Skip to main content
Disciplines
Automotive Business IT + Informatics Construction + Real Estate Electrical Engineering + Electronics Energy + Sustainability Insurance + Risk Finance + Banking Management + Leadership Marketing + Sales Mechanical Engineering + Materials
Events
DE
EN
Books
Journals
Topic Page
Marketing
Start single access now
Access for companies
EXTENDED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Wireless Personal Communications
Published in: Wireless Personal Communications 4/2021

25-09-2020

Leveraging Multi-Instance RPL Routing Protocol to Enhance the Video Traffic Delivery in IoMT

Authors: Ibtissem Bouacheria, Zahia Bidai, Bouabdellah Kechar, Francoise Sailhan

Published in: Wireless Personal Communications | Issue 4/2021

Log in

Activate our intelligent search to find suitable subject content or patents.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

Nowadays, the massive proliferation of real-world multimedia devices has paved the way to the emergence of a new paradigm called the Internet of Multimedia Things wherein Low-power and Lossy Networks (LLNs) are the main components of this new technology. RPL is an IPv6 routing protocol for LLNs designed by IETF to meet the requirements of a wide range of LLN applications such as Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks where video traffic is expected to reach 6 times more than non-video traffic in 2025. The mono-instance version of RPL is far from satisfying the network’s Quality of Service (QoS) and the user’s Quality of Experience (QoE), as video in its compressed form is typically composed of various frames with different priorities requiring different QoS and QoE levels. In this paper, we exploit the multi-instance version of RPL for developing a new routing approach that improves the transport of a compressed video, composed of two types of frames with different priorities, by delivering each of them on the corresponding instance. The fundamental question we are addressing, is to find the best way to construct these instances: instances with Nodes Disjoint (ND) or Links Disjoint (LD). To do so, we designed a Multi-Instance routing protocol, named MI-RPL, and we performed extensive simulation experiments using the Cooja simulator. The comparison of MI-RPL-ND, MI-RPL-LD and RPL which regards to QoS and QoE performance metrics, confirms that multi-instance routing for video transmission in WMSN (and in particular MI-RPL-ND) is the best choice.
previous article Recent Developments in Near Field Communication: A Study
next article Near Optimum Random Routing of Uniformly Load Balanced Nodes in Wireless Sensor Networks Using Connectivity Matrix

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Versicherung + Risiko




Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now
Footnotes
1
Initially, the \(Parent\_list_{Insti}\) contains a single parent, which therefore corresponds to the preferred parent.
 
