Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
AI & SOCIETY
Published in: AI & SOCIETY 4/2016

31-10-2015 | Original Article

Legal regulations and public policies for next-generation robots in Japan

Author: Tomoko Nambu

Published in: AI & SOCIETY | Issue 4/2016

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Faced with a declining birthrate and aging population, the Japanese government has been adopting policies to promote the R&D of next-generation robots (hereinafter “NGRs”) which are seen as key to solving issues of labor shortage and enhance global competitiveness of the Japanese economy. However, the legal environment surrounding NGRs is not developer-friendly, and may hamper their proliferation and use. In order to address this issue, the first section of this paper explains the legal status of NGRs in Japan, followed by a section focusing on the legal regulations in Japan which involve the developers, manufacturers, distributors, and operators of NGRs. The final section outlines the current situation of various policies adopted by the Japanese government to enhance and accelerate the development of NGRs. The aim of this paper was to show how NGRs are regarded under the laws of Japan and what legal barriers the NGR-related parties confront, and provide insight into how the Japanese government is trying to promote the development of NGRs.
previous article The problem of ascribing legal responsibility in the case of robotics
next article The autonomy-safety-paradox of service robotics in Europe and Japan: a comparative analysis

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
English translations of Japanese laws/ordinances can be found at the Japanese Law Translation Database System powered by the Ministry of Justice, http://​www.​japaneselawtrans​lation.​go.​jp/​. All English translations of Japanese laws/ordinances cited in this paper are, unless otherwise noted, taken from this database. Note that these are unofficial translations. Other Japanese materials are translated into English by the author.
 
2
The guidelines provide examples of NGRs, which include robots for cleaning, transportation, guidance for facilities, security services, housework, care giving, construction of buildings, maintenance, farm work, fishery, entertainment, education, welding, painting, assembling, inspection (for quality control), polishing, washing, and communication. The objective of these guidelines is to set forth the basic way of thinking about how to ensure safe application of NGRs in each stage of their design, manufacture, import, installment, maintenance, repair, sale, and use, which are considered to be common among the NGRs. For more information regarding the guidelines and NGR safety, see Weng et al. (2009).
 
3
A preliminary definition is provided by the Robotto Seisaku Kenkyūkai, a METI-led study group to propose industrial policies for NGRs. According to its interim report (2005), NGRs are robots which are not “conventional industrial robots isolated from human beings.” In particular, the report describes NGRs to be consisting of (1) “next-generation industrial robots” which act on behalf of or in cooperation with human beings in manufacturing sites for products of vast variety/variable quantity, and (2) “service robots” which serve human beings while sharing space with them in homes and other places for various purposes, such as cleaning, security, welfare, life support, and amusement. For early discussions on NGRs by study groups assembled by METI, see Weng et al. (2007).
 
4
The final report by the Robotto Seisaku Kenkyūkai (2006, p. 7) defines robots as “anything that has three essential technologies: sensors, software programs (for control), and drives” or “intelligent mechanical systems.” However, it is worth noting that this definition “may no longer be conclusive in the advent of the new phase in robotics,” “where robots can be driven by independent intelligence/control based on AI enabling access to various people and objects in real world without the help of specific actuation system.” (Headquarters for Japan’s Economic Revitalization 2015, pp. 8–9).
 
5
Kagoshima District Court, 22 Jan 2001, in Case No. (gyo-u) 1 of 1995.
 
6
Tokyo District Court, 26 Feb 2003, in Case No. (wa) 23454 of 2002.
 
7
Yokohama District Court, 31 Mar 2011, in Case No. (wa) 1463 of 2010, 2115 Hanrei jiho 70.
 
8
Kagoshima District Court, 2 Nov 2011, in Case No. (wa) 878 of 2011, Westlaw JAPAN Document No. 2011WLJPCA11026001, and Kagoshima District Court, 2 Nov 2011, in Case No. (gyo-u) 6 of 2011, Westlaw JAPAN Document No. 2011WLJPCA11026002.
 
9
The Act stipulates that if a person fulfills any of the stipulations below, the person is liable for damage caused by the defect in the product: (1) a person provides his/her name, trade name, trademark, or other indications (hereinafter referred to as “representation of name, etc.”) on the product as the manufacturer of such product; (2) a person provides the representation of name, etc. on the product which misleads others into believing that the person is the manufacturer; or (3) a person provides any representation of name, etc. on the product which, in light of the manner concerning the manufacturing, processing, importation or sales of the product, and other circumstances, creates the basis for making the person responsible as the substantial manufacturer of such product.
 
