Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Social Indicators Research
Published in: Social Indicators Research 2/2021

10-10-2020 | Original Research

Housing Status in Post-Soviet Contexts: A Multi-dimensional Measurement Approach

Authors: Jane R. Zavisca, Theodore P. Gerber, Hyungjun Suh

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 2/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This study draws on a novel survey in Azerbaijan, Kyrgyzstan, Russia, and Ukraine to develop a framework for conceptualizing and measuring housing status, a multi-dimensional construct reflecting positions in a housing stratification order. We employ structural equation modeling to confirm whether our measures reflect distinct dimensions of housing status. We validate our measurement approach by testing for distinct dimensional effects on subjective housing wellbeing. Our novel measures of housing tenure, quantity, quality, and wellbeing reflect post-Soviet intra-household differences in property rights; the cultural premium placed on having a room of one’s own; constellations of amenities and comforts comprising quality; and the significance of a sense of autonomy for subjective housing wellbeing. Results demonstrate that the three dimensions of housing status—tenure, quality, and quantity—exert independent effects on subjective housing wellbeing, with consistent effects across the four study countries. Our systematic attention to measurement of housing status in post-Soviet conditions models an approach that scholars could adapt for other contexts, including but not limited to other post-communist societies.
previous article How Aging Population Affects Health Care Expenditures in Pakistan? A Bayesian VAR Analysis
next article Influence of the Work-Family Relationship on Perceived Health 5-Years Later: The Moderating Role of Job Insecurity

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
The term residential satisfaction is sometimes used interchangeably with housing satisfaction, and more often to describe neighborhood-level satisfaction. The latter is beyond the scope of the present article.
 
2
Following conventions for SEM diagrams, ovals represent latent variables, while rectangles represent measured variables. Unidirectional arrows indicate a direct relationship (“effect”), while two-headed arrows indicate covariance. Error terms associated with measured variables are included in statistical models but not in the figure or tables of results (for concision). Latent variables are assumed to be continuous; measured indicators are ordinal or dichotomous, with probit link functions (see Mplus Version 8 User Guide, example 5.2).
 
3
Cases with missing values on housing tenure are listwise deleted due to this being a key variable with few missing cases in all but one country. Fewer than 1% of cases are missing everywhere except Ukraine, where 7% did not respond. Analysis of missingness did not identify systematic bias in nonresponse with respect to other variables of interest. In the interest of simplicity and given other complexities in our modeling framework, we elected to listwise delete rather than impute these cases.
 
4
We also performed a Mokken scale analysis (MSA) on the same sets of items. MSA and CFA have different vulnerabilities to violations of different assumptions (Antino et al. 2018; van der Eijk and Rose 2015). Results were consistent across the two methods everywhere except Azerbaijan, where MSA selected one scale for quality rather than two scales distinguishing amenities versus comfort. As discussed below, there are multicollinearity issues for some amenities in Azerbaijan. Because we have no substantive reason to expect differences in quality dimensionality for Azerbaijan, and because the two-dimension solution is confirmed for all four countries in CFA and three out of four in MSA, we treat amenities and comfort as separate factors in the SEM for all four countries.
 
5
Whereas in other countries an outhouse typically is not plumbed and is associated with poor housing quality, this may not be the case in Kyrgyzstan. Interviewers suggested (too late for the present survey) that it would be better to measure whether the home has access to a private plumbed toilet, including those in detached outbuildings.
 
