Top

Small Business Economics

Published in:

07-03-2017

Individual and place-based drivers of self-employment in Chile

Authors: Félix Modrego, Dusan Paredes, Gianni Romaní

Published in: Small Business Economics | Issue 2/2017

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

This paper analyzes the importance of individual and place characteristics on the selection into self-employment in Chile. Following a structural and multilevel empirical approach, we test whether both sets of variables explain the variation of individual wages, self-employed earnings, and the propensity of being in independent work. The results indicate that while most of the variation in these three outcomes is explained by individuals’ traits, place-related variables account for a non-negligible share of spatial variation. Second, as suggested by occupational choice theories, the propensity of being in self-employment positively correlates with larger expected earning differentials, but only in the case of employers. This, along with other results, suggests that while employers seem to choose their occupational status, own accounts in Chile seem to respond to factors pushing them into self-employment.

previous article Exploring the link between innovation and growth in Chilean firms

next article Responsibility or autonomy: children and the probability of self-employment in the USA

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Available only for authorised users

We are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for several comments about the importance of non-pecuniary motivations on the propensity to be in self-employment, which motivated a generalization of the utility functions and therefore of the empirical model.

The specific variable in CASEN (YOPRAJ) includes expenses such as discounts due to loan payments, labor union membership fees, or voluntary contributions to pension funds. On the contrary, it excludes legal discounts for social security, pension funds, and income taxes and also excludes exceptional bonuses and other allowances.

We also used the more theoretically-grounded Market Potential Function by Hanson (2005). Results did not change in any meaningful way.

As suggested by an SBE reviewer, we fitted models including interaction terms between the gender variable and the other regressors, in order to capture gender differences in marginal returns. The results indicate that the rate of return of schooling (and mean municipal schooling) is larger for women in salaried work, whereas the opposite is true for the apparent experience variable. The results are available upon request.

We also fitted the model with the Hanson’s (2005) NEG market potential function and the results are virtually the same.

The model including gender interaction terms indicated that the marginal rate of return of individual schooling and apparent experience is lower for women in self-employment, but the coefficient for municipal average schooling is not significant. Results available upon request.

We thank an anonymous reviewer for making this observation.

An LR test based on the estimation of a random-slope multilevel model rejects a uniform coefficient for this variable across Chilean comunas (chi2 with 1 d.f. = 12.13). The coefficients of the random slope model are very similar to those reported in column (3) of Table 3. The complete output is available upon request. We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting a formal test of a spatially varying effect of this variable.

The estimated coefficient is, in this case, very close to zero (0.007) and highly not significant (p value = 0.743; output available upon request). Moreover, it is contained in the 95% confidence interval of the parameter in Table 3 (−0.627; 0.075). We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting this robustness check.

A model including interactions of the gender dummy with the other regressors indicate that the coefficient for the apparent experience variable is larger for women, whereas it is smaller for the variable of specific experience. The results are not reported but are available upon request.

We are grateful to an anonymous reviewer for motivating this analysis.

This illustration was included following the suggestion by a reviewer to whom we are grateful.

The LR test based on the random slope model was unable to reject the hypothesis of a constant coefficient for the predicted earning differential across space in the case of employers (chi2 with 1 d.f. = 1.49) but rejects it for the own-account self-employed (chi2 with 1 d.f. = 5.97). The outputs are available upon request.

In this case, the coefficient for the alternative earnings differential is 1.45 (p value < 0.001) for employers and −0.140 (p value < 0.001) for own-accounts. In both cases, the coefficient for the alternative earning differentials is contained in the 95% confidence interval of the coefficient in Table 6 ([0.153; 1.733] for employers and [−0.706; −0.060] for own-accounts). Outputs available upon request.

For a discussion on these alternative theories, see Packard (2007).

These limitations of the empirical analysis were remarked by an anonymous reviewer to whom we are grateful.

Acs, Z. J., & Amorós, J. E. (2008). Entrepreneurship and competitiveness dynamics in Latin America. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 305–322. doi:10.1007/s11187-008-9133-y.CrossRef

Amorós, J. E., & Acha, A. (2014). Global entrepreneurship monitor (GEM): Reporte Nacional de Chile 2013. Santiago de Chile: Universidad del Desarrollo.

