Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Policy Sciences 1/2016

18-08-2015 | Research Article

Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework

Authors: Patrycja Rozbicka, Florian Spohr

Published in: Policy Sciences | Issue 1/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Although interests inhabit a central place in the multiple streams framework (MSF), interest groups have played only a minor role in theoretical and empirical studies until now. In Kingdon’s original conception, organized interests are a key variable in the politics stream. Revisiting Kingdon’s concept with a particular focus on interest groups and their activities—in different streams and at various levels—in the policy process, we take this argument further. In particular, we argue that specifying groups’ roles in other streams adds value to the explanatory power of the framework. To do this, we look at how interest groups affect problems, policies, and politics. The influence of interest groups within the streams is explained by linking the MSF with literature on interest intermediation. We show that depending on the number of conditions and their activity level, interest groups can be involved in all three streams. We illustrate this in case studies reviewing labor market policies in Germany and chemicals regulation at the European level.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Ainsworth, S. (2001). Lobbying together: Interest group coalitions in legislative politics. American Political Science Review, 95(2), 475–575.CrossRef Ainsworth, S. (2001). Lobbying together: Interest group coalitions in legislative politics. American Political Science Review, 95(2), 475–575.CrossRef
go back to reference Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.CrossRef Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–1074.CrossRef
go back to reference Bendel, P. (2006). Migrations- und Integrationspolitik der Europäischen Union: Widersprüchliche Trends und ihre Hintergründe. In S. Baringhorst, U. Hunger, & K. Schönwälder (Eds.), Politische Steuerung von Integrationsprozessen. Intentionen und Wirkungen (pp. 95–120). Wiesbaden: VS.CrossRef Bendel, P. (2006). Migrations- und Integrationspolitik der Europäischen Union: Widersprüchliche Trends und ihre Hintergründe. In S. Baringhorst, U. Hunger, & K. Schönwälder (Eds.), Politische Steuerung von Integrationsprozessen. Intentionen und Wirkungen (pp. 95–120). Wiesbaden: VS.CrossRef
go back to reference Beyers, J. (2002). Gaining and seeking access: The European adaptation of domestic interest associations. European Journal of Public Research, 41(5), 585–612. Beyers, J. (2002). Gaining and seeking access: The European adaptation of domestic interest associations. European Journal of Public Research, 41(5), 585–612.
go back to reference Binderkrantz, A. (2005). Interest groups strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies, 53(4), 694–715.CrossRef Binderkrantz, A. (2005). Interest groups strategies: Navigating between privileged access and strategies of pressure. Political Studies, 53(4), 694–715.CrossRef
go back to reference Boscarino, J. E. (2009). Surfing for problems: Advocacy groups strategy in U.S. Forestry Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 37(3), 415–434.CrossRef Boscarino, J. E. (2009). Surfing for problems: Advocacy groups strategy in U.S. Forestry Policy. Policy Studies Journal, 37(3), 415–434.CrossRef
go back to reference Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390.CrossRef Bouwen, P. (2002). Corporate lobbying in the European Union: The logic of access. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(3), 365–390.CrossRef
go back to reference Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of Business Lobbying in the EU Institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369.CrossRef Bouwen, P. (2004). Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of Business Lobbying in the EU Institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 43(3), 337–369.CrossRef
go back to reference Bouwen, P., & McCown, M. (2007). Lobbying versus litigation: Political and legal strategies of interest representation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 422–443.CrossRef Bouwen, P., & McCown, M. (2007). Lobbying versus litigation: Political and legal strategies of interest representation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(3), 422–443.CrossRef
go back to reference Bundgaard, U., & Vrangbæk, K. (2007). Reform by coincidence? Explaining the policy process of structural reform in Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(4), 491–520.CrossRef Bundgaard, U., & Vrangbæk, K. (2007). Reform by coincidence? Explaining the policy process of structural reform in Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(4), 491–520.CrossRef
go back to reference CEC. (2001). White Paper: Strategy for a future Chemicals Policy. COM (2001) 88 final. Brussels. CEC. (2001). White Paper: Strategy for a future Chemicals Policy. COM (2001) 88 final. Brussels.
