Skip to main content
Top

2014 | OriginalPaper | Chapter

11. Kooperative Geschäftsmodellentwicklung für systemische Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen: Eine Fallstudie im deutschen Smart Energy-Markt

Authors : Sebastian Knab, Prof. Dr. René Rohrbeck, Lars Konnertz

Published in: Kompendium Geschäftsmodell-Innovation

Publisher: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Zusammenfassung

Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen zeichnen sich häufig durch einen systemischen Charakter aus, so dass deren Entwicklung ein koordiniertes Vorgehen mehrerer Akteure erfordert. Um gemeinsam Chancen für systemische Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen zu erkennen, sie zu planen und umzusetzen, werden neue kooperative Methoden und Ansätze benötigt.
Insbesondere für die Entwicklung der Energiewirtschaft hin zu einer nachhaltigen Energieversorgung sind systemische Innovationen von großer Bedeutung. Die Integration eines schnell wachsenden Anteils erneuerbarer Energien und dezentraler Erzeugungsanlagen stellt Energieversorgungsunternehmen (EVU) vor Herausforderungen, die sie nicht alleine lösen können. Moderne Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IKT) werden zur effizienten Steuerung verteilter Erzeugungsanlagen und Verbraucher und zur Koordinierung zahlreicher Marktakteure benötigt. Die Entwicklung intelligenter Energiesysteme („Smart Energy“) eröffnet aber auch Chancen für die Erweiterung der Geschäftstätigkeit von EVU. Hierzu werden neue Geschäftsmodelle benötigt.
In diesem Beitrag stellen wir unseren Ansatz der kooperativen Geschäftsmodellentwicklung (KGE) vor. Wir wenden die KGE in einer Fallstudie an, bei der acht Unternehmen kooperiert haben, um neue Geschäftsmodelle für die Energiewirtschaft zu entwickeln. Nach der Darstellung unseres Ansatzes diskutieren wir seine Stärken und Limitationen und vergleichen ihn mit zwei alternativen Methoden der Strategie- und Innovationsplanung, der Szenariotechnik und dem Roadmapping.
Es zeigt sich, dass die KGE gut geeignet ist um 1. potentiellen wirtschaftlichen und gesellschaftlichen Nutzen zu identifizieren, 2. kooperative Wertschöpfungsarchitekturen zu entwickeln, 3. in komplexen und unsicheren Märkten zu planen und 4. die Umsetzung neuer Geschäftsmodelle vorzubereiten.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Footnotes
1
Dieser Abschnitt ist ein aktualisierter Auszug aus dem Artikel Knab und Konnertz (2011).
 
Literature
go back to reference Afuah AN, Bahram N (1995) The hypercube of innovation. Research Policy 24:51–76CrossRef Afuah AN, Bahram N (1995) The hypercube of innovation. Research Policy 24:51–76CrossRef
go back to reference Amit R, Zott C (2012) Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 53(3):41–49 Amit R, Zott C (2012) Creating value through business model innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 53(3):41–49
go back to reference Ayuso S, Rodriguez MA, Garcia-Castro R, Arino MA (2011) Does stakeholder engagement promote sustainable innovation orientation? Ind Manag Data Syst 111(9):1399–1417CrossRef Ayuso S, Rodriguez MA, Garcia-Castro R, Arino MA (2011) Does stakeholder engagement promote sustainable innovation orientation? Ind Manag Data Syst 111(9):1399–1417CrossRef
go back to reference Baden-Fuller C, Morgan MS (2010) Business models as models. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):156–171CrossRef Baden-Fuller C, Morgan MS (2010) Business models as models. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):156–171CrossRef
go back to reference B.A.U.M. Consult GmbH (2012) Smart Energy made in Germany: Zwischenergebnisse der E-Energy-Modellprojekte auf dem Weg zum Internet der Energie. B.A.U.M. Consult GmbH, München/Berlin B.A.U.M. Consult GmbH (2012) Smart Energy made in Germany: Zwischenergebnisse der E-Energy-Modellprojekte auf dem Weg zum Internet der Energie. B.A.U.M. Consult GmbH, München/Berlin
go back to reference Berg P, Pihlajamaa J, Poskela J, Smedlund A (2006) Benchmarking of quality and maturity of innovation activities in a networked environment. Int J Technol Manag 33(2–3):255–278CrossRef Berg P, Pihlajamaa J, Poskela J, Smedlund A (2006) Benchmarking of quality and maturity of innovation activities in a networked environment. Int J Technol Manag 33(2–3):255–278CrossRef
go back to reference Boons F, Lüdeke-Freund F (2013) Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod 45:9–19CrossRef Boons F, Lüdeke-Freund F (2013) Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. J Clean Prod 45:9–19CrossRef