10
In Japan, defects in the context of product liability are generally classified into three types: (1) a defect in the design of the product, (2) a defect in the manufacturing process, and (3) a defect in instructions or warnings for handling the product (Yamamoto 1994; Economic Planning Agency 1994).
 
11
Tokyo District Court, 13 Dec 2002, in Case No. (wa) 12677 of 2001, 1109 Hanrei taimuzu 285.
 
12
Tokyo District Court, 20 Mar 2003, in Case No. (wa) 27744 of 2001, 1133 Hanrei taimuzu 97.
 
13
The Civil Code does not set different standards on liability for animals generally perceived as dangerous and those which are not, although the degree of care required by the possessor of the former will be normally regarded as being higher. It is worth noting that Kelley et al. (2010) propose a framework for liability in human–robot interaction which “distinguish[es] between robots that are dangerous and robots that are considered largely safe.” (p. 1867).
 
14
Kagoshima District Court, 20 May 2008, in Case No. (wa) 22 of 2006, 2015 Hanrei jiho 116.
 
15
Osaka District Court, 28 Sept 2009, in Case No. (wa) 2167 of 2008.
 
16
See the proceedings of the Committee on Commerce and Industry of the House of Representatives of Japan, 129th Diet (No. 7 June 10, 1994, p. 13).
 
17
Tokyo District Court, 20 Jun 2001, in case No. (wa) 19478 of 1998, 1074 Hanrei taimuzu 219.
 
18
Tokyo District Court, 29 Oct 2003, in Case No. (wa) 25386 of 1999, 1843 Hanrei jiho 8.
 
20
For discussions on the implication of product liability on self-driving cars’ introduction to the market, see Hirano (2014).
 
21
An English translation of the Radio Act is available at http://​www.​soumu.​go.​jp/​main_​sosiki/​joho_​tsusin/​eng/​Resources/​laws/​090204_​3.​pdf (Accessed 16 Feb 2015).
 
22
See https://​www.​irobot-jp.​com/​import/​ (in Japanese, Accessed 16 Feb 2015).
 
24
The readers should note that, despite of announcements made by the media, Yamaha Motor Co. has been refraining from making comments on the details of this case.
 
25
See also, Wall Street Journal, “Police raid Yamaha Motor over suspected illegal exports,” http://​online.​wsj.​com/​articles/​SB11380065839285​3451 (Accessed 16 Feb 2015).
 
26
Article 3(i)-3 of the Ordinance of the Ministry Specifying Goods and Technologies Pursuant to Provisions of the Appended Table 1 of the Export Control Order and the Appended Table of the Foreign Exchange Order (Ordinance of the Ministry of International Trade and Industry No. 49 of 14 Oct 1991).
 
27
See New York Times, “Yamaha Motor accused of illegal export sales.”
 
28
It is not realistic for exporters who fear loss of business opportunity to apply for the Minister’s permission “just in case.” A certain amount of time is required from the application to the final judgment by the Minister. Basically, the Minister’s judgment will be made within 90 days of application (METI 2009).
 
29
This was possible by using an existing system which experimentally relaxes regulation in a regional basis and subsequently allows deregulation in a national basis.
 
30
See the Web site of the council on promotion of the mobility robot experiment tokku in Tsukuba, http://​council.​rt-tsukuba.​jp/​outline (Accessed 16 Feb 2015).
 
32
Public–Private ITS Initiative/Roadmaps defines level 3 automation as a state in which acceleration, steering, and braking actions are all controlled by the automobile except in case of emergency, where the human driver is required to take control.
 
33
See Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet (2014a).
 
34
Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet (2014b).
 