go back to reference CEC. (2003). Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (Reach), establishing a European Chemicals Agency and amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC). Brussels. CEC. (2003). Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (Reach), establishing a European Chemicals Agency and amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC). Brussels.
go back to reference Chalmers, A. W. (2011). Interests, influence and information: Comparing the influence of interest groups in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 471–486.CrossRef Chalmers, A. W. (2011). Interests, influence and information: Comparing the influence of interest groups in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 471–486.CrossRef
go back to reference Christiansen, P. M., Nørgaard, A., Rommetvedt, H., Svensson, T., Thesen, G., Öberg, P. (2010). Varieties of democracy: Interest groups and corporatist committees in Scandinavian policy making, In: Voluntas, 21, pp 22–40. Christiansen, P. M., Nørgaard, A., Rommetvedt, H., Svensson, T., Thesen, G., Öberg, P. (2010). Varieties of democracy: Interest groups and corporatist committees in Scandinavian policy making, In: Voluntas, 21, pp 22–40.
go back to reference Coen, D. (1997). The evolution of the large firm as a political actor in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 91–108.CrossRef Coen, D. (1997). The evolution of the large firm as a political actor in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 91–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Cox, R. H. (2001). The social construction of an imperative. Why welfare reform happened in denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany. World Politics, 53(3), 463–498.CrossRef Cox, R. H. (2001). The social construction of an imperative. Why welfare reform happened in denmark and the Netherlands but not in Germany. World Politics, 53(3), 463–498.CrossRef
go back to reference Cram, L. (2001). Integration theory and the study of the European policy process. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and policy-making (pp. 51–73). London: Routledge. Cram, L. (2001). Integration theory and the study of the European policy process. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and policy-making (pp. 51–73). London: Routledge.
go back to reference Czada, R. (2003). Konzertierung in verhandlungsdemokratischen Politikstrukturen. In S. Jochem & N. Siegel (Eds.), Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Das Modell Deutschland im Vergleich (pp. 35–69). Leske: Opladen.CrossRef Czada, R. (2003). Konzertierung in verhandlungsdemokratischen Politikstrukturen. In S. Jochem & N. Siegel (Eds.), Konzertierung, Verhandlungsdemokratie und Reformpolitik im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Das Modell Deutschland im Vergleich (pp. 35–69). Leske: Opladen.CrossRef
go back to reference Daviter, F. (2011). Policy framing in the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Daviter, F. (2011). Policy framing in the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference EC. (2004). Council of the European Union Ad hoc Working Party on chemicals. Outcome of Proceedings, 24 May 2004 9445/04. EC. (2004). Council of the European Union Ad hoc Working Party on chemicals. Outcome of Proceedings, 24 May 2004 9445/04.
go back to reference Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M., & Leiber, S. (2005). Complying with Europe. EU Harmonization and Soft Law in the Member States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M., & Leiber, S. (2005). Complying with Europe. EU Harmonization and Soft Law in the Member States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Fels, G., Heinze, R. G., Pfarr, H., Streeck, W. (1999). Bericht der Wissenschaftlergruppe der Arbeitsgruppe Benchmarking über Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung der Beschäftigungschancen gering qualifizierter Arbeitnehmer, Bundesregierung. Fels, G., Heinze, R. G., Pfarr, H., Streeck, W. (1999). Bericht der Wissenschaftlergruppe der Arbeitsgruppe Benchmarking über Möglichkeiten zur Verbesserung der Beschäftigungschancen gering qualifizierter Arbeitnehmer, Bundesregierung.
