cedar Rapids: University of Iowa.

Watson, D., & Hubbard, B. (1996). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the five factor model. Journal of Personality, 64, 735–774. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00943.x.CrossRef

Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work–family experience: Relationships of the big five to work–family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64, 108–130. doi:10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00035-6.CrossRef

Wiese, B. S., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2000). Selection, optimization, and compensation: An action-related approach to work and partnership. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 273–300. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1752.CrossRef

Young, L. M., Baltes, B. B., & Pratt, A. K. (2007). Using selection, optimization, and compensation to reduce job/family stressors: Effective when it matters. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(4), 511–540. doi:10.1007/s10869-007-9039-8.CrossRef

Title: Examining the Relationships Between Personality, Coping Strategies, and Work–Family Conflict
Authors: Boris B. Baltes
Ludmila S. Zhdanova
Malissa A. Clark
Publication date: 01-12-2011
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Business and Psychology / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 0889-3268
Electronic ISSN: 1573-353X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9207-0

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose

Design/Methodology/Approach

Findings

Implications

Originality/Value

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

Trait Goal Orientation, Self-Regulation, and Performance: A Meta-Analysis

Mentoring in China: Enhanced Understanding and Association with Occupational Stress

Influencing Learning States to Enhance Trainee Motivation and Improve Training Transfer

The Effectiveness of Self-Managed Work Teams in Government Organizations

The Amazing Diversity of Thought: A Qualitative Study on How Human Resource Practitioners Perceive Selection Procedures

Do Managers Use Feedback Seeking as a Strategy to Regulate Demands–Abilities Misfit? The Moderating Role of Implicit Person Theory

Premium Partner