In situ formation of 1D nanostructures from ceria nanoparticle dispersions by liquid cell TEM irradiation

The first scenario, “case 1” as of Fig. 1, comprises the formation of needle morphologies, free standing and supported only by the Si₃N₄ membrane. This development of new phase of needle morphology has been briefly reported [21] but not examined and explained; The timing is parallel to the radiolytic dissolution processes of original octahedral ceria nanoparticles, which is described in Asghar et al. [22], and is not dependent on the continued existence of raw facetted ceria nanoparticles. The mass-thickness contrast of newly formed needles is similar to raw ceria, and their crystalline nature is deduced from their straight axis, their flat facets and Bragg scattering features visible. Figure 1a–i shows various stages of needle formation, starting from equal aspect particles of size close to original (Fig. 1a, b) over rectangular particles (Fig. 1c–d), needles of increasing sharpness (Fig. 1e–h), and finally needle dissolution (Fig. 1g). During intermediate stages (Fig. 1b, c), the solid crystalline matter appears surrounded by amorphous matter, as discussed in Asghar et al. [21], possibly related to amorphous hydroxide phase.

However, more common than those free-standing needles are occasions where new needles form from existing solid particles, in well-defined geometric orientation, and remaining attached. This is the “case 2”, tracked in Fig. 2. Formation of needles starts as rather broad pyramids on two particles changing the original octahedral shape via corner sharpening. The yellow pair of arrows tracks an octahedral corner turning pyramidal, while the blue pair tracks a pyramidal corner turning needle shape, becoming sharper and pointier, increasing their aspect ratio (Fig. 2a–d). The evidence shows that needles preferentially grow parallel to a central mirror plane of the particles. In our earlier work [24, 25], these particles predominantly showed {100} capped cube–octahedral shapes: Combining these two sets of information, the needles seem form preferentially on {100} nanofacets along \(\langle{100}\rangle\) orientation. Evidently, the needles are themselves subject to radiolytic dissolution and therefore exist temporarily. However, the fact that after significant irradiation and raw particle dissolution, the needles become more prominent and visible across the viewing area, indicates an enrichment of needle phase relative to original particles, or a conversion of original particles into needle phase, and therefore the dissolution rate of needles must be slower than that of ceria nanoparticles. Eventually, all solid phase dissolves (as reported in [21]).

In a related observation, “case 3”, multiple needles were observed forming in some cases star-shaped multi-spike structures out of solid particles. In Fig. 3, these highly transient structures, reaching best visibility in Fig. 3b, seem to consume eventually all of the parent particles with small spikes receding in favour of one dominant spike, resulting eventually in a single needle (Fig. 3d). The most clearly visible particle cluster is encircled in blue in Fig. 3. Further irradiation then dissolves also the last needle.

Beyond spike-shaped particles, particular interest is in needles connecting between two neighbouring pre-existing particles. This can be observed either as short connections of two corners forming a neck or by longer “bridges” which appear identical to the earlier identified spikes, except that they connect simultaneously two suitably oriented particle facets. Finally, the idea of neck or bridge formation, if iterated, will lead to particle chains. In Figs. 4, 5, we expand on this phenomenon by listing various remarkable examples for needle-like phases connecting two or more neighbouring (mostly octahedral) ceria nanoparticles.

The first example in Fig. 4a shows a short connection of two cube–octahedral ceria nanoparticles, imaged sharply through little water thickness. Here the needle-shaped neck can be clearly identified to connect both octahedra at {100} cube facets, and both ceria nanoparticles are aligned with common octahedral symmetry axes. Similarly, however blurred by larger water thickness, the cases of Fig. 4b, c show firstly a straight bridge connecting two corners, however with the two c-axes of ceria nanoparticles not perfectly parallel (Fig. 4b) or a “bent” double-bridge connecting two large ceria nanoparticles via an intermediate small ceria nanoparticle (Fig. 4c). Finally, Fig. 4d, e underpins the impression of such bridges being a common phenomenon on multiple neighbouring particle systems. Here the needle decoration of two perpendicular {100}-facet directions leads to a network of particles co-oriented via intermediate needles at 90° (Fig. 4e), or at later stages (when most of the original particles vanish) to the formation of “chains of needles” (Fig. 4f).

On another occasion, Fig. 5, a video sequence of failure (presumably by rupture) of one bridge could be observed. The continuation of this sequence (Fig. 5d–f) is interesting as it comprises a switch from a corner docking (Fig. 5d, blue arrow) into a face-on-face attachment (Fig. 5e, f, yellow arrow) upon forming of a little chain. The latter sequence (Fig. 5d–f), however, happens at a time when dissolution of the raw particles is already showing strongly.

