Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 2/2017

01-06-2017 | State of the Art/Practice Paper

Geocell-Reinforced Foundation Systems: A Critical Review

Authors: Arghadeep Biswas, A. Murali Krishna

Published in: International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering | Issue 2/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The ever increasing infrastructure development requires adequate and competent ground, which is becoming scarce at present. Thus, developing techniques for improving the weak soil (having low bearing capacity and/or likely to undergo excessive settlement) into a competent acceptable condition is a major task for geotechnical engineering practice. In this perspective, the concept of ‘reinforcing the soil’ is being widely appreciated and extensively practiced. For last few decades, the soil-reinforcement in various forms, such as planar and/or three-dimensional, has been vividly applied in several fields of civil engineering. As compared to the planar form, the three-dimensional ‘Geocell’ is comparatively new invention in soil-reinforcement. It is a honeycombing interconnected cellular confinement system, made of geosynthetics, such as geotextiles and/or geogrids. It has been observed that ‘Geocells’ significantly enhances the load-bearing capacity of soils and reduces settlement of the concern geotechnical structure. Apart from load-bearing (especially in pavements and foundations), it has also been extensively used in various slope stabilization, embankment construction and railway track applications. With increasing trend and demand, the performance of geocell-reinforcement has rigorously been studied for its betterment and optimum parametric configurations. Studies have revealed a large numbers of parameters, such as reinforcement geometry, interaction with filled soil, etc., largely influencing the performance of geocell-reinforced systems. In view of that, this paper aims to present a critical review of the parametric behavior of geocell-reinforced systems which would be a very useful document for various applications and further research.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
1.
go back to reference Dewar S (1962) The oldest roads in Britain. Countryman 59(3):547–555 Dewar S (1962) The oldest roads in Britain. Countryman 59(3):547–555
2.
go back to reference Jones CJFP (1996) Earth reinforcement and soil structures. Thomas Telford Publication, LondonCrossRef Jones CJFP (1996) Earth reinforcement and soil structures. Thomas Telford Publication, LondonCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Shukla SK (2002) Geosynthetics and their applications. Thomas Telford, London Shukla SK (2002) Geosynthetics and their applications. Thomas Telford, London
4.
go back to reference Shukla SK (2012) Handbook of geosynthetic engineering. 2nd edn. ICE Publishing, London Shukla SK (2012) Handbook of geosynthetic engineering. 2nd edn. ICE Publishing, London
5.
go back to reference Shukla SK (2016) An introduction to geosynthetic engineering. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, London Shukla SK (2016) An introduction to geosynthetic engineering. CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, London
6.
go back to reference Saran S (2005). Reinforced soil and its engineering applications. I.K. International Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi Saran S (2005). Reinforced soil and its engineering applications. I.K. International Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi
7.
go back to reference Vidal H (1969). The principle of reinforced earth. Highway Research Record, 282, Washington, D.C. Vidal H (1969). The principle of reinforced earth. Highway Research Record, 282, Washington, D.C.
8.
go back to reference Binquet J, Lee KL (1975). Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(12):1241–1255 Binquet J, Lee KL (1975). Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(12):1241–1255
9.
go back to reference Binquet J, Lee KL (1975). Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(12), 1257–1276 Binquet J, Lee KL (1975). Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(12), 1257–1276
10.
go back to reference Giroud JP, Noiray L (1981) Geotexti1e reinforced unpaved road design. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 107(9), 1233–1254 Giroud JP, Noiray L (1981) Geotexti1e reinforced unpaved road design. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 107(9), 1233–1254
11.
