Top

Environmental Management

Published in:

01-08-2015

Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review

Authors: Britta Uhde, W. Andreas Hahn, Verena C. Griess, Thomas Knoke

Published in: Environmental Management | Issue 2/2015

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a decision aid frequently used in the field of forest management planning. It includes the evaluation of multiple criteria such as the production of timber and non-timber forest products and tangible as well as intangible values of ecosystem services (ES). Hence, it is beneficial compared to those methods that take a purely financial perspective. Accordingly, MCDA methods are increasingly popular in the wide field of sustainability assessment. Hybrid approaches allow aggregating MCDA and, potentially, other decision-making techniques to make use of their individual benefits and leading to a more holistic view of the actual consequences that come with certain decisions. This review is providing a comprehensive overview of hybrid approaches that are used in forest management planning. Today, the scientific world is facing increasing challenges regarding the evaluation of ES and the trade-offs between them, for example between provisioning and regulating services. As the preferences of multiple stakeholders are essential to improve the decision process in multi-purpose forestry, participatory and hybrid approaches turn out to be of particular importance. Accordingly, hybrid methods show great potential for becoming most relevant in future decision making. Based on the review presented here, the development of models for the use in planning processes should focus on participatory modeling and the consideration of uncertainty regarding available information.

previous article Wildfires, Ecosystem Services, and Biodiversity in Tropical Dry Forest in India

next article Implications from the Use of Non-timber Forest Products on the Consumption of Wood as a Fuel Source in Human-Dominated Semiarid Landscapes

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Aldea J, Martínez-Peña F, Diaz-Balteiro L (2012) Integration of fungal production in forest management using a multi-criteria method. Eur J Forest Res 131:1991–2003. doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0649-y

Ananda J, Herath G (2005) Evaluating public risk preferences in forest land-use choices using multi-attribute utility theory. Ecol Econ 55:408–419. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.015

Ananda J, Herath G (2009) A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecol Econ 68:2535–2548. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010

André FJ, Cardenete MA, Romero C (2010) Designing public policies. An approach based on multi-criteria analysis and computable general equilibrium modeling. Springer, Berlin, p 642

Behzadian M, Kazemzadeh R, Albadvi A, Aghdasi M (2010) PROMETHEE: a comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. Eur J Oper Res 200:198–215. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021

Bell D (1975) A decision analysis of objectives for a forest pest problem. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg

Belton V, Stewart T (2002) Multiple criteria decision analysis. An integrated approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

Bjørndal T, Herrero I, Newman A, Romero C, Weintraub A (2012) Operations research in the natural resource industry. Int Trans Oper Res 19:39–62. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3995.2010.00800.x

Boggia A, Cortina C (2010) Measuring sustainable development using a multi-criteria model: a case study. JEMA 91:2301–2306. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.009

Boroushaki S, Malczewski J (2010) ParticipatoryGIS: a web-based collaborative GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Urisa 22:23–32

Boyland M, Nelson J, Bunnell FL, D’Eon RG (2006) An application of fuzzy set theory for seral-class constraints in forest planning models. Forest Ecol Manag 223:395–402. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.001

Brans J, Mareschal B (2005) PROMETHEE methods. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Boston, pp 163–196

Brans J, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986) How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method. Eur J Oper Res 24:228–238. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(86)90044-5

Brugha CM (2004) Phased multicriteria preference finding. Eur J Oper Res 158:308–316. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.06.006

Butler B, Tyrell M, Feinberg G, VanManen S, Wiseman L, Wallinger S (2007) Understanding and reaching family forest owners: lessons from social marketing research. J Forest 105:348–357

Carson RT (2012) Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren’t available. J Econ Perspect 26:27–42. doi:10.1257/jep.26.4.27

Cheng H (2013) A satisficing method for fuzzy goal programming problems with different importance and priorities. Qual Quant 47:485–498. doi:10.1007/s11135-011-9531-0

Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B et al (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0

de Keyser W, Peeters P (1996) A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods. Eur J Oper Res 89:457–461

Destan S, Yilmaz O, Sahin A (2013) Making objective forest stand maps of mixed managed forest with spatial interpolation and multi-criteria decision analysis. iForest 6:268–277. doi:10.3832/ifor0099-006

Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2003) Forest management optimisation models when carbon captured is considered: a goal programming approach. Forest Ecol Manag 174:447–457. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00075-0

