Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Indicators Research 1/2019

11-05-2018

How Can we Achieve a Sustainable Redistributive Policy? Rethinking the Relationship Between Civic Engagement, Neighborhood Relationship and Labor Market Status

Author: JaeYoul Shin

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 1/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the effect of social relations on support for redistribution and to explore desirable forms of redistribution based on mutual understanding. Most previous studies have explained support for redistribution as insurance against risk or the pursuit of self-interest. Under the current framework, however, it is difficult to explain the establishment of a sustainable redistributive policy. To overcome this limitation, I focus on the role of social relations that suppress the tendency to pursue self-interest and promote support for redistribution. My findings indicate that social relations moderate the effect of self-interest and directly affect support for redistribution. From this result, I conclude that social relations could facilitate mutual understanding and alleviate the negative side effects of the labor market.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
Representative explanations include the EGP class hypothesis (Svallfors 1997), asset theory (Iversen and Soskice 2001), prospects of upward mobility hypothesis (Benabou and Ok 2001), fairness hypothesis (Alesina and Angeletos 2005) risk aversion hypothesis (Rehm 2009) and relative deprivation (satisfying rationality) hypothesis (Shin 2017).
 
2
Borrowing the terms used by Karl Polanyi, a self-regulating market economy is always subordinate to democratic society. Mark Granovetter more definitely stated that economic actions are always embedded in society.
 
3
Following Iversen’s advice, I do not simultaneously measure skill specificity and occupation. Iversen provided the following warning: “However, since the alternative conceptions of class often rely on simple classifications extracted from ILO’s standard classification of occupations (ISCO-88), which is also used in the construction of the skill variable, great care must be taken in designing the tests and interpreting the results. This note explains the problems in using class dummies extracted from occupational classifications, and then suggests a remedy.” Therefore, I also avoided the EGP scheme and replaced it with employment status. The EGP scheme does not reflect the effect of non-regular workers who experience insecurity and poor working conditions; rather, employment status encompasses the issue of non-regular employment. For more details, the interested reader is referred to the following site: http://​www.​people.​fas.​harvard.​edu/​~iversen/​SkillSpecificity​.​htm.
 
4
Piff et al. (2010) suggested a positive effect of egalitarian values and feelings of compassion on a more prosocial attitude. Arikan and Bloom (2015) more directly showed the effect of egalitarianism on attitudes toward welfare.
 
5
For more information, please see the following site: http://​ssp.​hus.​osaka-u.​ac.​jp/​en/​.
 
6
For more information about the specific calculation methods, please see:. http://​www.​people.​fas.​harvard.​edu/​~iversen/​SkillSpecificity​.​htm#Explanation.
 
7
Skill in the current occupation is mostly unnecessary in another occupational category. For example, even if a worker is proficient at oxyacetylene welding, he or she cannot use this skill for statistical analysis.
 
8
Separating politics from civic engagement is useful in the context of Japanese society for several reasons. First, except from 1993 to 1996 and from 2009 to 2012, the Liberal Democratic Party of Japan (LDPJ) has been the ruling party since 1955. Second, the turnover of voters varies according to age; for example, the turnover rates of voters in their 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 s are 32.58, 42.09, 49.98, 60.07 and 68.28%, respectively. Third, although grass-roots social movements and volunteer activities are widespread, participation in political movements has been relatively low since protests were defeated in the 1960s and 1970s.
 
9
This SPSS macro can be downloaded at the following site: http://​www.​processmacro.​org/​index.​html.
 
10
Please check the web appendix to confirm the results of the robustness tests and explanations.
 
11
Related to this issue, Kirkpatrick et al. (2007) elaborated on community development in Oakland, California. Their case study focused on two different communities; one effectively protects itself against pressures of marketization and gentrification, whereas the other fails to do so. They argued that although the pressures of marketization threaten communities, overcoming these pressures is possible as they are operating on “the neighborhood’s strong network of community-based organization.” This result indicates that social relations may be a useful apparatus.
 
12
Barabaschi (2015) noted that solidarity is based on the willingness to share risks. Following this argument, workers who actively participate in community affairs and have specific labor market skills will support redistribution.
 
