Top

Learning Environments Research

Published in:

29-09-2021 | Original Paper

Factors enabling and constraining students’ collaborative online international learning experiences

Author: Anisa Vahed

Published in: Learning Environments Research | Issue 3/2022

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The Collaborative Online International Learning (COIL) Virtual Exchange Project (VEP) emerged as a pedagogically-innovative and low-cost initiative to internationalise the curriculum and create team-taught coursework that links university classes in different countries. A COIL-VEP was formed between Durban University of Technology (DUT) in South Africa and Nassau Community College (NCC) in New York. The project entailed understanding business applications in developing a prototype to reduce material wastage in dental laboratories. In conjunction with acquiring discipline-specific knowledge, students had the opportunity to develop cross-cultural awareness and to use various technology-mediated tools. The aim of this study was to elicit students’ opinions and experiences related to a COIL-VEP. A quantitative and cross-sectional research design following a positivist paradigm was used. The 2018 second-year Dental Technology students (n = 14) from DUT and the Business Management students (n = 21) from NCC participated in the study. An anonymised and descriptive questionnaire was used to collect data, which were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Positive results encompassed five categories, namely: project introduction and preparation; cultural and diversity competence; impacts on personal behaviour; quality of learning; and overall experience and course quality. Although COIL is a nuanced teaching and learning paradigm, collaborative online learning is impeded by inadequate pre-training on intercultural awareness, insufficient prior knowledge of discipline-specific content, and the exclusion of a gradable component.

previous article Smart schools on the way: How school principals from Catalonia approach the future of education within the fourth industrial revolution

next article Gender differences among students undertaking iSTEM projects in multidisciplinary vs unidisciplinary STEM classrooms in government vs nongovermnment schools: Classroom emotional climate and attitudes

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Agnew, M., & Kahn, H. E. (2014). Internationalization-at-home: Grounded practices to promote intercultural, international, and global learning. Working with Diverse Communities, 25(3), 31–46.

Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press.

Beelan, J., & Jones, E. (2015). Redefining internationalization at home. In A. Curaj, L. Matei, R. Pricopie, J. Salmi, & P. Scott (Eds.), The European higher education area: Between critical reflections and future policies (pp. 59–72). Springer International Publishing.

Boehm, D., Kurthen, H., & Aniola-Jedrzejek, L. (2010). Do international online collaborative learning projects impact ethnocentrism? E-Learning and Digital Media, 7(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2010.7.2.133CrossRef

Boschma, R. (2005). Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887CrossRef

Ceo-DiFrancesco, D., & Bender-Slack, D. (2016). Collaborative online international learning: Students and professor making global connections. In A. J. Moeller (Ed.), Fostering connections, empowering communities, celebrating the world (pp. 147–174). Robert M. Terry.

Cetinkaya, L. (2017). The impact of Whatsapp use on success in education process. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3279CrossRef

Chydenius, T., & Jadin, T. (2017, May). Virtual teams as part of internationalization of higher education.In Paper presented at the cross-cultural business conference, Steyr, Austria.

Cifuentes, L., & Shih, Y.-C.D. (2001). Teaching and learning online: A collaboration between US and Taiwanese students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 456–474.CrossRef

Dafoulas, G. A., & Shokri, A. (2014). Delivery of e-learning through social learning networks. In Paper presented at the international conference e-learning multi conference on computer science and information systems.

Dorner, H. (2018). Exploring students’ conceptions of internationalised learning: Experiences from international online collaborative seminars. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1210530CrossRef

Hautala, J., & Schmidt, S. (2019). Learning across distances: An international collaborative learning project between Berlin and Turku. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 43(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2019.1599331CrossRef

He, J., & Huang, X. (2017). Collaborative online teamwork: Exploring students’ satisfaction and attitudes with google hangouts as a supplementary communication tool. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3–4), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2017.1327334CrossRef

Herrera-Pavo, M. Á. (2021). Collaborative learning for virtual higher education. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 28, 100437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2020.100437CrossRef

Howell, K. E. (2013). An introduction to the philosophy of methodology. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Kemp, S. (2019). Digital 2019: Essential insights into how people around the world use the internet, mobile devices, social media, and e-commerce. Hootsuite.

Kemp, S. (2020). Digital 2020: South Africa. Hootsuite.

Khan, I. U., Ayaz, M., & Khan, S. (2016). Using Skype to develop English learners’ speaking motivation. Science International, 28(5), 41–48.

Knowles, A. J., & Cooner, T. S. (2016). International collaborative learning using social media to learn about social work ethics and social media. Social Work Education, 35(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2016.1154662CrossRef

Leask, B. (2015). Internationalizing the curriculum. Routledge.

