Skip to main content
Top

2013 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

How Media Companies Should Create Value: Innovation Centered Business Models and Dynamic Capabilities

Authors : Hans van Kranenburg, Gerrit Willem Ziggers

Published in: Handbook of Social Media Management

Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Globalization, deregulation, technological innovation and the convergence of previously separated industries such as media, entertainment, information, and consumer electronics industries, have changed the media landscape into a turbulent environment. As a consequence of these developments, many media firms are experiencing severe challenges, as content proliferates, audiences change behaviors, advertising revenue erodes, and new competitors emerge. Media firms operating in this rapidly changing environment have to make adequate adaptations to these fast moving changes and respond quickly to create or to sustain their competitive advantage. They are generally confronted with the fact that existing resources and capabilities are no longer sufficient to deal with the new demands and requirements (Oh, Telecommunications Policy 20(9): 713–720, 1996). In order to adjust to the new environment, the media companies need to obtain, integrate, and reconfigure resources and capabilities in order to adjust to the new environment.
Creating social, ecological and financial values for stakeholders is the key to long-term survival. This requires new concepts, new idea and new managerial approaches. Two important questions that arise are what kind of business model do they need to create multiple values, and how should the company transform its old business model into a new model. In this chapter, we will attempt to contribute to the creation of multiple values by media companies. In the next section, we present the main characteristics of the old and the new business models for the media companies. In the following section, we will discuss the main corporate social responsibility (CSR) challenges that media companies face when they become a network organization. The closing section presents some conclusions that can be drawn from this contribution.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Aaker, D. A. (2009). Spanning silos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Aaker, D. A. (2009). Spanning silos. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
go back to reference Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion.
go back to reference Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of the distributor’s firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54, 42–58.CrossRef Anderson, J. C., & Narus, J. A. (1990). A model of the distributor’s firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. Journal of Marketing, 54, 42–58.CrossRef
go back to reference Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press. Chandler, A. D., Jr. (1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of the Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference D’Aveni, R. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press. D’Aveni, R. (1994). Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Day, G. S. (1995). Advantageous alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 297–300.CrossRef Day, G. S. (1995). Advantageous alliances. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 23(4), 297–300.CrossRef
go back to reference Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 183–195.CrossRef Day, G. S. (2011). Closing the marketing capabilities gap. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 183–195.CrossRef
go back to reference Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
go back to reference Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.CrossRef Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.CrossRef
go back to reference Fiol, C. M., & O’Connor, E. J. (2003). Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 54–70. Fiol, C. M., & O’Connor, E. J. (2003). Waking up! Mindfulness in the face of bandwagons. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 54–70.
go back to reference Geoffrion, A. M., & Krishnan, R. (2003). E-business and management science: Mutual impacts (part 1 of 2). Management Science, 49(10), 1275–1286.CrossRef Geoffrion, A. M., & Krishnan, R. (2003). E-business and management science: Mutual impacts (part 1 of 2). Management Science, 49(10), 1275–1286.CrossRef
go back to reference Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.CrossRef Gulati, R. (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397–420.CrossRef
go back to reference Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.CrossRef Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 693–706.CrossRef
go back to reference Haeckel, S. H. (1999). Winning in smart markets. Sloan Management Review, 41(1), 7–8. Haeckel, S. H. (1999). Winning in smart markets. Sloan Management Review, 41(1), 7–8.
go back to reference Hagel, J., Brown, J. S., & Davison, L. (2009). The big shift measuring the forces of change. Harvard Business Review, 87(7–8), 86–89. Hagel, J., Brown, J. S., & Davison, L. (2009). The big shift measuring the forces of change. Harvard Business Review, 87(7–8), 86–89.
go back to reference Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational-change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.CrossRef Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational-change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.CrossRef
go back to reference He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.CrossRef He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494.CrossRef
go back to reference Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford: Blackwell. Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M. A., Singh, H., & Winter, S. G. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
go back to reference Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 981–1000.CrossRef Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2007). Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, 28(10), 981–1000.CrossRef
go back to reference Kandemir, D., Yaprak, A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). Alliance orientation: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 324–340.CrossRef Kandemir, D., Yaprak, A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2006). Alliance orientation: Conceptualization, measurement, and impact on market performance. Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 324–340.CrossRef