go back to reference Greenwood, J. (1997). Representing interest in the European Union. London: Macmillan.CrossRef Greenwood, J. (1997). Representing interest in the European Union. London: Macmillan.CrossRef
go back to reference Greenwood, J. (2007). Interest representation in the European Union (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan. Greenwood, J. (2007). Interest representation in the European Union (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
go back to reference Hall, R. L., & Deardorff, A. (2006). Lobbying as legislative subsidy. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 69–84.CrossRef Hall, R. L., & Deardorff, A. (2006). Lobbying as legislative subsidy. American Political Science Review, 100(1), 69–84.CrossRef
go back to reference Hartz, P. et al. (2002). Moderne Dienstleistungen am Arbeitsmarkt. Vorschläge der Kommission zum Abbau der Arbeitslosigkeit und zur Umstrukturierung der Bundesanstalt für Arbeit. Hartz, P. et al. (2002). Moderne Dienstleistungen am Arbeitsmarkt. Vorschläge der Kommission zum Abbau der Arbeitslosigkeit und zur Umstrukturierung der Bundesanstalt für Arbeit.
go back to reference Heinze, R. G. (2006). Wandel wider Willen. Deutschland auf der Suche nach neuer Prosperität. Wiesbaden: VS. Heinze, R. G. (2006). Wandel wider Willen. Deutschland auf der Suche nach neuer Prosperität. Wiesbaden: VS.
go back to reference Jochem, S. (2009). Skandinavische Beschäftigungspolitik—Stärken und Schwächen im internationalen Vergleich. WSI Mitteilungen, 1(2009), 3–9. Jochem, S. (2009). Skandinavische Beschäftigungspolitik—Stärken und Schwächen im internationalen Vergleich. WSI Mitteilungen, 1(2009), 3–9.
go back to reference Jordan, G. (1990). The pluralism of pluralism: An anti-theory? Political Studies, 38(2), 286–301.CrossRef Jordan, G. (1990). The pluralism of pluralism: An anti-theory? Political Studies, 38(2), 286–301.CrossRef
go back to reference Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston/Toronto: Longman. Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). Boston/Toronto: Longman.
go back to reference Kjær, A. M. (2007). Rationality within REACH? On Functional Differentiation as the Structural Foundation of Legitimacy in European Chemical Regulation, EUI Working Papers. Kjær, A. M. (2007). Rationality within REACH? On Functional Differentiation as the Structural Foundation of Legitimacy in European Chemical Regulation, EUI Working Papers.
go back to reference Knaggård, Å. (2015). The multiple streams framework and the problem broker. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), 450–465.CrossRef Knaggård, Å. (2015). The multiple streams framework and the problem broker. European Journal of Political Research, 54(3), 450–465.CrossRef
go back to reference Knill, C., & Liefferink, D. (2007). Environmental politics in the European Union: Policy-making, implementation and patterns of multi-level governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRef Knill, C., & Liefferink, D. (2007). Environmental politics in the European Union: Policy-making, implementation and patterns of multi-level governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRef
go back to reference Kohler-Koch, B. (1994). Changing patterns of interest intermediation in the European Union. Government and Opposition, 29(2), 166–180.CrossRef Kohler-Koch, B. (1994). Changing patterns of interest intermediation in the European Union. Government and Opposition, 29(2), 166–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
go back to reference Kresi, H., Adam, S., & Jochum, M. (2006). Comparative analysis of policy networks in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), 341–361.CrossRef Kresi, H., Adam, S., & Jochum, M. (2006). Comparative analysis of policy networks in Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3), 341–361.CrossRef
go back to reference Lowery, D., Poppelaars, C., & Berkhout, J. (2008). The European Union interest system in comparative perspective: A bridge too far? West European Politics, 31(6), 1231–1252.CrossRef Lowery, D., Poppelaars, C., & Berkhout, J. (2008). The European Union interest system in comparative perspective: A bridge too far? West European Politics, 31(6), 1231–1252.CrossRef
go back to reference Lucas, J. W. (2003). Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity. Sociological Theory, 21(3), 236–253.CrossRef Lucas, J. W. (2003). Theory-testing, generalization, and the problem of external validity. Sociological Theory, 21(3), 236–253.CrossRef
go back to reference Margossian, N. (2007). Le Reglement REACH. La reglementation europeene sur les produits chimiques. Paris: Dunod. Margossian, N. (2007). Le Reglement REACH. La reglementation europeene sur les produits chimiques. Paris: Dunod.
