Skip to main content
Top

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Four Decades of Technology Transfer, Trade and Intellectual Property

Authors : Xavier Seuba, Mariano Genovesi

Published in: Intellectual Property and Development: Understanding the Interfaces

Publisher: Springer Singapore

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Five pillars sustain the vision of Pedro Roffe. The approach to innovation and development promotion by Pedro Roffe builds upon a number of basic and important understandings. First, the key role that intellectual property plays as tool to promote innovation. Second, the centrality of transfer of technology to address technological access and innovation challenges in developing countries. Third, the need of balance between intellectual property protection and the public interest, and the need to factor in the interests of consumers, right holders, and competitors. Fourth, the positive nexus between competition and intellectual property policies. Fifth, the existence of an international architecture of intellectual property, consisting of multilateral, plurilateral and bilateral intellectual property and trade agreements, and the relevance of national implementation and flexibility. In this chapter, we focus on the transfer of technology and the interplay between intellectual property and trade.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
United Nations (1975).
 
2
Roffe (1974).
 
3
Gehl Sampath and Roffe (2012), p. 34.
 
4
Roffe (1978), p. 4.
 
5
Gehl Sampath and Roffe (2012), p. 14.
 
6
Ibid.
 
7
Roffe (1985), p. 691.
 
8
Ibid.
 
9
Gehl Sampath and Roffe (2012), p. 15.
 
10
Ibid., p. 14.
 
11
While developing countries stated “that an international legally binding instrument is the only form capable of effectively regulating the transfer of technology”, developed countries position was that the code of conduct should consist of voluntary guidelines. See Roffe (1985), p. 696.
 
12
For developed economies, the anticompetitive effect was the central aspect to be considered, whereas developing countries stated that all practices which are unfair, and prejudicial to the economic and social development of the technology recipient countries, should be eliminated, whether anti-competitive or not. On the other hand, there was a deep disagreement to the extent to which restrictive provisions would apply to intra-enterprise transactions. While developed economies had open stance towards “restrictions for the purpose of rationalization or reasonable allocation of functions between parent and subsidiary or among enterprises belonging to the same concern”, in the Group of 77s view restrictions between commonly owned enterprises should be examined in the light of the rules, exceptions and factors applicable to all transfer of technology transactions. See Roffe (1985), pp. 698–702.
 
13
There was an irreconcilable disagreement regarding applicable law and settlement of disputes. Developed economies proposed that parties should have the freedom to choose the applicable national law and forum before which disputes will be brought, if there was a substantial relationship between applicable law and the forum and the parties and transaction, or another reasonable basis for the choices made. Developing countries position was that the law of the acquiring country is the law applicable to matters relating to public policy and sovereignty. The courts and other tribunals of the technology-acquiring country shall have jurisdiction. See Roffe (1985), pp. 702–704.
 
14
Ibid., p. 706.
 
15
Roffe and Tesfachew (2002), pp. 7 and 12.
 
16
Ibid., p. 7.
 
17
Ibid.
 
18
Ibid.
 
19
Ibid., p. 12.
 
20
Ibid.
 
21
Gehl Sampath and Roffe (2012), p. 14.
 
22
Ibid., p. 34.
 
23
Ibid., p. 33.
 
24
Ibid.
 
25
Ibid.
 
26
Ibid.
 
27
In particular, how this relationship was approached in the nineteenth century. See Roffe (1987), p. 1040.
 
28
Roffe (1979), p. 561.
 
29
Roffe (1987), p. 1045.
 
30
In particular, in Spanish. See Roffe (1987, 1989).
 
31
Roffe (2004), Roffe et al. (2016).
 
32
Roffe and Genovesi (2013).
 
33
Genovesi and Roffe (2013).
 
34
Roffe et al. (2007).
 
35
Roffe and Spennemann (2008).
 
36
Roffe (1974).
 
37
Such as those affecting IP and access to health, access to knowledge and genetic resources. See Roffe and Santa Cruz (2006).
 
38
Roffe and Santa Cruz (2006), Roffe and Spennemann (2006).
 
39
Roffe (2007, 2013).
 
40
Roffe (2005), p. 8.
 
41
Roffe (2007), p. 1.
 
42
Roffe (2005).
 
43
Ibid.
 
44
Ibid.
 
45
Roffe (2004), pp. 15–16.
 
46
For instance, regarding to patents and one specific chapter, “The limited, but significant, treatment of patents in the FTA is explained by the fact that on matters not dealt with, the principles and standards of the TRIPS Agreement govern the relationship of the Parties on these other matters.” See Roffe (2004), p. 19.
 
47
Roffe (1989), p. 29.
 
48
For instance, “multilateral negotiation helped countries such as the United States to move forward negotiations at the bilateral level as to obtain from developing nations changes in their intellectual property legislations.” See Roffe (1989), p. 28.
 