13
Iversen and Soskice (2006) showed that the middle class is likely to affiliate with a center-right party in a two-party majoritarian system. In contrast, in a proportional system, the middle-class tends to support redistribution. These results imply that support for redistribution depends on political context and circumstances.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236–253.CrossRef Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by “civic engagement”? Journal of Transformative Education, 3(3), 236–253.CrossRef
go back to reference Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G. M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution: US vs. Europe, American Economic Review, 95, 913–935.CrossRef Alesina, A., & Angeletos, G. M. (2005). Fairness and redistribution: US vs. Europe, American Economic Review, 95, 913–935.CrossRef
go back to reference Alesina, A. F., & Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for redistribution (No. w14825). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRef Alesina, A. F., & Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for redistribution (No. w14825). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRef
go back to reference Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of public Economics, 89(5), 897–931.CrossRef Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of public Economics, 89(5), 897–931.CrossRef
go back to reference Alt, J., & Iversen, T. (2017). Inequality, labor market segmentation, and preferences for redistribution. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 21–36.CrossRef Alt, J., & Iversen, T. (2017). Inequality, labor market segmentation, and preferences for redistribution. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 21–36.CrossRef
go back to reference Arikan, G., & Bloom, P. B. (2015). Social values and cross-national differences in attitudes towards welfare. Political Studies, 63, 431–448.CrossRef Arikan, G., & Bloom, P. B. (2015). Social values and cross-national differences in attitudes towards welfare. Political Studies, 63, 431–448.CrossRef
go back to reference Backus, P. G., & Esteller-Moré, A. (2017). Risk aversion and inequity aversion in demand for unemployment benefits. International Tax and Public Finance, 24(2), 198–220.CrossRef Backus, P. G., & Esteller-Moré, A. (2017). Risk aversion and inequity aversion in demand for unemployment benefits. International Tax and Public Finance, 24(2), 198–220.CrossRef
go back to reference Barabaschi, B. (2015). Intergenerational Solidarity in the Workplace: Can It Solve Europe’s Labor Market and Social Welfare Crises? SAGE Open, 5(4), 2158244015621464.CrossRef Barabaschi, B. (2015). Intergenerational Solidarity in the Workplace: Can It Solve Europe’s Labor Market and Social Welfare Crises? SAGE Open, 5(4), 2158244015621464.CrossRef
go back to reference Benabou, R., & Ok, E. A. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 447–487.CrossRef Benabou, R., & Ok, E. A. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 447–487.CrossRef
go back to reference Berger, B. (2009). Political theory, political science and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives on Politics, 7(2), 335–350.CrossRef Berger, B. (2009). Political theory, political science and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives on Politics, 7(2), 335–350.CrossRef
go back to reference Blekesaune, M. (2013). Economic strain and public support for redistribution: A comparative analysis of 28 European Countries. Journal of Social Policy, 42(01), 57–72.CrossRef Blekesaune, M. (2013). Economic strain and public support for redistribution: A comparative analysis of 28 European Countries. Journal of Social Policy, 42(01), 57–72.CrossRef
go back to reference Bothner, M. S., Stuart, T. E., & White, H. C. (2004). Status differentiation and the cohesion of social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(4), 261–295.CrossRef Bothner, M. S., Stuart, T. E., & White, H. C. (2004). Status differentiation and the cohesion of social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28(4), 261–295.CrossRef
go back to reference Brady, D., & Bostic, A. (2015). Paradoxes of social policy: Welfare transfers, relative poverty, and redistribution preferences. American Sociological Review, 80(2), 268–298.CrossRef Brady, D., & Bostic, A. (2015). Paradoxes of social policy: Welfare transfers, relative poverty, and redistribution preferences. American Sociological Review, 80(2), 268–298.CrossRef
go back to reference Brady, D., & Finnigan, R. (2014). Does immigration undermine public support for social policy? American Sociological Review, 79(1), 17–42.CrossRef Brady, D., & Finnigan, R. (2014). Does immigration undermine public support for social policy? American Sociological Review, 79(1), 17–42.CrossRef
go back to reference Burgoon, B., Koster, F., & Van Egmond, M. (2012). Support for redistribution and the paradox of immigration. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 288–304.CrossRef Burgoon, B., Koster, F., & Van Egmond, M. (2012). Support for redistribution and the paradox of immigration. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(3), 288–304.CrossRef
go back to reference Checchi, D., & Filippin, A. (2004). An experimental study of the POUM hypothesis. In F. Cowell (Ed.), Inequality, welfare and income distribution: Experimental approaches. Research on Economic Inequality (Vol. 11, pp. 115–136). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Checchi, D., & Filippin, A. (2004). An experimental study of the POUM hypothesis. In F. Cowell (Ed.), Inequality, welfare and income distribution: Experimental approaches. Research on Economic Inequality (Vol. 11, pp. 115–136). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
go back to reference Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. Cohen, J. L., & Arato, A. (1994). Civil society and political theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Cojocaru, A. (2014). Prospects of upward mobility and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from the life in transition survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 300–314.CrossRef Cojocaru, A. (2014). Prospects of upward mobility and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from the life in transition survey. European Journal of Political Economy, 34, 300–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Corneo, G., & Fong, C. M. (2008). What’s the monetary value of distributive justice? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 289–308.CrossRef Corneo, G., & Fong, C. M. (2008). What’s the monetary value of distributive justice? Journal of Public Economics, 92(1), 289–308.CrossRef