Lenkaitis, C. A., Loranc-Paszylk, B., & Hilliker, S. M. (2019). Global awareness and global identity development among foreign language learners: The impact of virtual exchanges. MEXTESOL Journal, 43(4), 1–11.

Lewis, T., & Odowd, R. (2016). Introduction to online intercultural exchange and this volume. In R. O. D. A. T. Lewis (Ed.), Online Intercultural Exchange: Policy, pedagogy practice (pp. 3–17). Routledge.

Liu, K. L. (2016). Exploring intercultural competence through an intercultural extracurricular activity in Taiwan. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 4(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.1515/jolace-2016-0008.

Liu, X., Liu, S., Lee, S.-H., & Magjuka, R. (2010). Cultural differences in online learning: International student perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 177–188.

Liu, Y., & Shirley, T. (2021). Without crossing a border: Exploring the impact of shifting study abroad online on students’ learning and intercultural competence development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Online Learning Journal, 25(1), 182–194.

Majumdar, S. (2003). Pedagogical framework for online learning. Vocational Training European Journal, 28, 21–30.

Marcillo, M., & Desilus, B. (2016). Collaborative online international learning experience in practice: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242016000100005CrossRef

Mustafa, E. N. E. (2018). The impact of Youtube, Skype and Whatsapp in improving EFL learners’ speaking skill. International Journal of Comtemporary Applied Researches, 5(5), 18–31.

Niu, L. (2019). Using Facebook for academic purposes: Current literature and directions for future research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1384–1406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117745161CrossRef

O’Dowd, R. (2017). Virtual exchange and internationalising the classroom. Training, Language and Culture, 4(2), 8–27.CrossRef

Otchie, W. (2018). Is technology the solution to effective pedagogy? A constructivist perspective.

Rigamonti, L., Dolci, A., Galetta, F., Stefanelli, C., Hughes, M., Bartsch, M., et al. (2019). Social media and e-learning use among European exercise science students. Health Promotion International. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz046CrossRef

Rodriguez, M., Ooms, A., & Montañez, M. (2008). Students’ perceptions of online-learning quality given comfort, motivation, satisfaction, and experience. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 7(2), 105–125.

Rosenbaum, P.-E.L. (2012). E-Learning. A study of students’ attitudes and learning outcome when using blended learning with integration of multimedia instructions. The University of Bergen.

Saini, C., & Abraham, J. (2019). Implementing Facebook-based instructional approach in pre-service teacher education: An empirical investigation. Computers & Education, 128, 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.025CrossRef

Sivakumar, R. (2015). Integrating Skype into education. Journal of Educational and Psychological Research, 5(1), 5–10.

State University of New York. (2018). About COIL. http://coil.suny.edu/page/about-coil-02018.

Suarez, E. D., & Michalska Haduch, A. (2020). Teaching business with internationally built teams. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 31(4), 312–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975930.2020.1851625CrossRef

Swartz, S., Luck, S., Barbosa, B., & Crawford, I. (2019, October). Professional learning experience through COIL: A faculty perspective. In International virtual exchange conference (IVEC 2019): Advancing the feld of online international learning.

Veeresh, C. M., & Kumara, T. M. P. (2017). Impact of Whatsapp mediated learning approach on academic achievement of student teachers. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 3(9), 210–218.

Villar-Onrubia, D., & Rajpal, B. (2016). Online international learning. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 20(2–3), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2015.1067652CrossRef

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wihlborg, M., Friberg, E. E., Rose, K. M., & Eastham, L. (2018). Facilitating learning through an international virtual collaborative practice: A case study. Nurse Education Today, 61, 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.10.007CrossRef

Title: Factors enabling and constraining students’ collaborative online international learning experiences
Author: Anisa Vahed
Publication date: 29-09-2021
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Learning Environments Research / Issue 3/2022
Print ISSN: 1387-1579
Electronic ISSN: 1573-1855
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09390-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2022

The perception problem: a comparison of teachers’ self-perceptions and students’ perceptions of instructional quality

Using student feedback about the learning environment as a starting point for co-construction

Measure of opportunity: assessing equitable conditions to learn twenty-first century thinking skills

Training youth at risk mentors in Paths, an innovative TE program: promoting resilience, mental wellbeing and meaningful learning through a self-determined learning environment

Gender differences among students undertaking iSTEM projects in multidisciplinary vs unidisciplinary STEM classrooms in government vs nongovermnment schools: Classroom emotional climate and attitudes

Innovative learning spaces: class management and universal design for learning

Premium Partner