go back to reference Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny & G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The State of the European Community (pp. 391–409). London: Longman. Marks, G. (1993). Structural policy and multi-level governance in the EC. In A. Cafruny & G. Rosenthal (Eds.), The State of the European Community (pp. 391–409). London: Longman.
go back to reference Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.CrossRef Marks, G., Hooghe, L., & Blank, K. (1996). European integration from the 1980s: State-centric v. multi-level governance. Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(3), 341–378.CrossRef
go back to reference Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (2007). Environmental Groups and the EC: Challenges and opportunities. In A. Jordan (Ed.), Environmental Policy in the European Union. Actors, institutions & processes (pp. 106–124). London: Earthscan. Mazey, S., & Richardson, J. (2007). Environmental Groups and the EC: Challenges and opportunities. In A. Jordan (Ed.), Environmental Policy in the European Union. Actors, institutions & processes (pp. 106–124). London: Earthscan.
go back to reference Nagel, A. (2009). Politische Entrepreneure als Reformmotor im Gesundheitswesen: Eine Fallstudie zur Einführung eines neuen Steuerungsinstruments im Politikfeld Psychotherapie. Wiesbaden: VS.CrossRef Nagel, A. (2009). Politische Entrepreneure als Reformmotor im Gesundheitswesen: Eine Fallstudie zur Einführung eines neuen Steuerungsinstruments im Politikfeld Psychotherapie. Wiesbaden: VS.CrossRef
go back to reference Nedlund, A.-C., & Garpenby, P. (2014). Puzzling about problems: The ambiguous search for an evidence-based strategy for handing influx of health technology. Policy Sciences, 47(4), 367–386.CrossRef Nedlund, A.-C., & Garpenby, P. (2014). Puzzling about problems: The ambiguous search for an evidence-based strategy for handing influx of health technology. Policy Sciences, 47(4), 367–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Öberg, P., et al. (2011). Disrupted exchange and declining corporatism: Government authority and interest groups capability in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition, 46(3), 365–391.CrossRef Öberg, P., et al. (2011). Disrupted exchange and declining corporatism: Government authority and interest groups capability in Scandinavia. Government and Opposition, 46(3), 365–391.CrossRef
go back to reference Patzwaldt, K. (2007). Was leistete Politikberatung in den rot-grünen Arbeitsmarktreformen? In K. D. Wolf (Ed.), Staat und Gesellschaft – fähig zur Reform? (pp. 211–228). Baden-Baden: Nomos. Patzwaldt, K. (2007). Was leistete Politikberatung in den rot-grünen Arbeitsmarktreformen? In K. D. Wolf (Ed.), Staat und Gesellschaft – fähig zur Reform? (pp. 211–228). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
go back to reference Pesendorfer, D. (2006). EU environmental policy under pressure: Chemicals Policy Change Between Antagonistic Goals? Environmental Politics, 15(1), 95–114.CrossRef Pesendorfer, D. (2006). EU environmental policy under pressure: Chemicals Policy Change Between Antagonistic Goals? Environmental Politics, 15(1), 95–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Peters, G. (2001). Agenda setting the European Union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union Power and Policymaking (pp. 77–94). London: Routledge. Peters, G. (2001). Agenda setting the European Union. In J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union Power and Policymaking (pp. 77–94). London: Routledge.
