Top

Journal of Classification

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Published in:

09-08-2019

MCC: a Multiple Consensus Clustering Framework

Authors: Tao Li, Yi Zhang, Dingding Wang, Jian Xu

Published in: Journal of Classification | Issue 3/2019

Abstract

Consensus clustering has emerged as an important extension of the classical clustering problem. Given a set of input clusterings of a given dataset, consensus clustering aims to find a single final clustering which is a better fit in some sense than the existing clusterings. There is a significant drawback in generating a single consensus clustering since different input clusterings could differ significantly. In this paper, we develop a new framework, called Multiple Consensus Clustering (MCC), to explore multiple clustering views of a given dataset from a set of input clusterings. Instead of generating a single consensus, we propose two sets of approaches to obtain multiple consensus. One employs the meta clustering method, and the other uses a hierarchical tree structure and further applies a dynamic programming algorithm to generate a flat partition from the hierarchical tree using the modularity measure. Multiple consensuses are finally obtained by applying consensus clustering algorithms to each cluster of the partition. Extensive experimental results on 11 real-world datasets and a case study on a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of the MCC framework.

previous article Using an Iterative Reallocation Partitioning Algorithm to Verify Test Multidimensionality

next article Note: t for Two (Clusters)

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

inform now

The software can be downloaded from http://glaros.dtc.umn.edu/gkhome/views/metis/.

Asa, B.-H., Elisseeff, A., Guyon, I. (2002). A stability based method for discovering structure in clustered data, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

Ashburner, M., Ball, C., Blake, J., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Michael, J., Davis, A., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S., Eppig, J., Harri, M., Hill, D., Traver, L., Kassarskis, A., Levis, S., Matese, J., Richardson, E., Ringwald, M., Rubin, G., Sherlock, G. (2000). Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics, 25, 24–29. CrossRef

Asur, S., Ucar, D., Parthasarathy, S. (2007). An ensemble framework for clustering protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics, 23(13), i29–i40. CrossRef

Azimi, J., & Fern, X. (2009). Adaptive cluster ensemble selection. In Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intellegence (pp. 993–997).

Blake, C.L., & Merz, C.J. (1998). UCI repository of machine learning databases.

Brandes, U., Delling, D., Gaertler, M., Gorke, R., Hoefer, M., Nikoloski, Z., Wagner, D. (2008). On modularity clustering. IEEE Transactions on in Knowledge and Data Engineering, 20(2), 172–188. CrossRef

Bronstein, M.M., Bronstein, A.M., Kimmel, R., Yavneh, I. (2006). Multigrid multidimensional scaling. In Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications (NLAA), 13:149C171, March–April (pp. 149–171). MathSciNetCrossRef

Caruana, R., Elhawary, M., Nguyen, N. (2006). Meta clustering. In Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

Cui, Y., Fern, X.Z., Dy, J. (2007). Non-redundant multi-view clustering via orthogonalization. In ICDM (pp. 133–142).

Ding, C., & He, X. (2002). Cluster merging and splitting in hierarchical clustering algorithms. In ICDM (pp. 139–146).

Dongen, S.V., & Dongen, S.V. (2000). Performance criteria for graph clustering and Markov cluster experiments, Technical report INS-R0012, National Research Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science.

Fallah, S., Tritchler, D., Beyene, J. (2008). Estimating number of clusters based on a general similarity matrix with application to microarray data. Journal of Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 7(1), 1–25. MathSciNetMATH

Fern, X.Z., Brodley, C.E., Fern, X.Z., Brodley, C.E. (2004). Solving cluster ensemble problems by bipartite graph partitioning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning.

Fern, X.Z., & Lin, W. (2008). Cluster ensemble selection. Journal of Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 1(3), 128–141. MathSciNetCrossRef

Fred, A.L., & Jain, A.K. (2003). Robust data clustering. IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2(128).

Gionis, A., Mannila, H., Tsaparas, P. (2005). Clustering aggregation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Data Engineering ICDE (pp. 341–352).

Han, E.-H., Boley, D., Gini, M., Gross, R., Hastings, K., Karypis, G., Kumar, V., Mobasher, B., Moore, J. (1998). WebACE: a Web agent for document categorization and exploration. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents (pp. 408–415).

