Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics
Published in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 6/2019

01-11-2019 | INFORMATION ANALYSIS

General and Specific Problems of Multilevel Synthesis of Models of Monitoring Objects

Author: N. A. Zhukova

Published in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Abstract—This paper considers the general and specific problems of multilevel synthesis of models of monitoring objects. These models satisfy the needs of domain experts for model building when solving forecasting and control problems, etc. The general problem can be formulated as a single-objective multi-constrained optimization problem. A set of synthesis efficiency criteria and indicators for assessing synthesized models is proposed. The specific problems of multilevel synthesis are determined in the context of the general problem definition and in terms of the developed set of indicators.
previous article The Specific Features of Source Data and Metadata Ontology in Virtual Reality Systems
next article On the Problem of Medical Diagnostic Evidence: Intelligent Analysis of Empirical Data on Patients in Samples of Limited Size
Literature
1.
Kotseruba, I. and Tsotsos, J.K., 40 years of cognitive architectures: Core cognitive abilities and practical applications, Artif. Intell. Rev., 2018. https://​link.​springer.​ com/article/10.1007/s10462-018-9646-y.
2.
Laird, J.E., The Soar Cognitive Architecture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.CrossRef
3.
Gore, B.F., Hooey, B.L., Wickens, C.D., and Scott-Nash, S., A computational implementation of a human attention guiding mechanism in MIDAs, International Conference on Digital Human Modeling, San Diego, CA, 2009, vol. 5.
4.
Tecuci, G., et al., An experiment in agent teaching by subject matter experts, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud., 2000, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 583–610.CrossRef
5.
Langley, P. and Choi, D., Learning recursive control programs from problem solving, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 2006, vol. 7, pp. 493–518.MathSciNetMATH
6.
Bridewell, W. and Bello, P.F., Incremental object perception in an attention-driven cognitive architecture, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognition Science Society (CogSci 2015 July 22–25), Pasadena, CA, 2015, pp. 279–284.
7.
Glodek, M., et al., Fusion paradigms in cognitive technical systems for human-computer interaction, Neurocomputing, 2015, vol. 161, pp. 17–37.CrossRef
8.
Perlovsky, L.I., Cognitive high level information fusion, Inf. Sci., 2007, pp. 2099–2118.CrossRef
9.
Hawkins, J. and Blakeslee, S., On Intelligence, New York: Times Books, 2004.
10.
Arel, I., Rose, D., and Coop, R., Destin: A scalable deep learning architecture with application to high-dimensional robust pattern recognition, Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Biologically Inspired Cognitive A-rchitectures, Washington, D.C., 2009.
11.
O'Reilly, R.C., Braver, T.S., and Cohen, J., A biologically-based computational model of working memory, in Models of Working Memory, Miyake, A. and Shah, P., Eds., New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 375–411.
12.
Fleischer, J., Gally, J., Eldeman, G., and Krichmar, J., Retrospective and prospective responses arising in modeled hippocampus during maze navigation by a brain-based device, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Am., 2007, vol. 104.CrossRef
13.
Modha, S., Introducing a brain-inspired computer TrueNorth’s neurons to revolutionize system architecture. http://​www.​research.​ibm.​com/​articles/​brain-chip.​shtml.​
14.
Haykin, S., Fatemi, M., Setoodeh, P., and Xue, Y., Cognitive control, Proc. IEEE, 2012, vol. 100, pp. 3156–3169.CrossRef
15.
Haikonen, P., The role of associative processing in cognitive computing, Cognit. Comput., 2009, vol. 1, pp. 42–49.CrossRef
16.
Palm, G., Neural associative memories and sparse coding, Neural Networks, 2013, no. 37, pp. 165–171.CrossRef
17.
Haykin, S., Neural Networks and Learning Machines, New York: Prentice Hall, 2008, 3rd ed.
18.
Osipov, V. and Osipova, M., Space-time signal binding in recurrent neural networks with controlled elements, Neurocomputing, 2018, no. 308, pp. 194–204.CrossRef
19.
Osipov, V. and Nikiforov, V., Formal aspects of streaming recurrent neural networks, Proceedings 15th International Symposium on Neural Networks Advances in Neural Networks–ISNN 2018; Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2018, vol. 10878, pp. 29–36.
20.
Osipov, V., Space-time structure of recurrent neural networks with controlled synapses, Proceedings International Symposium on Neural Networks Advances in Neural Networks–ISNN 2016; Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2016, vol. 9719, pp. 177–184.
21.
Osipov, V., Structure and basic functions of cognitive neural network machine, MATEC Web Conf., 2017, vol. 113.CrossRef
22.
Osipov, V., An associative intelligent machine with three signaling systems, Inf.-Upr. Sist., 2014, no. 5, pp. 12–17.
23.
Osipov, V., Automatic synthesis of multilevel automata models of biological objects, International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA 2019); Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2019, vol. 11620.
24.
Kosters, W.A., Pijls, W., and Popova, V., Complexity analysis of depth first and FP-growth implementations of APRIORI, Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition; Lect. Notes Comput. Sci., 2003, vol. 2734, pp. 284–292.CrossRef
25.
Foggia, P., Sansone, C., and Vento, M.A., Graph-based representations in pattern recognition, Proceedings of the 3rd IAPR TC-15 Workshop, Ischia, 2001, pp. 188–199.
26.
Cordella, L.P., Evaluating performance of the VF graph matching algorithm, Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Image. Analysis and Processing, 1999, pp. 1172–1177.
27.
Chen’, C. and Li, R., Method of resolutions, in Matematicheskaya logika i avtomaticheskoe dokazatel’stvo teorem (Mathematical Logic and Automatic Proof of Theorems), Moscow: Nauka, 1983, ch. 5, p. 358.
28.
Maslov, S.Yu., The inverse method for establishing derivability for logical calculi, Tr. Mat. Inst.im.V. A. Steklova Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1968, vol. 98.
29.
Donini, F., et al., Reasoning in description logics, in Principles of Knowledge Representation, Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information, 1996, pp. 191–236.
Metadata
Title
General and Specific Problems of Multilevel Synthesis of Models of Monitoring Objects
Author
N. A. Zhukova
Publication date
01-11-2019
Publisher
Pleiades Publishing
Published in
Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0005-1055
Electronic ISSN: 1934-8371
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105519060049

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 6/2019 Go to the issue

AUTOMATION OF TEXT PROCESSING

Classification of Scientific Texts Based on the Compression of Annotations to Publications

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS

On the Problem of Medical Diagnostic Evidence: Intelligent Analysis of Empirical Data on Patients in Samples of Limited Size

INFORMATION SYSTEMS

A Software Complex for Integration of Attribute Data of Information Objects

INFORMATION ANALYSIS

The Specific Features of Source Data and Metadata Ontology in Virtual Reality Systems

INFORMATION SYSTEMS

Methodological Foundations for the Formation of Information Space and Digital Twin Objects in Smart Homes

Premium Partner

    Image Credits