2
Emission starts after 60 s so as to ensure that the DODAG is entirely constructed.
 
Literature
1.
Akyildiz, I. F., Melodia, T., & Chowdhury, K. R. (2007). A survey on wireless multimedia sensor networks. Computer Networks, 51(4), 921–960.CrossRef
2.
Akyildiz, I. F., Melodia, T., & Chowdury, K. R. (2007). Wireless multimedia sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Wireless Communications, 14(6), 32–39.CrossRef
3.
Alvi, S. A., Shah, G. A., & Mahmood, W. (2015). Energy efficient green routing protocol for internet of multimedia things. In 2015 IEEE tenth international conference on intelligent sensors, sensor networks and information processing (ISSNIP), IEEE (pp. 1–6).
4.
Banerjee, R., & Bit, S. D. (2019). An energy efficient image compression scheme for wireless multimedia sensor network using curve fitting technique. Wireless Networks, 25(1), 167–183.CrossRef
5.
Banh, M., Mac, H., Nguyen, N., Phung, K. H., Thanh, N. H., & Steenhaut, K. (2015). Performance evaluation of multiple RPL routing tree instances for internet of things applications. In 2015 international conference on advanced technologies for communications (ATC), IEEE (pp. 206–211).
6.
Barcelo, M., Correa, A., Vicario, J. L., & Morell, A. (2016). Cooperative interaction among multiple RPL instances in wireless sensor networks. Computer Communications, 81, 61–71.CrossRef
7.
Bouzebiba, H., & Lehsaini, M. (2020). FreeBW-RPL: A new RPL protocol objective function for internet of multimedia things. Wireless Personal Communications, 112, 1–21.CrossRef
8.
9.
Busnel, Y., Bertier, M., Fleury, E., & Kermarrec, A. M. (2007). GCP: Gossip-based code propagation for large-scale mobile wireless sensor networks. Tech. rep., INRIA.
10.
11.
Dohler, M., Watteyne, T., Winter, T., & Barthel, D. (2009). Routing requirements for urban low-power and lossy networks. RFC 5548, RFC Editor.
12.
Dunkels, A., Gronvall, B., & Voigt, T. (2004). Contiki-a lightweight and flexible operating system for tiny networked sensors. In 29th annual IEEE international conference on local computer networks, IEEE (pp. 455–462).
13.
Gaddour, O., Koubâa, A., Baccour, N., & Abid, M. (2014). OF-FL: QoS-aware fuzzy logic objective function for the RPL routing protocol. In: 2014 12th International symposium on modeling and optimization in mobile, ad hoc, and wireless networks (WiOpt), IEEE (pp. 365–372).
14.
Gardašević, G., Veletić, M., Maletić, N., Vasiljević, D., Radusinović, I., Tomović, S., et al. (2017). The IoT architectural framework, design issues and application domains. Wireless Personal Communications, 92(1), 127–148.CrossRef
15.
16.
Gonizzi, P., Monica, R., & Ferrari, G. (2013). Design and evaluation of a delay-efficient RPL routing metric. In 2013 9th international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC), IEEE (pp. 1573–1577).
17.
Gürses, E., & Akan, Ö. B. (2005). Multimedia communication in wireless sensor networks. Annales des Télécommunications, 60, 872–900.
18.
Idrees, A. K., & Witwit, A. Energy-efficient load-balanced RPL routing protocol for internet of things (IOTs) networks. International Journal of Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (In press)
19.
Kettouche, S., Maimour, M., & Derdouri, L. (2019). QoE-based performance evaluation of video transmission using RPL in the IoMT. In 2019 7th Mediterranean congress of telecommunications (CMT), IEEE (pp. 1–4).
20.
Kim, H. S., Ko, J., Culler, D. E., & Paek, J. (2017). Challenging the IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks (RPL): A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(4), 2502–2525.CrossRef
21.
Lamaazi, H., & Benamar, N. (2020). A comprehensive survey on enhancements and limitations of the RPL protocol: A focus on the objective function. Ad Hoc Networks, 96, 102001.CrossRef
22.
23.
Levis, P., Madden, S., Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., Whitehouse, K., Woo, A., et al. (2005). TinyOS: An operating system for sensor networks. Ambient intelligence (pp. 115–148). Berlin: Springer.CrossRef
24.
Li, Z. N., Drew, M. S., & Liu, J. (2014). Fundamentals of multimedia. Cham: Springer.CrossRef
25.
Loeffler, C., Ligtenberg, A., & Moschytz, G. S. (1989). Practical fast 1-D DCT algorithms with 11 multiplications. In International conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing, IEEE (pp. 988–991).
26.
Long, N. T., Uwase, M. P., Tiberghien, J., & Steenhaut, K. (2013). QoS-aware cross-layer mechanism for multiple instances RPL. In 2013 international conference on advanced technologies for communications (ATC), IEEE (pp. 44–49).
27.
28.
Maimour, M. (2018). Sensevid: A traffic trace based tool for QoE video transmission assessment dedicated to wireless video sensor networks. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 87, 120–137.CrossRef