Diaz-Balteiro L, Romero C (2008) Making forestry decisions with multiple criteria: a review and an assessment. Forest Ecol Manag 255:3222–3241. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.038

Diaz-Balteiro L, Bertomeu M, Bertomeu M (2009a) Optimal harvest scheduling in eucalyptus plantations. Forest Policy Econ 11:548–554. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2009.07.005

Diaz-Balteiro L, Gonzalez-Pachon J, Romero C (2009b) Forest management with multiple criteria and multiple stakeholders: an application to two public forests in Spain. Scan J For Res 24:87–93. doi:10.1080/02827580802687440

Diaz-Balteiro L, Martell DL, Romero C, Weintraub A (2014) The optimal rotation of a flammable forest stand when both carbon sequestration and timber are valued: a multi-criteria approach. Nat Hazards 72:375–387. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-1013-3

Doole GJ, Pannell DJ (2013) A process for the development and application of simulation models in applied economics. Aust J Agr Res Econ 57:79–103. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8489.2012.00607.x

Ducey MJ, Larson BC (1999) A fuzzy set approach to the problem of sustainability. Forest Ecol Manag 115:29–40. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00433-2

Duncker PS, Raulund-Rasmussen K, Gundersen P, Katzensteiner K, de Jong J, Ravn HP et al (2012) How forest management affects ecosystem services, including timber production and economic return: synergies and trade-offs. Ecol and Soc 17:50. doi:10.5751/ES-05066-170450

Durbach IN, Stewart TJ (2012) Modeling uncertainty in multi-criteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 223:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2012.04.038

Farmer JD, Foley D (2009) The economy needs agent-based modelling. Nature 460:685–686. doi:10.1038/460685a

Feizizadeh B, Blaschke T (2013) GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran. Nat Hazards 65:2105–2128. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0463-3

Field D (1973) Goal programming for forest management. J Forest 19:125–135

Flavell RB (1976) A new goal programming formulation. Omega 4:731–732. doi:10.1016/0305-0483(76)90099-2

Fontana V, Radtke A, Bossi Fedrigotti V, Tappeiner U, Tasser E, Zerbe S, Buchholz T (2013) Comparing land-use alternatives: using the ecosystem services concept to define a multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Econ 93:128–136. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.05.007

García-Barrios L, Speelman E, Pimm M (2008) An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests. Ecol Model 210:115–126

Ghajar I, Najafi A (2012) Evaluation of harvesting methods for sustainable forest management (SFM) using the analytical network process (ANP). Forest Policy Econ 21:81–91. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.01.003

Goldstein JH, Caldarone G, Duarte TK, Ennaanay D, Hannahs N, Mendoza G et al (2012) Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:7565–7570. doi:10.1073/pnas.1201040109

Gómez T, Hernández M, León M, Caballero R (2006) A forest planning problem solved via a linear fractional goal programming model. Forest Ecol Manag 227:79–88. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.012

Görener A (2012) Comparing AHP and ANP: an application of strategic decisions making in a manufacturing company. Int J Bus Soc Sci 3:194–208

Greene R, Devillers R, Luther JE, Eddy BG (2011) GIS-based multiple-criteria decision analysis. Geogr Comp 5:412–432. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2011.00431.x

Groselj P, Zadnik Stirn L (2013) Between compromise and consensus in group decisions in forest management. Šumar list 7–8:403–410

Gupta A, Harboe R, Tabucanon M (2000) Fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making for crop area planning in Narmada river basin. Agr Syst 63:1–18

Hahn A, Knoke T (2010) Sustainable development and sustainable forestry: analogies, differences, and the role of flexibility. Eur J Forest Res 129:787–801

Hahn A, Knoke T (2013) Angebot, Nachfrage und Nachhaltigkeit im Wald. Holz-Zentralblatt 139:530–531

Halog A, Manik Y (2011) Advancing integrated systems modelling framework for life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability 3:469–499. doi:10.3390/su3020469

Härtl F, Hahn A, Knoke T (2013) Risk-sensitive planning support for forest enterprises: the YAFO model. Comput Electr Agr 94:58–70

Hausman J (2012) Contingent valuation: from Dubious to hopeless. J Econ Perspect 26:43–56. doi:10.1257/jep.26.4.43

Herva M, Roca E (2013) Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation. J Clean Prod 39:355–371. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.058

