Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Published in:
Herausforderungen der Führung und ihre Implikationen für Führungskräfte Read chapter Read first chapter

2019 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Frauen in Führungspositionen – Einige Fakten

Author : Regina Anna-Maria Palmer

Published in: Führung und ihre Herausforderungen

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Sowohl in Deutschland als auch weltweit sind weiterhin relativ wenige Frauen in Führungspositionen tätig. Diese wenigen weiblichen Führungskräfte weichen in ihrem Verhalten kaum von ihren männlichen Kollegen ab. Das resultiert aus Prozessen, die eng mit geschlechtsbezogener Voreingenommenheit in Verbindung stehen. Weibliche Führungskräfte werden weniger wahrscheinlich eingestellt, schlechter in ihrer Leistung beurteilt und weniger gemocht als männliche Führungskräfte. Eine Gegenstrategie ist das Verleugnen der eigenen Weiblichkeit und die Anpassung an die männlichen Verhaltensweisen, die noch die Führungskulturen vieler Unternehmen bestimmen. Dies führt jedoch dazu, dass die männlichen Führungskulturen bestehen bleiben. Nur eine Veränderung der Unternehmens- und Führungskulturen kann nachhaltig eine Steigerung des Frauenanteils in Führungspositionen bewirken.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
previous chapter Vom Umgang mit den Herausforderungen in einer Top-Führungsposition
next chapter Frauenfreundliche Arbeitskontexte
Literature
Adams, R.B. (2016). Women on boards: The superheroes of tomorrow? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 371–386.CrossRef
Adams, R.B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.CrossRef
Adams, R.B., & Funk, P.C. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management Science, 58(2), 219–235.CrossRef
Adams, S.M., Gupta, A., & Leeth, J.D. (2009). Are female executives over-represented in precarious leadership positions? British Journal of Management, 20(1), 1–12.CrossRef
Adams, R. B., Licht, A., & Sagiv, L. (2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1331–1355.CrossRef
Ahern, K.R., & Dittmar, A.K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127(1), 137–197.CrossRef
Andersen, J.A., & Hansson, P.H. (2011). At the end of the road? On differences between women and men in leadership behaviour. Leadership & organization development journal, 32(5), 428–441.CrossRef
Baixauli-Soler, J.S., Belda-Ruiz, M., & Sanchez-Marin, G. (2015). Executive stock options, gender diversity in the top management team, and firm risk taking. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 451–463.CrossRef
Bass, B.M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B.M., & Avolio, B.J. (1994). Shatter the glass ceiling: Women may make better managers. Human resource management, 33(4), 549–560.CrossRef
Beaman, L., Duflo, E., Pande, R., & Topalova, P. (2012). Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: A policy experiment in India. Science, 335(6068), 582–586.CrossRef
Beck, D., & Davis, E. (2005). EEO in senior management: Women executives in Westpac. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 43(2), 273–288.CrossRef
Beckmann, D., & Menkhoff, L. (2008). Will women be women? Analyzing the gender difference among financial experts. Kyklos, 61(3), 364–384.CrossRef
Bierema, L.L. (2016). Women’s leadership: Troubling notions of the „ideal“ (male) leader. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 18(2), 119–136.CrossRef
Bigelow, L., Lundmark, L., McLean Parks, J., & Wuebker, R. (2014). Skirting the issues: Experimental evidence of gender bias in IPO prospectus evaluations. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1732–1759.CrossRef
Bilimoria, D. (2000). Building the Business Case for Women Corporate Directors. In R. J. Burke & M. C. Mattis (Hrsg.), Women on Corporate Boards: International Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 25–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRef
Bilimoria, D. (2006). The relationship between women corporate directors and women corporate officers. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18(1), 47–61.
Boin, A., & Hart, P. T. (2003). Public leadership in times of crisis: mission impossible?. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 544–553.CrossRef
Bosak, J., & Sczesny, S. (2008). Am I the right candidate? Self-ascribed fit of women and men to a leadership position. Sex Roles, 58(9–10), 682–688.CrossRef
Brady, D., Isaacs, K., Reeves, M., Burroway, R., & Reynolds, M. (2011). Sector, size, stability, and scandal. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(1), 84–85CrossRef
Brass, D.J. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. The Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 327–343.
