Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Environmental Earth Sciences 9/2017

01-05-2017 | Original Article

Interpretation of in situ horizontal stress from self-boring pressuremeter tests in sands via cavity pressure less than limit pressure: a numerical study

Authors: Mohammad Mehdi Ahmadi, Ehsan Keshmiri

Published in: Environmental Earth Sciences | Issue 9/2017

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The paper presents a numerical finite difference model of self-boring pressuremeter test (SBPM) using FLAC software. Different cavity expansion theories in sand have been compared to the results of numerical analyses carried out in this study. Limit pressure is believed to be used as a key parameter for the estimation of soil parameters from pressuremeter tests. In practice, SBPM tests are conducted up to 10–15% cavity strains, and the strain level associated with the limit pressure state is not reached. Therefore, determination of limit pressure usually needs extrapolation. In this paper, the authors suggest to use cavity pressure at 10% strain (P 10) for the interpretation of in situ horizontal stress from SBPM test rather than limit pressure. For this purpose, more than 5000 numerical analyses of SBPM are carried out, and cavity pressures associated with 10% strain are deduced. Based on these extensive numbers of numerical analyses, a new relationship is established with the aid of genetic algorithm which correlates P 10 to soil parameters. The estimated values of P 10 from the proposed relationship are compared to a large database of measured ones obtained from laboratory and field results available in the literature. It was shown that the proposed relationship gives satisfactory predictions of P 10. A chart was established for deduction of the in situ horizontal stress using the proposed relationship. This method can be used as a complement to liftoff method which is not reliable for estimation of the in situ horizontal stress when soil disturbance occurs at cavity wall.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Literature
go back to reference Bahar R (1992) Analyse numérique de l’essai pressiométrique: application à l’identification de paramètres de comportement des sols. Thèse de doctorat. Ecole Centrale de Lyon, France Bahar R (1992) Analyse numérique de l’essai pressiométrique: application à l’identification de paramètres de comportement des sols. Thèse de doctorat. Ecole Centrale de Lyon, France
go back to reference Bellotti R, Bruzzi G, Ghionna V (1982) Design, construction and use of a calibration chamber. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium on penetration Testing, Amsterdam, vol 2. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 439–446 Bellotti R, Bruzzi G, Ghionna V (1982) Design, construction and use of a calibration chamber. In: Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium on penetration Testing, Amsterdam, vol 2. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 439–446
go back to reference Bellotti R, Crippa V, Ghionna VN, Jamiolkowski M, Robertson PK (1987) Self-boring pressuremeter in pluvially deposited sands. Final technical report to US army, European Research Office, London Bellotti R, Crippa V, Ghionna VN, Jamiolkowski M, Robertson PK (1987) Self-boring pressuremeter in pluvially deposited sands. Final technical report to US army, European Research Office, London
go back to reference Bellotti R, Ghionna V, Jamiolkowski M, Robertson PK, Peterson RW (1989) Interpretation of moduli from self-boring pressuremeter tests in sand. Géotechnique 39(2):269–292CrossRef Bellotti R, Ghionna V, Jamiolkowski M, Robertson PK, Peterson RW (1989) Interpretation of moduli from self-boring pressuremeter tests in sand. Géotechnique 39(2):269–292CrossRef
go back to reference Bolton F (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Géotechnique 36(1):65–78CrossRef Bolton F (1986) The strength and dilatancy of sands. Géotechnique 36(1):65–78CrossRef
go back to reference Bowels J (1995) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York Bowels J (1995) Foundation analysis and design, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
