Top

Education and Information Technologies

Published in:

26-03-2021

Fostering changes in teacher attitudes toward the use of computer simulations: Flexibility, pedagogy, usability and needs

Authors: Wei Ching Lee, Wei Leng Neo, Der-Thanq Chen, Tzu-Bin Lin

Published in: Education and Information Technologies | Issue 4/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

While benefits of using computer simulations in teaching and learning are well documented, actual classroom usage remains sporadic. It is acknowledged in the literature that greater embrace of general computer use can be developed when teachers hold positive attitudes towards it. However, to date, studies that investigate teacher attitudes specifically on computer simulations are limited. In this study, the researchers interviewed 14 secondary school science teachers in Singapore, to qualitatively unpack the nuances of the affective, behavioral and cognitive dimensions of teacher attitudes towards computer simulation. Through inductive thematic analysis, the study found the cognitive dimension is the most pronounced and is mediated by perceived usefulness and usability of the tool, student engagement and suitability and teacher professional needs. The authors suggest four ways to foster positive teacher attitudes: (a) overcoming logistical issues with flexible teaching and learning environments, (b) foregrounding the pedagogy of student-centeredness, (c) demanding user-friendly simulation tools, and (d) meeting teachers’ needs for professional growth.

previous article Digitalisation in early childhood education: a domestication theoretical perspective on teachers’ experiences

next article Toward a model of learning innovation integration: TPACK-SAMR based analysis of the introduction of a digital learning environment in three Russian universities

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

School teachers in Singapore have a career ladder to climb up from three different tracks. One of the three tracks is the teaching track. Teachers can be promoted as senior teacher, lead teacher, master teacher and principal master teacher. With each promotion, the responsibilities and professional requirements increase.

Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers’ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers & Education, 47(4), 373–398.CrossRef

Barnett, M. (2005). Using virtual reality computer models to support student understanding of astronomical concepts. Journal of computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 24(4), 333–356.

Bell, R. L., & Trundle, K. C. (2008). The use of a computer simulation to promote scientific conceptions of moon phases. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 346–372.CrossRef

Blake, C., & Scanlon, E. (2007). Reconsidering simulations in science education at a distance: Features of effective use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6), 491–502.CrossRef

Bo, W. V., Fulmer, G. W., Lee, C. K. E., & Chen, D.-T. (2018). How do secondary science teachers perceive the use of interactive simulations? The affordance in Singapore context. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(6), 550–565.CrossRef

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.CrossRef

Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1–13.CrossRef

Campbell, T., & Oh, P. S. (2015). Engaging students in modeling as an epistemic practice of science: An introduction to the special issue of the journal of science education and technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 125–131.CrossRef

Chang, K.-E., Chen, Y.-L., Lin, H.-Y., & Sung, Y.-T. (2008). Effects of learning support in simulation-based physics learning. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1486–1498.CrossRef

Chen, C.-H., & Howard, B. (2010). Effect of live simulation on middle school students’ attitudes and learning toward science. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 133–139.

Chen, D.-T., Lin, T.-B., Li, J.-Y., & Lee, L. (2018). Establishing the norm of new media literacy of Singaporean students: Implications to policy and pedagogy. Computers & Education, 124, 1–13.

Christian, W., Esquembre, F., & Barbato, L. (2011). Open source physics. Science, 334(6059), 1077–1078.CrossRef

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Desbien, D. M. (2011). High-speed video analysis in a conceptual physics class. The Physics Teacher, 49(6), 332–333.CrossRef

Drossel, K., Eickelmann, B., & Gerick, J. (2017). Predictors of teachers’ use of ICT in school–the relevance of school characteristics, teachers’ attitudes and teacher collaboration. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 551–573.CrossRef

Durán, M. J., Gallardo, S., Toral, S. L., Martínez-Torres, R., & Barrero, F. J. (2007). A learning methodology using Matlab/Simulink for undergraduate electrical engineering courses attending to learner satisfaction outcomes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(1), 55–73.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.CrossRef

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.CrossRef

Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81–93.CrossRef

Geban, Ö., Askar, P., & Özkan, Ï. (1992). Effects of computer simulations and problem-solving approaches on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 86(1), 5–10.CrossRef

Goldstone, R. L., & Son, J. Y. (2005). The transfer of scientific principles using concrete and idealized simulations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(1), 69–110.CrossRef

Guzey, S. S., & Roehrig, G. H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 25–45.

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223–252.CrossRef

Jimoyiannis, A., & Komis, V. (2001). Computer simulations in physics teaching and learning: A case study on students’ understanding of trajectory motion. Computers & Education, 36(2), 183–204.CrossRef

Jones, M. M., & McLean, K. J. (2012). Personalising learning in teacher education through the use of technology. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(1), 75–92.CrossRef

Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273–1292.CrossRef

Kenyon, L., Davis, E. A., & Hug, B. (2011). Design approaches to support preservice teachers in scientific modeling. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(1), 1–21.CrossRef

Khan, S. (2011). New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(3), 215–232.CrossRef

Kukkonen, J. E., Kärkkäinen, S., Dillon, P., & Keinonen, T. (2014). The effects of scaffolded simulation-based inquiry learning on fifth-graders’ representations of the greenhouse effect. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 406–424.CrossRef

Laws, P., & Pfister, H. (1998). Using digital video analysis in introductory mechanics projects. The Physics Teacher, 36(5), 282–287.CrossRef

Lin, T.-B., Li, J., Deng, F., & Lee, L. (2013). Understanding new media literacy: An explorative theoretical framework. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 160–170.