go back to reference Omar MT, Das BM, Yen SC, Puri VK, Cook EE (1993) Ultimate bearing capacity of rectangular foundations on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotech Test J ASTM 16(2):246–252.CrossRef Omar MT, Das BM, Yen SC, Puri VK, Cook EE (1993) Ultimate bearing capacity of rectangular foundations on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotech Test J ASTM 16(2):246–252.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kumar A, Walia BS, Saran S (2005). Pressure-settlement characteristics of rectangular footings resting on reinforced soil. J Geotechn Geol Eng 23:469–485CrossRef Kumar A, Walia BS, Saran S (2005). Pressure-settlement characteristics of rectangular footings resting on reinforced soil. J Geotechn Geol Eng 23:469–485CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tafreshi SNM, Dawson AR (2010) Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 28(1):72–84CrossRef Tafreshi SNM, Dawson AR (2010) Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 28(1):72–84CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rajyalakshmi K, Madhav MR, Ramu K (2012) Bearing capacity of reinforced strip foundation beds on compressible clays. Indian Geotech J 42(4):294–308 Rajyalakshmi K, Madhav MR, Ramu K (2012) Bearing capacity of reinforced strip foundation beds on compressible clays. Indian Geotech J 42(4):294–308
15.
go back to reference Jha JN, Choudhary AK, Gill KS, Shukla SK (2013) Bearing capacity of a strip footing resting on reinforced fly ash slope: an analytical approach. Indian Geotech J 43(4):354–366CrossRef Jha JN, Choudhary AK, Gill KS, Shukla SK (2013) Bearing capacity of a strip footing resting on reinforced fly ash slope: an analytical approach. Indian Geotech J 43(4):354–366CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) Effect of submergence on settlement and bearing capacity of surface strip footing on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng. doi:10.1007/s40891-014-0006-y Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) Effect of submergence on settlement and bearing capacity of surface strip footing on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng. doi:10.​1007/​s40891-014-0006-y
17.
go back to reference Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) An improved method to increase the load-bearing capacity of strip footing resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Indian Geotech J 45(1):98–109CrossRef Kazi M, Shukla SK, Habibi D (2015) An improved method to increase the load-bearing capacity of strip footing resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Indian Geotech J 45(1):98–109CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Biswas A, Ansari MA, Dash SK, Krishna AM (2015) Behavior of geogrid reinforced foundation systems supported on clay subgrades of different strengths. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1(3):1–10CrossRef Biswas A, Ansari MA, Dash SK, Krishna AM (2015) Behavior of geogrid reinforced foundation systems supported on clay subgrades of different strengths. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 1(3):1–10CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Webster SL, Watkins JE (1977) Investigation of construction techniques for tactical bridge approach roads across soft ground. Technical Report S-77-1, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Mississippi, USA Webster SL, Watkins JE (1977) Investigation of construction techniques for tactical bridge approach roads across soft ground. Technical Report S-77-1, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Mississippi, USA
20.
go back to reference Bush DI, Jenner CG, Bassett RH (1990) The design and construction of geocell foundation mattresses supporting embankments over soft ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):83–98CrossRef Bush DI, Jenner CG, Bassett RH (1990) The design and construction of geocell foundation mattresses supporting embankments over soft ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):83–98CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Simac MR (1990) Connections for geogrid systems. Geotext Geomembr 9(4):537–546CrossRef Simac MR (1990) Connections for geogrid systems. Geotext Geomembr 9(4):537–546CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Carroll RG, Curtis VC (1990) Geogrid connections. Geotext Geomembr 9(4–6):515–530CrossRef Carroll RG, Curtis VC (1990) Geogrid connections. Geotext Geomembr 9(4–6):515–530CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mandal JN, Gupta P (1994) Stability of geocell-reinforced soil. Constr Build Mater 8(1):55–62CrossRef Mandal JN, Gupta P (1994) Stability of geocell-reinforced soil. Constr Build Mater 8(1):55–62CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mhaiskar SY, Mandal JN (1996) Investigations on soft clay subgrade strengthening using geocells. Constr Build Mater 10(4):281–286CrossRef Mhaiskar SY, Mandal JN (1996) Investigations on soft clay subgrade strengthening using geocells. Constr Build Mater 10(4):281–286CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Dash SK, Sireesh S, Sitharam TG (2003) Behaviour of geocell reinforced sand beds under circular footing. Ground Improv 7(3):111–115CrossRef Dash SK, Sireesh S, Sitharam TG (2003) Behaviour of geocell reinforced sand beds under circular footing. Ground Improv 7(3):111–115CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zhou H, Wen X (2008) Model studies on geogrid or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil. Geotext Geomembr 26(3):231–238MathSciNetCrossRef Zhou H, Wen X (2008) Model studies on geogrid or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil. Geotext Geomembr 26(3):231–238MathSciNetCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Biswas A, Krishna AM, Dash SK (2013) Influence of subgrade strength on the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation systems. Geosynth Int 20(6):376–388CrossRef Biswas A, Krishna AM, Dash SK (2013) Influence of subgrade strength on the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation systems. Geosynth Int 20(6):376–388CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2015) 3-Dimensional numerical modelling of geocell reinforced sand beds. Geotext Geomembr 43:171–181CrossRef Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2015) 3-Dimensional numerical modelling of geocell reinforced sand beds. Geotext Geomembr 43:171–181CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K, Latha GM (2000) Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over a soft clay foundation. Geotech Test J 23(2):45–54 Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K, Latha GM (2000) Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over a soft clay foundation. Geotech Test J 23(2):45–54
31.