Hjortsø CN (2004) Enhancing public participation in natural resource management using Soft OR—an application of strategic option development and analysis in tactical forest planning. Eur J Oper Res 152:667–683. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00065-1

Huth A, Drechsler M, Köhler P (2004) Multicriteria evaluation of simulated logging scenarios in a tropical rain forest. JEMA 71:321–333. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.03.008

Huth A, Drechsler M, Köhler P (2005) Using multicriteria decision analysis and a forest growth model to assess impacts of tree harvesting in Dipterocarp lowland rain forests. Forest Ecol Manag 207:215–232. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.028

Hyde KM (2006) Uncertainty analysis methods for multi-criteria decision analysis. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Adelaide, Adelaide

Jactel H, Branco M, Duncker P, Gardiner B, Grodzki W, Langstrom B et al (2012) A multicriteria risk analysis to evaluate impacts of forest management alternatives on forest health in Europe. Ecol and Soc 17:52. doi:10.5751/ES-04897-170452

Kangas J (1992a) Metsikön uudistamisketjun valinta—monitavoitteiseen hyötyteoriaan perustuva päätösanalyysimalli. Summary: Choosing the regeneration chain in a forest stand: a decision analysis model based on multi-attribute utility theory. University of Joensuu, Joensuu

Kangas J (1992b) Multiple-use planning of forest resources by using the analytic hierarchy process. Scan J For Res 7:259–268. doi:10.1080/02827589209382718

Kangas J (1996) A participatory approach to tactical forest planning. Finnish society of forest planning; Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki. Acta For Fenn 251

Kangas AS, Kangas J (2004) Probability, possibility and evidence: approaches to consider risk and uncertainty in forestry decision analysis. Forest Policy Econ 6:169–188. doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00083-7

Kangas J, Kangas A (2005) Multiple criteria decision support in forest management—the approach, methods applied, and experiences gained. Forest Ecol Manag 207:133–143. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.023

Kangas J, Store R, Leskinen P, Mehtatalo L (2000) Improving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilizing advanced decision support tools. Forest Ecol Manag 132:157–171

Kangas A, Kangas J, Pykäläinen J (2001a) Outranking methods as tools in strategic natural resources planning. Silva Fenn 35:215–227

Kangas J, Hytönen LA, Loikkanen T (2001b) Integrating the AHP and HERO into process of participatory natural resources planning. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 131–147

Kangas J, Kangas A, Leskinen P, Pykäläinen J (2001c) MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences. J Multi Crit Decis Anal 10:257–271. doi:10.1002/mcda.306

Kangas J, Pesonen M, Kurttila M, Kajanus M (2001) A’WOT: integrating the AHP with SWOT analysis. In: Dellman K (ed) Proceedings of the sixth international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process ISAHP 2001. Kursaal Bern, 2–4 Aug, Berne-Switzerland pp 189–199

Kangas J, Pukkala T, Kangas A (2001e) HERO: heuristic optimisation for multi-criteria forestry decision analysis. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 51–66

Kangas A, Kangas J, Lahdelma R, Salminen P (2006) Using SMAA-2 method with dependent uncertainties for strategic forest planning. Forest Policy Econ 9:113–125. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.03.012

Kangas A, Kangas J, Kurttila M (2008) Decision support for forest management. Springer, Dordrecht

Kao C (2009) Efficiency measurement for parallel production systems. Eur J Oper Res 196:1107–1112. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2008.04.020

Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Fuzzy multiple criteria forestry decision making based on an integrated VIKOR and AHP approach. Expert Syst Appl 38:7326–7333. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.003

Keeney R, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives. preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

Khadka C, Vacik H (2012) Use of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) for supporting community forest management. iForest 5:60–71. doi:10.3832/ifor0608-009

Khadka C, Hujala T, Wolfslehner B, Vacik H (2013) Problem structuring in participatory forest planning. Forest Policy Econ 26:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.09.008

Kloeze H, Molenkamp A, Roelofs F (1980) Strategic planning and participation: a contradiction in terms? Long Range Plann 13:10–20. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(80)90098-9

Knoke T, Calvas B, Ochoa Moreno WS, Onyekwelu JC, Griess VC (2013) Food production and climate protection—what abandoned lands can do to preserve natural forests. Global Environ Chang 23:1064–1072. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.004

