Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Social Indicators Research 1/2022

22-02-2022 | Original Research

Invisible or Mainstream? Disability in Surveys and Censuses in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Authors: Sophie Mitra, Wei Chen, Justine Hervé, Sophia Pirozzi, Jaclyn Yap

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 1/2022

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

This paper examines to what extent household surveys and censuses in low- and middle-income countries include disability questions and the types of questions under use. We found that only 31% of 734 datasets between 2009 and 2018 from 133 low- and middle-income countries have at least one disability-related question. Of the surveys reviewed, 15% of the datasets have functional difficulty questions that meet international standards, i.e. Washington Group short set or other functional difficulty questions. Meanwhile, the most asked disability question “Do you have a disability?” is problematic as it does not produce meaningful and internationally comparable data. We recommend the adoption of functional difficulty questions for all surveys and censuses to track the progress of the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development as well as the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
This study is part of a larger study which identifies with the particular aim to identify surveys and censuses that was used to produce SDG or CRPD-related socio-economic and wellbeing indicators and compare outcomes persons with and without disability across a set of low- and middle-income countries.
 
2
The data collection options above could be blended. There could be a short questionnaire (e.g. WGSS or the WGSS-enhanced) as part of a core questionnaire and then special modules added from time to time to capture for instance environmental barriers and other determinants of inequalities. For instance, this is the approach used by International Labor Organization (ILO) (WG-ILO, 2020) in its recommendations for Labor Force Surveys.
 
4
We did not cover the UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys.
 
5
Disability focused surveys (e.g. Philippines Model functioning Survey) were not covered in this table for other disability questions, but were covered in Tables 1 and 2 and Appendices 1, 2 and 3. Disability focused surveys typically have several types of other disability questions beyond functional ADL, general and broad activity limitation questions.
 