go back to reference Zhang L, Zhao M, Shi C, Zhao H (2010) Bearing capacity of geocell reinforcement in embankment engineering. Geotext Geomembr 28(5):475–482CrossRef Zhang L, Zhao M, Shi C, Zhao H (2010) Bearing capacity of geocell reinforcement in embankment engineering. Geotext Geomembr 28(5):475–482CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Emersleben A, Meyer N (2008) The use of geocells in road constructions over soft soil: vertical stress and falling weight deflectometer measurements. EuroGeo4, paper number 132, 2008 Emersleben A, Meyer N (2008) The use of geocells in road constructions over soft soil: vertical stress and falling weight deflectometer measurements. EuroGeo4, paper number 132, 2008
33.
go back to reference Tanyu BF, Aydilek AH, Lau AW, Edil TB, Benson CH (2013) Laboratory evaluation of geocell-reinforced gravel subbase over poor subgrades. Geosynth Int 20(2):47–61CrossRef Tanyu BF, Aydilek AH, Lau AW, Edil TB, Benson CH (2013) Laboratory evaluation of geocell-reinforced gravel subbase over poor subgrades. Geosynth Int 20(2):47–61CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Leshchinsky B, Ling H (2013) Effects of geocell confinement on strength and deformation behaviour of gravel. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(2):340–352CrossRef Leshchinsky B, Ling H (2013) Effects of geocell confinement on strength and deformation behaviour of gravel. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139(2):340–352CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Leshchinsky B, Ling H (2013) Numerical modelling of behavior of railway ballasted structure with geocell confinement. Geotext Geomembr 36:33–43CrossRef Leshchinsky B, Ling H (2013) Numerical modelling of behavior of railway ballasted structure with geocell confinement. Geotext Geomembr 36:33–43CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Indraratna B, Biabani M, Nimbalkar S (2015) Behavior of geocell reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading in plane strain condition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(1):04014081CrossRef Indraratna B, Biabani M, Nimbalkar S (2015) Behavior of geocell reinforced subballast subjected to cyclic loading in plane strain condition. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 141(1):04014081CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Biabani MM, Indraratna B, Ngo NT (2016) Modelling of geocell-reinforced sub-ballast subjected to cyclic loading. Geotext Geomembr 44:489–503CrossRef Biabani MM, Indraratna B, Ngo NT (2016) Modelling of geocell-reinforced sub-ballast subjected to cyclic loading. Geotext Geomembr 44:489–503CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 9(4):235–256CrossRef Dash SK, Krishnaswamy NR, Rajagopal K (2001) Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 9(4):235–256CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2001) Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 19:529–538CrossRef Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2001) Strip footing on geocell reinforced sand beds with additional planar reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 19:529–538CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Dash SK, Sireesh S, Sitharam TG (2003) Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 21(4):197–219CrossRef Dash SK, Sireesh S, Sitharam TG (2003) Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. Geotext Geomembr 21(4):197–219CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2004) Performance of different geosynthetic reinforcement materials in sand foundations. Geosynth Int 11(1):35–42CrossRef Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2004) Performance of different geosynthetic reinforcement materials in sand foundations. Geosynth Int 11(1):35–42CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2007) Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading. Can Geotech J 44(7):905–916CrossRef Dash SK, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR (2007) Behaviour of geocell-reinforced sand beds under strip loading. Can Geotech J 44(7):905–916CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Dash SK, Reddy PD, Raghukanth TG (2008) Subgrade modulus of geocell-reinforced sand foundation. Ground Improv 161(12):79–87CrossRef Dash SK, Reddy PD, Raghukanth