Top

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Published in:

02-03-2021 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Identification of 11 position-independent geometric errors of a five-axis machine tool using 3D geometric sensitivity analysis

Authors: Seung-Han Yang, Kwang-Il Lee

Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | Issue 11-12/2021

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

In this paper, a method is proposed for identification of 11 position-independent geometric errors (PIGEs) of five-axis machine tools with a tilting/rotary table via single-ball measurements and three-dimensional (3D) geometric sensitivity analysis. Eleven PIGEs were identified, including three squareness errors between three linear axes, two offset errors, and two squareness errors for the tilting/rotary axis. The approach uses a set-up of a ball and three circular measurements involving simultaneous control of two linear axes and a tilting/rotary axis. A 3D geometric sensitivity analysis is carried out to investigate the effects of the 11 PIGEs on each of the measurement’s paths and between the measurement paths. The particular measurement paths used allow the radius of the circular path at the first measurement, and the distance between the circular paths of the second and third measurements, to be increased for accurate identification of the 11 PIGEs. The proposed method was also used to derive root-sum-square values of sensitivity coefficients, and then applied to a commercial five-axis machine tool for experimental verification. It calculates the peak-to-valley values of the positional deviations in the x-, y-, and z-directions along the test paths as 152.1, 118.2, and 47.1 μm, respectively, without compensation for the identified PIGEs, and as 17.6, 15.0, and 11.4 μm, respectively, with compensation. The results confirm the validity of our proposed method.

previous article A force model for face grinding using digital graphic scanning (DGS) method

next article Tool wear state prediction based on feature-based transfer learning

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Bohez ELJ (2002) Five–axis milling machine tool kinematic chain design and analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:505–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(01)00134-1CrossRef

Ramesh R, Mannan MA, Poo AN (2000) Error compensation in machine tools – a review Part I: geometric, cutting–force induced and fixture–dependent errors. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:1235–1256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00009-2CrossRef

Ferreira PM, Liu CR (1993) A method for estimating and compensating quasistatic errors of machine tools. J Eng Ind 115:149–159. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2901629CrossRef

Kiridena VSB, Ferreira PM (1994) Kinematic modeling of quasistatic errors of three–axis machining centers. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 34:85–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-6955(94)90042-6CrossRef

Barakat NA, Elbestawi MA, Spence AD (2000) Kinematic and geometric error compensation of a coordinate measuring machine. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:833–850. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(99)00098-XCrossRef

Olvera D, López de Lacalle LN, Compeán FI, Fz-Valdivielso A, Lamikiz A, Campa FJ (2012) Analysis of the tool tip radial stiffness of turn–milling centers. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60:883–891. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3645-3CrossRef

Fan J, Tao H, Pan R, Chen D (2020) Optimal tolerance allocation for five-axis machine tools in consideration of deformation caused by gravity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 111:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-06096-xCrossRef

Yang B, Liu Z (2020) Thermal error modeling by integrating GWO and ANFIS algorithms for the gear hobbing machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 109:2441–2456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05791-zCrossRef

Lee KI, Lee DM, Yang SH (2012) Parametric modeling and estimation of geometric errors for a rotary axis using double ball–bar. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:741–750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3834-0CrossRef

10.

ISO 230–1 (2012) Test Code for Machine Tools – Part 1: Geometric accuracy of machines operating under no–load or quasi–static conditions. ISO

11.

Ibaraki S, Iritani T, Matsushita T (2013) Error map construction for rotary axes on five–axis machine tools by on–the–machine measurement using a touch–trigger probe. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 68:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.01.001CrossRef

12.

Lee KI, Yang SH (2016) Compensation of position–independent and position–dependent geometric errors in the rotary axes of five–axis machine tools with a tilting rotary table. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85:1677–1685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8080-4CrossRef

13.