Brescoll, V.L. (2011). Who takes the floor and why: Gender, power, and volubility in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(4), 622–641.CrossRef
Brown, D., Brown, D., & Anastasopoulos, V. (2002). Women on Boards: Not just the Right Thing … But the ‘Bright’ Thing. Report 341-02, Ottawa: The Conference Board of Canada.
Buono, A.F., & Kamm, J.B. (1983). Marginality and the organizational socialization of female managers. Human Relations, 36(12), 1125–1140.CrossRef
Charles, M. (2011). A world of difference: International trends in women’s economic status. Annual Review of Sociology, 37 I, 355–371.CrossRef
Cohen, L.E., & Broschak, J.P. (2013). Whose jobs are these? The impact of the proportion of female managers on the number of new management jobs filled by women versus men. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(4), 509–541.CrossRef
Cook, A., & Glass, C. (2014). Women and top leadership positions: Towards an institutional analysis. Gender, Work & Organization, 21(1), 91–103.CrossRef
Cuadrado, I., Navas, M., Molero, F., Ferrer, E. & Morales, J. (2012). Gender differences in leadership styles as a function of leader and subordinates’ sex and type of organization. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(12), 3083–3113.CrossRef
Daily, C., Certo, T., & Dalton, D. (1999). A decade of corporate women: Some progress in the boardroom, none in the executive suite. Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 93–99.CrossRef
Daily, C.M., & Dalton D.R. (2003). Women in the boardroom: A business imperative. Journal of Business Strategy, 24(5), 8–10.CrossRef
Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: the stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231–246.CrossRef
Davies, P.G., Spencer, S.J., Quinn, D.M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1615–1628.CrossRef
De Mascia, S. (2015). Are women better leaders than men? Human Resource Management International Digest, 23(7), 1–4.CrossRef
Derks, B., Ellemers, N., Van Laar, C., & de Groot, K. (2011a). Do sexist organizational cultures create the queen bee? British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(3), 519–535.CrossRef
Derks, B., Van Laar, C., Ellemers, N., & de Groot, K. (2011b). Gender-bias primes elicit queen-bee responses among senior policewomen. Psychological Science, 22(10), 1243–1249.CrossRef
Derks, B., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2016). The queen bee phenomenon: Why women leaders distance themselves from junior women. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 456–469.CrossRef
Dezső, C.L., Ross, D.G., & Uribe, J. (2016). Is there an implicit quota on women in top management? A large-sample statistical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 37(1), 98–115.CrossRef
Diamond, E.E. (1971). Occupational interests: Male-female or high level-low level dichotomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 1(4), 305–315.CrossRef
Dobbins, G.H., & Platz, S.J. (1986). Sex differences in leadership: how real are they? Academy of Management review, 11(1), 118–127.CrossRef
Donnell, S.M., & Hall, J. (1980). Men and women as managers: A significant case of no significant difference. Organizational Dynamics, 8(4), 60–77.CrossRef
Duguid, M. (2011). Female tokens in high-prestige work groups: Catalysts or inhibitors of group diversification? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(1), 104–115.CrossRef
Dwyer, S., Orlando C.R., & Chadwick, K. (2003). Gender diversity in management and firm performance: the influence of growth orientation and organizational culture. Journal Of Business Research, 56(12), 1009–1019.CrossRef
Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A.H., & Carli, L.L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The leadership quarterly, 14(6), 807–834.CrossRef
Eagly, A.H., Gartzia, L., & Carli, L. (2014). Female advantage: revisited. In: S. Kumra, R. Simpson, & R.J. Burke (Hrsg.), The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organizations, (pp. 153–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eagly, A.H., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C. (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 781–797.CrossRef
Eagly, A.H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M.C., & Van Engen, M.L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: a meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological bulletin, 129(4), 569–591.CrossRef
Eagly, A.H., & Johnson, B.T. (1990). Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 233–256.CrossRef
Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 60(5), 685–710.CrossRef
Eagly, A.H., & Karau, S.J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological review, 109(3), 573–598.CrossRef
Eagly, A.H., Karau, S.J., & Makhijani, M.G. (1995). Gender and the effectiveness of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 125–145.CrossRef
Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., & Klonsky, B.G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22.