TG (2008) Subgrade modulus of geocell-reinforced sand foundation. Ground Improv 161(12):79–87CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Dash SK (2010) Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell reinforced sand foundations. J Mater Civ Eng ASCE 22(5):533–538MathSciNetCrossRef Dash SK (2010) Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell reinforced sand foundations. J Mater Civ Eng ASCE 22(5):533–538MathSciNetCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Dash SK (2012) Effect of geocell type on load carrying mechanism of geocell reinforced sand foundations. Int J Geomech ASCE 12(5):537–548CrossRef Dash SK (2012) Effect of geocell type on load carrying mechanism of geocell reinforced sand foundations. Int J Geomech ASCE 12(5):537–548CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Pokharel SK, Han J, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL, Halahmi I (2010) Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading. Geotext Geomembr 28(6):570–578CrossRef Pokharel SK, Han J, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL, Halahmi I (2010) Investigation of factors influencing behavior of single geocell-reinforced bases under static loading. Geotext Geomembr 28(6):570–578CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR, Latha GM (1999) Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotext Geomembr 17(3):171–184CrossRef Rajagopal K, Krishnaswamy NR, Latha GM (1999) Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. Geotext Geomembr 17(3):171–184CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Latha GM, Murthy VS (2007) Effects of reinforcement form on the behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 25(1):23–32CrossRef Latha GM, Murthy VS (2007) Effects of reinforcement form on the behaviour of geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 25(1):23–32CrossRef
50.
51.
go back to reference Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2005) Model studies of a circular footing supported on geocell-reinforced clay. Can Geotech J 42(2):693–703CrossRef Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2005) Model studies of a circular footing supported on geocell-reinforced clay. Can Geotech J 42(2):693–703CrossRef
52.
go back to reference Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2007) Performance of surface footing on geocell-reinforced soft clay beds. Geotech Geol Eng 25(5):509–524CrossRef Sitharam TG, Sireesh S, Dash SK (2007) Performance of surface footing on geocell-reinforced soft clay beds. Geotech Geol Eng 25(5):509–524CrossRef
53.
go back to reference Latha GM, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswami NR (2006) Experimental and theoretical investigation on geocell supported embankment. Int J Geomech 6(1):30–35CrossRef Latha GM, Rajagopal K, Krishnaswami NR (2006) Experimental and theoretical investigation on geocell supported embankment. Int J Geomech 6(1):30–35CrossRef
54.
go back to reference Latha GM, Dash SK, Rajagopal K (2008) Equivalent continuum simulations of geocell reinforced sand beds supporting strip footings. Geotech Geol Eng 26(4):387–398CrossRef Latha GM, Dash SK, Rajagopal K (2008) Equivalent continuum simulations of geocell reinforced sand beds supporting strip footings. Geotech Geol Eng 26(4):387–398CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Latha GM, Somwanshi A (2009) Bearing capacity of square footings on geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 27(4):281–294CrossRef Latha GM, Somwanshi A (2009) Bearing capacity of square footings on geosynthetic reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 27(4):281–294CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Henkel DJ, Gilbert GD (1952) The effect of the rubber membrane on the measured triaxial compression strength of clay samples. Geotechnique 3(1):20–29CrossRef Henkel DJ, Gilbert GD (1952) The effect of the rubber membrane on the measured triaxial compression strength of clay samples. Geotechnique 3(1):20–29CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Duncan JM, Seed HB (1967). Corrections for strength test data. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 93(5):121–137 Duncan JM, Seed HB (1967). Corrections for strength test data. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 93(5):121–137
58.