Literature
Alexeev, M. (1999). The effect of privatization on wealth distribution in Russia. Economics of Transition, 7(2), 449–465.
Amérigo, M., & Aragonés, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1), 47–57.
Arias, E., & De Vos, S. (1996). Using housing items to indicate socioeconomic status: Latin America. Social Indicators Research, 38(1), 53–80.
Attwood, L. (2010). Gender and housing in Soviet Russia: Private life in a public space. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Attwood, L. (2012). Privatisation of housing in Post-Soviet Russia: A new understanding of home? Europe-Asia Studies, 64(5), 903–928.
Ben-Shahar, D., & Warszawski, J. (2016). Inequality in housing affordability: Measurement and estimation. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1178–1202.
Bollen, K. A., Glanville, J. L., & Stecklov, G. (2002). Economic status proxies in studies of fertility in developing countries: Does the measure matter? Population Studies, 56(1), 81–96.
Bright, S., & Hopkins, N. (2011). Home, meaning and identity: Learning from the English model of shared ownership. Housing, Theory and Society, 28(4), 377–397.
Campagna, G. (2016). Linking crowding, housing inadequacy, and perceived housing stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 45, 252–266.
Cattaneo, M. D., Galiani, S., Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., & Titiunik, R. (2009). Housing, health, and happiness. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(1), 75–105.
Cheng, Z., King, S. P., Smyth, R., & Wang, H. (2016). Housing property rights and subjective wellbeing in urban China. European Journal of Political Economy, 45, 160–174.
Cirman, A., Mandič, S., & Zorić, J. (2013). Decisions to renovate: Identifying key determinants in Central and Eastern European post-socialist countries. Urban Studies, 50(16), 3378–3393.
Clair, A., Reeves, A., McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2018). Constructing a housing precariousness measure for Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(1), 13–28.
Clapham, D. (2005). The meaning of housing: A pathways approach. Bristol: Policy Press.
Clapham, D., Foye, C., & Christian, J. (2018). The concept of subjective well-being in housing research. Housing, Theory and Society, 35(3), 261–280.
Clark, J., & Kearns, A. (2012). Housing improvements, perceived housing quality and psychosocial benefits from the home. Housing Studies, 27(7), 915–939.
Coley, R. L., Kull, M., Leventhal, T., & Lynch, A. D. (2014). Profiles of housing and neighborhood contexts among low-income families: Links with children’s well-being. Cityscape, 16(1), 37.
Conley, D. (2001). A room with a view or a room of one’s own? Housing and social stratification. Sociological Forum, 16(2), 263–280.
Coulter, R., & Thomas, M. (2019). A new look at the housing antecedents of separation. Demographic Research, 40(26), 725–760.
Davis, D. S. (2004). Talking about property in the new Chinese domestic property regime. In F. Dobbin (Ed.), The sociology of the economy. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Devoto, F., Duflo, E., Dupas, P., Pariente, W., & Pons, V. (2012). Happiness on tap: Piped water adoption in urban Morocco. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(4), 68–99.
Dewilde, C. (2015). What have ECHP and EU-SILC to contribute to the comparative study of housing? Critical Housing Analysis, 2(2), 19–26.
Dewilde, C. (2017). Do housing regimes matter? Assessing the concept of housing regimes through configurations of housing outcomes. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26, 384–404.
Dhongde, S., & Haveman, R. (2017). Multi-dimensional deprivation in the U.S. Social Indicators Research, 133(2), 477–500.
Diaz-Serrano, L. (2009). Disentangling the housing satisfaction puzzle: Does homeownership really matter? Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(5), 745–755.
Druta, O., & Ronald, R. (2018). Intergenerational support for autonomous living in a post-socialist housing market: Homes, meanings and practices. Housing Studies, 33(2), 299–316.
Dupuis, A., & Thorns, D. C. (1998). Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. The Sociological Review, 46(1), 24–47.
Elsinga, M., & Hoekstra, J. (2005). Homeownership and housing satisfaction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 20(4), 401–424.
Foye, C. (2017). The relationship between size of living space and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(2), 427–461.
Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., & Ponsoda, V. (2016). Are fit indices really fit to estimate the number of factors with categorical variables? Some cautionary findings via Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 21(1), 93–111.
Gentile, M. (2005). Urban residential preferences and satisfaction in the former Soviet Union: Results from a survey in Ust’-Kamenogorsk, Kazakhstan. Urban Geography, 26(4), 296–327.
Gentile, M. (2015a). The “Soviet” factor: Exploring perceived housing inequalities in a midsized city in the Donbas, Ukraine. Urban Geography, 36(5), 696–720.