go back to reference Boons F, Roome N (2005) Sustainable enterprise in clusters of innovation: new directions in corporate sustainability research and practice. In: Sharma S, Aragon-Correa AJ (Hrsg) Corporate environmental strategy and competitive advantage. Edward Elgar Academic Publishing, Cheltenham Boons F, Roome N (2005) Sustainable enterprise in clusters of innovation: new directions in corporate sustainability research and practice. In: Sharma S, Aragon-Correa AJ (Hrsg) Corporate environmental strategy and competitive advantage. Edward Elgar Academic Publishing, Cheltenham
go back to reference Boons F, Montalvo C, Quist J, Wagner M (2013) Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. J Clean Prod 45:1–8CrossRef Boons F, Montalvo C, Quist J, Wagner M (2013) Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. J Clean Prod 45:1–8CrossRef
go back to reference Bouffard F, Kirschen DS (2008) Centralised and distributed electricity systems. Energy Policy 36(12):4504–4508CrossRef Bouffard F, Kirschen DS (2008) Centralised and distributed electricity systems. Energy Policy 36(12):4504–4508CrossRef
go back to reference Cairns G, Wright G, Van der Heijden K, Bradfield R, Burt G (2006) Enhancing foresight between multiple agencies: issues in the use of scenario thinking to overcome fragmentation. Futures 38(8):1010–1025CrossRef Cairns G, Wright G, Van der Heijden K, Bradfield R, Burt G (2006) Enhancing foresight between multiple agencies: issues in the use of scenario thinking to overcome fragmentation. Futures 38(8):1010–1025CrossRef
go back to reference Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):195–215CrossRef Casadesus-Masanell R, Ricart JE (2010) From strategy to business models and onto tactics. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):195–215CrossRef
go back to reference Chermack TJ, van der Merwe L, Lynham SA (2007) Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of strategic conversation quality. Technol Forecast Soc 74(3):379–390CrossRef Chermack TJ, van der Merwe L, Lynham SA (2007) Exploring the relationship between scenario planning and perceptions of strategic conversation quality. Technol Forecast Soc 74(3):379–390CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough HW (2003) The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 44(3):35–41 Chesbrough HW (2003) The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 44(3):35–41
go back to reference Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):354–363CrossRef Chesbrough H (2010) Business model innovation: opportunities and barriers. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):354–363CrossRef
go back to reference Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom RS (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Ind Corp Change 11(3):529–555CrossRef Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom RS (2002) The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Ind Corp Change 11(3):529–555CrossRef
go back to reference Chiou CH (2011) Dynamic capabilities, collaborative network and business model: an empirical analysis of Taiwan HTC Corporation. Afr J Bus Manag 5(2):294–305 Chiou CH (2011) Dynamic capabilities, collaborative network and business model: an empirical analysis of Taiwan HTC Corporation. Afr J Bus Manag 5(2):294–305
go back to reference Dahan NM, Doh JP, Oetzel J, Yaziji M (2010) Corporate-NGO collaboration: co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):326–342CrossRef Dahan NM, Doh JP, Oetzel J, Yaziji M (2010) Corporate-NGO collaboration: co-creating new business models for developing markets. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):326–342CrossRef
go back to reference De Boer Y, van Bergen B (2012) Expect the unexpected: building business value in a changing world. KPMG International, Zug De Boer Y, van Bergen B (2012) Expect the unexpected: building business value in a changing world. KPMG International, Zug
go back to reference De Laat PB (1999) Systemic innovation and the virtues of going virtual: the case of the digital video disc. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 11(2):159–180CrossRef De Laat PB (1999) Systemic innovation and the virtues of going virtual: the case of the digital video disc. Technol Anal Strateg Manag 11(2):159–180CrossRef
go back to reference Deloitte (2012) Smart Grid vs. Smart Market. Wie funktioniert die deutsche Energiewende. Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Berlin Deloitte (2012) Smart Grid vs. Smart Market. Wie funktioniert die deutsche Energiewende. Deloitte & Touche GmbH Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Berlin
go back to reference Demil B, Lecocq X (2010) Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):227–246CrossRef Demil B, Lecocq X (2010) Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):227–246CrossRef
go back to reference Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2006) The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R & D Manag 36(3):333–346CrossRef Dodgson M, Gann D, Salter A (2006) The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: the case of Procter & Gamble. R & D Manag 36(3):333–346CrossRef