go back to reference Bathurst RJ, Karpurapu R (1993) Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils. Geotech Test J 16(3):296–303CrossRef Bathurst RJ, Karpurapu R (1993) Large-scale triaxial compression testing of geocell-reinforced granular soils. Geotech Test J 16(3):296–303CrossRef
59.
go back to reference Fabymole PA, Sireesh S, Madhav MR (2014) Numerical modelling of strip footing on geocell reinforced beds. Ground Improv 168(3):194–205 Fabymole PA, Sireesh S, Madhav MR (2014) Numerical modelling of strip footing on geocell reinforced beds. Ground Improv 168(3):194–205
60.
go back to reference Han J, Yang X, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL (2008) Behaviour of geocell reinforced sand under a vertical load. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2045:95–101CrossRef Han J, Yang X, Leshchinsky D, Parsons RL (2008) Behaviour of geocell reinforced sand under a vertical load. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2045:95–101CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Sireesh S, Puppala AJ, Sitharam TG, Gowrisetti S (2009) Numerical simulation of geocell-reinforced sand and clay. Ground Improv 162(4):185–198CrossRef Sireesh S, Puppala AJ, Sitharam TG, Gowrisetti S (2009) Numerical simulation of geocell-reinforced sand and clay. Ground Improv 162(4):185–198CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Sireesh S, Sitharam TG, Dash SK (2009) Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell-sand mattress overlying clay bed with void. Geotext Geomembr 27(2):89–98CrossRef Sireesh S, Sitharam TG, Dash SK (2009) Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell-sand mattress overlying clay bed with void. Geotext Geomembr 27(2):89–98CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Sireesh S, Sailesh P, Sitharam TG, Puppala AJ (2013) Numerical analysis of geocell reinforced ballast overlying soft clay subgrades. Geomech Eng 5(3):263–281CrossRef Sireesh S, Sailesh P, Sitharam TG, Puppala AJ (2013) Numerical analysis of geocell reinforced ballast overlying soft clay subgrades. Geomech Eng 5(3):263–281CrossRef
64.
go back to reference Yang X, Han J, Parsons RL, Leshchinsky D (2010) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of single geocell reinforced sand. Front Archit Civ Eng China 4(2):233–240CrossRef Yang X, Han J, Parsons RL, Leshchinsky D (2010) Three-dimensional numerical modelling of single geocell reinforced sand. Front Archit Civ Eng China 4(2):233–240CrossRef
65.
go back to reference Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2013) Experimental and numerical studies on footings supported on geocell reinforced sand and clay beds. Int J Geotech Eng 7(4):347–354CrossRef Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2013) Experimental and numerical studies on footings supported on geocell reinforced sand and clay beds. Int J Geotech Eng 7(4):347–354CrossRef
66.
go back to reference Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2014) Effect of infill materials on the performance of geocell reinforced soft clay beds. Geomech Geoeng 10(3):1–11 Hegde A, Sitharam TG (2014) Effect of infill materials on the performance of geocell reinforced soft clay beds. Geomech Geoeng 10(3):1–11
67.
go back to reference Latha GM, Dash SK, Rajagopal K (2009) Numerical simulation of the behavior of geocell reinforced sand in foundations. Int J Geomech ASCE 8(4) 143–152CrossRef Latha GM, Dash SK, Rajagopal K (2009) Numerical simulation of the behavior of geocell reinforced sand in foundations. Int J Geomech ASCE 8(4) 143–152CrossRef
68.
go back to reference Bathrust RJ, Knight MA (1998) Analysis of geocell reinforced-soil covers over large span conduits. Comput Geotech 22(3):205–219CrossRef Bathrust RJ, Knight MA (1998) Analysis of geocell reinforced-soil covers over large span conduits. Comput Geotech 22(3):205–219CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Sitharam TG, Hegde A (2013) Design and construction of geocell foundation to support embankment on soft settled red mud. Geotext Geomembr 41:55–63CrossRef Sitharam TG, Hegde A (2013) Design and construction of geocell foundation to support embankment on soft settled red mud. Geotext Geomembr 41:55–63CrossRef
70.