Literature
Economic Planning Agency of Japan (1994) Chikujyō kaisetsu seizōbutsu sekininhō [Commentary on Product Liability Act]. Shōjihōmu Kenkyūkai, Tokyo
Hayashi R, Maeda T (1991) Shinpan chūshaku minpō (2) sōsoku (2) [General provisions of the civil code annotated 2-2: new edition]. Yūhikaku, Tokyo
Itō M (2008) Civil procedure, 3 supplemented edn. Yūhikaku, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association (2008) Kaitei rōdōanzeneiseikisoku no kaisetsu sangyōyō robotto kankei [Revised commentary on Ordinance on Industrial Safety and Health regarding industrial robots], 8th edn. Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association, Tokyo
Kelley R et al (2010) Liability in robotics: an international perspective on robots as animals. Adv Robot 24:1861–1871CrossRef
Kobayashi M (2010) Legal problems of next generation robots (in Japanese). J Soc Instrum Control Eng 49:373–378
Maeda M et al (2007) Jōkai keihō dai ni han [Commentary on the criminal code: 2nd edn.]. Kōbundō, Tokyo
MLIT, Government of Japan (2015) Dōro-unsō-sharyō no hoan kijun, dōro-unsō-sharyō hōsekō kisoku tō no ichibu kaiseitō ni kakaru ikenboshū ni tsuite. Segway nado tōjōgata idōshien robotto no kōdōjikkenjigyō no zenkoku tenkai [Call for public comments on revisions to traffic ordinance. Nationwide implementation of field testing of personal mobility robots such as Segways on public streets]. http://​www.​mlit.​go.​jp/​report/​press/​jidosha07_​hh_​000175.​html. Accessed 25 June 2015
Mukaidono M (2013) Robotto no anzengijutsu no gaiyō to saishindōkō [Summary of safety technology for robots and recent trends in related technology]. Robotto 211:1–7
Nambu T, Hashimoto T (2010) Robotto ni kansuru hōteki mondai to rōdōsha e no eikyō [Legal issues relating to robots and their implications to workers]. Rōdō no kagaku 65:19–22
Nishida N et al (2010) Japanese penal code annotated, vol 1. Yūhikaku, Tokyo (in Japanese)
Ōtsuka H (1986) Keihō gaisetsu (sōron) kaiteiban [Outline of the criminal code (general principles) revised edn.]. Yūhikaku, Tokyo
Wagatsuma S (1965) Shintei minpō sōsoku [General provisions of the civil code: new edn.]. Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo
Weng Y-H et al (2007) The legal crisis of next generation robots: on safety intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 4–8 June 2007, Stanford, CA, pp 205–209
Weng Y-H et al (2009) Safety intelligence and legal machine language: do we need three laws of robotics? In: Takahashi Y (ed) Service robot applications. InTech Education & Publishing, Wien, pp 195–214
Yamamoto T (1994) Chūshaku seizōbutsu sekininhō [Product liability act annotated]. Gyōsei, Tokyo
Kagoshima District Court, 20 May 2008, in Case No. (wa) 22 of 2006, 2015. Hanrei jihō 116
Kagoshima District Court, 2 Nov 2011, in Case No. (wa) 878 of 2011, Westlaw JAPAN Document No. 2011WLJPCA11026001
Kagoshima District Court, 2 Nov 2011, in Case No. (gyo-u) 6 of 2011, Westlaw JAPAN Document No.2011WLJPCA11026002
Tokyo District Court, 20 Jun 2001, in Case No. (wa) 19478 of 1998, 1074. Hanrei taimuzu 219
Tokyo District Court, 13 Dec 2002, in Case No. (wa) 12677 of 2001, 1109. Hanrei taimuzu 285
Tokyo District Court, 20 Mar 2003, in Case No. (wa) 27744 of 2001, 1133. Hanrei taimuzu 97
Tokyo District Court, 29 Oct 2003, in Case No. (wa) 25386 of 1999, 1843. Hanrei jihō 8
Yokohama District Court, 31 Mar 2011, in Case No. (wa) 1463 of 2010, 2115. Hanrei jihō 70
Committee on Commerce and Industry of the House of Representatives of Japan, 129th Diet (No. 7, 10 June 1994)
Asahi Shimbun (2007) Yamaha hatsudōki “tōkyoku no handan ni ando” sanshain fukiso, sōsa shūketsu. Heri fuseiyushutsu—Shizuoka ken [Yamaha Motors, “Relieved by the judgment of the authorities.” Case dropped for 3 men, investigation closed. Illegal export of helicopters—Shizuoka Prefecture]. 24 Mar 2007, morning edn.: 29 (print)
