Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Environmental Management 3/2017

18-01-2017

Factors Limiting Formation of Community Forestry Enterprises in the Southern Mixteca Region of Oaxaca, Mexico

Authors: José Antonio Hernández-Aguilar, Héctor Sergio Cortina-Villar, Luis Enrique García-Barrios, Miguel Ángel Castillo-Santiago

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 3/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Many studies have considered community-based forestry enterprises to be the best option for development of rural Mexican communities with forests. While some of Mexico’s rural communities with forests receive significant economic and social benefits from having a community forestry enterprise, the majority have not formed such enterprises. The purpose of this article is to identify and describe factors limiting the formation of community forestry enterprise in rural communities with temperate forests in the Southern Mixteca region of Oaxaca, Mexico. The study involved fieldwork, surveys applied to Community Board members, and maps developed from satellite images in order to calculate the forested surface area. It was found that the majority of Southern Mixteca communities lack the natural and social conditions necessary for developing community forestry enterprise; in this region, commercial forestry is limited due to insufficient precipitation, scarcity of land or timber species, community members’ wariness of commercial timber extraction projects, ineffective local governance, lack of capital, and certain cultural beliefs. Only three of the 25 communities surveyed have a community forestry enterprise; however, several communities have developed other ways of profiting from their forests, including pine resin extraction, payment for environmental services (PES), sale of spring water, and ecotourism. We conclude that community forestry enterprise are not the only option for rural communities to generate income from their forests; in recent years a variety of forest-related economic opportunities have arisen which are less demanding of communities’ physical and social resources.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Ejidos and agrarian communities are two types of collective landholdings recognized by Mexican agrarian law. Henceforth, both will be referred to as “communities”.
 
2
All acronyms of Mexican organizations are according to their Spanish initials.
 
3
An institutional initiative that aims to promote activities that help the conservation and management of natural resources in the communities of the Mixteca region. This integrated by the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas, SEMARNAT, GEF, the United Nations Environment Programme and World Wildlife Fund .
 
4
Forested areas may occupy communal land, individual plots, and areas with settlements.
 
5
Comunero is the legal term for adult members of a rural ejido or agrarian community who have the right to a specific plot of land as well as use of resources in communal areas.
 
6
Land that has not been designated by the Community Assembly for human settlement or individual agricultural plots.
 
7
Forest land parceling is an informal practice that is recognized by the Community Assembly.
 
8
According to comuneros, natural forest recovery is the time it takes for new vegetation to appear in an area which has naturally or artificially been altered.
 
9
According to comuneros, wood is of excellent quality when it is free of defects such as knots, cracks, or an irregular structure; its quality lessens when these defects are present.
 
10
Independent professionals certified by CONAFOR that provide technical assistance to communities.
 
11
Forest land parceling is an informal practice that is recognized by the Community Assembly.
 
12
PES was designed to fund owners of forested land to practice conservation (soil restoration, fire prevention, etc.) (SEMARNAT 2014).
 