go back to reference Corneo, G., & Grüner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of public Economics, 83(1), 83–107.CrossRef Corneo, G., & Grüner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of public Economics, 83(1), 83–107.CrossRef
go back to reference Cusack, T., Iversen, T., & Rehm, P. (2006). Risks at work: The demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(3), 365–389.CrossRef Cusack, T., Iversen, T., & Rehm, P. (2006). Risks at work: The demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(3), 365–389.CrossRef
go back to reference Diez Roux, A. V. (2001). Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1783–1789.CrossRef Diez Roux, A. V. (2001). Investigating neighborhood and area effects on health. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1783–1789.CrossRef
go back to reference Durante, R., Putterman, L., & Weele, J. (2014). Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 1059–1086.CrossRef Durante, R., Putterman, L., & Weele, J. (2014). Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 1059–1086.CrossRef
go back to reference Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human affairs, 22(3), 283–300.CrossRef Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human affairs, 22(3), 283–300.CrossRef
go back to reference Fox, C. (2004). The changing color of welfare? How Whites’ attitudes toward Latinos influence support for welfare. American Journal of Sociology, 110(3), 580–625.CrossRef Fox, C. (2004). The changing color of welfare? How Whites’ attitudes toward Latinos influence support for welfare. American Journal of Sociology, 110(3), 580–625.CrossRef
go back to reference Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRef Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRef
go back to reference Guillaud, E. (2013). Preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis over 33 countries’. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 57–78.CrossRef Guillaud, E. (2013). Preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis over 33 countries’. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 57–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Habermas, J. (1984) [1981]. The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.) (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon. Habermas, J. (1984) [1981]. The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.) (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon.
go back to reference Habermas, J. (1987) [1981]. The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.) (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon. Habermas, J. (1987) [1981]. The theory of communicative action: Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.) (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon.
go back to reference Hipp, J. R., & Wickes, R. (2016). Minority Status Distortion and Preference for In-group Ties: Consequences for Social Capital. Socius, 2, 2378023116640281. Hipp, J. R., & Wickes, R. (2016). Minority Status Distortion and Preference for In-group Ties: Consequences for Social Capital. Socius, 2, 2378023116640281.
go back to reference Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–893.CrossRef Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–893.CrossRef
go back to reference Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181.CrossRef Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181.CrossRef
go back to reference Jæger, M. M. (2006). Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: The regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review, 22(2), 157–170.CrossRef Jæger, M. M. (2006). Welfare regimes and attitudes towards redistribution: The regime hypothesis revisited. European Sociological Review, 22(2), 157–170.CrossRef
go back to reference Kearns, A., Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Livingston, M., & Leyland, A. (2014). ‘All in it together’? Social cohesion in a divided society: Attitudes to income inequality and redistribution in a residential context. Journal of Social Policy, 43(3), 453–477.CrossRef Kearns, A., Bailey, N., Gannon, M., Livingston, M., & Leyland, A. (2014). ‘All in it together’? Social cohesion in a divided society: Attitudes to income inequality and redistribution in a residential context. Journal of Social Policy, 43(3), 453–477.CrossRef
go back to reference Keeter, S., Zukin, C., Andolina, M., & Jenkins, K. (2002). The civic and political health of the nation: A generational portrait. Medford: Center for information and research on civic learning and engagement (CIRCLE). Keeter, S., Zukin, C., Andolina, M., & Jenkins, K. (2002). The civic and political health of the nation: A generational portrait. Medford: Center for information and research on civic learning and engagement (CIRCLE).
go back to reference Kirkpatrick, L. O. (2007). The two “logics” of community development: Neighborhoods, markets, and community development corporations”. Politics & Society, 35(2), 329–359.CrossRef Kirkpatrick, L. O. (2007). The two “logics” of community development: Neighborhoods, markets, and community development corporations”. Politics & Society, 35(2), 329–359.CrossRef
go back to reference Kulin, J., & Svallfors, S. (2013). Class, values, and attitudes towards redistribution: A European comparison. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 155–167.CrossRef Kulin, J., & Svallfors, S. (2013). Class, values, and attitudes towards redistribution: A European comparison. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 155–167.CrossRef
go back to reference Luttmer, E. F. (2001). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 500–528.CrossRef Luttmer, E. F. (2001). Group loyalty and the taste for redistribution. Journal of Political Economy, 109(3), 500–528.CrossRef