Andersson, M., & Koster, S. (2011). Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates—evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 179–201. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbp069.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional Studies, 28(4), 359–365. doi:10.1080/00343409412331348326.CrossRef

Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship and regional growth: an evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 605–616. doi:10.1007/s00191-004-0228-6.CrossRef

Benhabib, J., Rogerson, R., & Wright, R. (1991). Homework in macroeconomics: household production and aggregate fluctuations. Journal of Political Economy, 99(6), 1166–1187. doi:10.1086/261796.CrossRef

Behrens, K., & Robert-Nicoud, F. (2015). Agglomeration theory with heterogeneous agents. In G. Duranton, V. Henderson, & W. Strange (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. Volume 5A, pp. 171–246). North Holland: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-59517-1.00004-0.

Beugelsdijk, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial culture, regional innovativeness and economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 187–210. doi:10.1007/s00191-006-0048-y.CrossRef

Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 26–60. doi:10.1086/209881.CrossRef

Bosma, N., van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & de Wit, G. (2004). The value of social capital investments for the business performance of start-ups. Small Business Economics, 23, 227–223. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032032.21192.72.CrossRef

Bullen, N., Jones, K., & Duncan, C. (1997). Modelling complexity: analysing between-individual and between-place variation—a multilevel tutorial. Environment and Planning A, 29(4), 585–609. doi:10.1068/a290585.CrossRef

Callejón, M., & Segarra, A. (1999). Business dynamics and efficiency in industries and regions. Small Business Economics, 13, 253–271. doi:10.1023/A:1008015317323.

Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2003). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/0-387-24519-7_17.

Choi, Y. R., & Phan, P. H. (2006). The influences of economic and technology policy on the dynamics of new firm formation. Small Business Economics, 26, 493–503. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-5989-2.CrossRef

Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. E. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, 86, 54–70. doi:10.3386/w4313.

Contreras, D., & Plaza, G. (2010). Cultural factors in women's labor force participation in Chile. Feminist Economics, 16(2), 27–46. doi:10.1080/13545701003731815.CrossRef

Durand, D., & Shea, D. (1974). Entrepreneurial activity as a function of achievement motivation and reinforcement control. Journal of Psychology, 88, 57–63. doi:10.1080/00223980.1974.9915713.CrossRef

Earle, J. S., & Sakova, Z. (2000). Business start-ups or disguised unemployment? Evidence on the character of self-employment from transition economies. Labor Economics, 7, 575–601. doi:10.1016/S0927-5371(00)00014-2.CrossRef

Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79(3), 519–535. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-7854-7_6.

Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2007). The persistence of regional new business formation activity over time – assessing the potential of policy promotion programs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 299–315. doi:10.1007/s00191-007-0056-6.CrossRef

Gilbert, B. A., Audretsch, D. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2004). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy. Small Business Economics, 22(3–4), 313–323. doi:10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000022235.10739.a8.CrossRef

Glaeser, E., Kerr, W., & Ponzetto, G. (2010). Clusters of entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 150–168. doi:10.3386/w15377.CrossRef

Goetz, S. J., & Rupasingha, A. (2009). Determinants of growth in non-farm proprietor densities in the US, 1990-2000. Small Business Economics, 32, 425–438. doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9079-5.CrossRef

Hamilton, B. H. (2000). Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. Journal of Political Economy, 705(3), 604–631. doi:10.1086/262131.CrossRef

Hanson, G. (2005). Market potential, increasing returns, and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics, 67(1), 1–24. doi:10.3386/w6429.CrossRef

Harris, C.D. (1954). The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 44, 315–48.

Hundley, G. (2001). Why women earn less than men in self-employment. Journal of Labor Research, 22(4), 817–829. doi:10.1007/s12122-001-1054-3.CrossRef

Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499. doi:10.3386/w3275.CrossRef

Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 341–364. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00177.x.CrossRef

Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), 649–680. doi:10.1086/491605.CrossRef

Lederman, D., Messina, J., Pienknagura, S., & Rigolin, J. (2014). Latin America entrepreneur. Many firms but little innovation. Washington DC: The World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-0284-3.

Low, S. A., & Weiler, S. (2012). Employment risk, returns, and entrepreneurship. Economic Development Quarterly, 26(3), 238–251. doi:10.1177/0891242412452445.CrossRef

Lucas, R. E. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 508–523. doi:10.2307/3003596.CrossRef

McClelland, D. C. (1965). N-achievement and entrepreneurship: a longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 389–392. doi:10.1037/h0021956.CrossRef

McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press.