go back to reference Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). Mastering the management system. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 62–77. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). Mastering the management system. Harvard Business Review, 86(1), 62–77.
go back to reference Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation – The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.CrossRef Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation – The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 1–18.CrossRef
go back to reference Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. (2002). Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 141–158.CrossRef Lambe, C. J., Spekman, R. E., & Hunt, S. D. (2002). Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(2), 141–158.CrossRef
go back to reference Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4), 502–513.CrossRef Levinthal, D., & Rerup, C. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4), 502–513.CrossRef
go back to reference Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). 1st-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41–58.CrossRef Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). 1st-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41–58.CrossRef
go back to reference March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–78.CrossRef March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–78.CrossRef
go back to reference Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. (1993). Detach of the lethargic – Effects of expansion into new technical subfields on performance in a firm base business. Organization Science, 4(2), 152–180.CrossRef Mitchell, W., & Singh, K. (1993). Detach of the lethargic – Effects of expansion into new technical subfields on performance in a firm base business. Organization Science, 4(2), 152–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Moore, G. (2006). Dealing with Darwin: How great companies innovate at every state of their evolution. New York: Penguin Portfolio. Moore, G. (2006). Dealing with Darwin: How great companies innovate at every state of their evolution. New York: Penguin Portfolio.
go back to reference Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.CrossRef Narver, J. C., & Slater, S. F. (1990). The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 20–35.CrossRef
go back to reference O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organisation. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81. O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organisation. Harvard Business Review, 82(4), 74–81.
go back to reference Oh, J. (1996). Global strategic alliances in the telecommunications industry. Telecommunications Policy, 20(9), 713–720.CrossRef Oh, J. (1996). Global strategic alliances in the telecommunications industry. Telecommunications Policy, 20(9), 713–720.CrossRef
go back to reference Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Wiley Desktop Editions Series). New York: Wiley. Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Wiley Desktop Editions Series). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper.
go back to reference Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–623.CrossRef Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–623.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 448–461.CrossRef Smith, W. K., Binns, A., & Tushman, M. L. (2010). Complex business models: Managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 448–461.CrossRef
go back to reference Teece, D. J. (1993). The dynamics of industrial capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred Chandler’s scale and scope. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 199–225. Teece, D. J. (1993). The dynamics of industrial capitalism: Perspectives on Alfred Chandler’s scale and scope. Journal of Economic Literature, 31, 199–225.
go back to reference Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Teece, D. J. (2009). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRef Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.CrossRef
go back to reference Van Kranenburg, H. L., Clood, M., & Hagedoorn, J. (2001). An exploratory study of recent trends in the diversification of Dutch publishing companies in the multimedia and information industries. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(1), 64–86. Van Kranenburg, H. L., Clood, M., & Hagedoorn, J. (2001). An exploratory study of recent trends in the diversification of Dutch publishing companies in the multimedia and information industries. International Studies of Management and Organization, 31(1), 64–86.
go back to reference Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Free Press.
go back to reference Winter, S. G. (2005). On fitness and the survival of the fittest. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania. Winter, S. G. (2005). On fitness and the survival of the fittest. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania.
go back to reference Ziggers, G. W., & Tjemkes, B. V. (2010). Dynamics in inter-firm collaboration: The impact of alliance capabilities on performance. Journal of Food System Dynamics, 1(2), 151–166. Ziggers, G. W., & Tjemkes, B. V. (2010). Dynamics in inter-firm collaboration: The impact of alliance capabilities on performance. Journal of Food System Dynamics, 1(2), 151–166.
go back to reference Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRef Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2007). Business model design and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 18(2), 181–199.CrossRef
go back to reference Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.CrossRef Zott, C., & Amit, R. (2008). The fit between product market strategy and business model: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 1–26.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
How Media Companies Should Create Value: Innovation Centered Business Models and Dynamic Capabilities
Authors
Hans van Kranenburg
Gerrit Willem Ziggers
Copyright Year
2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28897-5_14