Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 5/2019

24-10-2019 | Research Paper

Identifiability-based model decomposition for hierarchical calibration

Authors: Taejin Kim, Byeng D. Youn

Published in: Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization | Issue 5/2019

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The computational model has become an essential tool in many engineering applications. To take full advantage of a computational model, its accuracy must be guaranteed. Validation and verification (V&V) methods have been proposed to enable construction of accurate computational models. One of the challenges in V&V is to calibrate the large number of parameters of the model of interest. To effectively calibrate the large number of calibration parameters, a hierarchical calibration method has been proposed; this method decomposes the system model into smaller models and calibrates the parameters for the decomposed models. However, the method uses only qualitative criteria for model decomposition in the hierarchical calibration. This study identifies the problems of using only these qualitative criteria for hierarchical calibration, and instead proposes to use identifiability, obtained from the Fisher information matrix, as a quantitative criterion. A detailed process for the proposed identifiability-based model decomposition is described. During decomposition, the experiments are designed to meet identifiability requirements. The proposed decomposition method is verified by examining the Pratt truss bridge model as a case study; the method shows accurate calibration results and requires fewer experiments, as compared with two arbitrary decompositions.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference A.I.o. Aeronautics (1998) Astronautics, AIAA guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. American Institute of aeronautics and astronautics A.I.o. Aeronautics (1998) Astronautics, AIAA guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations. American Institute of aeronautics and astronautics
go back to reference A.S.o.M. Engineers (2006) Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. ASME A.S.o.M. Engineers (2006) Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics. ASME
go back to reference B.M. Adams, W. Bohnhoff, K. Dalbey, J. Eddy, M. Eldred, D. Gay, K. Haskell, P.D. Hough, L.P. Swiler, DAKOTA, a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis: version 5.0 user’s manual, Sandia National Laboratories, Tech. Rep. SAND2010-2183, (2009) B.M. Adams, W. Bohnhoff, K. Dalbey, J. Eddy, M. Eldred, D. Gay, K. Haskell, P.D. Hough, L.P. Swiler, DAKOTA, a multilevel parallel object-oriented framework for design optimization, parameter estimation, uncertainty quantification, and sensitivity analysis: version 5.0 user’s manual, Sandia National Laboratories, Tech. Rep. SAND2010-2183, (2009)
go back to reference Arendt PD, Apley DW, Chen W (2012) Quantification of model uncertainty: calibration, model discrepancy, and identifiability. J Mech Des 134:100908CrossRef Arendt PD, Apley DW, Chen W (2012) Quantification of model uncertainty: calibration, model discrepancy, and identifiability. J Mech Des 134:100908CrossRef
go back to reference Chen W, Xiong Y, Tsui K-L, Wang S (2008) A design-driven validation approach using Bayesian prediction models. J Mech Des 130:021101CrossRef Chen W, Xiong Y, Tsui K-L, Wang S (2008) A design-driven validation approach using Bayesian prediction models. J Mech Des 130:021101CrossRef
go back to reference Choi KK, Kim N-H (2006) Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization 1: linear systems. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin Choi KK, Kim N-H (2006) Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization 1: linear systems. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin
go back to reference Cintrón-Arias A, Banks H, Capaldi A, Lloyd AL (2009) A sensitivity matrix based methodology for inverse problem formulation. Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems 17:545–564MathSciNetCrossRef Cintrón-Arias A, Banks H, Capaldi A, Lloyd AL (2009) A sensitivity matrix based methodology for inverse problem formulation. Journal of Inverse and Ill-Posed Problems 17:545–564MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Cobelli C, Distefano JJ 3rd (1980) Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys 239:R7–R24 Cobelli C, Distefano JJ 3rd (1980) Parameter and structural identifiability concepts and ambiguities: a critical review and analysis. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys 239:R7–R24
go back to reference Eisenberg MC, Hayashi MA (2014) Determining identifiable parameter combinations using subset profiling. Math Biosci 256:116–126MathSciNetCrossRef Eisenberg MC, Hayashi MA (2014) Determining identifiable parameter combinations using subset profiling. Math Biosci 256:116–126MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Ferreira AJ (2008) MATLAB codes for finite element analysis: solids and structures. Springer Science & Business Media Ferreira AJ (2008) MATLAB codes for finite element analysis: solids and structures. Springer Science & Business Media
go back to reference Ferson S, Oberkampf WL (2009) Validation of imprecise probability models. Int J Reliab Saf 3:3–22CrossRef Ferson S, Oberkampf WL (2009) Validation of imprecise probability models. Int J Reliab Saf 3:3–22CrossRef
go back to reference Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley New York, New York Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2000) Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley New York, New York
go back to reference Helton JC, Johnson JD, Oberkampf WL, Sallaberry CJ (2010) Representation of analysis results involving aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. Int J Gen Syst 39:605–646MathSciNetCrossRef Helton JC, Johnson JD, Oberkampf WL, Sallaberry CJ (2010) Representation of analysis results involving aleatory and epistemic uncertainty. Int J Gen Syst 39:605–646MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Higdon D, Nakhleh C, Gattiker J, Williams B (2008) A Bayesian calibration approach to the thermal problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2431–2441CrossRef Higdon D, Nakhleh C, Gattiker J, Williams B (2008) A Bayesian calibration approach to the thermal problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2431–2441CrossRef