Hu, X., Yoo, I., Zhang, X., Nanavati, P., Das, D. (2005). Wavelet transformation and cluster ensemble for gene expression analysis. International Journal of Bioinformatics Research and Applications, 1(4), 447–460. CrossRef

Li, T., & Ding, C. (2006). The relationships among various nonnegative matrix factorization methods for clustering. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Data Mining 2006 (pp. 362–371).

Li, T., & Ding, C. (2008). Weighted consensus clustering. In Proceedings of 2008 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 798–809).

Li, T., Ding, C., Jordan, M.I. (2007). Solving consensus and semi-supervised clustering problems using nonnegative matrix factorization. In Proceedings of the 7st IEEE International Conference on data Mining (pp. 577–582).

Mallows, C.L. (1972). A note on asymptotic joint normality. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 43(2), 508–515. MathSciNetCrossRef

McCallum, A.K. (1996). Bow: a toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering,. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/mccallum/bow.

Meila, M. (2002). Comparing clusterings, Technical report, Statistics, University of Washington.

Navlakha, S., Rastogi, R., Shrivastava, N. (2008). Graph summarization with bounded error. In SIGMOD (pp. 419–432).

Navlakha, S., White, J., Nagarajan, N., Pop, M., Kingsford, C. (2009). Finding biologically accurate clusterings in hierarchical tree decompositions using the variation of information. In Inproceedings of the 13th Annual International Conference on Research in Computational Molecular Biology (pp. 400–417).

Newman, M.E.J. (2006). Modularity and community structure in networks. In PNAS (pp. 8577–8582). CrossRef

Newman, M.E.J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69(2), 026113. CrossRef

Qi, Z., & Davidson, I. (2009). A principled and flexible framework for finding alternative clusterings. In SIGKDD (pp. 717–726).

Rand, W.M. (1971). Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66(336), 846–850. CrossRef

Reichardt, J., & Bornholdt, S. (2006). Statistical mechanics of community detection. Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 74(1), 016110. MathSciNetCrossRef

Shlens, J. (2009). A tutorial on principal component analysis, Technical report, Center for Neural Science, New York University.

Strehl, A., & Ghosh, J. (2003). Relationship-based clustering and visualization for high-dimensional data mining. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 15(2), 208–230. CrossRef

Strehl, A., Ghosh, J., Cardie, C. (2002). Cluster ensembles - a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 583–617. MathSciNetMATH

Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V. (2005). Introduction to data mining. Reading: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co.

von Luxburg, U. (n.d.) A tutorial on spectral clustering, Techonical report.

Wu, J., Xiong, H., Chen, J. (2009). Towards understanding hierarchical clustering: a data distribution perspective. Neurocomputing, 72(10-12), 2319–2330. CrossRef

Zhang, Y., Zeng, E., Li, T., Narasimhan, G. (2009). Weighted consensus clustering for identifying functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks. In The 8th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (pp. 539–544).

Zhanga, S., Ning, X., Zhang, X. -S. (2006). Identification of functional modules in a PPI network by clique percolation clustering. Journal of Computational Biology and Chemistry, 30(6), 445–451. CrossRef

Zhao, Y., & Karypis, G. (2002). Evaluation of hierarchical clustering algorithms for document datasets. In Conference of Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 515–524).

Zhou, D., Li, J., Zha, H. (2005). A new mallows distance based metric for comparing clusterings. In Proceeding of International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 1028–1035).

Title: MCC: a Multiple Consensus Clustering Framework
Authors: Tao Li
Yi Zhang
Dingding Wang
Jian Xu
Publication date: 09-08-2019
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Classification / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0176-4268
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1343
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-019-09318-4

Springer Professional

Hint

Swipe to navigate through the articles of this issue

Abstract

Please log in to get access to your license.

Dont have a licence yet? Then find out more about our products and how to get one now:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Editorial: Journal of Classification Vol. 36-3

A Framework for Analyzing Pairwise Experiments with Qualitative Responses

Erratum to: A Framework for Quantifying Qualitative Responses in Pairwise Experiments

Note: t for Two (Clusters)

The δ-Machine: Classification Based on Distances Towards Prototypes

A New Relationship Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Genetics

Premium Partner