go back to reference Martín, I., & Van Deth, J. W. (2007). 12 Political involvement. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis (pp. 303–333). London: Routledge. Martín, I., & Van Deth, J. W. (2007). 12 Political involvement. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis (pp. 303–333). London: Routledge.
go back to reference Nagayoshi, K., & Sato, Y. (2014). Who supports redistributive policies in contemporary Japan? An integrative approach to self-interest and trust models. International Sociology, 29(4), 302–323.CrossRef Nagayoshi, K., & Sato, Y. (2014). Who supports redistributive policies in contemporary Japan? An integrative approach to self-interest and trust models. International Sociology, 29(4), 302–323.CrossRef
go back to reference Offe, C. (1987). Democracy against the welfare state? Structural foundations of neoconservative political opportunities. Political Theory, 15(4), 501–537.CrossRef Offe, C. (1987). Democracy against the welfare state? Structural foundations of neoconservative political opportunities. Political Theory, 15(4), 501–537.CrossRef
go back to reference Paskov, M., & Dewilde, C. (2012). Income inequality and solidarity in Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(4), 415–432.CrossRef Paskov, M., & Dewilde, C. (2012). Income inequality and solidarity in Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 30(4), 415–432.CrossRef
go back to reference Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784.CrossRef Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784.CrossRef
go back to reference Polanyi, K. (2001) [1944]. The great transformation:(The political and economic origin of our time). Boston: Beacon Press. Polanyi, K. (2001) [1944]. The great transformation:(The political and economic origin of our time). Boston: Beacon Press.
go back to reference Raven, J., Achterberg, P., Van der Veen, R., & Yerkes, M. (2011). An institutional embeddedness of welfare opinions? The link between public opinion and social policy in the Netherlands (1970–2004). Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 369–386.CrossRef Raven, J., Achterberg, P., Van der Veen, R., & Yerkes, M. (2011). An institutional embeddedness of welfare opinions? The link between public opinion and social policy in the Netherlands (1970–2004). Journal of Social Policy, 40(2), 369–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Rehm, P. (2009). Risks and redistribution: An individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(7), 855–881.CrossRef Rehm, P. (2009). Risks and redistribution: An individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(7), 855–881.CrossRef
go back to reference Robert, P. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Robert, P. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
go back to reference Rodger, J. J. (2003). Social solidarity, welfare and post-emotionalism. Journal of Social Policy, 32(3), 403–421.CrossRef Rodger, J. J. (2003). Social solidarity, welfare and post-emotionalism. Journal of Social Policy, 32(3), 403–421.CrossRef
go back to reference Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free press. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free press.
go back to reference Schmidt, U. (2016). Insurance demand under prospect theory: A graphical analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 77–89.CrossRef Schmidt, U. (2016). Insurance demand under prospect theory: A graphical analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(1), 77–89.CrossRef
go back to reference Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.
go back to reference Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.CrossRef Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.CrossRef
go back to reference Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review, 13(3), 283–304.CrossRef Svallfors, S. (1997). Worlds of welfare and attitudes to redistribution: A comparison of eight western nations. European Sociological Review, 13(3), 283–304.CrossRef
go back to reference Svallfors, S. (2006). The moral economy of class: Class and attitudes in comparative perspective. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press. Svallfors, S. (2006). The moral economy of class: Class and attitudes in comparative perspective. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
go back to reference Svallfors, S., Kulin, J., & Schnabel, A. (2012). Age, class, and attitudes towards government responsibilities. In S. Svallfors (Ed.), Contested welfare states. Welfare attitudes in Europe and beyond. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.CrossRef Svallfors, S., Kulin, J., & Schnabel, A. (2012). Age, class, and attitudes towards government responsibilities. In S. Svallfors (Ed.), Contested welfare states. Welfare attitudes in Europe and beyond. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Talò, C., & Mannarini, T. (2015). Measuring participation: Development and validation the participatory behaviors scale. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 799–816.CrossRef Talò, C., & Mannarini, T. (2015). Measuring participation: Development and validation the participatory behaviors scale. Social Indicators Research, 123(3), 799–816.CrossRef
go back to reference Tóth, I. G. & Keller, T. (2011). Income distributions, inequality perceptions and redistributive claims in European societies. AIAS, GINI Discussion Paper 7. Tóth, I. G. & Keller, T. (2011). Income distributions, inequality perceptions and redistributive claims in European societies. AIAS, GINI Discussion Paper 7.
go back to reference Yamamura, E. (2012). Social capital, household income, and preferences for income redistribution. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(4), 498–511.CrossRef Yamamura, E. (2012). Social capital, household income, and preferences for income redistribution. European Journal of Political Economy, 28(4), 498–511.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How Can we Achieve a Sustainable Redistributive Policy? Rethinking the Relationship Between Civic Engagement, Neighborhood Relationship and Labor Market Status
Author
JaeYoul Shin
Publication date
11-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1922-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2019

Social Indicators Research 1/2019 Go to the issue