Gentile, M. (2015b). The post-Soviet urban poor and where they live: Khrushchev-era blocks, “bad” areas, and the vertical dimension in Luhansk, Ukraine. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(3), 583–603.
Greif, M. (2015). The intersection of homeownership, race and neighbourhood context: Implications for neighbourhood satisfaction. Urban Studies, 52(1), 50–70.
Grzeskowiak, S., Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D.-J., & Claiborne, C. B. (2006). Housing well-being: Developing and validating a measure. Social Indicators Research, 79(3), 503–541.
Harris, S. (2013). Communism on tomorrow street: Mass housing and everyday life after Stalin. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hashim, A. H., Rahim, Z. A., Rashid, S. N. S. A., & Yahaya, N. (2006). Visual privacy and family intimacy: A case study of Malay inhabitants living in two-story low-cost terrace housing. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33(2), 301–318.
Hu, M., & Ye, W. (2020). Home ownership and subjective wellbeing: A perspective from ownership heterogeneity. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(2), 1059–1979.
Hulse, K., & Milligan, V. (2014). Secure occupancy: A new framework for analysing security in rental housing. Housing Studies, 29(5), 638–656.
Ibem, E. O., & Amole, D. (2013). Residential satisfaction in public core housing in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. Social Indicators Research, 113(1), 563–581.
Jacobs, K., & Kes, A. (2015). The ambiguity of joint asset ownership: Cautionary tales from Uganda and South Africa. Feminist Economics, 21(3), 23–55.
Jansen, S. J. T. (2014). Why is housing always satisfactory? A study into the impact of cognitive restructuring and future perspectives on housing appreciation. Social Indicators Research, 116(2), 353–371.
Kalyukin, A., & Kohl, S. (2020). Continuities and discontinuities of Russian urban housing. The Soviet housing experiment in historical long-term perspective. Urban Studies, 57(8), 1768–1785.
Kim, B. J. H., Choi, M. J., & Ko, J. (2009). Mismatch between homeownership and residence in Korea. Housing Finance International, 24, 27–33.
Kleinhans, R., & Elsinga, M. (2010). ‘Buy your home and feel in control’: Does home ownership achieve the empowerment of former tenants of social housing? International Journal of Housing Policy, 10(1), 41–61.
Lauster, N. T. (2010). Housing and the proper performance of American motherhood, 1940–2005. Housing Studies, 25(4), 543–557.
Lersch, P. M., & Vidal, S. (2016). My house or our home? Transitions into sole home ownership in British couples. Demographic Research, 35, 139–166.
Lux, M., Sunega, P., & Katrňák, T. (2013). Classes and castles: Impact of social stratification on housing inequality in post-socialist states. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 274–288.
Maestri, V. (2015). A measure of income poverty including housing: Benefits and limitations for policy making. Social Indicators Research, 121(3), 675–696.
Mandić, S. (2001). Residential mobility versus “in-place” adjustments in Slovenia: Viewpoint from a society “in transition”. Housing Studies, 16(1), 53–73.
Mandič, S., & Cirman, A. (2012). Housing conditions and their structural determinants: Comparisons within the enlarged EU. Urban Studies, 49(4), 777–793.
Mandič, S., & Hrast, M. F. (2018). Homeownership in multi-apartment buildings: Control beyond property rights. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(4), 401–425.
Marcus, C. C. (2006). House as a mirror of self: Exploring the deeper meaning of home. Newburyport: Nicolas-Hays, Inc.
Montgomery, M. R., Gragnolati, M., Burke, K. A., & Paredes, E. (2000). Measuring living standards with proxy variables. Demography, 37(2), 155–174.
Munro, M., & Madigan, R. (1993). Privacy in the private sphere. Housing Studies, 8(1), 29–45.
Ozaki, R. (2002). Housing as a reflection of culture: Privatised living and privacy in England and Japan. Housing Studies, 17(2), 209–227.
Pattillo, M. (2013). Housing: Commodity versus right. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 509–531.
Payne, G., Durand-Lasserve, A., & Rakodi, C. (2009). The limits of land titling and home ownership. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 443–462.
Penner, J. E. (1995). The bundle of rights picture of property. UCLA Law Review, 43, 711–820.
Popova, D., & Pishniak, A. (2017). Measuring individual material well-being using multidimensional indices: An application using the gender and generation survey for Russia. Social Indicators Research, 130(3), 883–910.
Rajaei, S. A., & Mansourian, H. (2017). Urban growth and housing quality in Iran. Social Indicators Research, 131(2), 587–605.
Rex, J., Moore, R., Williams, J., & Shuttleworth, A. (1971). Race, community, and conflict: A study of Sparkbrook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saunders, P. (1984). Beyond housing classes: The sociological significance of private property rights in means of consumption. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 8(2), 202–227.
