Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Empirical Economics 4/2020

15-04-2019

GAS Copula models on who’s systemically important in South Africa: Banks or Insurers?

Authors: Mathias Mandla Manguzvane, John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba

Published in: Empirical Economics | Issue 4/2020

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper makes use of the generalized autoregressive score (GAS) Copula model to estimate the Conditional Value at Risk (CoVaR) measure of systemic risk. The proposed measure of systemic risk considers the score of the conditional density as the main driver of time-varying dynamics of tail dependence among financial institutions. Not only does the GAS Copula-based CoVaR enable us to monitor the amount of systemic risk posed by different financial institutions at a specific date, it also allows for the forecasting of systemic risk over time. Our results based on a sample of daily equity returns collected from January 2000 to July 2017 surprisingly show that in South Africa, insurers are the most systemically risky compared to banks and other financial sectors. Moreover, we make use of flexible GAS Copulas in order to approximate complex dependence structures. To validate the robustness of our results over time, we divide our sample period into two sub samples, namely the pre-crisis period (January 2000 to June 2007) and the post-crisis period (January 2010 to July 2017). We obtain similar results in the pre-crisis period. However, in the post-crisis period banks are found to be the biggest threat to system-wide stability.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Earlier version of this study was published as a working paper. Adrian and Brunnermeier (2016)
 
2
In other studies, such as Patton (2006) the driving mechanism is referred to as the forcing variable.
 
3
Earlier version of this paper was published as a working paper: Creal, Koopman and Lucas (2008)
 
4
Please see definition the definition of Copulas in the appendix.
 
5
The random variable \(Z_{s,t}\) also follows the skewed t distribution and has the same representation as in Eq. (13) with the only difference being the subscript i which changes to s.
 