Ellemers, N., Van Den Heuvel, H., De Gilder, D., Maass, A., & Bonvini, A. (2004). The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 315–338.CrossRef
Ely, R.J. (1994). The effects of organizational demographics and social identity on relationships among professional women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 203–238.CrossRef
Ely, R.J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D.M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474–493.CrossRef
Fairfax, L.M. (2006). Clogs in the pipeline: The mixed data on women directors and continued barriers to their advancement. Maryland Law Review, 65, 579–610.
Farrell, K.A., & Hersch, P.L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate finance, 11(1), 85–106.CrossRef
Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (2013). Social cognition: From brain to culture, 2. Aufl. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRef
Fondas, N., & Sassalos, S. (2000). A different voice in the boardroom: How the presence of women directors affects board influence over management. Global Focus, 12(2), 13–22.
Forbes, J.B., Piercy, J.E., & Hayes, T.L. (1988). Women executives: Breaking down barriers? Business Horizons, 31(6), 6–9.CrossRef
García-Morales, V.J., Jiménez-Barrionuevo, M.M., & Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, L. (2012). Transformational leadership influence on organizational performance through organizational learning and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 65(7), 1040–1050.CrossRef
Gibson, C.B. (1995). An investigation of gender differences in leadership across four countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 26(2), 255–279.CrossRef
Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2016). Leading at the top: Understanding women’s challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 51–63.CrossRef
Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus. New York: HarperBusiness.
Gumusluoglu, L., & Ilsev, A. (2009). Transformational leadership, creativity, and organizational innovation. Journal of business research, 62(4), 461–473.CrossRef
Haslam, S.A., Ryan, M.K., Kulich, C., Trojanowski, G., & Atkins, C. (2010). Investing with prejudice: The relationship between women’s presence on company boards and objective and subjective measures of company performance. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 484–497.
Heikkinen, S., Lämsä, A-M., & Hiillos, M. (2014). Narratives by women managers about spousal support for their careers. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(1), 27–39.CrossRef
Heilman, M.E. (1995). Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don’t know. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10(6), 3–26.
Heilman, M.E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 657–674.CrossRef
Heilman, M.E., Wallen, A.S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M.M. (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 416–427.CrossRef
Helgesen, S. (1990). The Female Advantage: Women’s Ways of Leadership. New York, NY: Doubleday Currency.
Hennig, M., & Jardim, A. (1977). Managerial woman. New York City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay? Race, gender and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208–224.CrossRef
Hewlett, S.A., & Luce, C.B. (2005). Off-ramps and on-ramps. Harvard Business Review, 83(3), 43–46, 48, 50–4.
Hippel, C. v., Walsh, A.M., & Zouroudis, A. (2011). Identity separation in response to stereotype threat. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 317–324.CrossRef
Hogue, M. (2016). Gender bias in communal leadership: examining servant leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31(4), 837–849.CrossRef
Hoogendoorn, S., Oosterbeek, H., & Van Praag, M. (2013). The impact of gender diversity on the performance of business teams: Evidence from a field experiment. Management Science, 59(7), 1514–1528.CrossRef
Hoyt, C.L., Burnette, J.L., & Innella, A.N. (2012). I can do that. The impact of implicit theories on leadership role model effectiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 257–268.CrossRef
Hoyt, C.L., Johnson, S.K., Murphy, S.E., & Skinnell, K.H. (2010). The impact of blatant stereotype activation and group sex-composition on female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(5), 716–732.CrossRef
Hoyt, C.L., & Simon, S. (2011). Female leaders injurious or inspiring role models for women? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(1), 143–157.CrossRef
Huse, M., & Solberg, A.G. (2006) Gender-related boardroom dynamics: how Scandinavian women make and can make contributions on corporate boards. Women in Management Review, 21(2), 113–130.CrossRef
Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11(5), 365–371.CrossRef
Jelinek, M., & Adler, N.J. (1988). Women: World-class managers for global competition. Academy Of Management Executive, 2(1), 11–19.
