Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Great Britain and Differentiated Integration in Europe

Author : Rafał Riedel

Published in: Brexit

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The United Kingdom has always been a special case in the European integration project. The British exceptionalism manifested in various forms and ways over the history. June 23rd 2016 delivered another culmination point in the story of the stubborn European’s relations with its continental partners. The so-called Brexit referendum, which brought about victory for the supporters of the UK leaving the European Union, marks an important milestone in these relations. It has never been an easy marriage and many times threatened by the divorce. Instead of becoming ever closer, the European Union becomes ever loser and the UK is ever closer to leaving. Brexit is not only vital for the British, it is potentially destructive for the EU from the core. The UK changes its status inside from an integration-tolerant country (not a very ambitious one anyway), to integration unfriendly country, which endangers the very fundaments of the integration process. It produces externalities to be consumed by other Member States and non-members as well.
Accordingly, the main purpose of this chapter is to shed light on the positive discrimination of the UK inside the EU and its entertaining the status of a preferential membership. The referendum is seen as a game in which London tried to win even more beneficial conditions inside the EU and now, after the referendum, will try to build a status of a preferential non-membership. From this perspective, this process can be seen as an exercise in searching the limits of differentiated integration. The problem has always been there, the Brexit referendum made it crystal clear. It may serve as a wakeup call for the necessary reforms of the EU.
Based on the analysis of the existing literature about the differentiated integration, this contribution sees the June 2016 Brexit referendum as a structural problem for the EU. Following the logic of the integration evolution from one crisis to another one, it is possible to interpret the Brexit decision as an opportunity for the EU’s reforms. The reformist impulse of Brexit may enhance the European integration in two various possible ways. First, it may help to reform the EU into a more differentiated system that will allow accommodate countries willing to integrate at various speeds and extends. Secondly, once “getting rid” of the major troublemaker and marauder, that is Britain as a country opposing the further integration, the EU may accelerate now towards the “ever closer union”.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Further see: Andersen and Sitter (2006).
 
2
For details see Schimmelfennig (2014).
 
3
See also Leruth (2015).
 
4
Compare with Andersen and Sitter (2006) and Mohler and Seitz (2012).
 
5
For more details see Leruth and Lord (2015).
 
6
See also Genschel and Jachtenfuchs (2014).
 
7
See further Leuffen et al. (2013) and Schimmelfennig (2014).
 
8
See also Jensen and Slapin (2012), De Neve (2007), Zielonka (2007) and Kölliker (2001).
 
9
Leruth and Lord (2015).
 
10
See further Lemke (2014).
 
11
For details see Fossum (2015).
 
12
Compare with Leruth and Lord (2015).
 
13
For an illustration of this approach see Szwarc (2015) and Zhelyankova (2014).
 
14
For example, see Winzen and Schimmelfennig (2015).
 
15
For an exemplification go to Leruth (2015).
 
16
See also Dyson and Sepos (2010).
 
17
For details see Schimmelfennig et al. (2015).
 
18
Compare with Kenny and Pearse (2016).
 
19
For details see Leruth and Lord (2015).
 
20
Glencross (2015), p. 306.
 
21
For details see Oliver (2015).
 
22
Also see Daddow (2015).
 
23
Fontana and Parsons (2015), p. 89.
 
24
Also see Kenny and Pearse (2016).
 
25
Compare with Hodgson (2016).
 
26
Hilton (2016).
 
27
Also see Haralambous (2016).
 
28
The potential success of separatisms like Scotish or Irish may stimulate the separatist movements in other parts of Europe, including the Basqes or Cathalans in Spain, Waloons or Flanders in the Netherlands or Silesians in Poland.
 
29
Also see Qvartrup (2016).
 
30
Further see Schimmelfennig (2014).
 
31
Also see Schimmelfennig and Winzen (2014).
 
32
Compare with Allemand (2005) and Schweiger and Magone (2014).
 
33
Directly after the Brexit referendum, in several EU Member States (Slovakia for example) some political forces started to collect citizens’ signatures for the initiative to organize an EU-exit referendum.
 