Literature
go back to reference Alatorre G (2000) La construcción de una cultura gerencial democrática en las empresas forestales comunitarias. Procuraduría Agraria, Mexico Alatorre G (2000) La construcción de una cultura gerencial democrática en las empresas forestales comunitarias. Procuraduría Agraria, Mexico
go back to reference Anta S, Carabias J (2008) Consecuencias de las políticas públicas en el uso de los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad. In: Sarukhán J (ed) Capital natural de México III: Políticas públicas y perspectivas de sustentabilidad. CONABIO, Mexico, pp 87–153CrossRef Anta S, Carabias J (2008) Consecuencias de las políticas públicas en el uso de los ecosistemas y la biodiversidad. In: Sarukhán J (ed) Capital natural de México III: Políticas públicas y perspectivas de sustentabilidad. CONABIO, Mexico, pp 87–153CrossRef
go back to reference Antinori C, Bray D (2005) Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico. World Dev 33(9):1529–1543CrossRef Antinori C, Bray D (2005) Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico. World Dev 33(9):1529–1543CrossRef
go back to reference Antinori C, Magaña O, Torres-Rojo J, Segura G, Bray D (2005) New interdisciplinary research on Mexico’s common property forests: a national survey. The commons in an age of global transition: challenges, risks and opportunities, the tenth conference of the international association for the study of common property, Oaxaca, Mexico, August 9–12 Antinori C, Magaña O, Torres-Rojo J, Segura G, Bray D (2005) New interdisciplinary research on Mexico’s common property forests: a national survey. The commons in an age of global transition: challenges, risks and opportunities, the tenth conference of the international association for the study of common property, Oaxaca, Mexico, August 9–12
go back to reference Bray D (2005) Community forestry in Mexico: twenty lessons learned and four future pathways. In: Bray D, Merino L, Barry D (eds) The community forests of Mexico. managing for sustainable landscapes. The University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 335–349 Bray D (2005) Community forestry in Mexico: twenty lessons learned and four future pathways. In: Bray D, Merino L, Barry D (eds) The community forests of Mexico. managing for sustainable landscapes. The University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 335–349
go back to reference Bray D (2010) Toward ‘post-REDD+ landscapes’ Mexico’s community forest enterprises provide a proven pathway to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. CIFOR, info brief, No. 30, November: 1–8 Bray D (2010) Toward ‘post-REDD+ landscapes’ Mexico’s community forest enterprises provide a proven pathway to reduce emissions from deforestation and forest degradation. CIFOR, info brief, No. 30, November: 1–8
go back to reference Bray D, Merino-Pérez L, Barry D (2005) The community forests of Mexico. Managing for sustainable landscapes. The University of Texas Press, Austin Bray D, Merino-Pérez L, Barry D (2005) The community forests of Mexico. Managing for sustainable landscapes. The University of Texas Press, Austin
go back to reference Hodgdon B (2009) A future with forestry: community forest enterprises offer hope for Rural Mexico. Earth Isl J 23(4):44–48 Hodgdon B (2009) A future with forestry: community forest enterprises offer hope for Rural Mexico. Earth Isl J 23(4):44–48
go back to reference Jensen J (1996) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice Hall, New Jersey Jensen J (1996) Introductory digital image processing: a remote sensing perspective. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
go back to reference Klooster D (1999) Community-based forestry in Mexico: Can it reverse processes of degradation? Land Degrad Dev 10(4):363–379CrossRef Klooster D (1999) Community-based forestry in Mexico: Can it reverse processes of degradation? Land Degrad Dev 10(4):363–379CrossRef
go back to reference Klooster D (2000) Institutional choice, community, and struggle: a case study of forest co-management in Mexico. World Dev 28(1):1–20CrossRef Klooster D (2000) Institutional choice, community, and struggle: a case study of forest co-management in Mexico. World Dev 28(1):1–20CrossRef
go back to reference Klooster D, Masera O (2000) Community forest management in Mexico: carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Glob Environ Chang 10:259–272CrossRef Klooster D, Masera O (2000) Community forest management in Mexico: carbon mitigation and biodiversity conservation through rural development. Glob Environ Chang 10:259–272CrossRef
go back to reference Koli A (2013) Community forest management addressing social vulnerability of forest communities in Bangladesh. Int Forest Rev 15(3):336–347CrossRef Koli A (2013) Community forest management addressing social vulnerability of forest communities in Bangladesh. Int Forest Rev 15(3):336–347CrossRef
go back to reference Macqueen D (2008) Forest Connect: reducing poverty and deforestation through support to community forest enterprises. Int Forest Rev 10(4):670–675CrossRef Macqueen D (2008) Forest Connect: reducing poverty and deforestation through support to community forest enterprises. Int Forest Rev 10(4):670–675CrossRef
go back to reference Madrid L, Núñez J, Quiroz G, Rodríguez J (2009) La propiedad social forestal en México. Investigación Ambiental 1(2):179–196 Madrid L, Núñez J, Quiroz G, Rodríguez J (2009) La propiedad social forestal en México. Investigación Ambiental 1(2):179–196