Jonsen, K., Maznevski, M.L., & Schneider, S.C. (2010). Gender differences in leadership – believing is seeing: implications for managing diversity. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29(6), 549–572.CrossRef
Judge, E. (2003, 11. November). Women on board: Help or hindrance? The Times, 21.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRef
Kakabadse, N.K., Figueira, C., Nicolopoulou, K., Hong Yang, J., Kakabadse, A.P. & Özbilgin, M.F. (2015). Gender diversity and board performance: women’s experiences and perspectives. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 265–281.CrossRef
Kalleberg, A.L., & Leicht, K.T. (1991). Gender and organizational performance: Determinants of small business survival and success. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 136–161.
Kanter, R.M. (1977a). Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965– 990.CrossRef
Kanter, R.M. (1977b). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Khurana, R. (2002). The curse of the superstar CEO. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 60–67.
Klatt, J., Eimler, S.C., & Krämer, N.C. (2016). Makeup your mind: The impact of styling on perceived competence and warmth of female leaders. The Journal of social psychology, 156(5), 483–497.CrossRef
Klettner, A., Clarke, T., & Boersma, M. (2016). Strategic and regulatory approaches to increasing women in leadership: multilevel targets and mandatory quotas as levers for cultural change. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(3), 395–419.CrossRef
Kloot, L. (2004). Women and leadership in universities: a case study of women academic managers. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(6), 470–485.CrossRef
Konrad, A.M., Kramer, V.W., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical Mass: The Impact of Three or More Women on Corporate Boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.CrossRef
Kramer, V.W., Konrad, A.M., Erkut, S., & Hooper, M.J. (2006). Critical mass on corporate boards: Why three or more women enhance governance. Boston: Wellesley Centers for Women.
Labelle, R., Francoeur, C., & Lakhal, F. (2015). To regulate or not to regulate? Early evidence on the means used around the world to promote gender diversity in the boardroom. Gender, Work & Organization, 22(4), 339–363.CrossRef
Latu, I.M., Mast, M.S., Lammers, J., & Bombari, D. (2013). Successful female leaders empower women’s behavior in leadership tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 444–448.CrossRef
Laud, R.L., & Johnson, M. (2013). Journey to the top: Are there really gender differences in the selection and utilization of career tactics?. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict, 17(1), 51–68.
Ledman, R.E., Miller, M., & Brown, D.R. (1995). Successful women and women’s colleges: Is there an intervening variable in the reported relationship? Sex roles, 33(7–8), 489–497.CrossRef
Levi, M., Li, K., & Zhang, F. (2014). Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 185–200.CrossRef
Linehan, M. (2001). Networking for female managers’ career development: Empirical evidence. Journal of Management Development, 20(10), 823–829.CrossRef
Loden, M. (1985). Feminine leadership, or, how to succeed in business without being one of the boys. New York City, NY: Crown Publishing Group.
Lowe, K.B., Kroeck, K.G., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The leadership quarterly, 7(3), 385–425.CrossRef
Marshall, J. (1993). Organisational cultures and women managers: Exploring the dynamics of resilience. Applied Psychology: An international Review, 42(4), 313–322.CrossRef
Martell, R.F., Lane, D.M., & Emrich, C. (1996). Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 15(2), 157–158.CrossRef
Marx, D.M., Ko, S.J., & Friedman, R.A. (2009). The „Obama effect“: how a salient role model reduces race-based performance differences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 953–956.CrossRef
Marx, D.M., & Roman, J.S. (2002). Female rolemodels: protecting women’s math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(9), 1183–1193.CrossRef
Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2013). A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(3), 136–169.