The driving force of particle attachment, presumably electrostatic, is clearly long range as imaged in Fig. 6, where pre-existing pairs of particles coagulate over distances a multiple of their diameter to form particle chains with 3–8 members. In the first example (Fig. 6a–c) the original touching point is again a corner of cube–octahedron (red arrow) although the attachment remains flexible for bending movements. The second sequence is about straightening a zig-zag chain (Fig. 6d) into a five-particle chain (Fig. 6e), which eventually breaks up, indicating that there is competition between particle–particle and particle–membrane (Si-nitride) attractions.

In contrast to the in situ formation of particle chains as of Figs. 5 and 6, there are also some cases of likely ex situ formed octahedral ceria nanoparticle chains, pre-existing before irradiation. The in situ irradiation sequence then shows the chain to turn into one major nanorod of longer size than the original particles (Fig. 7).

Formations of longer particle chains, not involving needles or visible attachment sites, are also found (Fig. 8). The particles appear roundish due to high water thickness and smaller magnification used. In building this chain, particles appear to be collected from a rather large distance, and all particles entering the chain have a rather mono-disperse size distribution. A final conversion of the particle chain into a needle or rod does not happen in this case, separating it from the previous examples.

Possible cerium-rich compound structures which are known to exhibit rod or needle shape include the four cases of cubic CeO₂, hexagonal Ce₂O₃, hexagonal Ce(OH)₃, and cubic Ce(OH)₄. The two hexagonal cases would lend themselves most easily to needle shape growth through crystallographic anisotropy, as they have unique axes, distinct from any other direction. Ce(OH)₃ nanorods (known to be more stable as a solid than Ce(OH)₄) are reported in TEM-research, e.g. Ma et al. [26], although considered not air stable, while round Ce(OH)₃ particles are found in Abellan et al. [27]. Ce₂O₃ reductive reaction products are known in TEM, but have never been reported to be of needle shape. Ce(OH)₄ is sometimes treated as a hydrated variety of CeO₂, however, its observation as solid needles is rare and on one occasion has been linked to specific growth conditions and use of surfactants [28] only. The fact that no needle shapes have ever been found on disassembled dry Si₃N₄ chips indicates instability of the needle phase.

On the other hand cubic CeO₂ has been reported to grow into rod and needle shape, in spite of its cubic symmetry, by one of two possible mechanisms: (i) CeO₂-nanorods might convert from intermediate Ce(OH)₃ nanorods, which form a template, by hydrothermal or airborne oxidation or special ageing procedures [29, 30]; (ii) oxide nanorods have been imaged to form directly by “oriented attachment” of preformed ceria nanoparticles oriented in either \(\langle{110}\rangle\) or \(\langle{211}\rangle\) growing direction for the rod [8, 31]. For CeO₂ cube–octahedral attachments along < 100 > , matching our observations, theoretically calculated predictions exist [32].

The crystalline nature of the rods in unambiguously confirmed via Bragg scattering induced double images, displaced from the particles due to defocus and lens aberrations; see Fig. 9. These would not exist for amorphous material phases.

In a related case, for cubic PdSe nanoparticles, oriented attachment growth in < 100 > direction has been found [33], and motivated by a collective < 100 > -directed dipole moment originating from multiple dipoles on various {100} facets of cuboctahedral particles with rocksalt structure.

This aspect is about the relative orientations between needles and (octahedral) pre-existing particles: In the cases highlighted in the figures, the needle orientation relative to the mirror planes of the original particles is compatible to what is a cubic {100} ceria nanoparticle plane normal. That renders an epitaxial growth of hexagonal rods (in whatever direction) on cubic planes unlikely due to symmetry mismatch. Growth of Ce(OH)₄ needles cube-on-cube would avoid symmetry mismatch, however, the factor 2 in Ce:O ratio between CeO₂ and Ce(OH)₄ should result in visible grey-value change on our TEM images from NPs to rods, which is never observed (e.g. see Figs. 1, 2, 3).

Instead, epitaxial bridges of the kind of Figs. 4 and 7 resemble a specific type of ceria nanoparticle aggregation found sometimes in original, un-irradiated powders observed by standard (dry) TEM. The main difference to the liquid-cell TEM is that the “neck” between two crystals would be pre-thinned and elongated by radiolytic water-induced dissolution. Such a separately recorded dry TEM image (aberration corrected HRTEM) is shown for illustrative purpose as Fig. 10.