29.
30.
Monowar, M. M., & Basheri, M. (2020). On providing differentiated service exploiting multi-instance RPL for industrial low-power and lossy networks. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2020, Article ID 1748647, pp.1-12.
31.
Mortazavi, F., & Khansari, M. (2018). An energy-aware RPL routing protocol for internet of multimedia things. In Proceedings of the international conference on smart cities and internet of things, ACM (p. 11).
32.
Nassar, J., Berthomé, M., Dubrulle, J., Gouvy, N., Mitton, N., & Quoitin, B. (2018). Multiple instances QoS routing in RPL: Application to smart grids. Sensors, 18(8), 2472.CrossRef
33.
Nassar, J., Gouvy, N., & Mitton, N. (2017). Towards multi-instances QoS efficient RPL for smart grids. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on performance evaluation of wireless ad hoc, sensor, and ubiquitous networks (pp. 85–92).
34.
Osterlind, F., Dunkels, A., Eriksson, J., Finne, N., & Voigt, T. (2006) Cross-level sensor network simulation with COOJA. In Proceedings of the 2006 31st IEEE conference on local computer networks, IEEE (pp. 641–648).
35.
36.
Reddy, G. R. S., et al. (2019). A taxonomy of issues, challenges and applications in internet of multimedia things (IoMMT). i-manager’s Journal on Cloud Computing, 6(1), 1.MathSciNetCrossRef
37.
Richardson, I. E. G. (2003). H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression Video Coding for Next-generation Multimedia. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRef
38.
Sayood, K. (2006). Introduction to data compression.  Elsevier.MATH
39.
Tahir, Y., Yang, S., & McCann, J. (2017). BRPL: Backpressure RPL for high-throughput and mobile IoTs. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 17(1), 29–43.CrossRef
40.
Taylor, C. N., Panigrahi, D., & Dey, S. (2001). Design of an adaptive architecture for energy efficient wireless image communication. In International workshop on embedded computer systems (pp. 260–273), Springer.
41.
42.
Todolí-Ferrandis, D., Santonja-Climent, S., Sempere-Payá, V., & Silvestre-Blanes, J. (2015). RPL routing in a real life scenario with an energy efficient objective function. In 2015 23rd Telecommunications Forum Telfor (TELFOR), IEEE (pp. 285–288).
43.
Tran, T. D. (1999). A fast multiplierless block transform for image and video compression. In Proceedings 1999 international conference on image processing (Cat. 99CH36348), IEEE (Vol. 3, pp. 822–826).
44.
45.
Wiegand, T., Sullivan, G. J., Bjontegaard, G., & Luthra, A. (2003). Overview of the H. 264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 13(7), 560–576.CrossRef
46.
47.
Witwit, A. J., & Idrees, A. K. (2018). A comprehensive review for RPL routing protocol in low power and lossy networks. In International conference on new trends in information and communications technology applications (pp. 50–66), Springer.
48.
Yang, M., & Bourbakis, N. (2005). An overview of lossless digital image compression techniques. In 48th midwest symposium on circuits and systems, 2005, IEEE (pp. 1099–1102).
49.
50.
ZainEldin, H., Elhosseini, M. A., & Ali, H. A. (2015). Image compression algorithms in wireless multimedia sensor networks: A survey. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6(2), 481–490.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Leveraging Multi-Instance RPL Routing Protocol to Enhance the Video Traffic Delivery in IoMT
Authors
Ibtissem Bouacheria
Zahia Bidai
Bouabdellah Kechar
Francoise Sailhan
Publication date
25-09-2020
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Wireless Personal Communications / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0929-6212
Electronic ISSN: 1572-834X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11277-020-07828-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Wireless Personal Communications 4/2021 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

A Novel Group Theoretic and Graphical Approach for Designing Cryptographically Strong Nonlinear Components of Block Ciphers

BriefCommunication

Physical Model Based Method to Generate Channel Coefficients for Nakagami-m Distribution

OriginalPaper

ZF and MMSE Detectors Performances of a Massive MIMO System Combined with OFDM and M-QAM Modulation

SI: Nature Inspired Computing for Wireless Networks Applications

Nature Based Self-Learning Mechanism and Simulation of Automatic Control Smart Hybrid Antilock Braking System

OriginalPaper

µBIGMSA-Microservice-Based Model for Big Data Knowledge Discovery: Thinking Beyond the Monoliths

OriginalPaper

A Bistatic MIMO Radar Angle Estimation Method for Coherent Sources in Impulse Noise Background