go back to reference Pijnenburg, B. (1998). EU lobbying by ad hoc coalitions: An exploratory case study. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2), 303–321.CrossRef Pijnenburg, B. (1998). EU lobbying by ad hoc coalitions: An exploratory case study. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(2), 303–321.CrossRef
go back to reference Pollack, M. A. (2005). Theorizing EU policy-making. In W. Wallace & M. A. Pollack (Eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union (pp. 13–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pollack, M. A. (2005). Theorizing EU policy-making. In W. Wallace & M. A. Pollack (Eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union (pp. 13–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Quittkat, Ch., & Kotzian, P. (2011). Lobbying via consultation—Territorial and functional interests in the commission’s consultation regime. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 401–418.CrossRef Quittkat, Ch., & Kotzian, P. (2011). Lobbying via consultation—Territorial and functional interests in the commission’s consultation regime. Journal of European Integration, 33(4), 401–418.CrossRef
go back to reference Radaelli, C. M. (1999). Harmful tax competition in the EU: Policy narratives and advocacy coalitions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 661–682.CrossRef Radaelli, C. M. (1999). Harmful tax competition in the EU: Policy narratives and advocacy coalitions. Journal of Common Market Studies, 37(4), 661–682.CrossRef
go back to reference Rehder, B. (2009). Interessenvermittlung in Politikfeldern—ein vergleichendes Fazit 267. In B. Rehder, T. Winter, & U. Willems (Eds.), Interessenvermittlung in Politikfeldern Vergleichende Befunde der Policy- und Verbändeforschung (pp. 267–273). Wiesbaden: VS.CrossRef Rehder, B. (2009). Interessenvermittlung in Politikfeldern—ein vergleichendes Fazit 267. In B. Rehder, T. Winter, & U. Willems (Eds.), Interessenvermittlung in Politikfeldern Vergleichende Befunde der Policy- und Verbändeforschung (pp. 267–273). Wiesbaden: VS.CrossRef
go back to reference Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 181–205.CrossRef Rhodes, R. A. W., & Marsh, D. (1992). New directions in the study of policy networks. European Journal of Political Research, 21(1–2), 181–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Rietig, K. (2014). Neutral experts? How input of scientific expertise matters in international environmental negotiations. Policy Sciences, 47(2), 141–160.CrossRef Rietig, K. (2014). Neutral experts? How input of scientific expertise matters in international environmental negotiations. Policy Sciences, 47(2), 141–160.CrossRef
go back to reference Rozbicka, P. (2013). Advocacy coalitions: Influencing the policy process in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 838–853.CrossRef Rozbicka, P. (2013). Advocacy coalitions: Influencing the policy process in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(6), 838–853.CrossRef
go back to reference Rüb, F. W. (2009). Multiple-Streams-Ansatz: Grundlagen, Probleme und Kritik. In K. Schubert & N. C. Bandelow (Eds.), Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse 2.0 (pp. 348–376). München: Oldenbourg. Rüb, F. W. (2009). Multiple-Streams-Ansatz: Grundlagen, Probleme und Kritik. In K. Schubert & N. C. Bandelow (Eds.), Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse 2.0 (pp. 348–376). München: Oldenbourg.
go back to reference Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.CrossRef Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130.CrossRef
go back to reference Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The Semisovereign people. A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Thomson Learning. Schattschneider, E. E. (1975). The Semisovereign people. A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Thomson Learning.
go back to reference Schlager, E. (2007). A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 293–319). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Schlager, E. (2007). A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 293–319). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
go back to reference Schmid, G. (2003). Gestaltung des Wandels durch wissenschaftliche Beratung. Das ‚Bündnis für Arbeit’ und die ‚Hartz-Kommission. In S. Ramge & G. Schmid (Eds.), Management of Change in der Politik? Reformstrategien am Beispiel der Arbeitsmarkt- und Beschäftigungspolitik. Waxmann: Münster. Schmid, G. (2003). Gestaltung des Wandels durch wissenschaftliche Beratung. Das ‚Bündnis für Arbeit’ und die ‚Hartz-Kommission. In S. Ramge & G. Schmid (Eds.), Management of Change in der Politik? Reformstrategien am Beispiel der Arbeitsmarkt- und Beschäftigungspolitik. Waxmann: Münster.