Literature
go back to reference Adans, J., Cappa, C., Crialesi, R., De Palma, E., Loeb, M., & Mont, D. (2018). The development and testing of a module on child functioning for identifying children with disabilities on surveys, I: Background. Disability and Health Journal, 11, 495–501.CrossRef Adans, J., Cappa, C., Crialesi, R., De Palma, E., Loeb, M., & Mont, D. (2018). The development and testing of a module on child functioning for identifying children with disabilities on surveys, I: Background. Disability and Health Journal, 11, 495–501.CrossRef
go back to reference Altman, B. M. (Ed.). (2016). International measurement of disability: Purpose, method and application, the work of the Washington Group. Social indicators research series 61. Springer International Publishing. Altman, B. M. (Ed.). (2016). International measurement of disability: Purpose, method and application, the work of the Washington Group. Social indicators research series 61. Springer International Publishing.
go back to reference Casebolt, M. T. (2020). Availability and quality of global disability data: A commentary on the Demographic and Health Surveys, Disability and Health Journal. Casebolt, M. T. (2020). Availability and quality of global disability data: A commentary on the Demographic and Health Surveys, Disability and Health Journal.
go back to reference Cieza, A., Sabariego, C., Bickenbach, J., & Chatterji, S. (2018). Rethinking disability. BMC Medicine, 16(1), 14.CrossRef Cieza, A., Sabariego, C., Bickenbach, J., & Chatterji, S. (2018). Rethinking disability. BMC Medicine, 16(1), 14.CrossRef
go back to reference Davis, L. (2016). Disability studies reader. Routledge, 5th edition. Davis, L. (2016). Disability studies reader. Routledge, 5th edition.
go back to reference Deaton, A. (2018). The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy. Reissue Edition with a New Preface. Washington, DC: World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO Deaton, A. (2018). The analysis of household surveys: A microeconometric approach to development policy. Reissue Edition with a New Preface. Washington, DC: World Bank. License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 IGO
go back to reference Goodley, D. (2016). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction, 2nd edition. Sage. Goodley, D. (2016). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction, 2nd edition. Sage.
go back to reference Groce, N. (2019). Comparing the Washington group questions and the model disability survey: A review of methodological approaches to disability data collection. Disability and International Development, 30(2), 16–22. Groce, N. (2019). Comparing the Washington group questions and the model disability survey: A review of methodological approaches to disability data collection. Disability and International Development, 30(2), 16–22.
go back to reference Groce, N., & Mont. D. (2017) Counting disability: Emerging consensus on the Washington Group Questionnaires. Lancet Global Health 5(7), pe649–pe650 Groce, N., & Mont. D. (2017) Counting disability: Emerging consensus on the Washington Group Questionnaires. Lancet Global Health 5(7), pe649–pe650
go back to reference Mactaggart, I., Banks, L.M., Kuper, H., Murthy, G.V.S., Sagar, J., Oye, J., & Polack, S. (2018). Livelihood opportunities amongst adults with and without disabilities in Cameroon and India: A case control study. PLoS ONE. Mactaggart, I., Banks, L.M., Kuper, H., Murthy, G.V.S., Sagar, J., Oye, J., & Polack, S. (2018). Livelihood opportunities amongst adults with and without disabilities in Cameroon and India: A case control study. PLoS ONE.
go back to reference Miller, K. (2016). Summary of Washington Group question evaluation studies. pp. 69–84. In Altman, B. M. (Ed.). International measurement of disability: Purpose, method and application, the work of the Washington group. Social indicators research series 61. Springer Miller, K. (2016). Summary of Washington Group question evaluation studies. pp. 69–84. In Altman, B. M. (Ed.). International measurement of disability: Purpose, method and application, the work of the Washington group. Social indicators research series 61. Springer
go back to reference Mitra, S. (2018). Disability, health and human development. Palgrave Macmillan US. Mitra, S. (2018). Disability, health and human development. Palgrave Macmillan US.
go back to reference Mitra, S., & Sambamoorthi, U. (2014). Disability prevalence among adults: Estimates for 54 countries and progress toward a global estimate. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36, 940–947.CrossRef Mitra, S., & Sambamoorthi, U. (2014). Disability prevalence among adults: Estimates for 54 countries and progress toward a global estimate. Disability and Rehabilitation, 36, 940–947.CrossRef
go back to reference Mont, D. (2007). Measuring health and disability. The Lancet, 369(9573), 1658–1663.CrossRef Mont, D. (2007). Measuring health and disability. The Lancet, 369(9573), 1658–1663.CrossRef
go back to reference Murray, C. J. L., & Chen, L. C. (1992). Understanding morbidity change. Population and Development Review, 18(3), 481–503.CrossRef Murray, C. J. L., & Chen, L. C. (1992). Understanding morbidity change. Population and Development Review, 18(3), 481–503.CrossRef
go back to reference Palmer, M., & Harley, D. (2012). Models and measurement in disability: An international review. Health Policy and Planning, 27(5), 357–364.CrossRef Palmer, M., & Harley, D. (2012). Models and measurement in disability: An international review. Health Policy and Planning, 27(5), 357–364.CrossRef
go back to reference Schneider, M. (2016). Cross-national issues in disability data collection. In Altman, B. M. (Ed.). International measurement of disability: Purpose, method and application, the work of the Washington group, pp 15–28. Social indicators research series (Vol. 61). Springer Schneider, M. (2016). Cross-national issues in disability data collection. In Altman, B. M. (Ed.). International measurement of disability: Purpose, method and application, the work of the Washington group, pp 15–28. Social indicators research series (Vol. 61). Springer
go back to reference Stewart, A., & Ware, J. (Eds.). (1992). Measuring functioning and well-being. The Rand Corporation. Stewart, A., & Ware, J. (Eds.). (1992). Measuring functioning and well-being. The Rand Corporation.
go back to reference Trani, J.-F., Babulal, G. M., & Bakhshi, P. (2015). Development and validation of the 34-item disability screening questionnaire (DSQ-34) for use in low and middle income countries epidemiological and development surveys. PLoS ONE, 10, 12.CrossRef Trani, J.-F., Babulal, G. M., & Bakhshi, P. (2015). Development and validation of the 34-item disability screening questionnaire (DSQ-34) for use in low and middle income countries epidemiological and development surveys. PLoS ONE, 10, 12.CrossRef
go back to reference Trani, J., Bakhshi, P., Myer Tlapek, S., Lopez, D., & Gall, F. (2015). Disability and poverty in Morocco and Tunisia: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 16(4), 518–548.CrossRef Trani, J., Bakhshi, P., Myer Tlapek, S., Lopez, D., & Gall, F. (2015). Disability and poverty in Morocco and Tunisia: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 16(4), 518–548.CrossRef
go back to reference United Nations. (1990). Disability statistics compendium. Department of international economic and social affairs, statistical office. Statistics on special population groups. Series Y, no. 4. United Nations. (1990). Disability statistics compendium. Department of international economic and social affairs, statistical office. Statistics on special population groups. Series Y, no. 4.
Metadata
Title
Invisible or Mainstream? Disability in Surveys and Censuses in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
Authors
Sophie Mitra
Wei Chen
Justine Hervé
Sophia Pirozzi
Jaclyn Yap
Publication date
22-02-2022
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Social Indicators Research / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02879-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Social Indicators Research 1/2022 Go to the issue

Premium Partner