49
Roffe et al. (2007), p. 2.
 
50
See Roffe and Spennemann (2006), p. 80.
 
51
Roffe (2007), p. 2; Roffe (2006).
 
52
Roffe et al. (2007), p. 2.
 
53
Ibid.
 
54
Roffe and Spennemann (2008).
 
55
Roffe (2004), p. 49.
 
56
Ibid.
 
57
Roffe et al. (2007), p. 2.
 
58
Roffe (2006), p. 13.
 
59
Roffe (2006), p. 14; Roffe et al. (2007), p. 5.
 
60
Roffe (2005), p. 8; Roffe et al. (2007), p. 4.
 
61
Roffe (2007), p. 14. See also in Roffe et al. (2007), p. 5.
 
62
Roffe (2007), p. 11. See also in Roffe et al. (2007), p. 5.
 
63
Roffe (1989), p. 27.
 
64
Roffe (2007), p. 7.
 
65
Roffe et al. (2007), p. 13.
 
66
Roffe (2007), p. 7.
 
67
Ibid., p. 10.
 
68
Roffe (2007), p. 17.
 
69
Ibid., p. 11.
 
70
Ibid., p. 14.
 
71
The Libreville Agreement, adopted in 1962 by francophone African countries and setting the institutional forerunner of the African Intellectual Property Organization, included countries such as the Republic of Dahomey, the Republic of Upper Volta or the Malagasy Republic.
 
72
“Patents should be viewed in terms of public interest not only in the theoretical sense but also in the practical judgement of what are likely to be the consequences of specific legal provisions for the national economy and its future development.” See Roffe (1974), p. 26.
 
