Top

Published in:

2018 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

1. Introduction

Authors : Yu Yu, Yao Chen, Qinfen Shi

Published in: Strategy and Performance of Knowledge Flow

Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

Faster technological development, shorter product life cycles, and more intense global competition have transformed the current competitive environment for most firms (Bettis and Hitt 1995). This new competitive landscape forces organizations to actively acquire knowledge since a firm’s competitive advantage is now more dependent on continuous knowledge development and enhancement (Santoro and Gopalakrishnan 2000). As competitive pressures increase, firms are often placed in positions where they have neither the time nor resources to internally develop the knowledge needed to achieve competitive success through product and process innovations. Thus, knowledge acquisition from external source partners has been identified as a key competency for sustained success in the competitive marketplace. A common and frequently viable option in this situation is the acquisition of technological knowledge from outside sources.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

next chapter Measuring the Performance of Knowledge Value-Added in University-Industry Collaborative Innovation

Abdullateef, E. (2000). Developing knowledge and creativity: Asset tracking as a strategy centerpiece. The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society, 30(3), 174–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632920009597311.CrossRef

Abernathy, W. J., & Chakravarthy, B. S. (1979). Government intervention and innovation in industry: A policy framework. Sloan Management Review, 20(3), 3–18.

Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A.-L. (1999). Diameter of the World-Wide Web. Nature, 401, 130. https://doi.org/10.1038/43601.CrossRef

Ali, E. A., Halit, K., Hayat, A., & Zeki, O. (2017). Knowledge sharing barriers in software development teams: A multiple case study in Turkey. Kybernetes, 46(4), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2016-0081.CrossRef

Allee, V. (1997). The knowledge evolution: Expanding organizational intelligence. Newton: Butterworth-Heinemann.

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47(1), i-171. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360.CrossRef

Alton, C. (2003). Knowledge sharing: A game people play. ASLIB Proceedings, 55(3), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530310472615.CrossRef

Amaral, L. A. N., & Ottino, J. M. (2004). Complex networks. The European Physical Journal B, 38(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2004-00110-5.CrossRef

Amaral, L. A. N., Scala, A., Barthélémy, M., & Stanley, H. E. (2000). Classes of small-world networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(21), 11149–11152. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.200327197.CrossRef

Ambos, T. C., Ambos, B., Eich, K. J., & Puck, J. (2016). Imbalance and isolation: How team configurations affect global knowledge sharing. Journal of International Management, 22(4), 316–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.03.005.CrossRef

Andersen, P., & Petersen, N. C. (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 39(10), 1261–1264.CrossRef

Anderson, T. R., Daim, T. U., & Lavoie, F. F. (2007). Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer. Technovation, 27(5), 306–318.CrossRef

Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2006). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37(10), 1865–1883.CrossRef

Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(00)00010-0.CrossRef

Bandyopadhyay, S., & Pathak, P. (2007). Knowledge sharing and cooperation in outsourcing projects — A game theoretic analysis. Decision Support Systems, 43(2), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2006.10.006.CrossRef

Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.CrossRef

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.CrossRef

Barrat, A., & Weigt, M. (2000). On the properties of small-world network models. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 13(3), 547–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050067.CrossRef

Beerepoot, M., & Beerepoot, N. (2007). Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector. Energy Policy, 35(10), 4812–4825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.015.CrossRef

Bell, G. G., & Zaheer, A. (2007). Geography, networks, and knowledge flow. Organization Science, 18(6), 955–972.CrossRef

Bernard, A., & Tichkiewitch, S. (2008). Methods and tools for effective knowledge life-cycle-management. Berlin: Springer.CrossRef

Bettis, R. A., & Hitt, M. A. (1995). The new competitive landscape. Strategic Management Journal, 16(S1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160915.CrossRef

Bhargava, S. C., Kumar, A., & Mukherjee, A. (1993). A stochastic cellular automata model of innovation diffusion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 44(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(93)90008-U.CrossRef

Birkinshaw, J., & Sheehan, T. (2002). Managing the knowledge life cycle. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 75–83.

Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2003). A robust nonparametric approach to the analysis of scientific productivity. Research Evaluation, 12(1), 47–69.CrossRef

Bonaccorsi, A., & Piccaluga, A. (1994). A theoretical framework for the evaluation of university-industry relationships. R&D Management, 24(3), 229–247.CrossRef

Bower, D. J. (1993). Successful joint ventures in science parks. Long Range Planning, 26(6), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90213-Y.CrossRef

Brenda, K., Yajiong, X., & Yongjun, L. (2016). Factors influencing knowledge sharing among global virtual teams. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 22(5/6), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-10-2015-0042.CrossRef

Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical handbook of material flow analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 9(5), 337–338.CrossRef

Bui, H. T. (2017). Big five personality traits and job satisfaction. Journal of General Management, 42(3), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306307016687990.CrossRef

Cabrera, E. F., & Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720–735. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500083020.CrossRef

Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190500404614.CrossRef

Cai, G., & Kock, N. (2009). An evolutionary game theoretic perspective on e-collaboration: The collaboration effort and media relativeness. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(3), 821–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.01.021.CrossRef

Carayol, N., & Roux, P. (2009). Knowledge flows and the geography of networks: A strategic model of small world formation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71(2), 414–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2009.02.005.CrossRef

Carlucci, D., Marr, B., & Schiuma, G. (2004). The knowledge value chain: How intellectual capital impacts on business performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(6–7), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2004.004903.CrossRef

Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: Influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740–753. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211262781.CrossRef

Cattell, R. B. (1943a). The description of personality. I. Foundations of trait measurement. Psychological Review, 50(6), 559–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057276.CrossRef

Cattell, R. B. (1943b). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38(4), 476–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054116.CrossRef

Cattell, R. B. (1945). The description of personality: Principles and findings in a factor analysis. The American Journal of Psychology, 58, 69–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/1417576.CrossRef

Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800090303.CrossRef

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.CrossRef

Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., Kao, C., & Zhu, J. (2013). Network DEA pitfalls: Divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.021.CrossRef

Cheng, J. H., Yeh, C. H., & Tu, C. W. (2008). Trust and knowledge sharing in green supply chains. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13(4), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810882170.CrossRef

Chong, C. W., Teh, P.-L., & Tan, B. C. (2014). Knowledge sharing among Malaysian universities’ students: Do personality traits, class room and technological factors matter? Educational Studies, 40(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2013.825577.CrossRef

Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.CrossRef

Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386–400.CrossRef

Cook, W. D., Zhu, J., Bi, G., & Yang, F. (2010). Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.006.CrossRef

Cooke, P., Kaufmann, D., Levin, C., & Wilson, R. (2006). The biosciences knowledge value chain and comparative incubation models. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5025-3.CrossRef

Cooper, W. W., Park, K. S., & Pastor, J. T. (1999). RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 11(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007701304281.CrossRef

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2007). Data envelopment analysis: A comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. New York: Springer US.

Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2011). Data envelopment analysis: History, models, and interpretations. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis. New York: Springer US.CrossRef

Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Costa, P. T., & MacCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Cowan, R., & Jonard, N. (2004). Network structure and the diffusion of knowledge. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(8), 1557–1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2003.04.002.CrossRef

Cress, U., & Martin, S. (2006). Knowledge sharing and rewards: A game-theoretical perspective. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(4), 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500112.CrossRef

Cyr, S., & Choo, C. W. (2010). The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Journal of Documentation, 66(6), 824–846. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411011087832.CrossRef

de Moor, M. H. M., Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., Krueger, R. F., de Geus, E. J. C., Toshiko, T., et al. (2012). Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies for personality. Molecular Psychiatry, 17(3), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2010.128.CrossRef

DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010). Testing predictions from personality neuroscience. Psychological Science, 21(6), 820–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610370159.CrossRef

DiCesare, F., Harhalakis, G., Proth, J.-M., Silva, M., & Vernadat, F. (1993). Practice of petri nets in manufacturing. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRef

Diez, J. R. (2000). The importance of public research institutes in innovative networks-empirical results from the metropolitan innovation systems Barcelona, Stockholm and Vienna. European Planning Studies, 8(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/713666418.CrossRef

Ding, Z., Ng, F., & Li, J. (2014). A parallel multiple mediator model of knowledge sharing in architectural design project teams. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.04.004.CrossRef

Drucker, P. F. (1998). Harvard business review on knowledge management. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Drucker, P. F. (2006). The practice of management (Reissue ed.). New York: Harper Business.

Dyer, J. H., & Chu, W. (2000). The determinants of trust in supplier-automaker relationships in the U.S., Japan and Korea. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490905.CrossRef

Dyer, J. H., Kale, P., & Singh, H. (2004). When to ally and when to acquire. Harvard Business Review, 82(7–8), 108–115.

Eustace, C. (2003). A new perspective on the knowledge value chain. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 4(4), 588–596.CrossRef

Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1985). A nonparametric cost approach to scale efficiency. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 87(4), 594–604.CrossRef

Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1996). Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Economics Letters, 50(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(95)00729-6.CrossRef

Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S. (2000). Network DEA. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00012-9.CrossRef

Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100.CrossRef

Franić, S., Borsboom, D., Dolan, C. V., & Boomsma, D. I. (2014). The big five personality traits: Psychological entities or statistical constructs? Behavior Genetics, 44(6), 591–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-013-9625-7.CrossRef

French, J. W. (1953). The description of personality measurements in terms of rotated factors. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

Fuentes, M. A., & Kuperman, M. N. (1999). Cellular automata and epidemiological models with spatial dependence. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 267(3–4), 471–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00027-8.CrossRef

Gagné, M. (2009). A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20298.CrossRef

Ghobadi, S. (2015). What drives knowledge sharing in software development teams: A literature review and classification framework. Information Management, 52(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.10.008.CrossRef

Ghobadi, S., & D’Ambra, J. (2013). Modeling high-quality knowledge sharing in cross-functional software development teams. Information Processing & Management, 49(1), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.07.001.CrossRef

Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology. California: Sage Publications.

Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. Spielberger, J. N. Butcher, & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 1). New York: Routledge.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The big-five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216.CrossRef

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the big-five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26.CrossRef

Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110.CrossRef

Greenberg, J. (1987). A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1987.4306437.CrossRef

Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639001600208.CrossRef

Guan, J., & Chen, K. (2012). Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems. Research Policy, 41(1), 102–115.CrossRef

Guan, J., & Wang, J. (2004). Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency. Scientometrics, 59(1), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000013303.25298.ae.CrossRef

Guan, J., & Zuo, K. (2014). A cross-country comparison of innovation efficiency. Scientometrics, 100(2), 541–575.CrossRef

Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnerships1This paper has benefited from the insightful comments and suggestions of Andy Brod and Kathy Combs.1. Research Policy, 29(4), 567–586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6.CrossRef

Harari, M. B., Jain, N. K., & Joseph, T. (2014). The five-factor model of personality and knowledge transfer in the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(4), 399–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12086.CrossRef

Hau, Y. S., Kim, B., Lee, H., & Kim, Y.-G. (2013). The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 33(2), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.009.CrossRef

Heintze, N. (1995). Control-flow analysis and type systems. In A. Mycroft (Ed.), Static analysis. SAS 1995. lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 983). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

Holsapple, C. W., & Singh, M. (2001). The knowledge chain model: Activities for competitiveness. Expert Systems with Applications, 20(1), 77–98.CrossRef

Homans, G. C. (1958). Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1086/222355.CrossRef

Hsu, B.-F., Wu, W.-L., & Yeh, R.-S. (2011). Team personality composition, affective ties and knowledge sharing: A team-level analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 53(2–4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2011.038597.CrossRef

Hu, J., Guan, Y., & Fan, X. (2010). The innovation efficiency of industry-University- Research Cooperation based on DEA. In 2010 3rd international conference on information management, innovation management and industrial engineering, 26–28 Nov. 2010 (Vol. 3, pp. 345–348), Kunming, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIII.2010.403 .