go back to reference Dormann, J, Holliday, C (2002) Innovation, technology, sustainability, and society. World Business Council for Sustainability (WBCSD). Hertfordshire, Stevenage Dormann, J, Holliday, C (2002) Innovation, technology, sustainability, and society. World Business Council for Sustainability (WBCSD). Hertfordshire, Stevenage
go back to reference Doz YL, Kosonen M (2010) Embedding strategic agility: a leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):370–382CrossRef Doz YL, Kosonen M (2010) Embedding strategic agility: a leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):370–382CrossRef
go back to reference Dubosson-Torbay M, Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2002) E-business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 44(1):5–23CrossRef Dubosson-Torbay M, Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2002) E-business model design, classification, and measurements. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 44(1):5–23CrossRef
go back to reference European Commission (2011) A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. European Commission, Brussels European Commission (2011) A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. European Commission, Brussels
go back to reference Franz et al (2006) Potenziale der Informations- und Kommunikations-Technologien zur Optimierung der Energieversorgung und des Energieverbrauchs (eEnergy). Bericht von wik-Consult, Fraunhofer ISI und Fraunhofer ISE, Bad Honnef Franz et al (2006) Potenziale der Informations- und Kommunikations-Technologien zur Optimierung der Energieversorgung und des Energieverbrauchs (eEnergy). Bericht von wik-Consult, Fraunhofer ISI und Fraunhofer ISE, Bad Honnef
go back to reference Garces-Ayerbe C, Rivera-Torres P, Murillo-Luna JL (2012) Stakeholder pressure and environmental proactivity Moderating effect of competitive advantage expectations. Manage Decis 50(1–2):189–206CrossRef Garces-Ayerbe C, Rivera-Torres P, Murillo-Luna JL (2012) Stakeholder pressure and environmental proactivity Moderating effect of competitive advantage expectations. Manage Decis 50(1–2):189–206CrossRef
go back to reference Govindarajan V, Trimble C (2011) The CEO’s role in business model reinvention. Harvard Bus Rev 89(1–2):108–114 Govindarajan V, Trimble C (2011) The CEO’s role in business model reinvention. Harvard Bus Rev 89(1–2):108–114
go back to reference Groenveld P (2007) Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Res Technol Manag 50(6):49–58 Groenveld P (2007) Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Res Technol Manag 50(6):49–58
go back to reference Hacklin F, Wallnöfer M (2012) The business model in practice of strategic decision making: insights from a case study. Manage Decis 50(2):166–188CrossRef Hacklin F, Wallnöfer M (2012) The business model in practice of strategic decision making: insights from a case study. Manage Decis 50(2):166–188CrossRef
go back to reference Hall KJ, Vredenburg H (2003) The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 45(1):61–68 Hall KJ, Vredenburg H (2003) The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 45(1):61–68
go back to reference Hanninen S (2007) The perfect technology syndrome: sources, consequences and solutions. Int J Technol Manag 39(1):20–32CrossRef Hanninen S (2007) The perfect technology syndrome: sources, consequences and solutions. Int J Technol Manag 39(1):20–32CrossRef
go back to reference Hansen EG, Grosse-Dunker F, Reichwald F (2009) Sustainability innovation cube: a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. Int J Innov Manag 13(4):683–713CrossRef Hansen EG, Grosse-Dunker F, Reichwald F (2009) Sustainability innovation cube: a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. Int J Innov Manag 13(4):683–713CrossRef
go back to reference Hansen EG, Große-Dunker F (2013) Sustainability-oriented innovation. In: Idowu SO, Capaldi N, Das Gupta A, Zu L (Hrsg) Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility. Springer, Heidelberg, S 2407–2417 Hansen EG, Große-Dunker F (2013) Sustainability-oriented innovation. In: Idowu SO, Capaldi N, Das Gupta A, Zu L (Hrsg) Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility. Springer, Heidelberg, S 2407–2417
go back to reference Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):986–1014 Hart SL (1995) A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Acad Manag Rev 20(4):986–1014
go back to reference Hart SL, Dowell, G (2011) A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. J Manag 37(5):1464–1479 Hart SL, Dowell, G (2011) A natural-resource-based view of the firm: fifteen years after. J Manag 37(5):1464–1479