Uddin MS, Ibaraki S, Matsubara A, Matsushita T (2009) Prediction and compensation of machining geometric errors of five–axis machining centers with kinematic errors. Precis Eng 33:194–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2008.06.001CrossRef

14.

Smith GT (2016) Measurement and machine tools–an introduction. In: Machine Tool Metrology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25109-7_1CrossRef

15.

Schwenke H, Knapp W, Haitjema H, Weckenmann A, Schmitt R, Delbressine F (2008) Geometric error measurement and compensation of machines–An update. CIRP Ann 57:660–675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2008.09.008CrossRef

16.

Ibaraki S, Knapp W (2012) Indirect measurement of volumetric accuracy for three–axis and five–axis machine tools: a review. Int J Autom Technol 6:110–124. https://doi.org/10.20965/ijat.2012.p0110CrossRef

17.

Uriarte L, Herrero A, Zatarain M, Santiso G, Lopéz de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Albizuri J (2007) Error budget and stiffness chain assessment in a micromilling machine equipped with tools less than 0.3 mm in diameter. Precis Eng 31:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2005.11.010CrossRef

18.

Lamikiz A, López de Lacalle L, Celaya A (2009) Machine tool performance and precision. In: López de Lacalle L, Lamikiz A (eds) Machine tools for high performance machining. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-380-4_6CrossRef

19.

Iñigo B, Ibabe A, Aguirre G, Urreta H, López de Lacalle LN (2019) Analysis of laser tracker–based volumetric error mapping strategies for large machine tools. Metals 9:757. https://doi.org/10.3390/met9070757CrossRef

20.

ISO 10791–6 (2014) Test conditions for machining centres – Part 6: Accuracy of Speeds and Interpolations. ISO

21.

Tsutsumi M, Saito A (2003) Identification and compensation of systematic deviations particular to 5–axis machining centers. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:771–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-6955(03)00053-1CrossRef

22.

Tsutsumi M, Saito A (2004) Identification of angular and positional deviations inherent to 5–axis machining centers with a tilting–rotary table by simultaneous four–axis control movements. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1333–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.013CrossRef

23.

Lee KI, Yang SH (2013) Measurement and verification of position–independent geometric errors of a five–axis machine tool using a double ball–bar. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 70:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.03.010CrossRef

24.

Chen YT, More P, Liu CS (2018) Identification and verification of location errors of rotary axes on five-axis machine tools by using a touch-trigger probe and a sphere. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 100:2653–2667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2863-3CrossRef

25.

Weikert S (2004) R–test, a new device for accuracy measurements on five axis machine tools. CIRP Ann 53:429–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60732-XCrossRef

26.

Hong C, Ibaraki S, Oyama C (2012) Graphical presentation of error motions of rotary axes on a five–axis machine tool by static R–test with separating the influence of squareness errors of linear axes. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 59:24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.03.004CrossRef

27.

Ibaraki S, Nagai Y (2017) Formulation of the influence of rotary axis geometric errors on five-axis on-machine optical scanning measurement—application to geometric error calibration by “chase-the-ball” test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92:4263–4273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0518-4CrossRef

28.

Ibaraki S, Iritani T, Matsushita T (2012) Calibration of location errors of rotary axes on five–axis machine tools by on–the–machine measurement using a touch–trigger probe. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 58:44–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2012.03.002CrossRef

29.

Jiang Z, Bao S, Zhou X, Tang X, Zheng S (2015) Identification of location errors by a touch-trigger probe on five-axis machine tools with a tilting head. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:149–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7189-9CrossRef

30.

Mayer JRR (2012) Five-axis machine tool calibration by probing a scale enriched reconfigurable uncalibrated master balls artefact. CIRP Ann 61:515–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.022CrossRef

31.

Hashemiboroujeni H, Marzdashti SE, Xing K, Mayer JRR (2019) Five-axis machine tool coordinate metrology evaluation using the ball dome artefact before and after machine calibration. J Manuf Mater Process 3:20. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp3010020CrossRef

32.