Huang, C.-C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(11), 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.003.CrossRef

Huang, X., He, P., & Zhang, W. (2016). A cooperative differential game of transboundary industrial pollution between two regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 120, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.095.CrossRef

Hung, S.-Y., Durcikova, A., Lai, H.-M., & Lin, W.-M. (2011). The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals’ knowledge sharing behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(6), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2011.02.004.CrossRef

Inzelt, A. (2004). The evolution of university–industry–government relationships during transition. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 975–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.03.002.CrossRef

Jadin, T., Gnambs, T., & Batinic, B. (2013). Personality traits and knowledge sharing in online communities. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.08.007.CrossRef

Jafari Navimipour, N., & Charband, Y. (2016). Knowledge sharing mechanisms and techniques in project teams: Literature review, classification, and current trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.003.CrossRef

Janssen, O., Lam, C. K., & Huang, X. (2010). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The moderating roles of distributive justice and positive affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.614.CrossRef

Jensen, K. (1994). An introduction to the theoretical aspects of coloured petri nets. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Johnes, J., & Yu, L. (2008). Measuring the research performance of Chinese higher education institutions using data envelopment analysis. China Economic Review, 19(4), 679–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2008.08.004.CrossRef

Jørgensen, S., & Zaccour, G. (2004). A brief tutorial on differential games. In S. Jørgensen & G. Zaccour (Eds.), Differential games in marketing. Boston: Springer.CrossRef

Judge, T. A., & Zapata, C. P. (2015). The person–situation debate revisited: Effect of situation strength and trait activation on the validity of the big five personality traits in predicting job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 58(4), 1149–1179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0837.CrossRef

Kalling, T. (2003). Organization-internal transfer of knowledge and the role of motivation: A qualitative case study. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(2), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.170.CrossRef

Kao, C. (2014). Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis with slacks-based measures. Omega, 45, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.12.002.CrossRef

Kari, J. (2005). Theory of cellular automata: A survey. Theoretical Computer Science, 334(1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2004.11.021.CrossRef

Kari, J. (2012). Basic concepts of cellular automata. In G. Rozenberg, T. Bäck, & J. N. Kok (Eds.), Handbook of natural computing. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

Keeling, M. J. (1999). The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266(1421), 859–867. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1999.0716.CrossRef

Kleinberg, J. M. (2000). Navigation in a small world. Nature, 406, 845. https://doi.org/10.1038/35022643.CrossRef

Kleingeld, A., van Mierlo, H., & Arends, L. (2011). The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1289–1304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024315.CrossRef

Koessler, F. (2004). Strategic knowledge sharing in Bayesian games. Games and Economic Behavior, 48(2), 292–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2003.10.002.CrossRef

Koschatzky, K., & Stahlecker, T. (2010). New forms of strategic research collaboration between firms and universities in the German research system. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 9(1–2), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijttc.2010.029427.CrossRef

Kumar, N., Scheer, L., Jan-Benedict, E. M., & Steenkamp. (1995). The effects of supplier fairness on vulnerable resellers. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152110.CrossRef

Kwong, J. Y. Y., & Cheung, F. M. (2003). Prediction of performance facets using specific personality traits in the Chinese context. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(02)00021-0.CrossRef

Lambertini, L., & Mantovani, A. (2010). Process and product innovation: A differential game approach to product life cycle. International Journal of Economic Theory, 6(2), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7363.2010.00132.x.CrossRef

Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist, 12(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290.CrossRef

Leavitt, H. J., & Bahrami, H. (1989). Managerial psychology: Managing behavior in organizations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lee, C. C., & Yang, J. (2000). Knowledge value chain. Journal of Management Development, 19(9), 783–794.CrossRef

Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Research Policy, 17(5), 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6.CrossRef

Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27–55). Boston: Springer US.CrossRef

Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0136.CrossRef

Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. (2004). Network DEA: Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure. Computers & Operations Research, 31(9), 1365–1410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00095-9.CrossRef

Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (1996). Emergence of a Triple Helix of university—Industry—Government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23(5), 279–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/23.5.279.CrossRef

Leydesdorff, L., & Guoping, Z. (2001). University—Industry—Government relations in China. Industry and Higher Education, 15(3), 179–182. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000001101295632.CrossRef

Li, Y.-M., & Jhang-Li, J.-H. (2010). Knowledge sharing in communities of practice: A game theoretic analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 1052–1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.033.CrossRef

Li, D., Ma, J., Tian, Z., & Zhu, H. (2015). An evolutionary game for the diffusion of rumor in complex networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 433, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.03.080.CrossRef

Lin, M., & Li, N. (2010). Scale-free network provides an optimal pattern for knowledge transfer. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(3), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2009.10.004.CrossRef

Liu, B. (2011). Study on performance of industry-university cooperation based on DEA. In 2011 international conference on business management and electronic information, 13–15 May 2011 (Vol. 4, pp. 168–171), Guangzhou, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBMEI.2011.5920944

Liu, Y., & Phillips, J. S. (2011). Examining the antecedents of knowledge sharing in facilitating team innovativeness from a multilevel perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.002.CrossRef

Liu, D., Kumar, S., & Mookerjee, V. S. (2012). Advertising strategies in electronic retailing: A differential games approach. Information Systems Research, 23(3-part-2), 903–917. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0377.CrossRef

Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., Smith, K. J., Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall College Div.

Lodi-Smith, J., & Roberts, B. W. (2007). Social investment and personality: A meta-analysis of the relationship of personality traits to investment in work, family, religion, and volunteerism. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 11(1), 68–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294590.CrossRef

Lu, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (2008). Strategic challenges for creating knowledge-based innovation in China: Transforming triple helix university-government-industry relations. Journal of Technology Management in China, 3(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468770810851476.CrossRef

Lundvall, B.-A. (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Pub Ltd.

Luo, Y. (2007). The independent and interactive roles of procedural, distributive, and interactional justice in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25526452.CrossRef

Ma, Z., Lee, Y., & Chen, C.-F. P. (2009). Booming or emerging? China’s technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 787–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.11.003.CrossRef

Maslow, A. H. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Müller, J., Herting, S., & Mooradian, T. A. (2008). Personality traits and knowledge sharing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(3), 301–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.06.004.CrossRef

Matzler, K., Renzl, B., Mooradian, T., von Krogh, G., & Mueller, J. (2011). Personality traits, affective commitment, documentation of knowledge, and knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(2), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2011.540156.CrossRef

McAdams, D. P., & Olson, B. D. (2010). Personality development: Continuity and change over the life course. Annual Review of Psychology, 61(1), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507.CrossRef

McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new big five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. The American Psychologist, 61(3), 204–217.CrossRef

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Joint factors in self-reports and ratings: Neuroticism, extraversion and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 4(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(83)90146-0.CrossRef

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: The Guilford Press.

McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-Commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.3.334.81.CrossRef

Merton, R. C. (2013). Innovation risk: How to make smarter decisions. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 48–56.

Metcalfe, M. (2005). Knowledge sharing, complex environments and small-worlds. Human Systems Management, 24(3), 185–195.

Milgram, S. (1967). The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 1(1), 61–67.