go back to reference Merino L (2004) Conservación o deterioro: El impacto de las políticas públicas en las instituciones comunitarias y en las prácticas de uso de los recursos forestales. INE-SEMARNAT, México Merino L (2004) Conservación o deterioro: El impacto de las políticas públicas en las instituciones comunitarias y en las prácticas de uso de los recursos forestales. INE-SEMARNAT, México
go back to reference Merino L, Ortiz G, Rodríguez J (2013) La política forestal. In: Merino L, Ortiz G (eds) Encuentros y desencuentros. Las comunidades forestales y las políticas públicas en tiempos de transición. UNAM, México, pp 101–160 Merino L, Ortiz G, Rodríguez J (2013) La política forestal. In: Merino L, Ortiz G (eds) Encuentros y desencuentros. Las comunidades forestales y las políticas públicas en tiempos de transición. UNAM, México, pp 101–160
go back to reference Merino L, Segura G (2007) Las políticas forestales y de conservación y sus impactos en las comunidades forestales de México. In: Bray D, Merino L, Barry D (eds) Los bosques comunitarios de México: manejo sustentable de paisajes forestales. SEMARNAT, Mexico, pp 77–95 Merino L, Segura G (2007) Las políticas forestales y de conservación y sus impactos en las comunidades forestales de México. In: Bray D, Merino L, Barry D (eds) Los bosques comunitarios de México: manejo sustentable de paisajes forestales. SEMARNAT, Mexico, pp 77–95
go back to reference Navarrete F (2008) Los pueblos indígenas de México. Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas (CDI) Navarrete F (2008) Los pueblos indígenas de México. Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas (CDI)
go back to reference Nolberto V, Ponce M (2008) Estadística inferencial aplicada. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Educación, Perú Nolberto V, Ponce M (2008) Estadística inferencial aplicada. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Facultad de Educación, Perú
go back to reference Ostrom E (1998) Self-Governance of Common-Pool Resources. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, vol. III. Macmillan Press, London, pp 424–433 Ostrom E (1998) Self-Governance of Common-Pool Resources. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, vol. III. Macmillan Press, London, pp 424–433
go back to reference Pagdee A, Kim Y, Daugherty P (2007) What makes community forest management successful : a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Soc Nat Resour 19(1):33–52CrossRef Pagdee A, Kim Y, Daugherty P (2007) What makes community forest management successful : a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Soc Nat Resour 19(1):33–52CrossRef
go back to reference Robles H (2004) Tendencias del campo mexicano a la luz del Programa de Certificación de los Derechos Ejidales (PROCEDE). In: Léonard E, Quesnel A, Velázquez E (eds) Políticas y regulaciones agrarias: dinámicas de poder y juegos de actores en torno a la tenencia de la tierra. CIESAS-IRD, Mexico, pp 131–155 Robles H (2004) Tendencias del campo mexicano a la luz del Programa de Certificación de los Derechos Ejidales (PROCEDE). In: Léonard E, Quesnel A, Velázquez E (eds) Políticas y regulaciones agrarias: dinámicas de poder y juegos de actores en torno a la tenencia de la tierra. CIESAS-IRD, Mexico, pp 131–155
go back to reference Rogé P, Friedman AR, Astier M, Altieri MA (2014) Farmer strategies for dealing with climatic variability: a case study from the Mixteca Alta region of Oaxaca, Mexico. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38(7):786–811CrossRef Rogé P, Friedman AR, Astier M, Altieri MA (2014) Farmer strategies for dealing with climatic variability: a case study from the Mixteca Alta region of Oaxaca, Mexico. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 38(7):786–811CrossRef
go back to reference Rzedowsky J (1978) La vegetación de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico Rzedowsky J (1978) La vegetación de México. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico
go back to reference Schmitt J, Pokorny B, Ying L (2008) Certification of non-timber forest products in China: effects on food quality, forest conservation and rural development. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 18(1):81–89CrossRef Schmitt J, Pokorny B, Ying L (2008) Certification of non-timber forest products in China: effects on food quality, forest conservation and rural development. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 18(1):81–89CrossRef
go back to reference Tomaselli MF, Hajjar R (2011) Promoting Community Forestry Enterprises in National REDD+ Strategies: A business approach. Forests 2(1):283–300CrossRef Tomaselli MF, Hajjar R (2011) Promoting Community Forestry Enterprises in National REDD+ Strategies: A business approach. Forests 2(1):283–300CrossRef
go back to reference Wright G, Andersson K (2012) Non-Governmental organizations, rural communities and forests: a comparative analysis of community NGO interactions. Small-scale For 12:33–50CrossRef Wright G, Andersson K (2012) Non-Governmental organizations, rural communities and forests: a comparative analysis of community NGO interactions. Small-scale For 12:33–50CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors Limiting Formation of Community Forestry Enterprises in the Southern Mixteca Region of Oaxaca, Mexico
Authors
José Antonio Hernández-Aguilar
Héctor Sergio Cortina-Villar
Luis Enrique García-Barrios
Miguel Ángel Castillo-Santiago
Publication date
18-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Environmental Management / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0821-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Environmental Management 3/2017 Go to the issue