Esmaeili SM, Mayer JRR (2020) Generation of a 3D error compensation grid from ISO 230-1 error parameters obtained by a SAMBA indirect calibration and validated by a ball-bar spherical test. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106:4649–4662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04928-4CrossRef

33.

Ibaraki S, Goto S, Tsuboi K, Saito N, Kojima N (2018) Kinematic modeling and error sensitivity analysis for on-machine five-axis laser scanning measurement under machine geometric errors and workpiece setup errors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 96:4051–4062. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-1874-4CrossRef

34.

ISO 10791–7 (2020) Test conditions for machining centres – Part 7: Accuracy of Finished Test Pieces. ISO

35.

Ohta K, Li ZM, Tsutsumi M (2012) Proposal of a machining test of five-axis machining centers using a truncated square pyramid. Key Eng Mater 523–524:475–480. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.523-524.475CrossRef

36.

Ibaraki S, Sawada M, Matsubara A, Matsushita T (2010) Machining tests to identify kinematic errors on five–axis machine tools. Precis Eng 34:387–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.09.007CrossRef

37.

Jiang Z, Tang X, Zhou X, Zheng S (2015) Machining tests for identification of location errors on five-axis machine tools with a tilting head. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-6838-3CrossRef

38.

Alessandro V, Gianni C, Antonio S (2015) Axis geometrical errors analysis through a performance test to evaluate kinematic error in a five axis tilting-rotary table machine tool. Precis Eng 39:224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2014.09.007CrossRef

39.

Yang H, Huang X, Ding S, Yu C, Yang Y (2017) Identification and compensation of 11 position-independent geometric errors on five-axis machine tools with a tilting head. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 94:533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0826-8CrossRef

40.

Matsushita T (2011) Method and program for identifying errors. United States Patent Application Publication US 2011/0040523 A1.

41.

Lee DM, Yang SH (2010) Mathematical approach and general formulation for error synthesis modeling of multi-axis system. Int J Mod Phys B 24:2737–2742. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979210065556CrossRefMATH

42.

Lamikiz A, López de Lacalle LN, Ocerin O, Díez D, Maidagan E (2007) The Denavit and Hartenberg approach applied to evaluate the consequences in the tool tip position of geometrical errors in five–axis milling centres. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:122–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0956-5CrossRef

43.

Lee KI, Lee JC, Yang SH (2018) Optimal on–machine measurement of position–independent geometric errors for rotary axes in five–axis machines with a universal head. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 19:545–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-018-0066-3CrossRef

44.

ISO/IEC Guide 98–3 (2008) Uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). ISO

45.

Kenno T, Sato R, Shirase K, Natsume S, Spaan HAM (2020) Influence of linear–axis error motions on simultaneous three–axis controlled motion accuracy defined in ISO 10791–6. Precis Eng 61:110–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2019.10.011CrossRef

Title: Identification of 11 position-independent geometric errors of a five-axis machine tool using 3D geometric sensitivity analysis
Authors: Seung-Han Yang
Kwang-Il Lee
Publication date: 02-03-2021
Publisher: Springer London
Published in: The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology / Issue 11-12/2021
Print ISSN: 0268-3768
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-06844-7

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Other articles of this Issue 11-12/2021

Coated CBN cutting tool performance in green turning of gray cast iron EN-GJL-250: modeling and optimization

Advances in precision manufacturing towards eco-friendly grinding process by applying MQL with cold air compared with cooled wheel cleaning jet

Experimental and numerical investigation of the effect of laser input energy on the mechanical behavior of stainless steel and polyamide joint in the LAMP joining method

Design for laser powder bed additive manufacturing of AlSi12 periodic mesoscale lattice structures

Ultrasonic machining of carbon fiber–reinforced plastic composites: a review

New milling methodology for sealing planes in AlSi9Cu3(Fe) alloy machined with PCD tool

Premium Partners