Fukuda N (2006) “Jiritsu” no kaishaku ni sa. Sōsatōkyoku to Yamaha Hatsudōki. Fuseiyushutsu misui. Shizuoka-ken [Different interpretation of “autonomous” by the investigation authorities and Yamaha Motors. Attempted illegal export—Shizuoka Prefecture]. Asahi Shimbun, 25 Jan 2006, morning edn.:31 (print)
Inō A (2007) Yamaha Hatsudōki fuseiyushutsu 3 nin taiho (sono 1) “kashigaihikō” jūshi—Shizuoka [Yamaha Motors, illegal export. 3 men arrested (Part 1). Focusing on “flight exceeding visible range”– Shizuoka]. Mainichi Shimbun, 24 Feb 2007, local issue:27 (print)
Kitagawa H, Takeji H (2007) Yamaha hatsudōki fuseiyushutsu. Keisanshō mujinheri nado yushutsukinshishobun [Yamaha Motors, illegal export. METI bans export of unmanned helicopters and accessories]. Mainichi Shimbun, 12 May 2007, morning edn.:26 (print)
Koitabashi T et al (2011) “Robotto taikoku Nihon” no kyojitsu. Genpatsu de nihonsei ga katsuyaku shinai wake [Truth and Falsehood of “Robot Kingdom”]. Nikkei Business (16 May 2011):38–49
Mochizuki K (2007) Yamaha-hatsudōki fuseiyushutsu: 3 nin taiho (sono 2 tome) “ihōsei” itten shi chinmoku—Shizuoka [Yamaha Motors, illegal export. 3 men were arrested. (Part 2, end)—Shizuoka]. Mainichi Shimbun, 24 Feb 2007, local issue:26 (print)
Shinoda K (2006) Segway: kōdō de unten no dansei ni bakkin 50 man en [Man fined a half million yen for driving Segway on public street]. Mainichi Shimbun, 10 Apr 2006, Tokyo-Kansai, morning edn.:26 (print)
Yomiuri Shimbun (2006) Mujinheri fuseiyushutsu sōsahonbu “gunjitenyō ga kanō” Yamahahatsu gawa wa hanron—Shizuoka [Illegal export of unmanned helicopters. Investigation headquarters say, “diversion to military use is possible.” Yamaha Motors objects]. Yomiuri Shimbun, 24 Jan 2006, morning edn.:35 (print)
Yomiuri Shimbun (2007a) Yamaha Hatsudōki fuseiyushutsu. Mujinheri seinō, kaishaku tairitsu. 3 nin wa yōgi hinin—Shizuoka [Yamaha Motors, illegal export of unmanned helicopters. Controversy over the interpretation of the functions of the unmanned helicopters. 3 men deny culpability—Shizuoka]. Yomiuri Shimbun, 24 Feb 2007, morning edn.:33 (print)
Yomiuri Shimbun (2007b) Yamahahatsu ryakushiki-kiso. Kōbō ichinen amari, kyūtenkai. Kigyō no yushutsukanri ni keishō—Shizuoka [Summary indictment against Yamaha Motors. Rapid developments after battle lasting more than 1 year. A warning to companies’ export management—Shizuoka] Yomiuri Shimbun, 17 Mar 2007, morning edn.:33 (print)
Yoshino K (2007) Kenkei “chōshu kasane shinchō ni” tancho wa chūgoku jin no kaisha sōsaku. Yamaha Hatsudōki heri fuseiyushutsu—Shizuoka-ken [Prefectural police says, “Careful investigation aided by repeated interviews.” Clue gained from the investigation of a Chinese-run company. Yamaha Motors, illegal export of unmanned helicopters. Shizuoka Prefecture]. Asahi Shimbun, 24 Feb 2007, morning edn.:28 (print)
Metadata
Title
Legal regulations and public policies for next-generation robots in Japan
Author
Tomoko Nambu
Publication date
31-10-2015
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
AI & SOCIETY / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0951-5666
Electronic ISSN: 1435-5655
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-015-0628-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

AI & SOCIETY 4/2016 Go to the issue

Open Forum

From an engineers point of view: response to “Social interaction with robots—three questions”. In Gesa Lindemann (this volume)

Original Article

On the ethical framing of research programs in robotics

Original Article

‘It looks like a human!’ The interrelation of social presence, interaction and agency ascription: a case study about the effects of an android robot on social agency ascription

Original Article

Care robots and the future of ICT-mediated elderly care: a response to doom scenarios

Original Article

Social robots: Things or agents?

Original Article

The autonomy-safety-paradox of service robotics in Europe and Japan: a comparative analysis

Premium Partner

    Image Credits