Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics 4/2022

21-01-2022

Human Preferences for Robot Eye Gaze in Human-to-Robot Handovers

Authors: Tair Faibish, Alap Kshirsagar, Guy Hoffman, Yael Edan

Published in: International Journal of Social Robotics | Issue 4/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper investigates human’s preferences for a robot’s eye gaze behavior during human-to-robot handovers. We studied gaze patterns for all three phases of the handover process: reach, transfer, and retreat, as opposed to previous work which only focused on the reaching phase. Additionally, we investigated whether the object’s size or fragility or the human’s posture affect the human’s preferences for the robot gaze. A public data-set of human-human handovers was analyzed to obtain the most frequent gaze behaviors that human receivers perform. These were then used to program the robot’s receiver gaze behaviors. In two sets of user studies (video and in-person), a collaborative robot exhibited these gaze behaviors while receiving an object from a human. In the video studies, 72 participants watched and compared videos of handovers between a human actor and a robot demonstrating each of the three gaze behaviors. In the in-person studies, a different set of 72 participants physically performed object handovers with the robot and evaluated their perception of the handovers for the robot’s different gaze behaviors. Results showed that, for both observers and participants in a handover, when the robot exhibited Face-Hand-Face gaze (gazing at the giver’s face and then at the giver’s hand during the reach phase and back at the giver’s face during the retreat phase), participants considered the handover to be more likable, anthropomorphic, and communicative of timing \((p < 0.0001)\). However, we did not find evidence of any effect of the object’s size or fragility or the giver’s posture on the gaze preference.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
2
The videos are available at: https://​youtu.​be/​9dD1YHG2Nco.
 