Minbaeva, D. B. (2008). HRM practices affecting extrinsic and intrinsic motivation of knowledge receivers and their effect on intra-MNC knowledge transfer. International Business Review, 17(6), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2008.08.001.CrossRef

Mischel, W. (2004). Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 1–22.CrossRef

Mooradian, T., Renzl, B., & Matzler, K. (2006). Who trusts? Personality, trust and knowledge sharing. Management Learning, 37(4), 523–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507606073424.CrossRef

Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research:The dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172742.CrossRef

Mu, J., Peng, G., & Love, E. (2008). Interfirm networks, social capital, and knowledge flow. Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(4), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270810884273.CrossRef

Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

Newman, M. E. J. (2000). Models of the small world. Journal of Statistical Physics, 101(3), 819–841. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1026485807148.CrossRef

Nierstrasz, O. M. (1985). Message flow analysis. In D. C. Tsichritzis (Ed.), Office automation. topics in information systems. Berlin/ Heidelberg: Springer.

Nigg, J. T., John, O. P., Blaskey, L. G., Huang-Pollock, C. L., Willcutt, E. G., Hinshaw, S. P., et al. (2002). Big five dimensions and ADHD symptoms: Links between personality traits and clinical symptoms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(2), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.451.CrossRef

Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14.CrossRef

Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow - A process theory of the knowledge-based firm. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(6), 574–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040291.CrossRef

Odum, E. P. (1968). Energy flow in ecosystems: A historical review. American Zoologist, 8(1), 11–18.CrossRef

OECD. (2008). OECD reviews of innovation policy: China. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2011). Public Research Institutions: Mapping sector trends. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Olaisen, J., & Revang, O. (2017). The dynamics of intellectual property rights for trust, knowledge sharing and innovation in project teams. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.05.012.CrossRef

O’leary-kelly, A. M., Martocchio, J. J., & Frink, D. D. (1994). A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.2307/256673.CrossRef

Ozer, D. J., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2006). Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 401–421.CrossRef

Pavitt, K. (1976). Government policies towards innovation: A review of empirical findings. Omega, 4(5), 539–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(76)90005-0.CrossRef

Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x.CrossRef

Picazo-Vela, S., Chou, S. Y., Melcher, A. J., & Pearson, J. M. (2010). Why provide an online review? An extended theory of planned behavior and the role of big-five personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 685–696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.005.CrossRef

Pinjani, P., & Palvia, P. (2013). Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams. Information Management, 50(4), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2012.10.002.CrossRef

Polanyi, M. (2015). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRef

Porter, M. E. (1996). What is strategy? Harvard Business Review, 86(5), 926–929.

Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J., & Siegel, D. S. (2002). Universities and fundamental research: Reflections on the growth of University–Industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.10.CrossRef

Quigley, N. R., Tesluk, P. E., Locke, E. A., & Bartol, K. M. (2007). A multilevel investigation of the motivational mechanisms underlying knowledge sharing and performance. Organization Science, 18(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0223.CrossRef

Rahm, D., Kirkland, J., & Bozeman, B. (2000). University-Industry R&D Collaboration in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef

Reisig, W. (1985). Petri nets: An introduction. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Richard, J., & Wayne, W. (2009). Using agent based simulation and game theory analysis to study knowledge flow in organizations: The KMscape. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 5(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.4018/jkm.2009010102.CrossRef

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2014). Organizational behavior (16th ed.). New York: Pearson.

