Top

Social Indicators Research

Published in:

05-06-2018

Kuznets Curve for the US: A Reconsideration Using Cosummability

Authors: Adnen Ben Nasr, Mehmet Balcilar, Seyi Saint Akadiri, Rangan Gupta

Published in: Social Indicators Research | Issue 2/2019

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config

AI-assisted search

Off

Abstract

The relationship between income inequality and long-run economic growth has gained a growing attention in economic research for over decades. This study employed advanced time series techniques to examine the existence of an inverted U-shaped long-run relationship between income inequality and economic growth, using long-span time series data for the United States between the periods 1917–2012. The concepts of summability, balancedness and co-summability was advanced to analyze nonlinear long-run relations among stochastic processes. The empirical results find no evidence in support of nonlinear long-run (inverted U-shaped) relationship for the US, but findings from a vocal set of economists lends strong support and is the basis for the conclusions drawn by this study.

previous article The Women’s Empowerment in Livestock Index

next article Study Engagement in Italian University Students: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale—Student Version

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

For interested reader see the work of Kuznets (1955) and Anand and Kanbur (1993).

In this study we use income per capita and economic growth synonymously.

There are many reasons why income inequality would negatively or positively influence economic growth. For more details see Weil (2005) and Toshiaki (2005).

For an exposition on the estimation of this series and file including percentile threshold see Frank, Sommeiller–Price and Saez. Interested reader for further explanation on estimation of other measures of income share or distribution should see Frank (2009).

Ahluwalia, M. S. (1976). Inequality, poverty and development. Journal of Development Economics, 3(4), 307–342.CrossRef

Alesina, A., & Rodrick, D. (1994). Redistributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal Economics, 109, 465–490.CrossRef

Anand, S., & Kanbur, S. R. (1993). The Kuznets process and the inequality—Development relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 40(1), 25–52.CrossRef

Babu, M. S., Bhaskaran, V., & Venkatesh, M. (2016). Does inequality hamper long run growth? Evidence from emerging economies. Economic Analysis and Policy, 52(4), 99–113.CrossRef

Banerjee, A. V., Duflo, E. (2000). Inequality and growth: What can the data say? (No. w7793). National bureau of economic research.

Barro, R. J. (2000). Inequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), 5–32.CrossRef

Berenguer-Rico, V., & Gonzalo, J. (2013). Co-summability from linear to nonlinear cointegration. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Departamento de Economía.

Berenguer-Rico, V., & Gonzalo, J. (2014). Summability of stochastic processes—A generalization of integration for nonlinear processes. Journal of Econometrics, 178, 331–341.CrossRef

Braulke, M. (1983). A note on Kuznets’s U. Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 135–139.CrossRef

Chan, K. S., Zhou, X., & Pan, Z. (2014). The growth and inequality nexus: The case of China. International Review of Economics and Finance, 34(4), 230–236.CrossRef

Chen, B. L. (2003). An inverted-U relationship between inequality and long-run growth. Economics Letters, 78(2), 205–212.CrossRef

Cingano, F. (2014). Trends in income inequality and its impact on economic growth. OECD social, employment and migration working papers, No. 163, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjncwxv6j-en.

Fang, W., Miller, S. M., & Yeh, C. C. (2015). The effect of growth volatility on income inequality. Economic Modelling, 45(1), 212–222.

Forbes, K. J. (2000). A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 869–887.CrossRef

Fosu, A. K. (1993). Kuznets’s inverted-U hypothesis: Comment. Southern Economic Journal, 59(3), 523–527.CrossRef

Frank, M. W. (2009). Inequality and growth in the United States: Evidence from a new state-level panel of income inequality measures. Economic Inquiry, 47(1), 55–68.CrossRef

Gonzalo, J., & Pitarakis, J. Y. (2006). Threshold effects in cointegrating relationships. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68(s1), 813–833.CrossRef

Hamilton, J. D. (2001). A parametric approach to flexible nonlinear inference. Econometrica, 69(3), 537–573.CrossRef

Hamilton, J. D. (2003). What is an oil shock? Journal of econometrics, 113(2), 363–398.CrossRef

Henderson, D. J., Qian, J., & Wang, L. (2015). The inequality–growth plateau. Economics Letters, 128(1), 17–20.CrossRef

Hsing, Y., & Smyth, D. J. (1994). Kuznets’s inverted-U hypothesis revisited. Applied Economics Letters, 1(7), 111–113.CrossRef

Huang, H. C. R. (2004). A flexible nonlinear inference to the Kuznets hypothesis. Economics Letters, 84(2), 289–296.CrossRef

Huang, H. C., Lin, Y. C., & Yeh, C. C. (2012). An appropriate test of the Kuznets hypothesis. Applied Economics Letters, 19(1), 47–51.CrossRef

Iradian, M. G. (2005). Inequality, poverty, and growth: Cross-country evidence. International Monetary Fund.

Jacobsen, P. W., & Giles, D. E. (1998). Income distribution in the United States: Kuznets’ inverted-U hypothesis and data non-stationarity. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 7(4), 405–423.CrossRef

Kim, D. H., Huang, H. C., & Lin, S. C. (2011). Kuznets hypothesis in a panel of states. Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(2), 250–260.CrossRef

Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.