3
To represent objects of different fragility a plastic bottle and a glass bottle were used. In order to examine people’s perception about the fragility of these objects, we conducted an online survey. This survey was conducted post experiment based on reviewers’ feedback. A total of 24 participants responded to the survey. The participants were undergraduate students from the Department of Industrial Engineering and Management at Ben-Gurion University, similar to the students who participated in our video and in-person experiments. The participants were told that this study deals with object handovers between a human and a robot.
The survey included 10 pictures of objects, made from different materials. The plastic bottle and the glass bottle used in our experiment were among these objects. Each picture was followed by a yes or no question: “Do you perceive this object to be fragile?”. Results revealed that all of the 24 participants perceived the plastic bottle to be non-fragile. 23 out of 24 participants perceived the glass bottle to be fragile. Additionally, when asked the same question for three other different plastic and glass bottles, 24 participants denoted the plastic bottles as non-fragile and 23 denoted the glass bottles as fragile. Details about this survey are available in [17]. This supports our decision to choose plastic and glass bottles to represents objects of different fragility.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kshirsagar A, Kress-Gazit H, Hoffman G (2019) Specifying and synthesizing human-robot handovers, In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau Kshirsagar A, Kress-Gazit H, Hoffman G (2019) Specifying and synthesizing human-robot handovers, In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau
2.
go back to reference Moon A, Troniak D, Gleeson B, Pan M, Zheng M, Blumer B, MacLean K, Croft E (2014) Meet me where I’m gazing: How shared attention gaze affects human-robot handover timing, In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI). Bielefeld, Germany Moon A, Troniak D, Gleeson B, Pan M, Zheng M, Blumer B, MacLean K, Croft E (2014) Meet me where I’m gazing: How shared attention gaze affects human-robot handover timing, In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI). Bielefeld, Germany
3.
go back to reference Zheng M, Moon A, Croft E, Meng M (2015) Impacts of robot head gaze on robot-to-human handovers. Int J Soc Robot 7(5):783–798CrossRef Zheng M, Moon A, Croft E, Meng M (2015) Impacts of robot head gaze on robot-to-human handovers. Int J Soc Robot 7(5):783–798CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fischer K, Jensen L, Kirstein F, Stabinger S, Erkent Ö, Shukla D, Piater J (2015) The effects of social gaze in human-robot collaborative assembly, In International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR). France, Paris Fischer K, Jensen L, Kirstein F, Stabinger S, Erkent Ö, Shukla D, Piater J (2015) The effects of social gaze in human-robot collaborative assembly, In International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR). France, Paris
5.
go back to reference Kühnlenz B, Wang Z.-Q, Kühnlenz K (2017) Impact of continuous eye contact of a humanoid robot on user experience and interactions with professional user background, In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man), Lisbon, Portugal Kühnlenz B, Wang Z.-Q, Kühnlenz K (2017) Impact of continuous eye contact of a humanoid robot on user experience and interactions with professional user background, In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man), Lisbon, Portugal
6.
go back to reference Kshirsagar A, Lim M, Christian S, Hoffman G (2020) Robot gaze behaviors in human-to-robot handovers. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 5(4):6552–6558CrossRef Kshirsagar A, Lim M, Christian S, Hoffman G (2020) Robot gaze behaviors in human-to-robot handovers. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 5(4):6552–6558CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Koay KL, Sisbot EA, Syrdal DS, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K, Alami R (2007) Exploratory study of a robot approaching a person in the context of handing over an object, In AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics. Stanford CA Koay KL, Sisbot EA, Syrdal DS, Walters ML, Dautenhahn K, Alami R (2007) Exploratory study of a robot approaching a person in the context of handing over an object, In AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics. Stanford CA
8.
go back to reference Edsinger A, Kemp CC (2007) Human-robot interaction for cooperative manipulation: Handing objects to one another, In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man). Jeju, South Korea Edsinger A, Kemp CC (2007) Human-robot interaction for cooperative manipulation: Handing objects to one another, In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man). Jeju, South Korea
9.
go back to reference Cakmak M, Srinivasa SS, Lee MK, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S (2011) Human preferences for robot-human hand-over configurations, In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). San Francisco Cakmak M, Srinivasa SS, Lee MK, Forlizzi J, Kiesler S (2011) Human preferences for robot-human hand-over configurations, In IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). San Francisco
10.
go back to reference Cakmak M, Srinivasa S. S, Lee M. K, Kiesler S, Forlizzi J (2011)Using spatial and temporal contrast for fluent robot-human hand-overs, In 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) Cakmak M, Srinivasa S. S, Lee M. K, Kiesler S, Forlizzi J (2011)Using spatial and temporal contrast for fluent robot-human hand-overs, In 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
11.
go back to reference zu Borgsen S. M, Bernotat J, Wachsmuth S, (2017) Hand in hand with robots: differences between experienced and naive users in human-robot handover scenarios, In International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR). Tsukuba, Japan zu Borgsen S. M, Bernotat J, Wachsmuth S, (2017) Hand in hand with robots: differences between experienced and naive users in human-robot handover scenarios, In International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR). Tsukuba, Japan
12.
go back to reference Pan M. K, Croft E. A, Niemeyer G (2018) Evaluating social perception of human-to-robot handovers using the robot social attributes scale (rosas), In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Chicago, USA Pan M. K, Croft E. A, Niemeyer G (2018) Evaluating social perception of human-to-robot handovers using the robot social attributes scale (rosas), In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Chicago, USA
13.
go back to reference Flanagan J, Johansson R (2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nat 424(6950):769CrossRef Flanagan J, Johansson R (2003) Action plans used in action observation. Nat 424(6950):769CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Strabala K, Lee M, Dragan A, Forlizzi J, Srinivasa S (2012) Learning the communication of intent prior to physical collaboration, In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man). France, Paris Strabala K, Lee M, Dragan A, Forlizzi J, Srinivasa S (2012) Learning the communication of intent prior to physical collaboration, In IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (Ro-Man). France, Paris
15.
go back to reference Admoni H, Dragan A, Srinivasa S, Scassellati B (2014) Deliberate delays during robot-to-human handovers improve compliance with gaze communication, In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Bielefeld, Germany Admoni H, Dragan A, Srinivasa S, Scassellati B (2014) Deliberate delays during robot-to-human handovers improve compliance with gaze communication, In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Bielefeld, Germany
16.
go back to reference Carfí A, Foglino F, Bruno B, Mastrogiovanni F (2019) A multi-sensor dataset of human-human handover. Data Brief 22:109–117CrossRef Carfí A, Foglino F, Bruno B, Mastrogiovanni F (2019) A multi-sensor dataset of human-human handover. Data Brief 22:109–117CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Faibish T (2021) Human-robot handovers: Human preferences and robot learning, Master’s thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion university of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel Faibish T (2021) Human-robot handovers: Human preferences and robot learning, Master’s thesis, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Ben-Gurion university of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel
18.
go back to reference Hunter D (2003) MM algorithms for generalized bradley-terry models. Annals Statist 32(1):384–406 Hunter D (2003) MM algorithms for generalized bradley-terry models. Annals Statist 32(1):384–406
19.
go back to reference Bradley R, Terry M (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39(3/4):324–345MathSciNetCrossRef Bradley R, Terry M (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39(3/4):324–345MathSciNetCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yamaoka F, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2006) How contingent should a communication robot be? In ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI). Salt Lake City, USA Yamaoka F, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2006) How contingent should a communication robot be? In ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI). Salt Lake City, USA
21.
go back to reference May WL, Johnson WD (1997) The validity and power of tests for equality of two correlated proportions. Statist Med 16(10):1081–1096CrossRef May WL, Johnson WD (1997) The validity and power of tests for equality of two correlated proportions. Statist Med 16(10):1081–1096CrossRef
22.
go back to reference McNemar Q (1947) Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12(2):153–157CrossRef McNemar Q (1947) Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika 12(2):153–157CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Morikawa T, Yanagawa T, Endou A, Yoshimura I (1996) Equivalence tests for pair-matched binary data. Bull Inf Cybern 28(1):31–46MATH Morikawa T, Yanagawa T, Endou A, Yoshimura I (1996) Equivalence tests for pair-matched binary data. Bull Inf Cybern 28(1):31–46MATH
24.
go back to reference Illowsky B, Dean S (2018) Introductory statistics, pp 579–584 Illowsky B, Dean S (2018) Introductory statistics, pp 579–584
25.
go back to reference Lakens D, Scheel AM, Isager PM (2018) Equivalence testing for psychological research: a tutorial. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci 1(2):259–269CrossRef Lakens D, Scheel AM, Isager PM (2018) Equivalence testing for psychological research: a tutorial. Adv Methods Pract Psychol Sci 1(2):259–269CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Human Preferences for Robot Eye Gaze in Human-to-Robot Handovers
Authors
Tair Faibish
Alap Kshirsagar
Guy Hoffman
Yael Edan
Publication date
21-01-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Journal of Social Robotics / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1875-4791
Electronic ISSN: 1875-4805
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-021-00836-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

International Journal of Social Robotics 4/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partners