go back to reference Bruzzi D, Ghionna V, Jamiolkowski M, Lancellotta R, Manfredini G (1986) Self-boring pressuremeter in Po river sand. In: The pressuremeter and its marine applications: second international symposium; ASTM STP, vol 950, pp 57–74 Bruzzi D, Ghionna V, Jamiolkowski M, Lancellotta R, Manfredini G (1986) Self-boring pressuremeter in Po river sand. In: The pressuremeter and its marine applications: second international symposium; ASTM STP, vol 950, pp 57–74
go back to reference Carter JP, Booker JR, Yeung SK (1986) Cavity expansion in cohesive frictional soils. Géotechnique 3:349–358CrossRef Carter JP, Booker JR, Yeung SK (1986) Cavity expansion in cohesive frictional soils. Géotechnique 3:349–358CrossRef
go back to reference Cunha RP (1994) Interpretation of self-boring pressuremeter tests in sand. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia Cunha RP (1994) Interpretation of self-boring pressuremeter tests in sand. PhD thesis, University of British Columbia
go back to reference Das BM (2008) Advanced soil mechanics. Taylor & Francis, New York Das BM (2008) Advanced soil mechanics. Taylor & Francis, New York
go back to reference Fahey M (1986) Expansion of a thick cylinder of sand: a laboratory simulation of the pressuremeter test. Géotechnique 36(3):397–424CrossRef Fahey M (1986) Expansion of a thick cylinder of sand: a laboratory simulation of the pressuremeter test. Géotechnique 36(3):397–424CrossRef
go back to reference Fahey M, Randolph MF (1984) Effect of disturbance on parameters derived from self-boring pressuremeter tests in sand. Géotechnique 34(1):81–97CrossRef Fahey M, Randolph MF (1984) Effect of disturbance on parameters derived from self-boring pressuremeter tests in sand. Géotechnique 34(1):81–97CrossRef
go back to reference Gibson RE, Anderson WF (1961) In-situ measurements of soil properties using a pressuremeter. Civ Eng Pub Works Rev 56:615–618 Gibson RE, Anderson WF (1961) In-situ measurements of soil properties using a pressuremeter. Civ Eng Pub Works Rev 56:615–618
go back to reference Houlsby GT, Clarke BG, Wroth CP (1986) Analysis of unloading of a pressuremeter in sand. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on pressuremeters, ASTM STP, vol 950, pp 245–64 Houlsby GT, Clarke BG, Wroth CP (1986) Analysis of unloading of a pressuremeter in sand. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on pressuremeters, ASTM STP, vol 950, pp 245–64
go back to reference Hughes JMO, Robertson PK (1985) Full-displacement pressuremeter testing in sand. Can Geotech J 1(22):298–307CrossRef Hughes JMO, Robertson PK (1985) Full-displacement pressuremeter testing in sand. Can Geotech J 1(22):298–307CrossRef
go back to reference Hughes JMO, Wroth CP, Windle D (1977) Pressuremeter tests in sands. Géotechnique 27(4):455–477CrossRef Hughes JMO, Wroth CP, Windle D (1977) Pressuremeter tests in sands. Géotechnique 27(4):455–477CrossRef
go back to reference Jewell RJ, Fahey M, Wroth CP (1980) Laboratory studies of the pressuremeter test in sand. Géotechnique 30(4):507–531CrossRef Jewell RJ, Fahey M, Wroth CP (1980) Laboratory studies of the pressuremeter test in sand. Géotechnique 30(4):507–531CrossRef
go back to reference Knappett JA, Craig RF (2012) Craig’s soil mechanics, 8th edn. Spon Press, Abingdon Knappett JA, Craig RF (2012) Craig’s soil mechanics, 8th edn. Spon Press, Abingdon
go back to reference Lade PV, Lee KL (1976) Engineering properties of soils. Report UCLA-Eng.7652-University of California, Los Angeles Lade PV, Lee KL (1976) Engineering properties of soils. Report UCLA-Eng.7652-University of California, Los Angeles
go back to reference Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1969) Soil mechanics. Wiley, New York, p 553 Lambe TW, Whitman RV (1969) Soil mechanics. Wiley, New York, p 553
go back to reference Lame G (1852) Lecons sur la theorie mathematique de l’elasticite des corps solides. Bachelier, Paris Lame G (1852) Lecons sur la theorie mathematique de l’elasticite des corps solides. Bachelier, Paris
go back to reference Mair RJ, Wood DE (1987) Pressuremeter testing: methods and interpretation. Ciria Report, Butterworths, UK Mair RJ, Wood DE (1987) Pressuremeter testing: methods and interpretation. Ciria Report, Butterworths, UK