Lessmann, C. (2014). Spatial inequality and development—Is there an inverted-U relationship? Journal of Development Economics, 106, 35–51.CrossRef

Li, H., & Zou, H. F. (1998). Income inequality is not harmful for growth: Theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics, 2(3), 318–334.CrossRef

Lin, S. C. (2007). Semiparametric Bayesian inference of the Kuznets hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics, 83(2), 491–505.CrossRef

Lin, S. C., Suen, Y. B., & Yeh, C. C. (2007). A quantile inference of the Kuznets hypothesis. Economic Modelling, 24(4), 559–570.CrossRef

Lin, S. C., & Weng, H. W. (2006). A semi-parametric partially linear investigation of the Kuznets’ hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(3), 634–647.CrossRef

Majumdar, S., & Partridge, M. D. (2009). Impact of economic growth on income inequality: A regional perspective. In 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26–28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin (No. 49270). Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

McElroy, T., & Politis, D. N. (2007). Computer-intensive rate estimation, diverging statistics, and scanning. The Annals of Statistics, 35, 1827–1848.CrossRef

Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2013). Joint determinants of fiscal policy, income inequality and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 30, 814–824.CrossRef

Nahum, R. A. (2005). Income inequality and growth: a panel study of Swedish counties 1960–2000. Department of Economics, Uppsala University.

Nielsen, F., & Alderson, A. S. (1997). The Kuznets curve and the great U-turn: Income inequality in US counties, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 62(1), 12–33.CrossRef

Ogus Binatli, A. (2012). Growth and income inequality: A comparative analysis. Economics Research International, 12(2), 1–7.CrossRef

Patriarca, F., & Vona, F. (2013). Structural change and income distribution: An inverted-U relationship. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(8), 1641–1658.CrossRef

Partridge, M. D. (1997). Is inequality harmful for growth? Comment. The American Economic Review, 87(5), 1019–1032.

Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (1994). Is inequality harmful for growth? The American Economic Review, 84(3), 600–621.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634.CrossRef

Politis, D. N., Romano, J. P., & Wolf, M. (1999). Subsampling. New York: Springer.CrossRef

Ram, R. (1991). Kuznets’s inverted-U hypothesis: Evidence from a highly developed country. Southern Economic Journal, 57(4), 1112–1123.CrossRef

Robinson, S. (1976). A note on the U hypothesis relating income inequality and economic development. The American Economic Review, 66(3), 437–440.

Rubin, A., & Segal, D. (2015). The effects of economic growth on income inequality in the United States. Journal of Macroeconomics, 45, 258–273.CrossRef

Saari, M. Y., Dietzenbacher, E., & Los, B. (2015). Sources of income growth and inequality across ethnic groups in Malaysia, 1970–2000. World Development, 76, 311–328.CrossRef

Shin, I. (2012). Income inequality and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2049–2057.CrossRef

Sukiassyan, G. (2007). Inequality and growth: What does the transition economy data say? Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 35–56.CrossRef

Theyson, K. C., & Heller, L. R. (2015). Development and income inequality: A new specification of the Kuznets hypothesis. The Journal of Developing Areas, 49(3), 103–118.CrossRef

Toshiaki, T. (2005). Confronting income inequality in Japan. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Tuominen, E. (2015). Reversal of the Kuznets curve: Study on the inequality-development relation using top income shares data (No. 2015/036). WIDER working paper.

Tuominen, E. (2016a). Changes or levels? Reassessment of the relationship between top-end inequality and growth. Working Papers 1609, University of Tampere, School of Management, Economics.

Tuominen, E. (2016b). Top-end inequality and growth: Empirical evidence. Working Papers 108, University of Tampere, School of Management, Economics.

Voitchovsky, S. (2005). Does the profile of income inequality matter for economic growth? Journal of Economic Growth, 10(3), 273–296.CrossRef

Wahiba, N. F., & El Weriemmi, M. (2014). The relationship between economic growth and income inequality. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 4(1), 135–143.

Wan, G., Lu, M., & Chen, Z. (2006). The inequality–growth nexus in the short and long run: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(4), 654–667.CrossRef

Weil, D. N. (2005). Accounting for the effect of health on growth. Working paper, Boston University, School of Management.

Title: Kuznets Curve for the US: A Reconsideration Using Cosummability
Authors: Adnen Ben Nasr
Mehmet Balcilar
Seyi Saint Akadiri
Rangan Gupta
Publication date: 05-06-2018
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Published in: Social Indicators Research / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0303-8300
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0921
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-1940-1

Springer Professional

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

The Women’s Empowerment in Livestock Index

Use and Misuse of PCA for Measuring Well-Being

Life Expectancy Index: Age Structure of Population and Environment Evolution

Does Demographic Transition with Human Capital Dynamics Matter for Economic Growth? A Dynamic Panel Data Approach to GMM

Does It Matter How You Retire? Old-Age Retirement Routes and Subjective Economic Well-Being

How Far is Campania from the Best-Performing Region in Italy? A Territorial-Divide Analysis of Separate Waste Collection