go back to reference Mehdipour I, Ghazavi M, Moayed RZ (2013) Numerical study on stability analysis of geocell reinforced slopes by considering the bending effect. Geotext Geomembr 37:23–34CrossRef Mehdipour I, Ghazavi M, Moayed RZ (2013) Numerical study on stability analysis of geocell reinforced slopes by considering the bending effect. Geotext Geomembr 37:23–34CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Webster SL (1979) Investigation of beach sand trafficability enhancement using sand-grid confinement and membrane reinforcement concepts. Technical Report GL-79-20. US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS. Webster SL (1979) Investigation of beach sand trafficability enhancement using sand-grid confinement and membrane reinforcement concepts. Technical Report GL-79-20. US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MS.
72.
go back to reference Rai M (2010) Geocell-sand mattress overlying soft clay subgrade: behaviour under circular loading. Ph.D. thesis, IIT Guwahati Rai M (2010) Geocell-sand mattress overlying soft clay subgrade: behaviour under circular loading. Ph.D. thesis, IIT Guwahati
73.
go back to reference Wesseloo J (2004) The strength and stiffness of geocell support packs. Ph.D. thesis, Univesity of Pretoria, Pretoria Wesseloo J (2004) The strength and stiffness of geocell support packs. Ph.D. thesis, Univesity of Pretoria, Pretoria
74.
go back to reference Wesseloo J, Visser AT, Rust E (2009) The stress-strain behavior of multiple cell geocell packs. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):31–38CrossRef Wesseloo J, Visser AT, Rust E (2009) The stress-strain behavior of multiple cell geocell packs. Geotext Geomembr 27(1):31–38CrossRef
75.
go back to reference Chummar AV (1972) Bearing capacity theory from experimental results. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(12):1311–1324 Chummar AV (1972) Bearing capacity theory from experimental results. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98(12):1311–1324
76.
go back to reference Biswas A (2016) Influence of subsoil strength on performance of geosynthetic-reinforced foundations. Ph.D. thesis, IIT Guwahati Biswas A (2016) Influence of subsoil strength on performance of geosynthetic-reinforced foundations. Ph.D. thesis, IIT Guwahati
77.
go back to reference Yoon YW, Heo SB, Kim KS (2008) Geotechnical performance of waste tires for soil reinforcement from chamber tests. Geotext Geomembr 26(1):100–107CrossRef Yoon YW, Heo SB, Kim KS (2008) Geotechnical performance of waste tires for soil reinforcement from chamber tests. Geotext Geomembr 26(1):100–107CrossRef
78.
go back to reference Webster SL, Alford SJ (1978) Investigation of construction concepts for pavements across soft ground. Technical Report S-78-6, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Mississippi, USA Webster SL, Alford SJ (1978) Investigation of construction concepts for pavements across soft ground. Technical Report S-78-6, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Mississippi, USA
79.
go back to reference Johnson JE (1982) Bridge and tidal waters. Munic Eng 109:104–107 Johnson JE (1982) Bridge and tidal waters. Munic Eng 109:104–107
80.
go back to reference Robertson J, Gilchrist AJT (1987) Design and construction of a reinforced embankment across soft lakebed deposits. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Foundations and Tunnels, London, M. C. Forde, vol 2. Engineering Technics Press, Edinburgh, pp 84–92 Robertson J, Gilchrist AJT (1987) Design and construction of a reinforced embankment across soft lakebed deposits. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Foundations and Tunnels, London, M. C. Forde, vol 2. Engineering Technics Press, Edinburgh, pp 84–92
81.