Rosendaal, B., & Bijlsma-Frankema, K. (2015). Knowledge sharing within teams: Enabling and constraining factors. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.45.CrossRef

Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926617.CrossRef

Sabel, C. F. (1993). Studied trust: Building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9), 1133–1170. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600907.CrossRef

Salimifard, K., & Wright, M. (2001). Petri net-based modelling of workflow systems: An overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 134(3), 664–676.CrossRef

Samaddar, S., & Kadiyala, S. S. (2006). An analysis of interorganizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation. European Journal of Operational Research, 170(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.06.024.CrossRef

Samieh, H. M., & Wahba, K. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior from game theory and socio-psychology perspectives. In 40th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, 3-6 Jan. 2007 (pp. 187c–187c). Big Island: University of Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2007.319.CrossRef

Santoro, M. D., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2000). The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry–university collaborative ventures. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(3), 299–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00027-8.CrossRef

Santoro, M. D., & Saparito, P. A. (2003). The firm’s trust in its university partner as a key mediator in advancing knowledge and new technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.817287.CrossRef

Savolainen, R. (2009). Small world and information grounds as contexts of information seeking and sharing. Library & Information Science Research, 31(1), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2008.10.007.CrossRef

Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1993). The big five in personnel selection: Factor structure in applicant and nonapplicant populations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(6), 966–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.6.966.CrossRef

Seibert, S. E., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). The five-factor model of personality and career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2000.1757.CrossRef

Seiford, L. M., & Thrall, R. M. (1990). Recent developments in DEA. Journal of Econometrics, 46(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90045-U.CrossRef

Selten, R. (1983). Evolutionary stability in extensive two-person games. Mathematical Social Sciences, 5(3), 269–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(83)90012-4.CrossRef

Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007.CrossRef

Shi, Y., & Guan, J. (2016). Small-world network effects on innovation: Evidences from nanotechnology patenting. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 18(11), 329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-016-3637-1.CrossRef

Shih, M.-H., Tsai, H.-T., Wu, C.-C., & Lu, C.-H. (2006). A holistic knowledge sharing framework in high-tech firms: Game and co-opetition perspectives. International Journal of Technology Management, 36(4), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtm.2006.010272.CrossRef

Shim, J. (2010). The relationship between workplace incivility and the intention to share knowledge: The moderating effects of collaborative climate and personality traits. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.

Sikhar, B., Gaurav, A., Zhang, W. J., Biswajit, M., & Tiwari, M. K. (2012). A decision framework for the analysis of green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2965–2976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.158.CrossRef

Silva, M., & Teruel, E. (1997). Petri nets for the design and operation of manufacturing systems. European Journal of Control, 3(3), 182–199.CrossRef

Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852.CrossRef

Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20(7), 595–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<595::AID-SMJ47>3.0.CO;2-5.CrossRef

Smith, J. M., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246(5427), 15–18.CrossRef

Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., & Fleming, L. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), 994–1017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.002.CrossRef

Srivastava, A., Bartol, K. M., & Locke, E. A. (2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478718.CrossRef

Strogatz, S. H. (2001). Exploring complex networks. Nature, 410(6825), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/35065725.CrossRef

Suzuki, J., Tsukada, N., & Goto, A. (2015). Role of Public Research Institutes in Japan’s National Innovation System: Case study of AIST, RIKEN and JAXA. Science, Technology and Society, 20(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721815579793.CrossRef

Swink, M. (2006). Building collaborative innovation capability. Research-Technology Management, 49(2), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2006.11657367.CrossRef

Tang, C., & Naumann, S. E. (2015). Team diversity, mood, and team creativity: The role of team knowledge sharing in Chinese R&D teams. Journal of Management & Organization, 22(3), 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2015.43.CrossRef

Taylor, P. D., & Jonker, L. B. (1978). Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences, 40(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9.CrossRef

Teh, P.-L., Yong, C.-C., Chong, C.-W., & Yew, S.-Y. (2011). Do the big five personality factors affect knowledge sharing behaviour? A study of Malaysian universities. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16(1), 47–62.