34
Compare with Oliver (2015).
 
35
Also see Bernstein (2016).
 
36
Schimmelfennig et al. (2015).
 
Literature
go back to reference Allemand F (2005) The impact of the EU enlargement on economic and Monetary Union: what lessons can be learnt from the differentiated integration mechanisms in an enlarged Europe? Eur Law J 11(5):586–617CrossRef Allemand F (2005) The impact of the EU enlargement on economic and Monetary Union: what lessons can be learnt from the differentiated integration mechanisms in an enlarged Europe? Eur Law J 11(5):586–617CrossRef
go back to reference Andersen SS, Sitter N (2006) Differentiated integration: what is it and how much can the EU accomodate? Eur Integr 28(4):313–330CrossRef Andersen SS, Sitter N (2006) Differentiated integration: what is it and how much can the EU accomodate? Eur Integr 28(4):313–330CrossRef
go back to reference Bernstein A (2016) To brexit or to brexit?, “News Extra” April 2016, p 7 Bernstein A (2016) To brexit or to brexit?, “News Extra” April 2016, p 7
go back to reference Daddow O (2015) Interpreting the outsider tradition in British European policy speeches from Thatcher to Cameron. J Common Mark Stud 53(1):71–88CrossRef Daddow O (2015) Interpreting the outsider tradition in British European policy speeches from Thatcher to Cameron. J Common Mark Stud 53(1):71–88CrossRef
go back to reference De Neve J-E (2007) The European onion? How differentiated integration is reshaping the EU. Eur Integr 29(4):503–521CrossRef De Neve J-E (2007) The European onion? How differentiated integration is reshaping the EU. Eur Integr 29(4):503–521CrossRef
go back to reference Dyson K, Sepos A (2010) Differentiation as design principle and as tool in the political management of European integration. In: Dyson K, Sepos A (eds) Which Europe? The politics of differentiated integration. Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 3–23 Dyson K, Sepos A (2010) Differentiation as design principle and as tool in the political management of European integration. In: Dyson K, Sepos A (eds) Which Europe? The politics of differentiated integration. Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 3–23
go back to reference Fontana G, Parsons C (2015) ‘One woman’s prejudice’: did Margaret Thatcher cause Britains’ anti-Europeanis? J Common Mark Stud 53(1):89–105CrossRef Fontana G, Parsons C (2015) ‘One woman’s prejudice’: did Margaret Thatcher cause Britains’ anti-Europeanis? J Common Mark Stud 53(1):89–105CrossRef
go back to reference Fossum JE (2015) Democracy and differentiation in Europe. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):799–815CrossRef Fossum JE (2015) Democracy and differentiation in Europe. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):799–815CrossRef
go back to reference Genschel P, Jachtenfuchs M (2014) Introduction: beyond market regulation. Analysing the European integration of core state powers. In: Genschel P, Jachtenfuchs M (eds) Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core state powers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–23 Genschel P, Jachtenfuchs M (2014) Introduction: beyond market regulation. Analysing the European integration of core state powers. In: Genschel P, Jachtenfuchs M (eds) Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core state powers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–23
go back to reference Glencross A (2015) Why a British referendum on EU membership will not solve the Europe question. Int Aff 91(2):303–317CrossRef Glencross A (2015) Why a British referendum on EU membership will not solve the Europe question. Int Aff 91(2):303–317CrossRef
go back to reference Hilton A (2016) Statement in: “The London Evening Standard” 25 February 2016 Hilton A (2016) Statement in: “The London Evening Standard” 25 February 2016
go back to reference Hodgson P (2016) Complying with Brexit, “Complience Week” May 2016, pp 53–55 Hodgson P (2016) Complying with Brexit, “Complience Week” May 2016, pp 53–55
go back to reference Jensen D, Slapin J (2012) Institutional hokey-pokey: the politics of multispeed integration in the European Union. J Eur Publ Policy 19(6):779–795CrossRef Jensen D, Slapin J (2012) Institutional hokey-pokey: the politics of multispeed integration in the European Union. J Eur Publ Policy 19(6):779–795CrossRef
go back to reference Kenny M, Pearse N (2016) After Brexit. The Eurosceptic dream of an Anglosphere. Juncture 22(4):304–307CrossRef Kenny M, Pearse N (2016) After Brexit. The Eurosceptic dream of an Anglosphere. Juncture 22(4):304–307CrossRef
go back to reference Kölliker A (2001) Bringing together or driving apart the union? Towards a theory of differentiated integration. West Eur Polit 24(4):125–151CrossRef Kölliker A (2001) Bringing together or driving apart the union? Towards a theory of differentiated integration. West Eur Polit 24(4):125–151CrossRef