Here, ceria nanoparticle powder represented by a randomly found cluster of predominantly octahedra ceria nanoparticles shows clear epitaxial attachment on {100} planes with atomically sharp bonding, turning the entire cluster into a “single crystal”. If the attachment direction would be along a common [001] direction, this matches < 001 > “oriented attachment” (as labelled “case i” in Zhang and Banfield [32], see also [34] for the case of chains made of anatase TiO₂). Molecular modelling simulated self-assembly of ceria nanooctahedra is described in Kuchibhatla et al. [35]. The new needle phase appears rigid enough to survive mechanical tension until fracture (Fig. 5), rather than de-attaching from the docking position on the ceria nanoparticles, indicating strong bonds between needles and cube-octahedral surface facets.

Another important consideration is the principle of particle “envelope”: This concept evaluates whether any new 1D structure (needles, spikes, stars) forms inside or outside the external frame (envelope) of the old particle before irradiation:

Measurements on Fig. 2 reveal that the new spiky particle entirely fits within the envelope of the original particle. Such a process would peculiarly maximise surface energy by depleting the most energetically favourable ceria facets first. Therefore, this can only happen if an overruling driving force exists, such as a phase transformation, which prefers 1D rod shape as a new morphology. On the other hand, in the examples of Figs. 4 and 7, 1D rods or bridges comprise and consume multiple raw particles, and therefore form outside the envelope of any raw particle. The complexity of the system is further enhanced, as the timing of spike or bridge formation as of Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 is rather late during an entire ceria-dissolution video-recording sequence, and the chemical identity of the particles from which the needles form, might no longer be considered chemically stoichiometric CeO₂.

Finally, we refer to similarity of bent bridges (Fig. 4b, c) to the case of “near-oriented attachment” introduced in Yoreo et al. [36] and furthermore to the case of formation of “Mineral Bridges” as one of four mechanisms of oriented attachment growth as discussed in Song and Cölfen [37].

Finally, we contrast the atomically sharp attachment of above aspect (ii) with the more commonly observed “loose” attachment of two particles on corners or faces during live video-recording, with orientation relationship remaining flexible as of Fig. 6 and 8. In this aspect (iii), the driving force for attraction is mainly expected to be a result of surface charges with field lines connecting the tips or spikes of neighbouring particles, not forming any chemical bond. Formation of particle chains or rod chains would minimise the free surface charge and stray field energies. Within liquid cell TEM research, chain-forming behaviour has been found for metallic NPs, such as Fe₃Pt [38] or Au [39] and motivated either by magnetic dipole interactions or electrostatic interactions. For Au nanoparticles, pair formation with a small equilibrium distance between non-touching particles has been described [11], with a balance struck between attractive van der Waals forces and repulsive hydration double-layer forces, while entire Au nanorod chains are found in [40] with an end-to-end local van der Waals attachment proposed after irradiation had weakened electrostatic repulsive forces. The particle–particle finite distance is considered transient before atomistic bonds eventually form, as observed in liquid cell TEM in [11]. Furthermore, it is highly likely that all particles in the chain are attached to the underlying Si₃N₄ membrane and merely move in 2D. For ceramic nanoparticulate materials, e.g. in the ZnO or ZnS family, Wurtzite structure would contribute a natural orientational asymmetry. However, for the cubic sphalerite modification, net dipole moments have been identified to be necessary to be generated by surface occupancy defects, or subtle shape asymmetries [41]; furthermore, embedding in water is shown to strengthen dipole moments [41]. For fluorite instead of sphalerite, the [100] facets contribute unsaturated dipoles on the nanoscale even in the absence of water. Once a dipole moment is established, electric field interaction along the axis of a particle pair forces the 3rd particle on line [12] rather than in a close-packed position, which would be expected [42] in a general 2D colloidal particle assembly.

As the attachment events in this work happen alongside overall corrosive dissolution [21], we remind of earlier examinations, including dry irradiation [43] finding a “robust” (irradiation resistant and mechanically rigid) cerium oxide fluorite structure, which would exclude the formation of necks/bridges using diffusion and surface flow. Equivalently, radiation-induced fluidity or “quasi-melting”, as examined in glasses and ceramics, is un-realistic for liquid cell TEM, as most beam energy is absorbed by the water and the Si₃N₄ membranes.

The question when or whether particles during dissolution adopt roundening to a sphere (as found in Asghar et al. [21]), elongation from isotropic to oval form (as found in Asghar et al. [22]), or ultimately conversion to needle shape, as reported here, must be due to timing, as there is no deliberate change in sample geometry, liquid, or particle loading. Different amounts of pre-exposure to electrons will alter local pH and water dissociation products, and formation of surface reaction layers on raw particles. The option that any needle shapes are already in existence on the raw nanoparticles can be safely excluded due to our extensive studies of the dry particles [24, 25, 44].