Korosuo A, Wikström P, Öhman K, Eriksson LO (2011) An integrated MCDA software application for forest planning: a case study in southwestern Sweden. Math Comput For Nat Res Sci 3:75–86

Krcmar E, van Kooten GC, Vertinsky I (2005) Managing forest and marginal agricultural land for multiple tradeoffs: compromising on economic, carbon and structural diversity objectives. Ecol Model 185:451–468. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.12.014

Kurttila M, Pesonen M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2000) Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process AHP in SWOT analysis a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy Econ 1:41–52

Leskinen P (2007) Comparison of alternative scoring techniques when assessing decision maker’s multi-objective preferences in natural resource management. JEMA 85:363–370. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.10.003

Leskinen L, Leskinen P, Kurttila M, Kangas J, Kajanus M (2006) Adapting modern strategic decision support tools in the participatory strategy process—a case study of a forest research station. Forest Policy Econ 8:267–278. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2004.06.007

Lexer M, Vacik H, Palmetzhofer D, Oitzinger G (2005) A decision support tool to improve forestry extension services for small private landowners in southern Austria. Comput Electr Agr 49:81–102. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.004

Limaei SM (2013) Efficiency of Iranian forest industry based on DEA models. J For Res 24:759–765. doi:10.1007/s11676-013-0371-8

Limaei SM, Kouhi MS, Sharaji TR (2014) Goal programming approach for sustainable forest management (case study in Iranian Caspian forests). J For Res 25:429–435. doi:10.1007/s11676-014-0472-z

Linkov I, Bakr Ramadan A (eds) (2004) Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making., NATO science series. Series IV, Earth and environmental sciencesKluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p 38

Linkov I, Seager T, Kiker G, Bridges T (2004) Multi-criteria decision analysis: a framework for structuring remedial decisions at contaminated sites. In: Linkov I, Bakr Ramadan A (eds) Comparative risk assessment and environmental decision making, vol 38., NATO science series. Series IV, Earth and environmental sciencesKluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 15–54

Lootsma FA (1990) The French and the American school in multi-criteria decision analysis. Oper Res 24:380–388

Lynam T, de Jong W, Sheil D, Kusumanto T, Evans K (2007) A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences, and values into decision making in natural resources management. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art5/. Accessed 14 Aug 2013

Malczewski J (1999) GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Wiley, New York

Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 20:703–726. doi:10.1080/13658810600661508

McCarl BA, Spreen TH (1997) Applied mathematical programming using algebraic systems. http://agecon2.tamu.edu/people/faculty/mccarl-bruce/books.htm. Accessed 14 Aug 2013

MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. A report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington

Mendoza G, Martins H (2006) Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. Forest Ecol Manag 230:1–22. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.023

Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2000) Development of a methodology for selecting criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory assessment. Environ Manage 26:659–673. doi:10.1007/s002670010123

Mendoza GA, Bruce Bare B, Zhou Z (1993) A fuzzy multiple objective linear programming approach to forest planning under uncertainty. Agr Syst 41:257–274. doi:10.1016/0308-521X(93)90003-K

Mendoza G, Macoun P, Prabhu R, Sukadri D, Purnomo H, Hartanto H (1999) Guidelines for applying multi-criteria analysis to the assessment of criteria and indicators, vol 9., The Criteria & indicators toolbox seriesCenter for International Forestry Research, Jakarta

Mustajoki J, Saarikoski H, Marttunen M, Ahtikoski A, Hallikainen V, Helle T et al (2011) Use of decision analysis interviews to support the sustainable use of the forests in Finnish Upper Lapland. J Environ Manage 92:1550–1563. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.01.007

Myllyviita T, Hujala T, Kangas A, Leskinen P (2011) Decision support in assessing the sustainable use of forests and other natural resources—a comparative review. Open For Sci J 4:24–41

Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D et al (2009) Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ 7:4–11. doi:10.1890/080023

Nordström E, Eriksson L, Öhman K (2010) Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy Econ 12:562–574. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2010.07.006

Nordström E, Holmström H, Öhman K (2013) Evaluating continuous cover forestry based on the forest owner’s objectives by combining scenario analysis and multiple criteria decision analysis. Silva Fenn. 47:1–22. doi:10.14214/sf.1046

Ozturk D, Batuk F (2011) Implementation of GIS-based mulicriteria decision analysis with VB in ArcGIS. Int J Infor Tech Dec Mak 10:1023–1042. doi:10.1142/S0219622011004695