Melamed, T., & Bozionelos, N. (1992). Gender differences in the personality features of British managers. Psychological reports, 71(3), 979–986.CrossRef
Meyerson, D.E., & Fletcher, J.K. (2000). A Modest Manifesto for Shattering the Glass Ceiling. Harvard Business Review, January – February.
Miller, D.I., Eagly, A.H. & Linn, M.C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 631–644.CrossRef
Miller Burke, J., & Attridge, M. (2011). Pathways to Career and Leadership Success: Part 2 – Striking Gender Similarities Among $100 k Professionals. Journal of workplace behavioral health, 26(3), 207–239.CrossRef
Moore, L.M., & Rickel, A.U. (1980). Characteristics of women in traditional and non-traditional managerial roles. Personnel Psychology, 33(2), 317–333.CrossRef
Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.CrossRef
O’Neil, D.A., Hopkins, M.M., & Sullivan, S.E. (2011). Do women’s networks help advance women’s careers? Differences in perceptions of female workers and top leadership. Career Development International, 16(7), 733–754.CrossRef
Oliver, L. W. (1974). Achievement and affiliation motivation in career-oriented and homemaking-oriented college women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 4(3), 275–281.CrossRef
Olsen, R., & Cox, C. (2001). The influence of gender on the perception and response to investment risk: the case of professional investors. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets, 2(1), 29–36.CrossRef
Palermo, J. (2004). Breaking the Cultural Mode: The Key to Women’s Career Success. Hudson 20:20 Series Whitepaper: Hudson Global Resources and Human Capital Solutions.
Parks-Stamm, E.J., Heilman, M.E., & Hearns, K.A. (2008). Motivated to penalize: Women’s strategic rejection of successful women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 237–247.CrossRef
Paustian-Underdahl, S.C., Walker, L.S., & Woehr, D.J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1129–1145.CrossRef
Pease, A. & Pease, B. (2000). Why Men Don’t Listen and Women Can’t Read Maps. New York: Broadway Books.
Pfaff, L.A., Boatwright, K.J., Potthoff, A.L., Finan, C., Ulrey, L.A., & Huber, D.M. (2013). Perceptions of Women and Men Leaders Following 360-Degree Feedback Evaluations. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 26(1), 35–56.CrossRef
Phelan, J.E., Moss-Racusin, C.A., & Rudman, L.A. (2008). Competent yet out in the cold: Shifting criteria for hiring reflect backlash toward agentic women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 406–413.CrossRef
Piterman, H. (2008). The leadership challenge: Women in management. Melbourne: Committee for Economic Development of Australia.
Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: a meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571.CrossRef
Powell, G.N. (2012). Six ways of seeing the elephant: the intersection of sex, gender, and leadership. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 27(2), 119–141.CrossRef
Powell, G.N., & Butterfield, D.A. (1994). Investigating the „glass ceiling“ phenomenon: An empirical study of actual promotions to top management. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 68–86.
Reciniello, S. (1999). The emergence of a powerful female workforce as a threat to organizational identity. American Behavioural Scientist, 43(2), 301–24.CrossRef
Rink, F., Ryan, M.K., & Stoker, J.I. (2012). Influence in times of crisis how social and financial resources affect men’s and women’s evaluations of glass-cliff positions. Psychological science, 23(11), 1306–1313.CrossRef
Roberson, L., & Kulik, C.T. (2007). Stereotype threat at work. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(2), 24–40.CrossRef
Rosener, J.B. (1990). Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review, 68(6), 119–125.
