Skip to main content
Top

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

Inefficiency of Equilibria in Doodle Polls

Authors : Barbara M. Anthony, Christine Chung

Published in: Combinatorial Optimization and Applications

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Doodle polls allow people to schedule meetings or events based on time preferences of participants. Each participant indicates on a web-based poll form which time slots they find acceptable and a time slot with the most votes is chosen. This is a social choice mechanism known as approval voting, in which a standard assumption is that all voters vote sincerely—no one votes “no” on a time slot they prefer to a time slot they have voted “yes” on. We take a game-theoretic approach to understanding what happens in Doodle polls assuming participants vote sincerely. First we characterize Doodle poll instances where sincere pure Nash Equilibria (NE) exist, both under lexicographic tie-breaking and randomized tie-breaking. We then study the quality of such NE voting profiles in Doodle polls, showing the price of anarchy and price of stability are both unbounded, even when a time slot that many participants vote yes for is selected. Finally, we find some reasonable conditions under which the quality of the NE (and strong NE) is good.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
A sample of over 340,000 polls in a 3-month period in 2011 had a median of about 5 respondents and 12 time slots [17].
 
Literature
2.
go back to reference Anthony, B.M., Chung, C.: How bad is selfish Doodle voting?: (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2018 (2018) Anthony, B.M., Chung, C.: How bad is selfish Doodle voting?: (extended abstract). In: Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. AAMAS 2018 (2018)
3.
go back to reference Brams, S.J., Fishburn, P.C.: Approval Voting. Birkhauser, Boston (1983) Brams, S.J., Fishburn, P.C.: Approval Voting. Birkhauser, Boston (1983)
4.
go back to reference Brams, S.J., Sanver, M.R.: Critical strategies under approval voting: who gets ruled in and ruled out. Elect. Stud. 25(2), 287–305 (2006)CrossRef Brams, S.J., Sanver, M.R.: Critical strategies under approval voting: who gets ruled in and ruled out. Elect. Stud. 25(2), 287–305 (2006)CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brânzei, S., Caragiannis, I., Morgenstern, J., Procaccia, A.D.: How bad is selfish voting? In: desJardins, M., Littman, M.L. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Bellevue, Washington, USA, pp. 138–144. AAAI Press (2013) Brânzei, S., Caragiannis, I., Morgenstern, J., Procaccia, A.D.: How bad is selfish voting? In: desJardins, M., Littman, M.L. (eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Bellevue, Washington, USA, pp. 138–144. AAAI Press (2013)
6.
go back to reference Bredereck, R., Chen, J., Niedermeier, R., Obraztsova, S., Talmon, N.: Teams in online scheduling polls: game-theoretic aspects. In: Singh, S.P., Markovitch, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, California, USA, pp. 390–396. AAAI Press (2017) Bredereck, R., Chen, J., Niedermeier, R., Obraztsova, S., Talmon, N.: Teams in online scheduling polls: game-theoretic aspects. In: Singh, S.P., Markovitch, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, California, USA, pp. 390–396. AAAI Press (2017)
7.
go back to reference Caragiannis, I., Procaccia, A.D.: Voting almost maximizes social welfare despite limited communication. Artif. Intell. 175(9–10), 1655–1671 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef Caragiannis, I., Procaccia, A.D.: Voting almost maximizes social welfare despite limited communication. Artif. Intell. 175(9–10), 1655–1671 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRef
8.
go back to reference De Sinopoli, F., Dutta, B., Laslier, J.: Approval voting: three examples. Int. J. Game Theory 35(1), 27–38 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRef De Sinopoli, F., Dutta, B., Laslier, J.: Approval voting: three examples. Int. J. Game Theory 35(1), 27–38 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Laslier, J.F.: The leader rule: a model of strategic approval voting in a large electorate. J. Theor. Polit. 21(1), 113–136 (2009)CrossRef Laslier, J.F.: The leader rule: a model of strategic approval voting in a large electorate. J. Theor. Polit. 21(1), 113–136 (2009)CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Myerson, R.B., Weber, R.J.: A theory of voting equilibria. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 87(1), 102–114 (1993)CrossRef Myerson, R.B., Weber, R.J.: A theory of voting equilibria. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 87(1), 102–114 (1993)CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Obraztsova, S., Polukarov, M., Rabinovich, Z., Elkind, E.: Doodle poll games. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. AAMAS 2017, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 876–884 (2017) Obraztsova, S., Polukarov, M., Rabinovich, Z., Elkind, E.: Doodle poll games. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems. AAMAS 2017, Sao Paulo, Brazil, pp. 876–884 (2017)
15.
go back to reference Thompson, D.R., Lev, O., Leyton-Brown, K., Rosenschein, J.: Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. AAMAS 2013, St. Paul, MN, pp. 391–398 (2013) Thompson, D.R., Lev, O., Leyton-Brown, K., Rosenschein, J.: Empirical analysis of plurality election equilibria. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems. AAMAS 2013, St. Paul, MN, pp. 391–398 (2013)
16.
17.
go back to reference Zou, J., Meir, R., Parkes, D.: Strategic voting behavior in Doodle polls. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. CSCW 2015, pp. 464–472. ACM, New York (2015) Zou, J., Meir, R., Parkes, D.: Strategic voting behavior in Doodle polls. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. CSCW 2015, pp. 464–472. ACM, New York (2015)
Metadata
Title
Inefficiency of Equilibria in Doodle Polls
Authors
Barbara M. Anthony
Christine Chung
Copyright Year
2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04651-4_48

Premium Partner