go back to reference Schmitter, P. C. (1989). Corporatism is dead! Long live corporatism! Government and Opposition, 24(1), 54–73.CrossRef Schmitter, P. C. (1989). Corporatism is dead! Long live corporatism! Government and Opposition, 24(1), 54–73.CrossRef
go back to reference Schorling, I. (2004). REACH. The only planet guide to the secrets of chemicals policy in the EU. What happened and why?, Brussels, 2004. Schorling, I. (2004). REACH. The only planet guide to the secrets of chemicals policy in the EU. What happened and why?, Brussels, 2004.
go back to reference Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
go back to reference Spohr, F. (2015). Pfadwechsel in der Arbeitsmarktpolitik. Eine Analyse aktivierender Reformen in Großbritannien Deutschland und Schweden anhand des Multiple Streams Ansatzes. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Spohr, F. (2015). Pfadwechsel in der Arbeitsmarktpolitik. Eine Analyse aktivierender Reformen in Großbritannien Deutschland und Schweden anhand des Multiple Streams Ansatzes. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
go back to reference Stone, D. A. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton & Co. Stone, D. A. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton & Co.
go back to reference Streeck, W. (2003). No longer the century of corporatism. Das Ende des “Bündnisses für Arbeit“, MPIfG Working Paper 03/4. Streeck, W. (2003). No longer the century of corporatism. Das Ende des “Bündnisses für Arbeit“, MPIfG Working Paper 03/4.
go back to reference Tiernan, A., & Burke, T. (2002). A load of old garbage: Applying Garbage-can theory to contemporary housing policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(3), 86–97.CrossRef Tiernan, A., & Burke, T. (2002). A load of old garbage: Applying Garbage-can theory to contemporary housing policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(3), 86–97.CrossRef
go back to reference Trampusch, Ch. (2003). Von Verbänden zu Parteien. Der Elitenwechsel in der Sozialpolitik, MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/3, Köln: MPIfG. Trampusch, Ch. (2003). Von Verbänden zu Parteien. Der Elitenwechsel in der Sozialpolitik, MPIfG Discussion Paper 04/3, Köln: MPIfG.
go back to reference Truman, D. B. (1951). The Governmental process. Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Truman, D. B. (1951). The Governmental process. Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
go back to reference Warleigh, A. (2000). The hustle: Citizenship practice, NGOs and policy coalitions in the European Union—the cases of auto oil, drinking water and unit pricing. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), 229–243.CrossRef Warleigh, A. (2000). The hustle: Citizenship practice, NGOs and policy coalitions in the European Union—the cases of auto oil, drinking water and unit pricing. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), 229–243.CrossRef
go back to reference Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., & Sabatier, P. A. (2012). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45(1), 1–21.CrossRef Weible, C. M., Heikkila, T., deLeon, P., & Sabatier, P. A. (2012). Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sciences, 45(1), 1–21.CrossRef
go back to reference Wonka, A. (2008). Europeanized convergence? British and German business associations’ European lobbying strategies in the formulation of REACH. In R. Grote, A. Lang, & V. Schneider (Eds.), Organised business interests in changing environments (pp. 179–199). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Wonka, A. (2008). Europeanized convergence? British and German business associations’ European lobbying strategies in the formulation of REACH. In R. Grote, A. Lang, & V. Schneider (Eds.), Organised business interests in changing environments (pp. 179–199). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, time, and multiple streams. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 73–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, time, and multiple streams. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 73–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Zahariadis, N. (2007). The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy-process (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press. Zahariadis, N. (2007). The multiple streams framework: Structure, limitations, prospects. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy-process (2nd ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
go back to reference Zahariadis, N. (2008). Ambiguity and choice in European public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 514–530.CrossRef Zahariadis, N. (2008). Ambiguity and choice in European public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 514–530.CrossRef
go back to reference Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In P. Sabatier & Ch M Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 25–58). Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Zahariadis, N. (2014). Ambiguity and multiple streams. In P. Sabatier & Ch M Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 25–58). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Metadata
Title
Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework
Authors
Patrycja Rozbicka
Florian Spohr
Publication date
18-08-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Policy Sciences / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 0032-2687
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0891
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Policy Sciences 1/2016 Go to the issue