Rosener, J.B. (1995). America’s competitive secret: Women managers. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rosette, A.S., & Tost, L.P. (2010). Agentic women and communal leadership: how role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(2), 221–235.CrossRef
Rudman, L.A. (1998). Self-promotion is a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counter-stereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645.CrossRef
Rudman, L.A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of social issues, 57(4), 743–762.CrossRef
Rudman, L.A., & Phelan, J.E. (2010). The effect of priming gender roles on women’s implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations. Social Psychology, 41, 192–202.CrossRef
Rutherford, S. (2001). Organizational cultures, women managers and exclusion. Women in Management Review, 16(8), 371–382.CrossRef
Ryan, M.K., & Haslam, S.A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of management, 16(2), 81–90.CrossRef
Ryan, M.K., & Haslam, S.A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 549–572.CrossRef
Ryan, M.K., Haslam, S.A. & Kulich, C. (2010). Politics and the glass cliff: Evidence that women are preferentially selected to contest hard-to-win seats. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 56–64.CrossRef
Ryan, M.K., Haslam, S.A., Morgenroth, T., Rink, F., Stoker, J., & Peters, K. (2016). Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 446–455.CrossRef
Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in. New York City, NY: Knopf.
Schein, V.E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of applied psychology, 57(2), 95–100.CrossRef
Schein, V.E. (1975). Relationships between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics among female managers. Journal of applied psychology, 60(3), 340–344.CrossRef
Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336–356.CrossRef
Sealy, R., & Vinnicombe, S. (2012). Women and the governance of corporate boards. In T. Clarke & D. Branson (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance. London, UK: Sage.
Seierstad, C., & Opsahl, T. (2011). For the few not the many? The effects of affirmative action on presence, prominence, and social capital of women directors in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 27(1), 44–54.CrossRef
Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 68–74.CrossRef
Sheridan, A.J. (1995). Affirmative action in Australia – employment statistics can’t tell the whole story. Women in Management Review, 10(2), 26–34.CrossRef
Sinclair, A. (2005). Doing leadership differently. Victoria: Melbourne University Press.
Singh, V. (2008). Transforming boardroom cultures in science, engineering and technology organizations. Bradford: UK Rsource Centre for Women in Science, Engineering and Technology.
Singh, V., Vinnicombe, S., & Johnson, P. (2001). Women directors on top UK boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9(3), 206–216.CrossRef
Smith, A.E., & Monaghan, K.R. (2013). Some ceilings have more cracks: Representative bureaucracy in federal regulatory agencies. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(1), 50–71.CrossRef
Sojo, V.E., Wood, R.E., Wood, S.A., & Wheeler, M.A. (2016). Reporting requirements, targets, and quotas for women in leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 519–536.CrossRef
Steele, C.M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(5), 797–811.CrossRef
Stroebe, K., Ellemers, N., Barreto, M., & Mummendey, A.I. (2009). For better or for worse: The congruence of personal and group outcomes on targets’ responses to discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 576–591.CrossRef
Sturm, S. (2001). Second generation employment discrimination: a structural approach. Columbia Law Review, 101(3), 458–568.CrossRef
Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163.CrossRef
Tate, G., & Yang, L. (2015). Female leadership and gender equity: Evidence from plant closure. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 77–97.CrossRef
Terborg, J. R. (1977). Women in management: A research review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(6), 647–664.CrossRef
Terjesen, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Board gender quotas: Exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(1), 23–65.CrossRef
Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.CrossRef
Torchia, M., Calabro, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.CrossRef
van Emmerik, I.H., Euwema, M.C., & Wendt, H. (2008). Leadership behaviors around the world: The relative importance of gender versus cultural background. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 8(3), 297–315.CrossRef
Van Engen, M.L., & Willemsen, T.M. (2004). Sex and leadership styles: A meta-analysis of research published in the 1990s. Psychological Reports, 94(1), 3–18.CrossRef
Van Staveren, I. (2014). The Lehman Sisters hypothesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38(5), 995–1014.CrossRef
Walker, R.C., & Aritz, J. (2015). Women doing leadership: Leadership styles and organizational culture. International Journal of Business Communication, 52(4), 452–478.CrossRef
Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Metadata
Title
Frauen in Führungspositionen – Einige Fakten
Author
Regina Anna-Maria Palmer
Copyright Year
2019
Book
Führung und ihre Herausforderungen

Print ISBN: 978-3-658-25277-9

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-658-25278-6

Copyright Year: 2019

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25278-6_12