go back to reference Paul J (1988) Reinforced soil system in embankments-construction practices. In: Proceedings of the International Geotechnical Symposium on practice of Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, October, pp 461–466 Paul J (1988) Reinforced soil system in embankments-construction practices. In: Proceedings of the International Geotechnical Symposium on practice of Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, October, pp 461–466
82.
go back to reference Dean R, Lothian E (1990) Embankment construction problems over deep variable soft deposits using a geocell mattress.In: McGown A, Yeo KC, Andrawes KZ (eds) Performance of reinforced soil structures. Thomas Telford Ltd., London, pp 443–447 Dean R, Lothian E (1990) Embankment construction problems over deep variable soft deposits using a geocell mattress.In: McGown A, Yeo KC, Andrawes KZ (eds) Performance of reinforced soil structures. Thomas Telford Ltd., London, pp 443–447
83.
go back to reference Boyle S, Robertson K (2007) Geocell, geogrid and reinforced-soil restoration of eroded steep slopes. Geosynthetics 25(2):20–26 Boyle S, Robertson K (2007) Geocell, geogrid and reinforced-soil restoration of eroded steep slopes. Geosynthetics 25(2):20–26
84.
go back to reference Cowland JW, Wong SCK (1993) Performance of a road embankment on soft clay supported on a geocell mattress foundation. Geotext Geomembr 12(8):687–705CrossRef Cowland JW, Wong SCK (1993) Performance of a road embankment on soft clay supported on a geocell mattress foundation. Geotext Geomembr 12(8):687–705CrossRef
85.
go back to reference Gupta P, Somnath B (1994) Bearing capacity improvement using geogrids. J Civ Eng Constr Rev 7:12–13 Gupta P, Somnath B (1994) Bearing capacity improvement using geogrids. J Civ Eng Constr Rev 7:12–13
86.
go back to reference Koerner RM (1997) Designing with geosynthetics 3rd edn. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey Koerner RM (1997) Designing with geosynthetics 3rd edn. Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey
87.
go back to reference Forsman J, Slunga E, Lahtinen P (1998). Geogrid and geocell reinforced secondary road over deep peat deposit. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, vol 2. Atlanta, pp 773–778 Forsman J, Slunga E, Lahtinen P (1998). Geogrid and geocell reinforced secondary road over deep peat deposit. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, vol 2. Atlanta, pp 773–778
88.
go back to reference Biswas A, Dash SK, Krishna AM (2012) Parameters influencing the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation system: a brief review. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference. IIT Delhi, vol 1, pp 365–368 Biswas A, Dash SK, Krishna AM (2012) Parameters influencing the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation system: a brief review. In: Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference. IIT Delhi, vol 1, pp 365–368
89.
go back to reference Akinmusuru JO, Akinbolade JA (1981) Stability of loaded footings on reinforced soil. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 107(6):819–827 Akinmusuru JO, Akinbolade JA (1981) Stability of loaded footings on reinforced soil. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 107(6):819–827
90.
go back to reference Fragaszy RJ, Lawton E (1984). Bearing capacity of reinforced sand subgrades. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 110(10):1500–1507CrossRef Fragaszy RJ, Lawton E (1984). Bearing capacity of reinforced sand subgrades. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 110(10):1500–1507CrossRef
91.
go back to reference Guido VA, Chang DK, Sweeney MA (1986) Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth slabs. Can Geotech J 23:435–440CrossRef Guido VA, Chang DK, Sweeney MA (1986) Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth slabs. Can Geotech J 23:435–440CrossRef
92.
go back to reference Love JP, Burd HJ, Milligan, G.W.E., Houlsby GT (1987) Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on soft clay subgrade. Can Geotech J 24(4):611–622CrossRef Love JP, Burd HJ, Milligan, G.W.E., Houlsby GT (1987) Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on soft clay subgrade. Can Geotech J 24(4):611–622CrossRef
93.
go back to reference Kim SI, Cho SD (1988) An experimental study on the contribution of geotextiles to bearing capacity of footings on weak clays. In: Proceedings of the International Geotechnical Symposium on Theory and Practice of Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, pp 215–220 Kim SI, Cho SD (1988) An experimental study on the contribution of geotextiles to bearing capacity of footings on weak clays. In: Proceedings of the International Geotechnical Symposium on Theory and Practice of Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, pp 215–220
94.