Michelacci, C., & Silva, O. (2007). Why some many local entrepreneurs? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 615–633. doi:10.1162/rest.89.4.615.CrossRef

Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Modrego, F., McCann, P., Foster, W. E., & Olfert, M. R. (2015). Regional entrepreneurship and innovation in Chile: a knowledge matching approach. Small Business Economics, 44, 685–703. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9612-2.CrossRef

Montenegro, C. (2001). Wage distribution in Chile: does gender matter? A quantile regressions approach. Working paper series no. 20. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Naudé, W. A., Gries, T., Wood, E., & Meintjes, A. (2008). Regional determinants of entrepreneurial start-ups in a developing country. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 20(2), 111–124. doi:10.1080/08985620701631498.CrossRef

Ñopo, H. J. (2006). The gender wage gap in Chile 1992–2003 from a matching comparisons perspective. Research department working paper 562. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

Olfert, R., Partridge, M., Berdegué, J., Escobal, J., Jara, B., & Modrego, F. (2014). Places for place-based policies. Development Policy Review, 32(1), 5–32. doi:10.1111/dpr.12041.CrossRef

Packard, TG (2007) Do workers in Chile choose informal employment? A dynamic analysis of sector choice. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4232.

Paredes, D. (2013). The role of human capital, market potential and natural amenities in understanding spatial wage disparities in Chile. Spatial Economic Analysis, 8(2), 154–175. doi:10.1080/17421772.2013.774094.CrossRef

Parker, S. C. (2005a). Explaining regional variations in entrepreneurship as multiple equilibria. Journal of Regional Science, 45(4), 829–850. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4146.2005.00394.x.CrossRef

Parker, S. C. (2005b). The economics of entrepreneurship: what we know and what we don’t. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 1–54. doi:10.1561/0300000001.CrossRef

Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511817441.

Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using Stata. STATA press. doi:10.1002/sim.3225.

Redding, S., & Venables, A. (2004). Economic geography and international inequality. Journal of International Economics, 62, 53–82. doi:10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.07.001.CrossRef

Rees, H., & Shah, A. (1986). An empirical analysis of self-employment in the U.K. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 95–108. doi:10.1002/jae.3950010107.CrossRef

Reynolds, P., Hay, M., Bygrave, W. D., Camp, S. M., & Autio, E. (2000). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: executive report. Kansas City, KS: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.

Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976-88. Small Business Economics, 7, 389–407. doi:10.1007/BF01302739.CrossRef

Roback, J. (1982). Wages, rents, and the quality of life. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 1257–1278. doi:10.1086/261120.CrossRef

Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2001). The determinants of agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 50(2), 191–229. doi:10.1006/juec.2001.2230.CrossRef

Sato, Y., Tabuchi, T., & Yamamoto, K. (2012). Market size and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 1139–1166. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbr035.CrossRef

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.

Soto, R., & Torche, A. (2004). Spatial inequality, migration and economic growth in Chile. Latin American Journal of Economics, 41, 401–424 http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-68212004012400005.

Szerb, L., & Acs, Z. J. (2012). The global entrepreneurship and development index. Northampton MA: Edward Elgar.

van der Panne, G. (2004). Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus Jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 593–604. doi:10.1007/s00191-004-0232-x.CrossRef

van Praag, M., & Cramer, S. (2001). The roots of entrepreneurship and labour demand: individual ability and low risk aversion. Economica, 68(269), 45–62. doi:10.1111/1468-0335.00232.CrossRef

Wennekers, S., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309. doi:10.1007/s11187-005-1994-8.CrossRef

Title: Individual and place-based drivers of self-employment in Chile
Authors: Félix Modrego
Dusan Paredes
Gianni Romaní
Publication date: 07-03-2017
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Small Business Economics / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0921-898X
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0913
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9841-2

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

As the market churns: productivity and firm exit in developing countries

How young firms achieve growth: reconciling the roles of growth motivation and innovative activities

Cost of capital and public loan guarantees to small firms

Do entrepreneurs really earn less?

Product market competition and access to credit

Entrepreneurial spawning and knowledge-based perspective: a meta-analysis

Premium Partner