Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8/2018

19-02-2018 | LETTER TO THE EDITOR

LCA capability roadmap—product system model description and revision

Authors: Brandon Kuczenski, Antonino Marvuglia, Miguel F. Astudillo, Wesley W. Ingwersen, M. Barclay Satterfield, David P. Evers, Christoph Koffler, Tomás Navarrete, Ben Amor, Lise Laurin

Published in: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment | Issue 8/2018

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Purpose

Life cycle assessment (LCA) practitioners face many challenges in their efforts to describe, share, review, and revise their product system models, and to reproduce the models and results of others. Current life cycle inventory modeling techniques have weaknesses in the areas of describing model structure, documenting the use of proxy or non-ideal data, specifying allocation, and including modeler’s observations and assumptions—all affecting how the study is interpreted and limiting the reuse of models. Moreover, LCA software systems manage modeling information in different and sometimes non-compatible ways. Practitioners must also deal with licensing, privacy/confidentiality of data, and other issues around data access which impact how a model can be shared.

Methods

This letter was prepared by a working group of the North American Life Cycle Assessment Advisory Group to support the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative’s Flagship Activity on Data, Methods, and Product Sustainability Information. The aim of the working group is to define a roadmap of the technical advances needed to achieve easier LCA model sharing and improve replicability of LCA results among different users in a way that is independent of the LCA software used to compute the results and does not infringe on any licensing restrictions or confidentiality requirements. This is intended to be a consensus document providing the state of the art in this area, with milestones for research and implementation needed to resolve current issues.

Results and Conclusions

The roadmap identifies fifteen milestones in three areas: “describing model contents,” “describing model structure,” and “collaborative use of models.” The milestones should support researchers and software developers in advancing practitioners’ abilities to share and review product system models.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
go back to reference Buckheit J, Donoho D (1995) WaveLab and reproducible research. In: A. A, G O (eds) Wavelets and statistics. Springer, New York, pp 55–81 Buckheit J, Donoho D (1995) WaveLab and reproducible research. In: A. A, G O (eds) Wavelets and statistics. Springer, New York, pp 55–81
go back to reference Clift R, Frischknecht R, Huppes G et al (1998) Towards a coherent approach to life cycle inventory analysis. SETAC Europe, Brussels Clift R, Frischknecht R, Huppes G et al (1998) Towards a coherent approach to life cycle inventory analysis. SETAC Europe, Brussels
go back to reference UN Environment (2017) The global LCA data access network. http://web.unep.org/resourceefficiency/what-we-do/assessment/life-cycle-thinking/global-lca-data-access-network. Accessed 22 Dec 2017 UN Environment (2017) The global LCA data access network. http://​web.​unep.​org/​resourceefficien​cy/​what-we-do/​assessment/​life-cycle-thinking/​global-lca-data-access-network.​ Accessed 22 Dec 2017
go back to reference Heath GA, Mann MK (2012) Background and reflections on the Life Cycle Assessment Harmonization Project. J Ind Ecol 16:8–11CrossRef Heath GA, Mann MK (2012) Background and reflections on the Life Cycle Assessment Harmonization Project. J Ind Ecol 16:8–11CrossRef
go back to reference ISO (2002) ISO/TS 14048:2002 - Environmental management—life cycle assessment—data documentation format ISO (2002) ISO/TS 14048:2002 - Environmental management—life cycle assessment—data documentation format
go back to reference ISO (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044:2006) ISO (2006) Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines (ISO 14044:2006)
go back to reference Rydberg T, Palsson A-C (2009) Towards a Nordic guideline for nomenclature and data exchange format for life cycle assessment—NorDEX. Technical Report U3156. Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL). Rydberg T, Palsson A-C (2009) Towards a Nordic guideline for nomenclature and data exchange format for life cycle assessment—NorDEX. Technical Report U3156. Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL).
go back to reference Steubing B, Mutel C, Suter F, Hellweg S (2015) Streamlining scenario analysis and optimization of key choices in value chains using a modular LCA approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:510–522CrossRef Steubing B, Mutel C, Suter F, Hellweg S (2015) Streamlining scenario analysis and optimization of key choices in value chains using a modular LCA approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 21:510–522CrossRef
go back to reference Verones F, Bare J, Bulle C, Frischknecht R, Hauschild M, Hellweg S, Henderson A, Jolliet O, Laurent A, Liao X, Lindner JP, Maia de Souza D, Michelsen O, Patouillard L, Pfister S, Posthuma L, Prado V, Ridoutt B, Rosenbaum RK, Sala S, Ugaya C, Vieira M, Fantke P (2017) LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. J Clean Prod 161:957–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.206 CrossRef Verones F, Bare J, Bulle C, Frischknecht R, Hauschild M, Hellweg S, Henderson A, Jolliet O, Laurent A, Liao X, Lindner JP, Maia de Souza D, Michelsen O, Patouillard L, Pfister S, Posthuma L, Prado V, Ridoutt B, Rosenbaum RK, Sala S, Ugaya C, Vieira M, Fantke P (2017) LCIA framework and cross-cutting issues guidance within the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative. J Clean Prod 161:957–967. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​jclepro.​2017.​05.​206 CrossRef
go back to reference Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B et al (2015) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:1280–1230 Wernet G, Bauer C, Steubing B et al (2015) The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 3:1280–1230
Metadata
Title
LCA capability roadmap—product system model description and revision
Authors
Brandon Kuczenski
Antonino Marvuglia
Miguel F. Astudillo
Wesley W. Ingwersen
M. Barclay Satterfield
David P. Evers
Christoph Koffler
Tomás Navarrete
Ben Amor
Lise Laurin
Publication date
19-02-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0948-3349
Electronic ISSN: 1614-7502
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1446-8

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 8/2018 Go to the issue