Pagiola S, von Ritter K, Bishop J (2004) Assessing the economic value of ecosystem conservation. World Bank Environment Department, Washington

Palma J, Graves A, Burgess P, van der Werf W, Herzog F (2007) Integrating environmental and economic performance to assess modern silvoarable agroforestry in Europe. Ecol Econ 63:759–767. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.01.011

Paul C, Knoke T (2015) Between land sharing and land sparing—what role remains for forest management and conservation? Int Forest Rev (in press)

Pauwels D, Lejeune P, Rondeux J (2007) A decision support system to simulate and compare silvicultural scenarios for pure even-aged larch stands. Ann For Sci 64:345–353. doi:10.1051/forest:2007011

Perman R (2011) Natural resource and environmental economics, 4th edn. Pearson Addison Wesley, Harlow

Polatidis H, Haralambopoulos D, Munda G, Vreeker R (2006) Selecting an appropriate multi-criteria decision analysis technique for renewable energy planning. Energy Source Part B 1:181–193. doi:10.1080/009083190881607

Pukkala T, Kangas J (1993) A heuristic optimization method for forest planning and decision making. Scan J For Res 8:560–570. doi:10.1080/02827589309382802

Pykäläinen J, Hiltunen V, Leskinen P (2007) Complementary use of voting methods and interactive utility analysis in participatory strategic forest planning: experiences gained from western Finland. Can J For Res 37:853–865. doi:10.1139/X06-241

Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G, Bennett E (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:5242–5247. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107

Rinner C, Malczewski J (2002) Web-enabled spatial decision analysis using ordered weighted averaging (OWA). J Geogr Syst 4:385–403. doi:10.1007/s101090300095

Rivas-Dávalos F, Moreno-Goytia E, Gutiérrez-Alcaraz G, Tovar-Hernández J (2007) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in power systems: state-of-the-art. In : IEEE Lausanne Power Tech, 2007. Lausanne, Switzerland. IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, 1–5 July 2007

Robert N (2013) Sustaining the supply of multiple ecosystem services. An analysis based on the simulation of the joint production of wood and non-wood goods in forests. Dissertation, Paris Tech, Nancy Cedex. French National Institute of Geographic and Forest Information (IGN) and Laboratory of Forest Economics

Roessiger J, Griess VC, Knoke T (2011) May risk aversion lead to near-natural forestry? A simulation study. Forestry 84:527–537. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpr017

Romero C, Tamiz M, Jones DF (1998) Goal programming, compromise programming and reference point method formulations: linkages and utility interpretations. J Oper Res Soc 49:986–991. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600611

Roy B (1968) Classement et choix en présence de points de vue multiples—La méthode ELECTRE. RIRO 8:57–75

Saaty T (1990) The analytic hierarchy process. planning, priority setting, resource allocation, 2nd edn. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

Sandker M, Campbell B, Ruiz-Pérez M, Sayer J, Cowling R, Kassa H, Knight A (2010) The role of participatory modeling in landscape approaches to reconcile conservation and development, 2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art13/. Accessed 14 Aug 2013

Sanon S, Hein T, Douven W, Winkler P (2012) Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. JEMA 111:159–172. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.06.008

Schmoldt DL, Mendoza G (2001) Past developments and future directions for the AHP in natural resources. In: Schmoldt DL, Kangas J, Mendoza G, Pesonen M (eds) The analytic hierarchy process in natural resource and environmental decision making. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 289–305

Schwenk W, Donovan T, Keeton W, Nunery J (2012) Carbon storage, timber production, and biodiversity: comparing ecosystem services with multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecol Appl 22:1612–1627

Seidl R, Lexer MJ (2013) Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity. J Environ Manage 114:461–469. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.028

Sharma LK, Kanga S, Nathawat MS, Sinha S, Pandey PC (2012) Fuzzy AHP for forest fire risk modeling. Disaster Prevent Manag 21:160–171. doi:10.1108/09653561211219964

Shen J, Jing Z, Wen Y (2013) Measuring the true technical efficiency of farmers’ forest management in Fujian, China: a three-stage dea analysis. Inf Technol J 12:8604–8608. doi:10.3923/itj.2013.8604.8608