Schmeer, K. K., & Yoon, A. J. (2016). Home sweet home? Home physical environment and inflammation in children. Social Science Research, 60, 236–248.
Schwartz, H., & Seabrooke, L. (2008). Varieties of residential capitalism in the international political economy: Old welfare states and the new politics of housing. Comparative European Politics, 6(3), 237–261.
Shaw, M. (2004). Housing and public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 397–418.
Shlay, A. B. (2014). Life and liberty in the pursuit of housing: Rethinking renting and owning in post-crisis America. Housing Studies, 30(4), 560–579.
Soaita, A. M. (2012). Strategies for in situ home improvement in Romanian large housing estates. Housing Studies, 27(7), 1008–1030.
Soaita, A. M. (2014). Overcrowding and “underoccupancy” in Romania: A case study of housing inequality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(1), 203–221.
Soaita, A. M. (2015). The meaning of home in Romania: Views from urban owner–occupiers. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(1), 69–85.
Soaita, A. M. (2017). The changing nature of outright home ownership in Romania: Housing wealth and housing inequality. In C. Dewilde & R. Ronald (Eds.), Housing wealth and welfare. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Soaita, A. M., & Dewilde, C. (2019). A critical-realist review of housing quality within the post-communist EU states: Progressing towards a middle-range explanation. Housing, Theory and Society, 36(1), 44–75.
Solari, C. D., & Mare, R. D. (2012). Housing crowding effects on children’s wellbeing. Social Science Research, 41(2), 464–476.
Stephens, M., Lux, M., & Sunega, P. (2015). Post-socialist housing systems in Europe: Housing welfare regimes by default? Housing Studies, 30(8), 1210–1234.
Tan, S., Wang, S., & Cheng, C. (2016). Change of housing inequality in urban China and its decomposition: 1989–2011. Social Indicators Research, 129(1), 29–45.
Tomaszewski, W., & Perales, F. (2014). Who settles for less? Subjective dispositions, objective circumstances, and housing satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 181–203.
Tunstall, B. (2015). Relative housing space inequality in England and Wales, and its recent rapid resurgence. International Journal of Housing Policy, 15(2), 105–126.
Wang, S., Cheng, C., & Tan, S. (2019). Housing determinants of health in urban China: A structural equation modeling analysis. Social Indicators Research, 143(3), 1245–1270.
Wang, S.-Y. (2014). Property rights and intra-household bargaining. Journal of Development Economics, 107, 192–201.
Warren, E. J. (2018). Housing affordability and material hardship: Does affordability measurement matter? Journal of Poverty, 22(3), 228–247.
Xia, Y., & Yang, Y. (2019). RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 409–428.
Zanuzdana, A., Khan, M., & Kraemer, A. (2013). Housing satisfaction related to health and importance of services in urban slums: Evidence from Dhaka, Bangladesh. Social Indicators Research, 112(1), 163–185.
Zavisca, J. R. (2012). Housing the new Russia. New York: Cornell University Press.
Zavisca, J. R. (2013). A home not one’s own: How young Russians living with extended family navigate and negotiate space. In M. Kusenbach, K. Paulsen, & M. Milligan (Eds.), Home–place–community: International sociological perspectives. New York: Peter Lag.
Zavisca, J. R., & Gerber, T. P. (2016). The socioeconomic, demographic, and political effects of housing in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 347–367.
Zavisca, J. R., & Gerber, T. P. (2017). Experiences of homeownership and housing mobility after privatization in Russia, 1992–2013. In C. Dewilde & R. Ronald (Eds.), Housing wealth and wellbeing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Metadata
Title
Housing Status in Post-Soviet Contexts: A Multi-dimensional Measurement Approach
Authors
Jane R. Zavisca
Theodore P. Gerber
Hyungjun Suh
Publication date
10-10-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02477-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Social Indicators Research 2/2021 Go to the issue

Original Research

An Age–Period–Cohort Approach to the Incidence and Evolution of Overeducation and Skills Mismatch

Original Research

Estimating Household Consumption Expenditure at Local Level In Italy: The Potential of the Cokriging Spatial Predictor

Original Research

An Alternative Aggregation Process for Composite Indexes: An Application to the Heritage Foundation Economic Freedom Index

Original Research

Impact of Trade Liberalization on Household Welfare: An Analysis Using Household Exposure-to-Trade Indices

Original Research

Building Well-Being Composite Indicator for Micro-Territorial Areas Through PLS-SEM and K-Means Approach

EditorialNotes

Educational Resilience Among Asian Children in Challenging Family Environment

Premium Partner

    Image Credits