go back to reference Hart SL, Milstein MB (2003) Creating sustainable value. Acad Manag Exec 17(2):56–67CrossRef Hart SL, Milstein MB (2003) Creating sustainable value. Acad Manag Exec 17(2):56–67CrossRef
go back to reference Heger T, Rohrbeck R (2012) Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(5):819–831CrossRef Heger T, Rohrbeck R (2012) Strategic foresight for collaborative exploration of new business fields. Technol Forecast Soc Change 79(5):819–831CrossRef
go back to reference Hellström T (2007) Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco-innovation concepts. Sustain Dev 15(3):148–159CrossRef Hellström T (2007) Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco-innovation concepts. Sustain Dev 15(3):148–159CrossRef
go back to reference Hines F, Marin O (2004) Building innovations for sustainability: 11th international conference of the greening of industry network. Bus Strat Environ 13(4): 201–208 Hines F, Marin O (2004) Building innovations for sustainability: 11th international conference of the greening of industry network. Bus Strat Environ 13(4): 201–208
go back to reference Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG (2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci 12(4):435–449CrossRef Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG (2001) Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci 12(4):435–449CrossRef
go back to reference Holmes S, Smart P (2009) Exploring open innovation practice in firm-nonprofit engagements: a corporate social responsibility perspective. R & D Manag 39(4):394–409CrossRef Holmes S, Smart P (2009) Exploring open innovation practice in firm-nonprofit engagements: a corporate social responsibility perspective. R & D Manag 39(4):394–409CrossRef
go back to reference Itami H, Nishino K (2010) Killing two birds with one stone: profit for now and learning for the future. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):364–369CrossRef Itami H, Nishino K (2010) Killing two birds with one stone: profit for now and learning for the future. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):364–369CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson MW, Suskewicz J (2009) How to jump-start the clean tech economy. Harvard Bus Rev 87(11):52–60 Johnson MW, Suskewicz J (2009) How to jump-start the clean tech economy. Harvard Bus Rev 87(11):52–60
go back to reference Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008) Reinventing your business model. Harvard Bus Rev 2008:50–59 Johnson MW, Christensen CM, Kagermann H (2008) Reinventing your business model. Harvard Bus Rev 2008:50–59
go back to reference Kanter RM (2011) How great companies think differently. Harvard Bus Rev 89(11):66–78 Kanter RM (2011) How great companies think differently. Harvard Bus Rev 89(11):66–78
go back to reference Knab S, Konnertz L (2011) Smart Energy – Branchenübergreifende Exploration eines entstehenden Marktes. et – Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 61(5):8–12 Knab S, Konnertz L (2011) Smart Energy – Branchenübergreifende Exploration eines entstehenden Marktes. et – Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen 61(5):8–12
go back to reference Knab S, Strunz K, Lehmann H (2010) Smart grid: the central nervous system for power supply. New paradigms, new challenges, new services. In TU Berlin (Hrsg) Schriftenreihe Innovationszentrum Energie Nr 2. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, Berlin Knab S, Strunz K, Lehmann H (2010) Smart grid: the central nervous system for power supply. New paradigms, new challenges, new services. In TU Berlin (Hrsg) Schriftenreihe Innovationszentrum Energie Nr 2. Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin, Berlin
go back to reference Koen PA, Bertels HMJ, Elsum IR (2011) The three faces of business model innovation: Challenges for established firms. Res Technol Manag 54(3):52–59CrossRef Koen PA, Bertels HMJ, Elsum IR (2011) The three faces of business model innovation: Challenges for established firms. Res Technol Manag 54(3):52–59CrossRef
go back to reference Laszlo A, Laszlo KC, Dunsk H (2010) Redefining success: designing systemic sustainable strategies. Syst Res Behav Sci 27(1):3–21 Laszlo A, Laszlo KC, Dunsk H (2010) Redefining success: designing systemic sustainable strategies. Syst Res Behav Sci 27(1):3–21
go back to reference Lei DT (2000) Industry evolution and competence development: the imperatives of technological convergence. Int J Technol Manag 19(7–8):699–738CrossRef Lei DT (2000) Industry evolution and competence development: the imperatives of technological convergence. Int J Technol Manag 19(7–8):699–738CrossRef
go back to reference Lichtenthaler E (2005) The choice of technology intelligence methods in multinationals: towards a contingency approach. Int J Technol Manag 32(3–4):388–407CrossRef Lichtenthaler E (2005) The choice of technology intelligence methods in multinationals: towards a contingency approach. Int J Technol Manag 32(3–4):388–407CrossRef
