Skip to main content
Top

2021 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

8. Fine–Kinney-Based Occupational Risk Assessment Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy QUALIFLEX

Authors : Assoc. Prof. Muhammet Gul, Assoc. Prof. Suleyman Mete, Assist. Prof. Faruk Serin, Assoc. Prof. Erkan Celik

Published in: Fine–Kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-criteria Occupational Risk Assessment

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

In this chapter, we improved Fine–Kinney occupational risk assessment approach with interval type-2 fuzzy QUALIFLEX (IT2FQUALIFLEX). QUALIFLEX is an outranking multi-attribute decision-making method proposed by an extension of the Paelinck’s (Pap Reg Sci Assoc 36:59–74,[1]), generalized Jacquet-Lagreze’s permutation method. Similar to other outranking solution-based approaches, it considers the solution which is a comparison of hazards. In this chapter, we adapted the interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs) into QUALIFLEX as it reflects the uncertainty well in decision-making. IT2FQUALIFLEX algorithm under the Fine–Kinney concept provides a useful and solid approach to the occupational health and safety risk assessment. In addition to proposing this new approach, a case study is performed in the chrome plating unit. A validation is also performed in this study. Finally, the proposed approach is implemented in Python.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Paelinck, J. H. P. (1976). Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 36, 59–74.CrossRef Paelinck, J. H. P. (1976). Qualitative multiple criteria analysis, environmental protection and multiregional development. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 36, 59–74.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Alinezhad, A., & Khalili, J. (2019). QUALIFLEX method. In New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM) (pp. 41–46). Springer, Cham. Alinezhad, A., & Khalili, J. (2019). QUALIFLEX method. In New methods and applications in multiple attribute decision making (MADM) (pp. 41–46). Springer, Cham.
3.
go back to reference Chen, T. Y., Chang, C. H., & Lu, J. F. R. (2013). The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 615–625.MathSciNetCrossRef Chen, T. Y., Chang, C. H., & Lu, J. F. R. (2013). The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 615–625.MathSciNetCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lee, L. W., Chen, S. M. (2008). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the extension of TOPSIS method and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on machine learning and cybernetic (pp. 3260–3265). Taipei. Retrieved July 12–15, 2008. Lee, L. W., Chen, S. M. (2008). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the extension of TOPSIS method and interval type-2 fuzzy sets. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on machine learning and cybernetic (pp. 3260–3265). Taipei. Retrieved July 12–15, 2008.
5.
go back to reference Chen, S. M., & Lee, L. W. (2010). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2790–2798.CrossRef Chen, S. M., & Lee, L. W. (2010). Fuzzy multiple attributes group decision-making based on the interval type-2 TOPSIS method. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2790–2798.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gul, M., Guven, B., & Guneri, A. F. (2018). A new Fine–Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 53, 3–16.CrossRef Gul, M., Guven, B., & Guneri, A. F. (2018). A new Fine–Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 53, 3–16.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Celik, E., Aydin, N., & Gumus, A. T. (2014). A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transport Policy, 36, 283–293.CrossRef Celik, E., Aydin, N., & Gumus, A. T. (2014). A multiattribute customer satisfaction evaluation approach for rail transit network: A real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transport Policy, 36, 283–293.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wang, J. C., Tsao, C. Y., & Chen, T. Y. (2015). A likelihood-based QUALIFLEX method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets for multiple criteria decision analysis. Soft Computing, 19(8), 2225–2243.CrossRef Wang, J. C., Tsao, C. Y., & Chen, T. Y. (2015). A likelihood-based QUALIFLEX method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets for multiple criteria decision analysis. Soft Computing, 19(8), 2225–2243.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zhang, X. (2016). Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Information Sciences, 330, 104–124.CrossRef Zhang, X. (2016). Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: A hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Information Sciences, 330, 104–124.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chen, T. Y. (2014). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QUALIFLEX method with a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Information Sciences, 261, 149–169.MathSciNetCrossRef Chen, T. Y. (2014). Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy QUALIFLEX method with a likelihood-based comparison approach for multiple criteria decision analysis. Information Sciences, 261, 149–169.MathSciNetCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Li, J., & Wang, J. Q. (2017). An extended QUALIFLEX method under probability hesitant fuzzy environment for selecting green suppliers. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(6), 1866–1879.MathSciNetCrossRef Li, J., & Wang, J. Q. (2017). An extended QUALIFLEX method under probability hesitant fuzzy environment for selecting green suppliers. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 19(6), 1866–1879.MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2015). Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2), 873–884.MathSciNetCrossRef Zhang, X., & Xu, Z. (2015). Hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach with a signed distance-based comparison method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(2), 873–884.MathSciNetCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zhang, X., Xu, Z., & Liu, M. (2016). Hesitant trapezoidal fuzzy QUALIFLEX method and its application in the evaluation of green supply chain initiatives. Sustainability, 8(9), 952.CrossRef Zhang, X., Xu, Z., & Liu, M. (2016). Hesitant trapezoidal fuzzy QUALIFLEX method and its application in the evaluation of green supply chain initiatives. Sustainability, 8(9), 952.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chen, T. Y. (2013). Data construction process and QUALIFLEX-based method for multiple-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 12(03), 425–467.CrossRef Chen, T. Y. (2013). Data construction process and QUALIFLEX-based method for multiple-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 12(03), 425–467.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Demirel, H., Akyuz, E., Celik, E., & Alarcin, F. (2019). An interval type-2 fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach to measure performance effectiveness of ballast water treatment (BWT) system on-board ship. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14(7), 675–683.CrossRef Demirel, H., Akyuz, E., Celik, E., & Alarcin, F. (2019). An interval type-2 fuzzy QUALIFLEX approach to measure performance effectiveness of ballast water treatment (BWT) system on-board ship. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14(7), 675–683.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gumus, A. T., Aydin, N., Celik, E. (2014). Passenger satisfaction evaluation for rail transit lines in Istanbul using qualiflex approach based on interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. In CIE 2014—44th international conference on computers and industrial engineering and IMSS 2014—9th international symposium on intelligent manufacturing and service systems, joint international symposium on the social impacts of developments in information, manufacturing and service systems—proceedings (pp. 343–357). Istanbul, Turkey. Gumus, A. T., Aydin, N., Celik, E. (2014). Passenger satisfaction evaluation for rail transit lines in Istanbul using qualiflex approach based on interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. In CIE 2014—44th international conference on computers and industrial engineering and IMSS 2014—9th international symposium on intelligent manufacturing and service systems, joint international symposium on the social impacts of developments in information, manufacturing and service systems—proceedings (pp. 343–357). Istanbul, Turkey.
17.
go back to reference Celik, E., Gul, M., Aydin, N., Gumus, A. T., & Guneri, A. F. (2015). A comprehensive review of multi criteria decision making approaches based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 85, 329–341.CrossRef Celik, E., Gul, M., Aydin, N., Gumus, A. T., & Guneri, A. F. (2015). A comprehensive review of multi criteria decision making approaches based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, 85, 329–341.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mendel, J. M., John, R. I., & Liu, F. L. (2006). Interval type-2 fuzzy logical systems made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14(6), 808–821.CrossRef Mendel, J. M., John, R. I., & Liu, F. L. (2006). Interval type-2 fuzzy logical systems made simple. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 14(6), 808–821.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Zhang, Z. (2017). Multi-criteria decision-making using interval-valued hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX methods based on a likelihood-based comparison approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 28(7), 1835–1854.CrossRef Zhang, Z. (2017). Multi-criteria decision-making using interval-valued hesitant fuzzy QUALIFLEX methods based on a likelihood-based comparison approach. Neural Computing and Applications, 28(7), 1835–1854.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fine–Kinney-Based Occupational Risk Assessment Using Interval Type-2 Fuzzy QUALIFLEX
Authors
Assoc. Prof. Muhammet Gul
Assoc. Prof. Suleyman Mete
Assist. Prof. Faruk Serin
Assoc. Prof. Erkan Celik
Copyright Year
2021
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52148-6_8