73
Roffe (1974), p. 15.
 
Literature
go back to reference Gehl Sampath, P., & Roffe, P. (2012). Unpacking the international technology transfer debate: Fifty years and beyond. Issue Paper No. 36. Geneva: ICTSD. Gehl Sampath, P., & Roffe, P. (2012). Unpacking the international technology transfer debate: Fifty years and beyond. Issue Paper No. 36. Geneva: ICTSD.
go back to reference Genovesi, L. M., & Roffe, P. (2013). Vinculación o linkage entre patentes y autorización sanitaria de medicamentos. In Seuba, X. (Ed.), Propiedad intelectual, competencia y aspectos regulatorios del medicamento (pp. 73–110). Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Grupo Editorial Ibáñez and Geneva: ICTSD. Genovesi, L. M., & Roffe, P. (2013). Vinculación o linkage entre patentes y autorización sanitaria de medicamentos. In Seuba, X. (Ed.), Propiedad intelectual, competencia y aspectos regulatorios del medicamento (pp. 73–110). Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Grupo Editorial Ibáñez and Geneva: ICTSD.
go back to reference Roffe, P. (1974). Abuses of patent monopoly: A legal appraisal. World Development, 2, 15–26.CrossRef Roffe, P. (1974). Abuses of patent monopoly: A legal appraisal. World Development, 2, 15–26.CrossRef
go back to reference Roffe, P. (1978). América Latina y el código de conducta para la transferencia de tecnología. Integración Latinoamericana 26/31. Roffe, P. (1978). América Latina y el código de conducta para la transferencia de tecnología. Integración Latinoamericana 26/31.
go back to reference Roffe, P. (1979). Reflections on current attempts to revise international legal structures: The North-South dialogue—Clash of values and concepts, contradictions and compromises. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 9, 559–572. Roffe, P. (1979). Reflections on current attempts to revise international legal structures: The North-South dialogue—Clash of values and concepts, contradictions and compromises. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 9, 559–572.
go back to reference Roffe, P. (1985). Transfer of technology: UNCTAD’s draft international code of conduct. International Lawyer, 19, 689–707. Roffe, P. (1985). Transfer of technology: UNCTAD’s draft international code of conduct. International Lawyer, 19, 689–707.
go back to reference Roffe, P. (1987). Evolución e importancia del sistema de la propiedad intelectual. Comercio Exterior, 37, 1039–1045. Roffe, P. (1987). Evolución e importancia del sistema de la propiedad intelectual. Comercio Exterior, 37, 1039–1045.
go back to reference Roffe, P. (1989). La propiedad intelectual y el comercio internacional: Las negociaciones multilaterales en el GATT. Integración Latinoamericana, 151, 24–31. Roffe, P. (1989). La propiedad intelectual y el comercio internacional: Las negociaciones multilaterales en el GATT. Integración Latinoamericana, 151, 24–31.
go back to reference Roffe, P. (2004). Bilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world: The Chile–USA free trade agreement. TRIPS Issues Paper No. 4. Ottawa: Quaker International Affairs Programme. Roffe, P. (2004). Bilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world: The Chile–USA free trade agreement. TRIPS Issues Paper No. 4. Ottawa: Quaker International Affairs Programme.
go back to reference Roffe, P. (2005). La propiedad intelectual y la agenda económica internacional: El papel de América Latina, informe preparado para Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF). Roffe, P. (2005). La propiedad intelectual y la agenda económica internacional: El papel de América Latina, informe preparado para Corporación Andina de Fomento (CAF).
go back to reference Roffe, P. (2006). Intellectual property provisions in bilateral and regional trade agreements: The challenges of implementation. The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL). Roffe, P. (2006). Intellectual property provisions in bilateral and regional trade agreements: The challenges of implementation. The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL).
go back to reference Roffe, P. (2007). Intellectual property, bilateral agreements and sustainable development: The challenges of implementation. The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL). Roffe, P. (2007). Intellectual property, bilateral agreements and sustainable development: The challenges of implementation. The Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL).
go back to reference Roffe, P. (2013). Free Trade Agreements and the Americas. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 44, 932–942.CrossRef Roffe, P. (2013). Free Trade Agreements and the Americas. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 44, 932–942.CrossRef
go back to reference Roffe, P., Escudero, S., & Seuba, X. (2016). From TRIPS to preferential trade agreements. In H. Vardhana Singh (Ed.), TPP and India: Implications of mega-regionals for developing economies (pp. 281–374). New Delhi: Wisdom Tree. Roffe, P., Escudero, S., & Seuba, X. (2016). From TRIPS to preferential trade agreements. In H. Vardhana Singh (Ed.), TPP and India: Implications of mega-regionals for developing economies (pp. 281–374). New Delhi: Wisdom Tree.
go back to reference Roffe, P., & Genovesi, L. M. (2013). La recepción de la excepción regulatoria, o excepción Bolar, en la normativa interna. In Seuba, X. (Ed.), Propiedad intelectual, competencia y aspectos regulatorios del medicamento (pp. 277–294). Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Grupo Editorial Ibáñez and Geneva: ICTSD. Roffe, P., & Genovesi, L. M. (2013). La recepción de la excepción regulatoria, o excepción Bolar, en la normativa interna. In Seuba, X. (Ed.), Propiedad intelectual, competencia y aspectos regulatorios del medicamento (pp. 277–294). Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Grupo Editorial Ibáñez and Geneva: ICTSD.
go back to reference Roffe, P., & Santa Cruz, M. (2006). Los derechos de propiedad intelectual en los acuerdos de libre comercio celebrados por países de América Latina con países desarrollados. Santiago de Chile: División de Comercio Internacional e Integración. Roffe, P., & Santa Cruz, M. (2006). Los derechos de propiedad intelectual en los acuerdos de libre comercio celebrados por países de América Latina con países desarrollados. Santiago de Chile: División de Comercio Internacional e Integración.
go back to reference Roffe, P., & Spennemann, C. (2006). The impact of FTAs on public health policies and TRIPS flexibilities. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 1, 75–93.CrossRef Roffe, P., & Spennemann, C. (2006). The impact of FTAs on public health policies and TRIPS flexibilities. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 1, 75–93.CrossRef
go back to reference Roffe, P., & Spennemann, C. (2008). Control of anti-competitive practices in contractual licences under the TRIPs Agreement. In C. M. Correa & A. Yusuf (Eds.), Intellectual property and international trade: The TRIPS agreement (2nd ed., pp. 293–329). The Hague: Kluwer Law International. Roffe, P., & Spennemann, C. (2008). Control of anti-competitive practices in contractual licences under the TRIPs Agreement. In C. M. Correa & A. Yusuf (Eds.), Intellectual property and international trade: The TRIPS agreement (2nd ed., pp. 293–329). The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
go back to reference Roffe, P., & Tesfachew, T. (2002). Revisiting the technology transfer debate: Lessons for the new WTO Working Group. Bridges 6. Roffe, P., & Tesfachew, T. (2002). Revisiting the technology transfer debate: Lessons for the new WTO Working Group. Bridges 6.
go back to reference Roffe, P., Vivas, D., & Vea, G. (2007). Maintaining policy space for development: A case study on IP technical assistance in FTAs. Issue Paper No. 19. Geneva: ICTSD. Roffe, P., Vivas, D., & Vea, G. (2007). Maintaining policy space for development: A case study on IP technical assistance in FTAs. Issue Paper No. 19. Geneva: ICTSD.
go back to reference United Nations. (1975). The role of the patent system in the transfer of technology to developing countries. New York: United Nations Publication. Sales No. E.75.II. D.6. United Nations. (1975). The role of the patent system in the transfer of technology to developing countries. New York: United Nations Publication. Sales No. E.75.II. D.6.
Metadata
Title
Four Decades of Technology Transfer, Trade and Intellectual Property
Authors
Xavier Seuba
Mariano Genovesi
Copyright Year
2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2856-5_5