Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Argumentation 3/2016

12-07-2015

Harald R. Wohlrapp: The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation. Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning 4

Springer, Dordrecht, 2014, pp. lxii + 443, hardcover US$179, eBook $139, softcover $24.99, ISBN: 978-94-017-8761-1 (print), 978-017-8762-8 (online)

Author: David Hitchcock

Published in: Argumentation | Issue 3/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Excerpt

In this work, the fruit of some 30 years of research in the Hamburg argumentation group, the author proposes a new philosophical foundation for the study of argumentation. His theory can be briefly characterized as “pragmatic-dialectical”, since it is shaped by a Peircean pragmatism and a quasi-Hegelian dialectic. It is both more pragmatic and more dialectical than the Amsterdam pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. …

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Here and elsewhere, an italicized word or phrase is a technical term of Wohlrapp’s theory. Such terms will usually be italicized only at their first occurrence, and will be explained at that point or soon after.
 
2
Here and elsewhere, numbers in parentheses are page numbers of the book under review.
 
3
Pages 1–46 of the German original correspond to pages xiii–lxii of the English translation, and pages 47–500 of the German original to pages 1–419 of the English translation. Hence, roughly speaking, for German pages 1–46 the corresponding English page number is 12 + (50/46 of G) in Roman numerals, and for German pages 47–500 it is 419/454 of (G—46) in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adler, J. 2013. Are conductive arguments possible? Argumentation 27: 245–257.CrossRef Adler, J. 2013. Are conductive arguments possible? Argumentation 27: 245–257.CrossRef
go back to reference Apel, K.-O. 2002. Pragmatismus als sinnkritischer Realismus auf der Basis regulativer Ideen. In Hilary Putnam und die Tradition des Pragmatismus, ed. M.L. Raters, and M. Willaschek, 117–150. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp. Apel, K.-O. 2002. Pragmatismus als sinnkritischer Realismus auf der Basis regulativer Ideen. In Hilary Putnam und die Tradition des Pragmatismus, ed. M.L. Raters, and M. Willaschek, 117–150. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp.
go back to reference Bailin, S., and M. Battersby. 2010. Reason in the balance: An inquiry approach to critical thinking. Whitby: McGraw Hill Ryerson. Bailin, S., and M. Battersby. 2010. Reason in the balance: An inquiry approach to critical thinking. Whitby: McGraw Hill Ryerson.
go back to reference Blair, J.A., and R. Johnson (eds.). 2011. Conductive argument. An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning. London: College Publications. Blair, J.A., and R. Johnson (eds.). 2011. Conductive argument. An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning. London: College Publications.
go back to reference Finocchiaro, M. 2013. Meta-argumentation. An approach to logic and argumentation theory. London: College Publications. Finocchiaro, M. 2013. Meta-argumentation. An approach to logic and argumentation theory. London: College Publications.
go back to reference Habermas, J. 1984/1981. The theory of communicative action, volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press. German original first published 1981. Habermas, J. 1984/1981. The theory of communicative action, volume one: Reason and the rationalization of society. Boston: Beacon Press. German original first published 1981.
go back to reference Habermas, J. 1996/1991. Between facts and norms. Trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. German original first published 1991. Habermas, J. 1996/1991. Between facts and norms. Trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. German original first published 1991.
go back to reference Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen. Hamblin, C.L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.
go back to reference Johnson, R. 2000. Manifest rationality. A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah: Erlbaum. Johnson, R. 2000. Manifest rationality. A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Kenyon, T. 2008. Clear thinking in a blurry world. Toronto: Nelson Education. Kenyon, T. 2008. Clear thinking in a blurry world. Toronto: Nelson Education.
go back to reference Peirce, C.S. 1955/1878. How to make our ideas clear. In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. J. Buchler, 22–41. New York: Dover. First published in 1878. Peirce, C.S. 1955/1878. How to make our ideas clear. In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. J. Buchler, 22–41. New York: Dover. First published in 1878.
go back to reference Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969/1958). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. French-language original first published in 1958. Perelman, C., and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969/1958). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. French-language original first published in 1958.
go back to reference Toulmin, S.E. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Toulmin, S.E. 1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRef van Eemeren, F.H., and R. Grootendorst. 1984. Speech acts in argumentative discussions. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRef
go back to reference Walton, D., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Walton, D., C. Reed, and F. Macagno. 2008. Argumentation schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Harald R. Wohlrapp: The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation. Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning 4
Springer, Dordrecht, 2014, pp. lxii + 443, hardcover US$179, eBook $139, softcover $24.99, ISBN: 978-94-017-8761-1 (print), 978-017-8762-8 (online)
Author
David Hitchcock
Publication date
12-07-2015
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Argumentation / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0920-427X
Electronic ISSN: 1572-8374
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-015-9365-3

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Argumentation 3/2016 Go to the issue

Premium Partner