Sheppard SR, Meitner M (2005) Using multi-criteria analysis and visualisation for sustainable forest management planning with stakeholder groups. Forest Ecol Manag 207:171–187. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.032

Stewart TJ, French S, Rios J (2013) Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—review and extension. Omega 41:679–688. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.003

Tamiz M, Jones D, Romero C (1998) Goal programming for decision making: an overview of the current state-of-the-art. Eur J Oper Res 111:569–581. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00317-2

Triantakonstantis DP, Kalivas DP, Kollias VJ (2013) Autologistic regression and multicriteria evaluation models for the prediction of forest expansion. New Forest 44:163–181. doi:10.1007/s11056-012-9308-x

Triantaphyllou E (2000) Multi-criteria decision making methods. A comparative study. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

UNCED (1992) The non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. Report on the United Nations Conference on Environment and Dept. Rio de Janeiro

Uribe D, Geneletti D, del Castillo R, Orsi F (2014) Integrating stakeholder preferences and GIS-based multicriteria analysis to identify forest landscape restoration priorities. Sustainability 6:935–951. doi:10.3390/su6020935

Vahidnia M, Alesheikh A, Alimohammadi A, Bassiri A (2008) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in GIS application. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 37(B2):593–596

Vainikainen N, Kangas A, Kangas J (2008) Empirical study on voting power in participatory forest planning. JEMA 88:173–180. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.02.004

Vassilev V, Genova K, Vassileva M (2005) A brief survey of multicriteria decision making and software systems. Cybernet Inf Tech 5:3–13

Velasquez M, Hester PT (2013) An analysis of multi-criteria decision making methods. Int J Oper Res 10:56–66

von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Weintraub A, Romero C (2006) Operations research models and the management of agricultural and forestry resources: a review and comparison. Interfaces 36:446–457. doi:10.1287/inte.1060.0222

Willis AJ (1997) The ecosystem: an evolving concept viewed historically. Funct Ecol 11:268–271

Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R et al (2009) Implications of Limiting CO₂ concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183–1186. doi:10.1126/science.1168475

Wolfslehner B, Seidl R (2010) Harnessing ecosystem models and multi-criteria decision analysis for the support of forest management. Environ Manag 46:850–861. doi:10.1007/s00267-009-9414-5

Wolfslehner B, Vacik H, Lexer MJ (2005) Application of the analytic network process in multi-criteria analysis of sustainable forest management. For Ecol Manag 207:157–170. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.025

Wolfslehner B, Brüchert F, Fischbach J, Rammer W, Becker G, Lindner M, Lexer MJ (2012) Exploratory multi-criteria analysis in sustainability impact assessment of forest-wood chains: the example of a regional case study in Baden-Württemberg. Eur J Forest Res 131:47–56. doi:10.1007/s10342-011-0499-z

Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

Zadnik Stirn L (2006) Integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with dynamic programming approach for determining the optimal forest management decisions. Ecol Model 194:296–305. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.023

Zarghami M, Szidarovszky F (2011) Multicriteria analysis. Applications to water and environment management. Springer, Berlin

Zeleny M (1973) Compromise programming. In: Cochrane JL, Zeleny M (eds) Multiple criteria decision making, 1st edn. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp 262–301

Zhang Z, Sherman R, Yang Z, Wu R, Wang W, Yin M et al (2013) Integrating a participatory process with a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for protected area zoning in China. J Nat Conserv 21:225–240. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.12.006

Title: Hybrid MCDA Methods to Integrate Multiple Ecosystem Services in Forest Management Planning: A Critical Review
Authors: Britta Uhde
W. Andreas Hahn
Verena C. Griess
Thomas Knoke
Publication date: 01-08-2015
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Environmental Management / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 0364-152X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0503-3

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

Statistical Dimensioning of Nutrient Loading Reduction: LLR Assessment Tool for Lake Managers

Implications from the Use of Non-timber Forest Products on the Consumption of Wood as a Fuel Source in Human-Dominated Semiarid Landscapes

Stakeholder Interaction in Participatory Land Restoration in Iceland: Environmental Officers’ Challenges and Strategies

A Coupled SD and CLUE-S Model for Exploring the Impact of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case Study in Baoshan District, Shanghai, China

Farmers and Climate Change: A Cross-National Comparison of Beliefs and Risk Perceptions in High-Income Countries

Governance Challenges in Joint Inter-Jurisdictional Management: The Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, Elk Case