go back to reference Monnet J (2007) Validation of an elastoplastic theory of the pressuremeter test in granular soil. Stud Geotech Mech 29(3–4):69–80 Monnet J (2007) Validation of an elastoplastic theory of the pressuremeter test in granular soil. Stud Geotech Mech 29(3–4):69–80
go back to reference Robertson PK (1982) In-situ testing of soil with emphasis on its application to liquefaction assessment. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia Robertson PK (1982) In-situ testing of soil with emphasis on its application to liquefaction assessment. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia
go back to reference Robertson PK, Hughes JMO (1986) Determination of properties of sand from self-boring pressuremeter test. In: The pressuremeter and its marine applications, proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on pressuremeters, College Station, Texas. ASTM, Special Technical Publication STP 950, pp 283–302 Robertson PK, Hughes JMO (1986) Determination of properties of sand from self-boring pressuremeter test. In: The pressuremeter and its marine applications, proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on pressuremeters, College Station, Texas. ASTM, Special Technical Publication STP 950, pp 283–302
go back to reference Rowe PW (1962) The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc R Sot A 269:500–527CrossRef Rowe PW (1962) The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc R Sot A 269:500–527CrossRef
go back to reference Schnaid F (2009) In situ testing in geomechanics. Taylor & Francis, New York Schnaid F (2009) In situ testing in geomechanics. Taylor & Francis, New York
go back to reference Schnaid F, Ortigao JAR, Mántaras FM, Cunha RP, MacGregor I (2000) Analysis of self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) and Marchetti dilatometer (DMT) tests in granite saprolites. Can Geotech J 37:796–810CrossRef Schnaid F, Ortigao JAR, Mántaras FM, Cunha RP, MacGregor I (2000) Analysis of self-boring pressuremeter (SBPM) and Marchetti dilatometer (DMT) tests in granite saprolites. Can Geotech J 37:796–810CrossRef
go back to reference Stroud MA (1971) Sand at low stress levels in the simple shear apparatus. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge Stroud MA (1971) Sand at low stress levels in the simple shear apparatus. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge
go back to reference Wride CE, Robertson PK (1998) CANLEX-Phases 1 and 2 data review report. Volume 2. Appendices. BiTech Publishers Ltd., Richmond Wride CE, Robertson PK (1998) CANLEX-Phases 1 and 2 data review report. Volume 2. Appendices. BiTech Publishers Ltd., Richmond
go back to reference Wroth CP (1984) The interpretation of in situ soil tests. Géotechnique 34(4):449–489CrossRef Wroth CP (1984) The interpretation of in situ soil tests. Géotechnique 34(4):449–489CrossRef
go back to reference Yu HS (1994) State parameter from self-boring pressuremeter tests in sand. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2118–2135CrossRef Yu HS (1994) State parameter from self-boring pressuremeter tests in sand. J Geotech Eng 120(12):2118–2135CrossRef
go back to reference Yu HS (1996) Interpretation of pressuremeter unloading tests in sands. Géotechnique 46(1):17–31CrossRef Yu HS (1996) Interpretation of pressuremeter unloading tests in sands. Géotechnique 46(1):17–31CrossRef
go back to reference Yu HS, Houlsby GT (1991) Finite cavity expansion in dilatant soils. Géotechnique 41(2):173–183CrossRef Yu HS, Houlsby GT (1991) Finite cavity expansion in dilatant soils. Géotechnique 41(2):173–183CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Interpretation of in situ horizontal stress from self-boring pressuremeter tests in sands via cavity pressure less than limit pressure: a numerical study
Authors
Mohammad Mehdi Ahmadi
Ehsan Keshmiri
Publication date
01-05-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Environmental Earth Sciences / Issue 9/2017
Print ISSN: 1866-6280
Electronic ISSN: 1866-6299
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6660-3

Other articles of this Issue 9/2017

Environmental Earth Sciences 9/2017 Go to the issue