go back to reference Lemke C (2014) Challenging the “ever closer union”: political consequences of the Eurozone crisis. Am Foreign Policy Interests 36:18–24CrossRef Lemke C (2014) Challenging the “ever closer union”: political consequences of the Eurozone crisis. Am Foreign Policy Interests 36:18–24CrossRef
go back to reference Leruth B (2015) Operationalizing national preferences on Europe and differentiated integration. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):816–835CrossRef Leruth B (2015) Operationalizing national preferences on Europe and differentiated integration. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):816–835CrossRef
go back to reference Leruth B, Lord C (2015) Differentiated integration in the European Union: a concept, a process, a system or a theory? J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):754–764CrossRef Leruth B, Lord C (2015) Differentiated integration in the European Union: a concept, a process, a system or a theory? J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):754–764CrossRef
go back to reference Leuffen D, Rittberger B, Schimmelfennig F (2013) Differentiated integration. Explaining variation in the European Union. Palgrave, BasingstokeCrossRef Leuffen D, Rittberger B, Schimmelfennig F (2013) Differentiated integration. Explaining variation in the European Union. Palgrave, BasingstokeCrossRef
go back to reference Mohler L, Seitz M (2012) The gains from variety in the European Union. Rev World Econ 148:475–500CrossRef Mohler L, Seitz M (2012) The gains from variety in the European Union. Rev World Econ 148:475–500CrossRef
go back to reference Oliver T (2015) To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question? Britains’ European question and an in/out referendum. Int Aff 91(1):77–91CrossRef Oliver T (2015) To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question? Britains’ European question and an in/out referendum. Int Aff 91(1):77–91CrossRef
go back to reference Qvartrup M (2016) Referendums on membership and European integration. Polit Q 87(1):61–67CrossRef Qvartrup M (2016) Referendums on membership and European integration. Polit Q 87(1):61–67CrossRef
go back to reference Schimmelfennig F (2014) EU enlargement and differentiated integration: discrimination or equal treatment? J Eur Publ Policy 21(5):681–698CrossRef Schimmelfennig F (2014) EU enlargement and differentiated integration: discrimination or equal treatment? J Eur Publ Policy 21(5):681–698CrossRef
go back to reference Schimmelfennig F, Winzen T (2014) Instrumental and constitutional differentiation in the European Union. J Common Mark Stud 52(2):354–370CrossRef Schimmelfennig F, Winzen T (2014) Instrumental and constitutional differentiation in the European Union. J Common Mark Stud 52(2):354–370CrossRef
go back to reference Schimmelfennig F, Leufen D, Rittberger B (2015) The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: interdependence, politicisation, differentiation. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):764–782CrossRef Schimmelfennig F, Leufen D, Rittberger B (2015) The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: interdependence, politicisation, differentiation. J Eur Publ Policy 22(6):764–782CrossRef
go back to reference Schweiger C, Magone J (2014) Differentiated integration and cleavage under crisis conditions. Perspect Eur Polit Soc 15(3):259–265CrossRef Schweiger C, Magone J (2014) Differentiated integration and cleavage under crisis conditions. Perspect Eur Polit Soc 15(3):259–265CrossRef
go back to reference Szwarc M (2015) Zróżnicowana integracja i wzmocniona współpraca w prawie Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2005 Szwarc M (2015) Zróżnicowana integracja i wzmocniona współpraca w prawie Unii Europejskiej, Warszawa 2005
go back to reference Winzen T, Schimmelfennig F (2015) The choice for differentiated Europe; Why European Union member states opt out of integration. Paper prepared for the 14th biennial conference of the European Union Studies Association, 5–7 March 2015, Boston MA, USA Winzen T, Schimmelfennig F (2015) The choice for differentiated Europe; Why European Union member states opt out of integration. Paper prepared for the 14th biennial conference of the European Union Studies Association, 5–7 March 2015, Boston MA, USA
go back to reference Zhelyankova A (2014) From selective integration into selective implementation: the link between differentiated integration and conformity with EU laws. Eur J Polit Res 53:727–746CrossRef Zhelyankova A (2014) From selective integration into selective implementation: the link between differentiated integration and conformity with EU laws. Eur J Polit Res 53:727–746CrossRef
go back to reference Zielonka J (2007) Europa jako imperium. Nowe spojrzenie na Unię Europejską. PISM, Warszawa Zielonka J (2007) Europa jako imperium. Nowe spojrzenie na Unię Europejską. PISM, Warszawa
Metadata
Title
Great Britain and Differentiated Integration in Europe
Author
Rafał Riedel
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73414-9_6

Premium Partner