go back to reference Samatani NC, Sonpal RC (1989) Laboratory tests of strip footing on reinforced cohesive soil. J Geotech Eng ASCE 115(9):1326–1330CrossRef Samatani NC, Sonpal RC (1989) Laboratory tests of strip footing on reinforced cohesive soil. J Geotech Eng ASCE 115(9):1326–1330CrossRef
95.
go back to reference Huang CC, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):51–82CrossRef Huang CC, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):51–82CrossRef
96.
go back to reference Mandal JN, Sah HS (1992) Bearing capacity tests on geogrid- reinforced clay. Geotext Geomembr 11(3):327–333CrossRef Mandal JN, Sah HS (1992) Bearing capacity tests on geogrid- reinforced clay. Geotext Geomembr 11(3):327–333CrossRef
97.
go back to reference Shin EC, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1993) Bearing capacity of strip foundation on geogrid reinforced clay. Geotech Test J ASTM 16(4):534–541CrossRef Shin EC, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1993) Bearing capacity of strip foundation on geogrid reinforced clay. Geotech Test J ASTM 16(4):534–541CrossRef
98.
go back to reference Khing KH, Das BM, Puri VK, Cook EE, Yen SC (1993) The bearing capacity of a strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 12(4):351–361CrossRef Khing KH, Das BM, Puri VK, Cook EE, Yen SC (1993) The bearing capacity of a strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 12(4):351–361CrossRef
99.
go back to reference Khing KH, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1994) Foundation on strong sand underlain by weak clay with geogrid at the interface. Geotext Geomembr 13(3):199–206CrossRef Khing KH, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC, Cook EE (1994) Foundation on strong sand underlain by weak clay with geogrid at the interface. Geotext Geomembr 13(3):199–206CrossRef
100.
go back to reference Das BM, Omar MT (1994) The effects of foundation width on model tests for the bearing capacity of sand with geogrid reinforcement. Geotech Geol Eng 12(3):133–141CrossRef Das BM, Omar MT (1994) The effects of foundation width on model tests for the bearing capacity of sand with geogrid reinforcement. Geotech Geol Eng 12(3):133–141CrossRef
101.
go back to reference Michael AT, Collin JG (1997) Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123(1):66–72CrossRef Michael AT, Collin JG (1997) Large model spread footing load tests on geosynthetic reinforced soil foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 123(1):66–72CrossRef
102.
go back to reference Alawaji HA (2001) Settlement and bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over collapsible soil. Geotext Geomembr 19(2):75–88CrossRef Alawaji HA (2001) Settlement and bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over collapsible soil. Geotext Geomembr 19(2):75–88CrossRef
103.
go back to reference Sitharam TG, Sireesh S (2004) Model studies of embedded circular footing on geogrid reinforced sand beds. Ground Improv 8(2):69–75CrossRef Sitharam TG, Sireesh S (2004) Model studies of embedded circular footing on geogrid reinforced sand beds. Ground Improv 8(2):69–75CrossRef
104.
go back to reference Basudhar PK, Saha S, Deb K (2007) Circular footings resting on geotextile reinforced sand bed. Geotext Geomembr 25(6):377–384CrossRef Basudhar PK, Saha S, Deb K (2007) Circular footings resting on geotextile reinforced sand bed. Geotext Geomembr 25(6):377–384CrossRef
105.
go back to reference Sawwaf ME, Nazer A (2005). Behaviour of circular footings resting on confined granular soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(3):359–366CrossRef Sawwaf ME, Nazer A (2005). Behaviour of circular footings resting on confined granular soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng ASCE 131(3):359–366CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Geocell-Reinforced Foundation Systems: A Critical Review
Authors
Arghadeep Biswas
A. Murali Krishna
Publication date
01-06-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 2199-9260
Electronic ISSN: 2199-9279
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0093-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 2/2017 Go to the issue