go back to reference Lorenz M-L, Menkens C, Konrad N (2009) E-Energy. Trend Report 2009/2010. Center for Digital Technology and Management, München Lorenz M-L, Menkens C, Konrad N (2009) E-Energy. Trend Report 2009/2010. Center for Digital Technology and Management, München
go back to reference McDowall W, Eames M (2006) Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: a review of the hydrogen futures literature. Energ Policy 34(11):1236–1250CrossRef McDowall W, Eames M (2006) Forecasts, scenarios, visions, backcasts and roadmaps to the hydrogen economy: a review of the hydrogen futures literature. Energ Policy 34(11):1236–1250CrossRef
go back to reference McGrath RG (2010) Business models: a discovery driven approach. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):247–261CrossRef McGrath RG (2010) Business models: a discovery driven approach. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):247–261CrossRef
go back to reference Miles RE, Miles G, Snow CC (2006) Collaborative entrepreneurship: a business model for continuous innovation. Organ Dyn 35(1):1–11CrossRef Miles RE, Miles G, Snow CC (2006) Collaborative entrepreneurship: a business model for continuous innovation. Organ Dyn 35(1):1–11CrossRef
go back to reference MIT Sloan Management Review, The Boston Consulting Group (2012) Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. Winter 53(2):69–74 MIT Sloan Management Review, The Boston Consulting Group (2012) Sustainability nears a tipping point. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. Winter 53(2):69–74
go back to reference Osterwalder A (2004) The business model ontology – a proposition in a design science approach. Dissertation, HEC Lausanne Osterwalder A (2004) The business model ontology – a proposition in a design science approach. Dissertation, HEC Lausanne
go back to reference Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, Hoboken Osterwalder A, Pigneur Y (2010) Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. Wiley, Hoboken
go back to reference Paucar-Caceres A, Espinosa A (2011) Management science methodologies in environmental management and sustainability: discourses and applications. J Oper Res Soc 62(9):1601–1620CrossRef Paucar-Caceres A, Espinosa A (2011) Management science methodologies in environmental management and sustainability: discourses and applications. J Oper Res Soc 62(9):1601–1620CrossRef
go back to reference Petrick IJ, Echols AE (2004) Technology roadmapping in review: a tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71(1–2):81–100CrossRef Petrick IJ, Echols AE (2004) Technology roadmapping in review: a tool for making sustainable new product development decisions. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71(1–2):81–100CrossRef
go back to reference Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2004a) Collaborative technology roadmapping: network development and research prioritisation. Int J Technol Intell Plann 1(1):39–54 Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2004a) Collaborative technology roadmapping: network development and research prioritisation. Int J Technol Intell Plann 1(1):39–54
go back to reference Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2004b) A framework for supporting the management of technological knowledge. Int J Technol Manag 27(1):1–15CrossRef Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2004b) A framework for supporting the management of technological knowledge. Int J Technol Manag 27(1):1–15CrossRef
go back to reference Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2004c) Technology roadmapping – a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71(1–2):5–26CrossRef Phaal R, Farrukh CJP, Probert DR (2004c) Technology roadmapping – a planning framework for evolution and revolution. Technol Forecast Soc Change 71(1–2):5–26CrossRef
go back to reference Pinkse J, Kolk A (2010) Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Bus Strat Environ 19(4):261–272 Pinkse J, Kolk A (2010) Challenges and trade-offs in corporate innovation for climate change. Bus Strat Environ 19(4):261–272
go back to reference Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) The big idea: creating shared value. Harvard Bus Rev 89(1–2):62–77 Porter ME, Kramer MR (2011) The big idea: creating shared value. Harvard Bus Rev 89(1–2):62–77
go back to reference Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) (2008) Smart Metering: Umsetzungsstand und strategische Implikationen für die Energiewirtschaft. PricewaterhouseCoopers, Düsseldorf. Price Waterhouse Coopers (PWC) (2008) Smart Metering: Umsetzungsstand und strategische Implikationen für die Energiewirtschaft. PricewaterhouseCoopers, Düsseldorf.