go back to reference Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2001) Bayesian calibration of computer models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 63:425–464MathSciNetCrossRef Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2001) Bayesian calibration of computer models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 63:425–464MathSciNetCrossRef
go back to reference Lee PM (2012) Bayesian statistics: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons Lee PM (2012) Bayesian statistics: an introduction. John Wiley & Sons
go back to reference Lee G, Yi G, Youn BD (2018) A comprehensive study on enhanced optimization-based model calibration using gradient information. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 57:2005–2025 Lee G, Yi G, Youn BD (2018) A comprehensive study on enhanced optimization-based model calibration using gradient information. Struct Multidiscipl Optim 57:2005–2025
go back to reference Lehmann EL, Romano JP (2006) Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinMATH Lehmann EL, Romano JP (2006) Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer Science & Business Media, BerlinMATH
go back to reference Ling Y, Mahadevan S (2013) Quantitative model validation techniques: new insights. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 111:217–231CrossRef Ling Y, Mahadevan S (2013) Quantitative model validation techniques: new insights. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 111:217–231CrossRef
go back to reference Liu F, Bayarri M, Berger J, Paulo R, Sacks J (2008) A Bayesian analysis of the thermal challenge problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2457–2466CrossRef Liu F, Bayarri M, Berger J, Paulo R, Sacks J (2008) A Bayesian analysis of the thermal challenge problem. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:2457–2466CrossRef
go back to reference Liu Y, Chen W, Arendt P, Huang H-Z (2011) Toward a better understanding of model validation metrics. J Mech Des 133:071005CrossRef Liu Y, Chen W, Arendt P, Huang H-Z (2011) Toward a better understanding of model validation metrics. J Mech Des 133:071005CrossRef
go back to reference O’Hagan A (1995) Fractional Bayes factors for model comparison. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:99–118MathSciNetMATH O’Hagan A (1995) Fractional Bayes factors for model comparison. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 57:99–118MathSciNetMATH
go back to reference Oberkampf WL, Barone MF (2006) Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: validation metrics. J Comput Phys 217:5–36CrossRef Oberkampf WL, Barone MF (2006) Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: validation metrics. J Comput Phys 217:5–36CrossRef
go back to reference Oberkampf WL, Roy CJ (2010) Verification and validation in scientific computing. Cambridge University Press Oberkampf WL, Roy CJ (2010) Verification and validation in scientific computing. Cambridge University Press
go back to reference Oberkampf WL, Trucano TG (2002) Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:209–272CrossRef Oberkampf WL, Trucano TG (2002) Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Prog Aerosp Sci 38:209–272CrossRef
go back to reference Pawitan Y (2001) In all likelihood: statistical modelling and inference using likelihood. Oxford University Press, OxfordMATH Pawitan Y (2001) In all likelihood: statistical modelling and inference using likelihood. Oxford University Press, OxfordMATH
go back to reference Rebba R, Mahadevan S (2006) Validation of models with multivariate output. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91:861–871CrossRef Rebba R, Mahadevan S (2006) Validation of models with multivariate output. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91:861–871CrossRef
go back to reference Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2015) Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 138:194–209CrossRef Sankararaman S, Mahadevan S (2015) Integration of model verification, validation, and calibration for uncertainty quantification in engineering systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 138:194–209CrossRef
go back to reference Scharf LL, Demeure C (1991) Statistical signal processing: detection, estimation, and time series analysis, Addison-Wesley Reading, MA Scharf LL, Demeure C (1991) Statistical signal processing: detection, estimation, and time series analysis, Addison-Wesley Reading, MA
go back to reference Schervish MJ (1996) P values: what they are and what they are not. Am Stat 50:203–206MathSciNet Schervish MJ (1996) P values: what they are and what they are not. Am Stat 50:203–206MathSciNet
go back to reference Seghouane A-K, Bekara M, Fleury G (2005) A criterion for model selection in the presence of incomplete data based on Kullback’s symmetric divergence. Signal Process 85:1405–1417CrossRef Seghouane A-K, Bekara M, Fleury G (2005) A criterion for model selection in the presence of incomplete data based on Kullback’s symmetric divergence. Signal Process 85:1405–1417CrossRef
go back to reference Youn BD, Jung BC, Xi Z, Kim SB, Lee W (2011) A hierarchical framework for statistical model calibration in engineering product development. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:1421–1431CrossRef Youn BD, Jung BC, Xi Z, Kim SB, Lee W (2011) A hierarchical framework for statistical model calibration in engineering product development. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:1421–1431CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Identifiability-based model decomposition for hierarchical calibration
Authors
Taejin Kim
Byeng D. Youn
Publication date
24-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1615-147X
Electronic ISSN: 1615-1488
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-019-02405-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 5/2019 Go to the issue

Premium Partners