6
The marginal model results for the other 16 institutions are in the appendix.
 
7
The rest of the Copula results are in the appendix.
 
8
The graphs provided in the appendix and are for 8 institutions only.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adams Z, Füss R, Gropp R (2011) Modelling spill over effects among financial institutions: a state dependent sensitivity value-at-risk approach. EBS Working Paper Adams Z, Füss R, Gropp R (2011) Modelling spill over effects among financial institutions: a state dependent sensitivity value-at-risk approach. EBS Working Paper
go back to reference Bank for International Settlements (2009) Basel committee on banking supervision (BCBS). In: International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: a revised framework Bank for International Settlements (2009) Basel committee on banking supervision (BCBS). In: International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: a revised framework
go back to reference Bernal O, Gnabo JY, Guilmin G (2014) Assessing the contribution of banks, insurance and other financial services to systemic risk. J Bank Financ 47(1):270–287CrossRef Bernal O, Gnabo JY, Guilmin G (2014) Assessing the contribution of banks, insurance and other financial services to systemic risk. J Bank Financ 47(1):270–287CrossRef
go back to reference Claessens S, Herring R, Schoenmaker D, Summe K (2010) A safer world financial system: improving the resolution of systemic institutions. Geneva Reports on the World Economy Claessens S, Herring R, Schoenmaker D, Summe K (2010) A safer world financial system: improving the resolution of systemic institutions. Geneva Reports on the World Economy
go back to reference Creal D, Koopman SJ, Lucas A (2013) Generalized autoregressive score models with applications. J Appl Econ 28(5):777–795CrossRef Creal D, Koopman SJ, Lucas A (2013) Generalized autoregressive score models with applications. J Appl Econ 28(5):777–795CrossRef
go back to reference Cummins JD, Weiss MA (2013) Systemic risk and the insurance industry. Handbook of insurance. Springer, New York, pp 745–793CrossRef Cummins JD, Weiss MA (2013) Systemic risk and the insurance industry. Handbook of insurance. Springer, New York, pp 745–793CrossRef
go back to reference Eckernkemper T (2018) Modelling systemic risk: time-varying tail dependence when forecasting marginal expected shortfall. J Financ Econom 16(1):63–117CrossRef Eckernkemper T (2018) Modelling systemic risk: time-varying tail dependence when forecasting marginal expected shortfall. J Financ Econom 16(1):63–117CrossRef
go back to reference Financial Stability Board (2010) Reducing the moral hazard posed by systemically important financial institutions. Financial stability board report, 20 October 2010 Financial Stability Board (2010) Reducing the moral hazard posed by systemically important financial institutions. Financial stability board report, 20 October 2010
go back to reference Girardi G, Ergün AT (2013) Systemic risk measurement: multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR. J Bank Financ 37(8):3169–3180CrossRef Girardi G, Ergün AT (2013) Systemic risk measurement: multivariate GARCH estimation of CoVaR. J Bank Financ 37(8):3169–3180CrossRef
go back to reference Hu L (2006) Dependence patterns across financial markets: a mixed Copula approach. Appl Financ Econom 16(10):717–729CrossRef Hu L (2006) Dependence patterns across financial markets: a mixed Copula approach. Appl Financ Econom 16(10):717–729CrossRef
go back to reference Huang X, Zhou H, Zhu H (2009) A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions. J Bank Financ 33(11):2036–2049CrossRef Huang X, Zhou H, Zhu H (2009) A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions. J Bank Financ 33(11):2036–2049CrossRef
go back to reference International Monetary Fund, Financial Stability Board, Bank for International Settlements (2011) Macroprudential policy tools and frameworks–update to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors International Monetary Fund, Financial Stability Board, Bank for International Settlements (2011) Macroprudential policy tools and frameworks–update to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors
go back to reference Jordanger LA, Tjøstheim D (2014) Model selection of copulas: AIC versus a cross validation copula information criterion. Stat Probab Lett 92:249–255CrossRef Jordanger LA, Tjøstheim D (2014) Model selection of copulas: AIC versus a cross validation copula information criterion. Stat Probab Lett 92:249–255CrossRef
go back to reference Koopman SJ, Lucas A (2008) A non-Gaussian panel time series model for estimating and decomposing default risk. J Bus Econom Stat 26(4):510–525CrossRef Koopman SJ, Lucas A (2008) A non-Gaussian panel time series model for estimating and decomposing default risk. J Bus Econom Stat 26(4):510–525CrossRef
go back to reference Laeven L, Ratnovski L, Tong H (2016) Bank size, capital, and systemic risk: some international evidence. J Bank Financ 69(1):25–34CrossRef Laeven L, Ratnovski L, Tong H (2016) Bank size, capital, and systemic risk: some international evidence. J Bank Financ 69(1):25–34CrossRef
go back to reference Mainik G, Schaanning E (2014) On dependence consistency of CoVaR and some other systemic risk measures. Stat Risk Model 31(1):49–77 Mainik G, Schaanning E (2014) On dependence consistency of CoVaR and some other systemic risk measures. Stat Risk Model 31(1):49–77
go back to reference Makatjane K, Xaba D, Moroke N (2017) Application of generalized autoregressive score model to stock returns. Int J Econ Manag Eng 11(11):2714–2717 Makatjane K, Xaba D, Moroke N (2017) Application of generalized autoregressive score model to stock returns. Int J Econ Manag Eng 11(11):2714–2717
go back to reference Manguzvane M, Muteba Mwamba JW (2017) Modelling systemic risk in the South African banking sector using CoVaR, ERSA Working Paper (No. 709) Manguzvane M, Muteba Mwamba JW (2017) Modelling systemic risk in the South African banking sector using CoVaR, ERSA Working Paper (No. 709)
go back to reference Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econom J Econom Soc 59:347–370 Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econom J Econom Soc 59:347–370
go back to reference Patton AJ (2006) Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. Int Econ Rev 47(2):527–556CrossRef Patton AJ (2006) Modelling asymmetric exchange rate dependence. Int Econ Rev 47(2):527–556CrossRef
go back to reference Reboredo JC, Ugolini A (2015) Systemic risk in European sovereign debt markets: a CoVaR-Copula approach. J Int Money Financ 51:214–244CrossRef Reboredo JC, Ugolini A (2015) Systemic risk in European sovereign debt markets: a CoVaR-Copula approach. J Int Money Financ 51:214–244CrossRef
Metadata
Title
GAS Copula models on who’s systemically important in South Africa: Banks or Insurers?
Authors
Mathias Mandla Manguzvane
John Weirstrass Muteba Mwamba
Publication date
15-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Empirical Economics / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0377-7332
Electronic ISSN: 1435-8921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-019-01695-4

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Empirical Economics 4/2020 Go to the issue