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. . Jossey-Bass.

Miller, A. R., & Kastens, K. A. (2018). Investigating the impacts of targeted professional development around models and modeling on teachers’ instructional practice and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5), 641–663.CrossRef

Miniaoui, S., & Halaweh, M. (2011). FACEBOOK for CoP of researchers: Identifying the needs and evaluating the compatibility. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(4), 106–119.CrossRef

Ploetzner, R., Lippitsch, S., Galmbacher, M., Heuer, D., & Scherrer, S. (2009). Students’ difficulties in learning from dynamic visualisations and how they may be overcome. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 56–65.CrossRef

Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136–153.CrossRef

Sahin, A., Top, N., & Delen, E. (2016). Teachers’ first-year experience with chromebook laptops and their attitudes towards technology integration. Technology, knowledge, and learning, 21(3), 361–378.CrossRef

Saldaña, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage Publications.

Sang, G., Valcke, M., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112.CrossRef

Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.

Schwarz, C. V. (2009). Developing preservice elementary teachers’ knowledge and practices through modeling-centered scientific inquiry. Science Education, 93(4), 720–744.CrossRef

Schwarz, C. V., Meyer, J., & Sharma, A. (2007). Technology, pedagogy, and epistemology: Opportunities and challenges of using computer modeling and simulation tools in elementary science methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(2), 243–269.CrossRef

Shapka, J. D., & Ferrari, M. (2003). Computer-related attitudes and actions of teacher candidates. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(3), 319–334.CrossRef

Squire, K., Barnett, M., Grant, J. M., & Higginbotham, T. (2004). Electromagnetism supercharged!: Learning physics with digital simulation games. Paper presented at the 6^th international conference on Learning Sciences, Santa Monica, California.

Stern, L., Barnea, N., & Shauli, S. (2008). The effect of a computerized simulation on middle school students’ understanding of the kinetic molecular theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 305–315.CrossRef

Tate, M., Evermann, J., & Gable, G. (2015). An integrated framework for theories of individual attitudes toward technology. Information & Management, 52(6), 710–727.CrossRef

Teo, T. (2008). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A Singapore survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(4), 413–424.CrossRef

Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302–312.CrossRef

Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432–2440.CrossRef

Teo, T., Milutinović, V., & Zhou, M. (2016). Modelling Serbian pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards computer use: A SEM and MIMIC approach. Computers & Education, 94, 77–88.CrossRef

Trey, L., & Khan, S. (2008). How science students can learn about unobservable phenomena using computer-based analogies. Computers & Education, 51(2), 519–529.CrossRef

Tsai, C.-C., & Chai, C. S. (2012). The “third”–order barrier for technology-integration instruction: Implications for teacher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(6), 1057–1060.CrossRef

Tufford, L., & Newman, P. (2012). Bracketing in qualitative research. Qualitative social work, 11(1), 80–96.CrossRef

Van Braak, J. (2001). Individual characteristics influencing teachers’ class use of computers. Journal of educational computing research, 25(2), 141–157.CrossRef

Vera, F., & Romanque, C. (2009). Another way of tracking moving objects using short video clips. The Physics Teacher, 47(6), 370–373.CrossRef

Wang, L. Y., Tan, L. S., Li, J. Y., Tan, I., & Lim, X. F. (2017). A qualitative inquiry on sources of teacher efficacy in teaching low-achieving students. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(2), 140–150.CrossRef

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2015). Personalising learning: Exploring student and teacher perceptions about flexible learning and assessment in a flipped university course. Computers & Education, 88, 354–369.CrossRef

Wee, L. K., & Mak, W. K. (2012). Leveraging on easy java simulation tool and open source computer simulation library to create interactive digital media for mass customization of high school physics curriculum. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0219.

White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction, 16(1), 3–118.CrossRef

Wu, H. K., & Huang, Y. L. (2007). Ninth-grade student engagement in teacher-centered and student-centered technology-enhanced learning environments. Science Education, 91(5), 727–749.CrossRef

Zacharia, Z. (2003). Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 792–823.CrossRef

Zacharia, Z., & Anderson, O. R. (2003). The effects of an interactive computer-based simulation prior to performing a laboratory inquiry-based experiment on students’ conceptual understanding of physics. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 618–629.CrossRef

Title: Fostering changes in teacher attitudes toward the use of computer simulations: Flexibility, pedagogy, usability and needs
Authors: Wei Ching Lee
Wei Leng Neo
Der-Thanq Chen
Tzu-Bin Lin
Publication date: 26-03-2021
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Education and Information Technologies / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 1360-2357
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7608
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10506-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Use of flipped classroom in the marketing career during the educational process on financial mathematics

Current trends in the digital transformation of higher education institutions in Russia

Editorial for EAIT issue 4, 2021

Measuring in-service teacher self-efficacy for teaching computational thinking: development and validation of the T-STEM CT

A literature review on the influence of Kahoot! On learning outcomes, interaction, and collaboration

An ontology-based hybrid e-learning content recommender system for alleviating the cold-start problem

Premium Partner