2001 | OriginalPaper | Chapter
GMM Estimation with Optimal Weights
Author : Dr. Joachim Inkmann
Published in: Conditional Moment Estimation of Nonlinear Equation Systems
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Included in: Professional Book Archive
Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.
Select sections of text to find matching patents with Artificial Intelligence. powered by
Select sections of text to find additional relevant content using AI-assisted search. powered by
Having established the lower bound Λu of the GMM variance-covariance matrix for given unconditional moment functions in Section 5.2 which is attained by an optimal choice of the weight matrix $$ {\rm{\hat W}}$$ such that W = V0-1, a consistent estimator $$ {{\rm{\hat V}}^{{\rm{ - 1}}}}$$ of V0-1 remains to be derived in order to obtain a feasible GMM estimator. A simple estimator for V0 has been already introduced at the end of Section 3.2. By continuity of matrix inversion a consistent estimator of V0-1 results from (7.1.1)$$ \hat V^{{\text{ - 1}}} = \left[ {\tfrac{1} {n}\sum\limits_{i = 1}^n \psi \left( {Z_i ,\hat \theta _1 } \right)\psi \left( {Z_i ,\hat \theta _1 } \right)^\prime } \right]^{ - 1} $$ with $$ {{\rm{\hat \theta }}_{\rm{1}}}$$ being some consistent first step estimator. The usual procedure in applied work consists of computing $$ {{\rm{\hat \theta }}_{\rm{1}}}$$ in a first step by minimizing the GMM objective function (2.1.6) for a weight matrix which is independent of $$\hat \theta $$ , e.g. the identity matrix, and obtaining the final GMM estimator $$ {{\rm{\hat \theta }}_{\rm{2}}}$$ which reaches the lower bound of the asymptotic variance-covariance matrix in a second step using the weight matrix $$ {\rm{\hat W}}$$ = $$ {{\rm{\hat V}}^{{\rm{ - 1}}}}$$. A consistent estimator $$ {\hat \Lambda _{\rm{u}}}$$ of the asymptotic variancecovariance matrix of the stabilizing transformation of $$ {{\rm{\hat \theta }}_{\rm{2}}}$$ is obtained afterwards by substituting the elements of Λ u = (G0′V0-1G0)-1 with consistent plug-in estimators. The matrix V0-1 can be estimated using either (7.1.1) or a corresponding expression evaluated at the final estimator $$ {{\rm{\hat \theta }}_{\rm{2}}}$$. Newey and McFadden (1994, p. 2161) point out that there seems to be no evidence if any of these two methods creates efficiency advantages in small samples. A consistent estimator of G0 was introduced in Section 3.2 and replaces the population moment by a sample moment.