go back to reference Probert D, Farrukh C, Gregory M, Robinson N (1999) Linking technology to business planning: theory and practice. Int J Technol Manag 18(1–2):11–30CrossRef Probert D, Farrukh C, Gregory M, Robinson N (1999) Linking technology to business planning: theory and practice. Int J Technol Manag 18(1–2):11–30CrossRef
go back to reference Rice MP, Leifer R, O’Connor GC (2002) Commercializing discontinuous innovations: bridging the gap from discontinuous innovation project to operations. IEEE T Eng Manag 49(4): 330–340CrossRef Rice MP, Leifer R, O’Connor GC (2002) Commercializing discontinuous innovations: bridging the gap from discontinuous innovation project to operations. IEEE T Eng Manag 49(4): 330–340CrossRef
go back to reference Richardson J (2008) The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strat Change 17(5–6):133–144CrossRef Richardson J (2008) The business model: an integrative framework for strategy execution. Strat Change 17(5–6):133–144CrossRef
go back to reference Richter M (2013) Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy. Energ Policy 62:1226–1237.CrossRef Richter M (2013) Business model innovation for sustainable energy: German utilities and renewable energy. Energ Policy 62:1226–1237.CrossRef
go back to reference Ringland G (2010) The role of scenarios in strategic foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(9):1493–1498CrossRef Ringland G (2010) The role of scenarios in strategic foresight. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(9):1493–1498CrossRef
go back to reference Rohrbeck R, Kallehave P (2012) The role of corporate foresight in promoting sustainability, UN Global Compact International Yearbook. United Nations, New York Rohrbeck R, Kallehave P (2012) The role of corporate foresight in promoting sustainability, UN Global Compact International Yearbook. United Nations, New York
go back to reference Rohrbeck R, Döhler M, Arnold H (2009a) Creating growth with externalization of R & D results – the spin-along approach. Global Bus Organ Excellence 28(4):44–51CrossRef Rohrbeck R, Döhler M, Arnold H (2009a) Creating growth with externalization of R & D results – the spin-along approach. Global Bus Organ Excellence 28(4):44–51CrossRef
go back to reference Rohrbeck R, Hölzle K, Gemünden HG (2009b) Opening up for competitive advantage – how Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R & D Manag 39(4):420–430CrossRef Rohrbeck R, Hölzle K, Gemünden HG (2009b) Opening up for competitive advantage – how Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem. R & D Manag 39(4):420–430CrossRef
go back to reference Rohrbeck R, Konnertz L, Knab S (2013) Collaborative business modeling for systemic and sustainability innovations. International Journal of Technology Management 63(1/2):4–23 Rohrbeck R, Konnertz L, Knab S (2013) Collaborative business modeling for systemic and sustainability innovations. International Journal of Technology Management 63(1/2):4–23
go back to reference Ruff F (2006) Corporate foresight: integrating the future business environment into innovation and strategy. Int J Technol Manag 34(3–4):278–295CrossRef Ruff F (2006) Corporate foresight: integrating the future business environment into innovation and strategy. Int J Technol Manag 34(3–4):278–295CrossRef
go back to reference Ruohomaa S, Kutvonen L (2010) Trust and distrust in adaptive inter-enterprise collaboration management. J Theor Appl Elect Com Res 5(2):118–136 Ruohomaa S, Kutvonen L (2010) Trust and distrust in adaptive inter-enterprise collaboration management. J Theor Appl Elect Com Res 5(2):118–136
go back to reference Schaltegger S, Beckmann M, Hansen EG (2013) Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability: mapping the field. Bus Strat Environ 22(4):219–229.CrossRef Schaltegger S, Beckmann M, Hansen EG (2013) Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability: mapping the field. Bus Strat Environ 22(4):219–229.CrossRef
go back to reference Smith WK, Binns A, Tushman ML (2010) Complex business models: managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):448–461CrossRef Smith WK, Binns A, Tushman ML (2010) Complex business models: managing strategic paradoxes simultaneously. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):448–461CrossRef
go back to reference Sosna M, Trevinyo-RodrÌguez RN, Velamuri SR (2010) Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: the naturhouse case. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):383–407CrossRef Sosna M, Trevinyo-RodrÌguez RN, Velamuri SR (2010) Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: the naturhouse case. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):383–407CrossRef