Teigland, R., & Wasko, M. (2009). Knowledge transfer in MNCs: Examining how intrinsic motivations and knowledge sourcing impact individual centrality and performance. Journal of International Management, 15(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2008.02.001.CrossRef

Tett, R. P., & Burnett, D. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517.CrossRef

Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.CrossRef

Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2009). Network DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(1), 243–252.CrossRef

Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1992). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60(2), 225–251.CrossRef

Uzzi, B., Amaral, L. A. N., & Reed-Tsochas, F. (2007). Small-world networks and management science research: A review. European Management Review, 4(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.emr.1500078.CrossRef

van der Aalst, W. M. (1998). The application of petri nets to workflow management. Journal of circuits, systems, and computers, 8(01), 21–66.CrossRef

Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303039001001.CrossRef

Vincent, T. L. (1985). Evolutionary games. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 46(4), 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00939163.CrossRef

von Krogh, G., Nonaka, I., & Rechsteiner, L. (2012). Leadership in organizational knowledge creation: A review and framework. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 240–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00978.x.CrossRef

Wang, Z. (2012). Knowledge integration in collaborative innovation and a self-organizing model. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 11(02), 427–440. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219622012400093.CrossRef

Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2005). The knowledge value chain: A pragmatic knowledge implementation network. Handbook of Business Strategy, 6(1), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/08944310510558115.CrossRef

Wang, C.-C., & Yang, Y.-J. (2007). Personality and intention to share knowledge: An empirical study of scientists in an R&D laboratory. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(10), 1427–1436. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.10.1427.CrossRef

Watts, D. J. (2004). The “new” science of networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 30(1), 243–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342.CrossRef

Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.CrossRef

Wei, J., Liu, L., & Francesco, C. A. (2010). A cognitive model of intra-organizational knowledge-sharing motivations in the view of cross-culture. International Journal of Information Management, 30(3), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.08.007.CrossRef

Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

Wolf, D. E. (1999). Cellular automata for traffic simulations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 263(1), 438–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00536-6.CrossRef

Wolfram, S. (1984). Universality and complexity in cellular automata. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 10(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(84)90245-8.CrossRef

Xu, Y., & Bernard, A. (2010). Knowledge value chain: An effective tool to measure knowledge value. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 23(11), 957–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/0951192x.2010.500677.CrossRef

Yao, W., Chen, J., & Si, Y. (2011). Research on the knowledge creation process of the university-industry collaboration: A case from China. African Journal of Business Management, 5(32), 12586–12597.

Yao, W., Han, X., & Li, Y. (2015). Cross-organizational knowledge creation theory from the perspective of I-Ching: Case study in Chinese aerospace industry. Chinese Management Studies, 9(4), 528–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-07-2015-0162.CrossRef

Yu, Y., Hao, J.-X., Dong, X.-Y., & Khalifa, M. (2013). A multilevel model for effects of social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive work teams. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 780–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.005.CrossRef

Zhao, R., Zhou, X., Han, J., & Liu, C. (2016). For the sustainable performance of the carbon reduction labeling policies under an evolutionary game simulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.008.CrossRef

Zhu, J. (2009). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: Data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. New York: Springer US.CrossRef

Zhu, Y.-Q. (2016). Solving knowledge sharing disparity: The role of team identification, organizational identification, and in-group bias. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6), 1174–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.08.003.CrossRef

Zhuge, H. (2002a). A knowledge flow model for peer-to-peer team knowledge sharing and management. Expert Systems with Applications, 23(1), 23–30. Pii s0957-4174(02)00024-62391016/s0957-4174(02)00024-6.CrossRef

Zhuge, H. (2002b). A knowledge grid model and platform for global knowledge sharing. Expert Systems with Applications, 22(4), 313–320.CrossRef

Zhuge, H. (2004). The knowledge grid (Vol. 2012). Hackensack: World Scientific.CrossRef

Zohar, D. (1995). The justice perspective of job stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16(5), 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030160508.CrossRef

Title: Introduction
Authors: Yu Yu
Yao Chen
Qinfen Shi
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Book: Strategy and Performance of Knowledge Flow
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77925-6

Electronic ISBN: 978-3-319-77926-3

Copyright Year: 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77926-3_1