go back to reference Storbacka K, Nenonen S (2011) Scripting markets: from value propositions to market propositions. Ind Mark Manag 40(2):255–266CrossRef Storbacka K, Nenonen S (2011) Scripting markets: from value propositions to market propositions. Ind Mark Manag 40(2):255–266CrossRef
go back to reference Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):172–194CrossRef Teece DJ (2010) Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):172–194CrossRef
go back to reference Thom N, Rohrbeck R, Dunaj M (2010) Innovation instruments for translating future insights into managerial actions. Paper presented at the ISPIM Conference 2010. Bilbao Thom N, Rohrbeck R, Dunaj M (2010) Innovation instruments for translating future insights into managerial actions. Paper presented at the ISPIM Conference 2010. Bilbao
go back to reference Thompson JD, MacMillan IC (2010) Business models: creating new markets and societal wealth. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):291–307CrossRef Thompson JD, MacMillan IC (2010) Business models: creating new markets and societal wealth. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):291–307CrossRef
go back to reference Timmers P (1998) Business models for electronic markets. Electron Mark 8(2):3–8CrossRef Timmers P (1998) Business models for electronic markets. Electron Mark 8(2):3–8CrossRef
go back to reference Ulhøi JP (2008) Supporting the development of environmentally sustainable technologies and products: The role of innovation, informal cooperation and governmental agency. Int J Environ Pollut 32(1):121–133CrossRef Ulhøi JP (2008) Supporting the development of environmentally sustainable technologies and products: The role of innovation, informal cooperation and governmental agency. Int J Environ Pollut 32(1):121–133CrossRef
go back to reference Ulhøi JP, Madsen H (2009) Recapturing the corporate environmental management research agenda. Bus Strat Environ 18(2):79–82CrossRef Ulhøi JP, Madsen H (2009) Recapturing the corporate environmental management research agenda. Bus Strat Environ 18(2):79–82CrossRef
go back to reference United Nations Secretary-General’s high-level panel on global sustainability (2012) Resilient people, resilient planet: a future worth choosing. Overview. United Nations, New York United Nations Secretary-General’s high-level panel on global sustainability (2012) Resilient people, resilient planet: a future worth choosing. Overview. United Nations, New York
go back to reference van Dinther C, Weidlich A, Block C (2006) Energiemärkte der Zukunft. Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe van Dinther C, Weidlich A, Block C (2006) Energiemärkte der Zukunft. Universität Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe
go back to reference Visser MP, Chermack TJ (2009) Perceptions of the relationship between scenario planning and firm performance: a qualitative study. Futures 41(9):581–592CrossRef Visser MP, Chermack TJ (2009) Perceptions of the relationship between scenario planning and firm performance: a qualitative study. Futures 41(9):581–592CrossRef
go back to reference Wells R, Phaal R, Farrukh C, Probert D (2004) Technology roadmapping for a service organization. Res Technol Manag 47(2):46–51 Wells R, Phaal R, Farrukh C, Probert D (2004) Technology roadmapping for a service organization. Res Technol Manag 47(2):46–51
go back to reference Yaziji M (2004) Turning gadflies into allies. Harvard Bus Rev 2004:110–115 Yaziji M (2004) Turning gadflies into allies. Harvard Bus Rev 2004:110–115
go back to reference Yunus M, Moingeon B, Lehmann-Ortega L (2010) Building social business models: lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):308–325CrossRef Yunus M, Moingeon B, Lehmann-Ortega L (2010) Building social business models: lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):308–325CrossRef
go back to reference Zott C, Amit R (2010) Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):216–226 Zott C, Amit R (2010) Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plann 43(2–3):216–226
Metadata
Title
Kooperative Geschäftsmodellentwicklung für systemische Nachhaltigkeitsinnovationen: Eine Fallstudie im deutschen Smart Energy-Markt
Authors
Sebastian Knab
Prof. Dr. René Rohrbeck
Lars Konnertz
Copyright Year
2014
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04459-6_11